Well it always could be used to kill the one armed guard that will let you use their weapons afterwards... with a bit of daring this is at least better than fists, a club, a knife or a rag with chloroform for that purpose.
@@lopanreturns7085 please, dont play their games by giving them the fear they want, people say much worse things about them constantly, I've had a lengthy conversation about the various MK projects AND my very unfavorable opinions on the people who decided human lives are a plaything in a much more public forum than this. Just laugh at them
yeah that's what i thought, surely there were (and still are) warehouses full of old revolvers and pistols, that the CIA can get for next to nothing. its not as if the client can be choosy.
tthe ideal option for deniability is generally to use weapons made by your enemy. like how the soviets used german pistols to execute all those poles in katyn forest (though at the time, the germans weren't yet their enemies).
This looks like the kids toys that were sold at the time.. They may nave designed it that way so that it would be ignored if seen in an innocent context..
Well I mean... The CIA asked for it. Literally. They tried getting the previous but couldn't.. So they actually had to legitimately ask for this... Monstrosity.
That's the point - they were meant to look like improvised firearms so no one would trace them back to the U.S. gov't. If you saw one of these in the wild, you wouldn't think "CIA pistol," you'd think "someone made this in their shed with plumbing parts."
@Mike Gee tell Ian because I don't really give a shit. The Glocjk 19 mud test was disastrous, basically the worst of all guns they tested. Others would have been fine after a field strip and cleaning. It wasn't possible to field strip the muddy Glock. You should have a look sometime.
"Hey, those LIberators worked quite well in the war, we might find use them today." "Yeah. Unfortunately, they were all scraped after the war, but we can make something similar, just worse and more expensive." "Perfect."
Can you imagine the amount of relief you’d feel when your captured but finally got this bad boy in your hand. I know what I’d be thinking “Thanks, I’ll make it work.”
First real rifle was a rossi 243, never actually took a deer with it, but theres a funny story of me sleeping through my dad shooting a deer with it, (i have narcolepsy, diagnosed several years later)
@@libertarian4323 My uncle told me about a female Goat the government wanted protected and transported and the government spent like 7 million on the goat ... Didn't believe it until I started hearing all the other crazy government stories
_"Hey listen Snake, equipping this weapon boosts your camo index to 95% reduces all your footsteps to noiseless and gives you the ability to run without losing stamina"_
@@demomanchaos Seems like it's still doing the job now that Snake has it equipped, though. I mean, you've seen how gullible he is, right? Guess those boosts are all in his head.
That's actually a really good point. If you are a someone who needs a weapon like this you don't want to be caught with a weapon. The Liberator is an odd looking gun but it is still very obviously a gun. This thing could literally be taken to its main pieces and just mixed into the contents of a work bench without drawing attention if you were to be searched.
@@vintageyamahasquid If you put a plastic shell over it, take out the plunger in the back, and put in a dummy electrical cord in the grip it could easily pass for a hot glue gun.
I feel like the fact that "they" are blocking FOIA requests means that there must have been some use, or at least they gave some to someone. If they just never actually got used then I don't see why they would reject a FOIA request.
Even if they were not used maybe they aren't really fine to openly say that they spent 300000$ on bad dangerous guns to arm "undefined" characters... Especially since the idea was spending 3$ for gun...
@@LVPittinsberg Yes. The only legitimate claim is a current threat to national security, which is incredibly difficult to claim for anything that long ago. But the government also has tons of documents still secret from WW2 for the same reason, like Nazi ghosts will rise up if they hear the truth.
@@Etherman7 they could claim national security if they believe that it will piss off a strategic ally or instigate active conflict with an ideological enemy, especially if these guns were used for political assassinations. Given we do know they actively armed religious extremists, anti-democratic resistance movements, and terrorists around the world, it's likely that one or two of these guns were used to murder our allies' soldiers, politicians, or journalists.
when i was real young about 25-35 years ago my grandfather had a deer gun in his collection ending up selling it for a big amount before he died. odd to see one again
That looks almost exactly like my 1950s / 1960s cast aluminum pistol-grip car-mechanic / machinist's air gun for blowing dust or metal shavings of what you're working on.
As I understand it, a primary requirement was to make the gun useful to partisans (shoot that solider and get his rifle) but useless to the occupying force that the partisans were fighting. In the 1950s I'm sure the CIA could lay it's hands on boatloads of WWII surplus for less then the cost of the 1000 of these made, but most of that stuff was still militarily useful and when arming partisans (especially by covert air drop) you have to assume that much of your supplies will be captured by the occupying force. And The CIA didn't want to efficiently arm the forces they were trying to depose. I also think that part of the reason this didn't get beyond the 1000 initial production is the CIA figured out it's easier and cheaper to get arms dealers to move that cheap WWII surplus to the rebels you want to support as you are no longer arming cells in Fortress Europe by covert airdrop.
Parts of the defence planning in Europe incorporated lessons from the partisan warfare in WW II. There was an expectation that the soviet forces would initially take territory while NATO powers in Europe and the USA mobilized. So there would be a lot of people fighting delaying and partisan warfare behind or around the front. Those operations would have used stashes of weapons, explosives etc placed beforehand. We have a crate in a fake shed out on a farm, or this concrete storage block out in the woods that's unmarked on maps that the local Home Guard units know how to find. If someone wants to start a partisan movement like we encourage them to do, we hand them a cheap but not crap-cheap SMG from one of these stashes.
That's a good point. If an enemy solider intercepted an insurgent and got a hold of this, they would not only not be able to trace it back to the CIA, but they'd probably think this was made by hand in a shed. However, an insurgent could probably get the drop on a soldier and get a shot off at very close range due to how comically small that pistol is.
@@TeodorSpiridon You're on the streets of Copenhagen and assassinating nazis? It has to be a single nazi, you need to be pretty close, and you need them by surprise. And it's either this thing or just about any black market pistol. The polish Home Army managed to make weapons in a shed in a swamp, and they were better than this piece.
That's not a fair comparison. A mass-produced Hi Point costs less than a pilot production Deer Gun because the Deer Gun was only made in a small quantity pilot production run (as far as we know), so the Hi Point's up-front tooling costs were spread across a zillion guns while the Deer Gun's up-front tooling costs were spread across a thousand guns. If the Deer Gun was put into mass production and dumped out of cargo planes by the millions, then each one would have been very cheap. It might have still been a bad idea, but they wouldn't have been $300 guns if the plan went all the way forward.
The Hi Point comparison isn’t completely off. The government spent all that money because they wanted something special, just for them. Today, you would be better off having Jimenez sell you a bunch of guns and send those. That would actually be more covert. If people start showing up with Deer Guns all of a sudden, the authorities are going to wonder what is going on. If their insurgents are found with cheap guns commonly used by criminals. No suspicion is aroused. A good mix of Jimenez, Cobra, Hi Points, and Sigmas would be your best bet to avoid suspicion.
"Dad I never got Ralph a toy for his birthday!" "Damn lets go to the pharmacy and pick up a plastic pop gun on the way over. Say...these give me an idea hold on while I call Langley."
@@hazahizabbanzabalawan3815 Fun Fact: All information i found stated the opposite, including some medical cases involving rabid possums, though rabies is very rare amongst them.
@BoomerLemon It means you either have it or don't, it can't be sometimes yes, sometimes no. Freedom, however, means different things to different people.
BoomerLemon The IRS is not a US government agency. It is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391) 2. The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N. (Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. page 816) 3. The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921 (41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654) 4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Presidential Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887) 5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. (Executive Order 12803) 6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the U.S. government, even though the "U.S. Government" held stock in the agencies. (U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239) 7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms and not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are "Department of the Treasury". (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b)) 8. There are NO Judicial courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178) 9. There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178) 10. According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number. (House Report (103-826) 11. New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that "New York City is the capital of the World." For once, he told the truth. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) ) 12. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548) 13. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations. (It says "U.S. Department of Treasury" at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above) 14. You own NO property. Slaves can't own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours. You are listed as a TENANT. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session) 15. The most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 PA. C.S.A. 502) 16. The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War. (Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80) 17. You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it! The U.S. Constitution applies to the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES, a privately owned and operated corporation (headquartered out of Washington, DC) much like IBM (International Business Machines, Microsoft, et al) and NOT to the people of the sovereign Republic of the united States of America. (Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520) 18. America is a British Colony. The United States is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796 (Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774) 19. th-cam.com/video/lVsMUpPgdT0/w-d-xo.html 20. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213) 21. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54) 22. A 1040 Form is for tribute paid to Britain (IRS Publication 6209) 23. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493) 24. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493) 25. The Pope's laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44) 26. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children. (Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481) 27. Military dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) in to Districts (Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate) 28. "The People" does NOT include you and me. (Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243) 29. It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, REiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247) 30. Every thing in the "United States" is up for sale: bridges, roads, water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc... Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake?? (Executive Order 12803) 31. "We are human capital” (Executive Order 13037) The world cabal makes money off of the use of your signatures on mortgages, car loans, credit cards, your social security number, etc. 32. The U.N. - United Nations - has financed the operations of the United States government (the corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) for over 50 years (U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. see above) and now owns every man, woman and child in America. 33. An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260). 34. Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense. (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100). 35. “One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance." (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910). 36. “These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence." (Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.) 37. “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.” (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105) 38. “If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)
$300,000 ($300×1000 guns) was for design and tooling. After that existing tools could churn out ~five dollar guns indefinitely. Make 99,000 more of them and your total cost might barely hit $1,000,000. $10/gun is no joke.
Well, this also could be some kind of gratification for a manufacturer, after all silence is golden. But from the other point of view - tooling, design, plus 1000 guns, seems to be a quite a good deal.
Love the way this looks kind of like those kids die-cast metal cap guns that you just don't see any more... and at the same time, as serious as a heart-attack.
It doesn't even make sense one shot form 9mm isn't enough to just drop someone dead most of the time ,so one shot 9mm is horrible idea. They could at least make it 2 barrel to give you 2 shoots. And it doesnt look threatening at all so to treaten somone with it to give away his real gun you would prabably first need to explain it is a fire arm. Pity for the guys who would need to use this or original liberator.
@@MrMleczkp seems like we found the Fudd. This gun wasn't meant to threaten, it was meant to be used in an ambush situation, close quarters. If the enemy still lived after being shot, you could still finish them off with their own gun.
@@blarfroer8066 SO why use gun when you could use knife? SU and this time was handing AKs to militias so this particular idea was really bad. If they come with gun disguised as common tools, OK worth to try it, but this one is ridiculous.
@@Dominic-fd2wz but can it take care of invincible bears wearing body armor? If not I'm grabbing my boulder and going to rape a church and burn some women while I load up my baby skull seeking bullets in my innocent lives killing gun.. His names Donald. Yeah.. IDK where I was going with that.. At first it was a reference.. Later on it just became a mess. And no I don't have a gun named Donald. I name mine after demons not people thank you very much.
@@Dominic-fd2wz Lmao, that reminded of that Family Guy episode where the Deer blow's a hunter away with his own .308 Hunting rifle after he misses the shot.
I almost wonder if the very limited usability for the gun was seen as a feature. It would give an insurgent something for sneaking up on the enemy with and killing the guy, but if the enemy collected them they would be little more than scrap metal. A real gun would have been more useful to the insurgents but it would also be useful to the enemy.
@notsaying7838 firstly, knives are literally over the counter, just go into any kitchen and you can find at least one good knife. Secondly, knives are a meme when it comes to effectively unaliving someone silently. The traditional way requires at least six full-in stabs in order to make them unconscious, struggling all the while. The more effective, but trickier, way is to slip it between the base of the skull and the first vertebrate, this severing the spine from the brain and causing death by paralysis of the lungs and heart. But that requires you to be ROGHT behind the target, which at that point, why rely on something THAT finicky? Why not just get some piano wire around the throat? Or better yet, why not just dome the guy from a safer range with a silenced .22 pistol, like the Ruger Mk. III?
@@notsaying7838do you know how hard it is to sneak right up behind somebody outside of games, and how liog it takes somebody to die from a stab wound (while making lots of noise and fighting you back)
@@callumbreton8930 Fair point, knives aren't that hard to find legally, although this _particular_ gun isn't much of an improvement either. Loud, ridiculously inaccurate and short ranged, seemed to me like a disadvantage compared to a regular knife. Of course they could've picked a better gun, however that's not what they did, they made _that_ abomination. I'm not praising knives over guns, I'm critiquing this particular gun design against knives.
Manufacturing has came a long way. Ran the estimates for machining and casting something like this and it came to 6 bucks a pop in modern dollars for 1000.
@@AesculapiusPiranha Neither does the one inch long barrel, but then again, this gun was only ever intended to be used to sneakily get yourself a much better gun from someone who had one.
I had one of those when I was a kid, I had no idea what it was, and no idea where it ended up, probably in the garbage pit on our old farm It was in a workshop on the rental farmstead where we moved when dad put his land in the soil bank and we moved where we could keep our cattle and horses. I remember clearly though playing with it when I was in like the 4th and 5th grade.
Despite how awful this may have been and how reviled it may be to many people, I love how simple this is. Something about it is really appealing to me.
Why a "Deer gun", though? Other than, "oh deer, is this the best we could do?" I'm kinda also wondering, if any thought was put into, er, concealment in plain sight? The Liberator looks like a gun, this, however, could be stored among garage tools, and your regular grunt wouldn't even suspect it was a gun.
That would be, "Oh dear!" I was thinking "Deere" as in the die-cast John Deere toy tractors from the '50s and '60s. But really, did Ian explain the origin of the name? I didn't notice if he did.
Pretty sure the "Saturday Night Special" moniker was just propaganda. To deny people owning firearms. Of course they'd be cheaper the a S&W model 29 and not built as well
From memory this sounds like it was made by the guy who wrote a lot of books on firearm design. He did mention that he worked on CIA designs.. Him or his family may have them.
I saw a new one of these for 2020 gun line up for shot show. It is called a ALTOR PISTOL & has a price of $120.00 for .380 & $130.00 for 9mm . My guess is, more then likely, it will end up here on Forgotten Weapons. Get them now while they are cheap & then them sell in 20 plus years for big $$$.
Hey Ian, just thought I'd mention, one of the M-16's assigned to me was made by GM Hydromatic Division It was my Favorite of all the Weapons i had/used in the Army. She was a Honey and I was the first to use it. Absolutely dead accurate.
I’d imagine it goes with the deniability thing. Like the liberator was called a flare projector or something. “Oh this isn’t for waging guerilla warfare it’s for shooting deer”
I can't imagine it would have been difficult to convince a good revolver manufacturer to produce an unmarked run of snub nose 9mm with some small differences from their normal production. For deniability.
The chaos gremlin in me wants to say, "You can clean the threads with a solution of lye". The nice guy in me wants to tell you that would dissolve the gun creating an aluminum solution and giving off free hydrogen gas.
American Machine Foundry: Your one stop shop for cigarette machines, boat parts, bowling machines and apparently one shot guns... Learn something new everyday.
Jesse James Not really the point of the weapon, the point is yoinking someone elses gun you’d be better off if you got AKs right off the bat for your revolt or something instead of, I still see your point could be a assasins weapon if the assasins location couldnt get better tools for the job
The liberator concept in general has always seemed a bit strange. "Sir, we need a cheap, deniable way to arm the resistance. Nothing special, just enough to kill a soldier and steal their weapon." "How about we drop them a single shot pistol that's more expensive and complex to operate than a knife and looks distinctly western, but also only works from distances that you could use a knife, and makes far more noise?" "perfect."
idk man, knives are really hard to "operate". Just stabbing people in random places tends to hurts them, and hurt people make noise. Like, "ow, why the fvck did you just stab me". Unless you hit them in some very special places, it usually also takes them some time to die even if you score a fatal hit. Whereas putting a one-shot gun roughly onto their chest or face and pulling a trigger is real easy to do for some uneducated farmer-turned-guerilla. I mean, the same argument could be used against your knife - "if you get within knife-fighting distance of an enemy soldier, you might as well just bash him over the head with a rock or something".
Why not drop some of the masses of surplus German and Japanese arms that were left over from the war. Easy to deny where it came from as they were scattered all over.
CIA: "Quick, whats the cheapest gun we can make?"
Random Intern: "Hot Glue Gun?"
*gets an instant promotion*
Im glad im not the only person who thinks it looks like a glue gun
@@jakehildebrand1824 bruh.... Literally thought the same.
@Hat Kid i heard it
I'll take 10!
Who stole that off the end of my garden hose?
Best comment ever
Haha
Good one lol
If someone made a garden hose sprayer that looked like that I would buy one.
Great comment! Made me laugh!
Hahaha
Who ever put a sight on there has a sense of humor.
A reflex sight or a Acog would be sick
Or is a hopeless optimist.
@@dlxmarks 😂
And whoever decided they should rifle some of the 'barrels' was as close to a memelord as someone in the 50's could be.
You watch, ima snipe from 400m with this thing
Imagine CIA promises to arm you so you can start your own insurgency, then air drops you this.
[Chuckles] *I'm in danger*
I want this gun in a new farcry game
@@sneakysnake7695 you're in luck, seeing as it's in south America. Probably plenty of these lying around
Its for when you want to support your allies, but not really
Well it always could be used to kill the one armed guard that will let you use their weapons afterwards... with a bit of daring this is at least better than fists, a club, a knife or a rag with chloroform for that purpose.
Nothing good starts with "In the 50s, the CIA..."
Tried to assassinate putin but putin assassinated them first
😂
One exception... a lot of interesting documentaries started with that line
Only documentaries
@@lopanreturns7085 please, dont play their games by giving them the fear they want, people say much worse things about them constantly, I've had a lengthy conversation about the various MK projects AND my very unfavorable opinions on the people who decided human lives are a plaything in a much more public forum than this. Just laugh at them
part of me is expecting that gun to destroy anything in front like it's the noisy cricket from MiB
put a underwood p+ in there it would be lol
lol you'll get them wetter with the garden hose.
And send your ass flying as it does.
Underated movie.
It's a little bit weird to watch this video right after one of Joe Rogan's interviews with a navy pilot who go video of a UFO.
It looks like a rusty 1950's space blaster toy
Baron OfHell it sure does. Looks like a gun Cpt. Kirk would carry
Given it's condition, it was probably used as a child's toy.
Or a workshop tool of some kind.
I think I had one of these while playing Fallout.
I was thinking the exact same thing.
Very impressed with this ingenuity. Never knew deer had ever made guns.
Wait till you see cow tools.
@@solidsnake3014 gary larson still gets mail to this day about cow tools...
Yeah but when you see what they came upw it, it's no wonder hunters are still winning.
They've even made rifles!
@@reidhanson4755so did some elephants!!
"We want something deniable, so let's make it very obviously bespoke & covert in nature rather than some random surplus firearm"
yeah that's what i thought, surely there were (and still are) warehouses full of old revolvers and pistols, that the CIA can get for next to nothing. its not as if the client can be choosy.
they did that when they got Egyptian AKs to arm the afghans in the 70s.
@@koenvangeleuken2853 Imagine insurgents running around with Colt SAAs and S&W Number 3's.
tthe ideal option for deniability is generally to use weapons made by your enemy. like how the soviets used german pistols to execute all those poles in katyn forest (though at the time, the germans weren't yet their enemies).
@@Immafraid allahu yeehaw
air drop hi-points... save the government money.
I'm in total agreement. Ugly but accurate and effective
Air drop a B58. Go big or go home.
Why? We want to send actual functioning pistols, not hi points
@@jongles2530 Hi poi ts are more relyable than the avdage automatic pistol. You could probably drop them without parachutes.
@@ineednochannelyoutube5384 Hi points are even more reliable than your keyboard. Remarkable.
Makes the liberator look like a high end HK
I would absolutely rather this than the liberator
(In prime condition that is)
This looks like the kids toys that were sold at the time..
They may nave designed it that way so that it would be ignored if seen in an innocent context..
Mark Wilko I didnt think about this.
@@zakofrx give it a bright paintjob/green etc. Its a toy or garden hose or whatever
i was thinking the same thing! lol!
Putting sights on this thing seems like misplaced optimism
This made my day
Its just part of the casting, so why not.
I heard this comment in John Cleese’s voice.
Well, I think it was more of a safety that could be used as a "sight", so why not?
I view the front sight more like a place to store the clip when not using it as a "safety".
The sequel no one asked for.
But we're glad we got it nonetheless.
Well I mean... The CIA asked for it.
Literally.
They tried getting the previous but couldn't.. So they actually had to legitimately ask for this... Monstrosity.
Liberator II: Cast Aluminum Boogaloo
😁
The comment no one asked for.
Nobody:
CIA: lets make a hot glue gun
Lol...lol
@@terreausore2435 Damn why are you so aggressive, he didnt say anything wrong
Capra Ibexx saying that icky word is wrong
@@terreausore2435 imagine commenting on an idiotic non-comment like lol. Must feel highly intelligent.
Jason Frederick i dont like you ahymore
Guy pumping his tire: we should make a gun
His friend: that!
Guy: what the air pump nozzle
Friend: ya, what if it shot bullets
Lmao
Sounds like some high conversation.
Liberator II aka the ‘noisy cricket’
Looking incredibly 1950s!
Loved the Original MIB .
"the CIA has rejected all FOIA requests related to them"
well that's not worrying
nor surprising. we dont call em the Secret Squirrels for nothin
FOIA? What is that?
Fangadora Wolfen Freedom Of Information Act
@@fangadorawolfen6164 freedom of information act 👍 basically a legal precedent to disclose information that's requested.
(Within reason)
Because: imagine having to justify to Oversight why you spent $300 per gun on a single-shot garden hose pistol.
Ryobi called.
They want their heat glue gun back. 🤣
My first thought
Ok. That was funny.
Regards,
Marky
John1911 Gun Blog ok boomer
complete insult and lie
There isn't enough plastic
"It is not functional anymore." Plot twist: It never was.
Plotter twist: it's the ultra destructive gun from men in black
Theres a DC-10 at the bottom of the Atlantic with 5000 of these in it.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight....
@@guardiandogoargentinos1385 right
@@hatespeakersargonofakkad6523 you good...? Sent the same comment 20 mins apart....Did you want a response that bad?
@@guardiandogoargentinos1385 🤣🤣🤣
@Howie Felterbush right?
Looks like someone DIY-ed a gun out of a garden hose sprinkler
or with a glue gun
That's the point - they were meant to look like improvised firearms so no one would trace them back to the U.S. gov't. If you saw one of these in the wild, you wouldn't think "CIA pistol," you'd think "someone made this in their shed with plumbing parts."
@@Tormundisc00l well, it worked
@Zach cash Hey brother, nice to see a fellow traveller around these parts. Hope you are living the fourteen. Stay well.
“Covertly arm them with a pretty lame gun”
😆
Don't you mean a water pistol fabricated out of steel?
i saw this just as he read it
@Mike Gee on the other hand if the Hi Point drops into mud it'll do better than a Glock
@Mike Gee Ian's other channel InRangeTV tested both. The Hi Point didn't do as well as a Luger but better, much better than the Glock.
@Mike Gee tell Ian because I don't really give a shit. The Glocjk 19 mud test was disastrous, basically the worst of all guns they tested. Others would have been fine after a field strip and cleaning. It wasn't possible to field strip the muddy Glock. You should have a look sometime.
"Hey, those LIberators worked quite well in the war, we might find use them today."
"Yeah. Unfortunately, they were all scraped after the war, but we can make something similar, just worse and more expensive."
"Perfect."
Perfect snapshot of government efficiency. Lol
I mean its about the same cost and deosnt have a big ass seam to pinch you
Government in a nutshell
When you manage to make the liberator worse you are truly getting something
Can you imagine the amount of relief you’d feel when your captured but finally got this bad boy in your hand. I know what I’d be thinking “Thanks, I’ll make it work.”
Ian : I have actually never seen a deer gun before
*.243 Winchester has left chat*
First real rifle was a rossi 243, never actually took a deer with it, but theres a funny story of me sleeping through my dad shooting a deer with it, (i have narcolepsy, diagnosed several years later)
"It cost the US government $300." Sheesh, it looks like something you'd mail in twelve Crackerjack box tops for.
that's the idea; looks as harmless as a toy
The government always pays too much.
@@libertarian4323
My uncle told me about a female Goat the government wanted protected and transported and the government spent like 7 million on the goat ... Didn't believe it until I started hearing all the other crazy government stories
@@xxeye4u2c64 Was that old goat named Clinton?
@@phillhuddleston9445 Honestly it could be
Wish I asked him more about it
_"Hey listen Snake, equipping this weapon boosts your camo index to 95% reduces all your footsteps to noiseless and gives you the ability to run without losing stamina"_
Wrong gun there boss, the EZ Gun is based on the Liberator not the Deer Gun.
@@demomanchaos _"Hey... you're pretty good!"_
@@PACKERMAN2077 kept you waiting huh?
@@demomanchaos Seems like it's still doing the job now that Snake has it equipped, though. I mean, you've seen how gullible he is, right? Guess those boosts are all in his head.
“Ugh, but Otacon, it’s just a glue gun”
You forgot to mention it has fully ambidextrous controls ;)
Wow such advanced wow
When there are no controls, they are not biased towards one side.
I would say it has "controls" that can be used even without hands at all.
@@HappyBeezerStudios *Whoosh yourself to restore Honour*
Yeah, looks like something the deer could start making to defend themselves, this checks out
Give this to one of those youtube channels that does old item restorations, watch it come out smooth, polished, painted, and fully working.
Taken apart, that thing would blend right into the pile of odds and ends on the desk at my dad's paint shop.
That's actually a really good point. If you are a someone who needs a weapon like this you don't want to be caught with a weapon. The Liberator is an odd looking gun but it is still very obviously a gun. This thing could literally be taken to its main pieces and just mixed into the contents of a work bench without drawing attention if you were to be searched.
Don't even need to go that far. Just attach an air hose connector and no one will bat an eye.
@@vintageyamahasquid That was a feature of the Welrod. Without the magazine grip, it didn't look like a gun
@@zacharyrollick6169 Someone with an actual tool bench could make a convincing hacksaw grip out of it as well.
@@vintageyamahasquid If you put a plastic shell over it, take out the plunger in the back, and put in a dummy electrical cord in the grip it could easily pass for a hot glue gun.
I feel like the fact that "they" are blocking FOIA requests means that there must have been some use, or at least they gave some to someone. If they just never actually got used then I don't see why they would reject a FOIA request.
Doesn't it kind of defeat the purpose of an act called the "Freedom of Information Act" if they can just refuse?
Even if they were not used maybe they aren't really fine to openly say that they spent 300000$ on bad dangerous guns to arm "undefined" characters...
Especially since the idea was spending 3$ for gun...
@@LVPittinsberg Yes. The only legitimate claim is a current threat to national security, which is incredibly difficult to claim for anything that long ago. But the government also has tons of documents still secret from WW2 for the same reason, like Nazi ghosts will rise up if they hear the truth.
@@Etherman7 they could claim national security if they believe that it will piss off a strategic ally or instigate active conflict with an ideological enemy, especially if these guns were used for political assassinations. Given we do know they actively armed religious extremists, anti-democratic resistance movements, and terrorists around the world, it's likely that one or two of these guns were used to murder our allies' soldiers, politicians, or journalists.
@Lochness Monsta Yeah probably in some 3rd world S**t hole that annoyed uncle Sam somehow.
when i was real young about 25-35 years ago my grandfather had a deer gun in his collection ending up selling it for a big amount before he died. odd to see one again
That looks almost exactly like my 1950s / 1960s cast aluminum pistol-grip car-mechanic / machinist's air gun for blowing dust or metal shavings of what you're working on.
Studied and worked for years to become an agent, thinking it would be like James bond: *gets handed this gun*
"Hey, K, come on, man, you get a serious Atomizer and i get a midget Cricket?!"
That's GOOD ! LOL
As I understand it, a primary requirement was to make the gun useful to partisans (shoot that solider and get his rifle) but useless to the occupying force that the partisans were fighting. In the 1950s I'm sure the CIA could lay it's hands on boatloads of WWII surplus for less then the cost of the 1000 of these made, but most of that stuff was still militarily useful and when arming partisans (especially by covert air drop) you have to assume that much of your supplies will be captured by the occupying force. And The CIA didn't want to efficiently arm the forces they were trying to depose.
I also think that part of the reason this didn't get beyond the 1000 initial production is the CIA figured out it's easier and cheaper to get arms dealers to move that cheap WWII surplus to the rebels you want to support as you are no longer arming cells in Fortress Europe by covert airdrop.
Yup, this is the real answer. The CIA found this thing called the Black Market.
What an insightful post
Parts of the defence planning in Europe incorporated lessons from the partisan warfare in WW II. There was an expectation that the soviet forces would initially take territory while NATO powers in Europe and the USA mobilized. So there would be a lot of people fighting delaying and partisan warfare behind or around the front.
Those operations would have used stashes of weapons, explosives etc placed beforehand. We have a crate in a fake shed out on a farm, or this concrete storage block out in the woods that's unmarked on maps that the local Home Guard units know how to find. If someone wants to start a partisan movement like we encourage them to do, we hand them a cheap but not crap-cheap SMG from one of these stashes.
That's a good point. If an enemy solider intercepted an insurgent and got a hold of this, they would not only not be able to trace it back to the CIA, but they'd probably think this was made by hand in a shed. However, an insurgent could probably get the drop on a soldier and get a shot off at very close range due to how comically small that pistol is.
@@TeodorSpiridon You're on the streets of Copenhagen and assassinating nazis? It has to be a single nazi, you need to be pretty close, and you need them by surprise. And it's either this thing or just about any black market pistol.
The polish Home Army managed to make weapons in a shed in a swamp, and they were better than this piece.
When you realize a hi point is half of what this costs
Not only that, but he's saying 300 bucks in 1960 money. Insane overspending
@@chadf9630 The other $295 was diverted to Area 51, obviously.
That's not a fair comparison. A mass-produced Hi Point costs less than a pilot production Deer Gun because the Deer Gun was only made in a small quantity pilot production run (as far as we know), so the Hi Point's up-front tooling costs were spread across a zillion guns while the Deer Gun's up-front tooling costs were spread across a thousand guns. If the Deer Gun was put into mass production and dumped out of cargo planes by the millions, then each one would have been very cheap. It might have still been a bad idea, but they wouldn't have been $300 guns if the plan went all the way forward.
The Hi Point comparison isn’t completely off. The government spent all that money because they wanted something special, just for them. Today, you would be better off having Jimenez sell you a bunch of guns and send those. That would actually be more covert. If people start showing up with Deer Guns all of a sudden, the authorities are going to wonder what is going on. If their insurgents are found with cheap guns commonly used by criminals. No suspicion is aroused. A good mix of Jimenez, Cobra, Hi Points, and Sigmas would be your best bet to avoid suspicion.
Mark's Tech Channel tl(almost)dr but correct nonetheless
If this was airdropped to me I'll be pissed.
If we're using weapons like this, it's astonishing that we managed to 'win' the Cold War
@@b-chroniumproductions3177 nobody but diplomacy won, its still ongoing even in many people's opinions
@@b-chroniumproductions3177 we didn't we dropped it to poor countries, did you listen to the video at all?
@@bigbud6842 cold war was fought using poor countries as proxies
庄司 慎吾 - Shōji Shingo wat
Hi, I'm Ian and today on Forgotten Weapons we're taking a look at the endy bit of my garden hose. Well, here it is. Thanks for watching!
2020: Should we make a new one of these?
- Naah, just ship some of the Berettas we "scrapped" for the army.
"Dad I never got Ralph a toy for his birthday!" "Damn lets go to the pharmacy and pick up a plastic pop gun on the way over. Say...these give me an idea hold on while I call Langley."
Actually, back then it was "lemmie find a payphone so I can call Langley."
Deer guns
Deer guns made: 100,00
Deer guns shipped: 100
Deer guns used: 1
Use: rabid possum outside radio station
Ain't no rabid possums, friend.
@Jimmy Peeps bcuz they possums don't carry Rabies. Simple. Don't believe it??? Look it up
@Jimmy Peeps I go out of my way to be mauled by a possum everytime I encounter one. Ain't caught the hydrophobie yet!
And they can't carry it. At all.
@@hazahizabbanzabalawan3815 Fun Fact: All information i found stated the opposite, including some medical cases involving rabid possums, though rabies is very rare amongst them.
You forgot to add the last part: missed possom way wide due to the wildly inaccurate nature of the gun
I bet There’s several of these laying around in some grandparents garage
In many south american countries, you can find these at yard sales every saturday morning.
Secard420 Woah, South America sounds kinda cool, excusing the other stuff
Yeah there's probably even more stashed on some army base somewhere in the us
@@secard4202 bring me one
EDNA!!!! THE NOZZLE WONT FIT ON THE HO-*BANG*
*GOV* “ghost guns are illegal
*ALSO THE GOV* “lets air drop these ghost guns”
As a mechanical engineer. Thank you for understanding tooling investments. Great video 🙌🏻
The clever thing is, you can screw on any chamber, so you can drop it customised for ammo that's available in the area.
.50 BMG Deer Gun?
@@BetaDude4012 gauge?
"Rejected Freedom of Information requests" - Is it really 'Freedom' if they can reject it?
oh please, freedom died a long time ago
@BoomerLemon freedom isnt an on/off deal
@BoomerLemon It means you either have it or don't, it can't be sometimes yes, sometimes no. Freedom, however, means different things to different people.
Americans-Freedom of information request submited
CIA- freedom exercised to deny information request.
Liberty prime- democracy is non negotiable.
BoomerLemon The IRS is not a US government agency. It is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391) 2. The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N. (Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. page 816) 3. The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921 (41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654) 4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Presidential Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887) 5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. (Executive Order 12803) 6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the U.S. government, even though the "U.S. Government" held stock in the agencies. (U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239) 7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms and not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are "Department of the Treasury". (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b)) 8. There are NO Judicial courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178) 9. There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178) 10. According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number. (House Report (103-826) 11. New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that "New York City is the capital of the World." For once, he told the truth. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) ) 12. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548) 13. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations. (It says "U.S. Department of Treasury" at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above) 14. You own NO property. Slaves can't own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours. You are listed as a TENANT. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session) 15. The most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 PA. C.S.A. 502) 16. The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War. (Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80) 17. You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it! The U.S. Constitution applies to the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES, a privately owned and operated corporation (headquartered out of Washington, DC) much like IBM (International Business Machines, Microsoft, et al) and NOT to the people of the sovereign Republic of the united States of America. (Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520) 18. America is a British Colony. The United States is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796 (Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774) 19. th-cam.com/video/lVsMUpPgdT0/w-d-xo.html 20. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213) 21. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54) 22. A 1040 Form is for tribute paid to Britain (IRS Publication 6209) 23. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493) 24. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493) 25. The Pope's laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44) 26. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children. (Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481) 27. Military dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) in to Districts (Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate) 28. "The People" does NOT include you and me. (Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243) 29. It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, REiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247) 30. Every thing in the "United States" is up for sale: bridges, roads, water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc... Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake?? (Executive Order 12803) 31. "We are human capital” (Executive Order 13037) The world cabal makes money off of the use of your signatures on mortgages, car loans, credit cards, your social security number, etc. 32. The U.N. - United Nations - has financed the operations of the United States government (the corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) for over 50 years (U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. see above) and now owns every man, woman and child in America.
33. An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery."
(State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
34. Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense. (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
35. “One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance."
(Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
36. “These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence." (Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.)
37. “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.” (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)
38. “If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)
"You could make them for about $3.95 apiece." "Cost the US government about $300." Wow, no wonder the manufacturer took on that contract!!
$300,000 ($300×1000 guns) was for design and tooling. After that existing tools could churn out ~five dollar guns indefinitely. Make 99,000 more of them and your total cost might barely hit $1,000,000. $10/gun is no joke.
Well, this also could be some kind of gratification for a manufacturer, after all silence is golden. But from the other point of view - tooling, design, plus 1000 guns, seems to be a quite a good deal.
The reason for the difference is explained at 6:13.
It's not a cheap gun. It's a deer gun.
A $4 object costs $300. Sounds like a government run operation.
Why does my mind go to a triangular foam “support” pillow whenever he mentions “the liberator?”
Love the way this looks kind of like those kids die-cast metal cap guns that you just don't see any more... and at the same time, as serious as a heart-attack.
While I understand the purpose, in practice this may be one of the shittiest guns not made by Cobray.
It doesn't even make sense one shot form 9mm isn't enough to just drop someone dead most of the time ,so one shot 9mm is horrible idea. They could at least make it 2 barrel to give you 2 shoots. And it doesnt look threatening at all so to treaten somone with it to give away his real gun you would prabably first need to explain it is a fire arm. Pity for the guys who would need to use this or original liberator.
@@MrMleczkp seems like we found the Fudd. This gun wasn't meant to threaten, it was meant to be used in an ambush situation, close quarters. If the enemy still lived after being shot, you could still finish them off with their own gun.
@@blarfroer8066 SO why use gun when you could use knife? SU and this time was handing AKs to militias so this particular idea was really bad. If they come with gun disguised as common tools, OK worth to try it, but this one is ridiculous.
@@plasot Pulling a trigger is probably easier for random people than using a knife, albeit louder.
I think I'd rather have a gun made by Cobray than one of the multitude of pot metal 25 ACP, 22 LR, etc pistols out there.
"Why the homies keep joking on my strap"
Gun Falls: "What is this?"
Looks up to the Sky: "I knew you hated me..."
The Liberator's straight to Video sequel.
Just imagine some farmer still using these to quickly kill their livestock
This was my first thought too, it's strangely close to being a cattle gun with some (very minimal) reach.
azmanabdula you can use it to kill a deer and take its gun
@@Dominic-fd2wz but can it take care of invincible bears wearing body armor?
If not I'm grabbing my boulder and going to rape a church and burn some women while I load up my baby skull seeking bullets in my innocent lives killing gun.. His names Donald.
Yeah.. IDK where I was going with that.. At first it was a reference.. Later on it just became a mess. And no I don't have a gun named Donald. I name mine after demons not people thank you very much.
@@Dominic-fd2wz every time i see the ingsoc sign it reminds me of the sydney swans AFL logo
@@Dominic-fd2wz Lmao, that reminded of that Family Guy episode where the Deer blow's a hunter away with his own .308 Hunting rifle after he misses the shot.
My reaction when I saw this thumbnail:
OH NO
DEER GOD what they have done?
@@giornogiovanna729 Haha cute dad joke.
@@FlymanMS I think we found the FBI agent here
I almost wonder if the very limited usability for the gun was seen as a feature. It would give an insurgent something for sneaking up on the enemy with and killing the guy, but if the enemy collected them they would be little more than scrap metal. A real gun would have been more useful to the insurgents but it would also be useful to the enemy.
Why not giving them knives? Muuuch better for sneaking up on people.
@notsaying7838 firstly, knives are literally over the counter, just go into any kitchen and you can find at least one good knife. Secondly, knives are a meme when it comes to effectively unaliving someone silently. The traditional way requires at least six full-in stabs in order to make them unconscious, struggling all the while. The more effective, but trickier, way is to slip it between the base of the skull and the first vertebrate, this severing the spine from the brain and causing death by paralysis of the lungs and heart. But that requires you to be ROGHT behind the target, which at that point, why rely on something THAT finicky? Why not just get some piano wire around the throat? Or better yet, why not just dome the guy from a safer range with a silenced .22 pistol, like the Ruger Mk. III?
@@notsaying7838do you know how hard it is to sneak right up behind somebody outside of games, and how liog it takes somebody to die from a stab wound (while making lots of noise and fighting you back)
@@callumbreton8930 Fair point, knives aren't that hard to find legally, although this _particular_ gun isn't much of an improvement either. Loud, ridiculously inaccurate and short ranged, seemed to me like a disadvantage compared to a regular knife. Of course they could've picked a better gun, however that's not what they did, they made _that_ abomination. I'm not praising knives over guns, I'm critiquing this particular gun design against knives.
@@Ukraineaissance2014 Honestly, I think the deer gun would have pretty much the same issues.
When you pick up a hot glue gun and a message pops up:
"New recipes unlocked! Check your recipe book"
Manufacturing has came a long way.
Ran the estimates for machining and casting something like this and it came to 6 bucks a pop in modern dollars for 1000.
Well that's pretty cool
I mean, totally useless even if it did "work" but, yeah. Pretty cool.
Omg useless duck company
Investigator: Here's a FOIA
CIA: What's in it for me?
Investigator: Uhmm...
CIA: Thought so.
[Gets handed a Deer Gun]
"I feel like I'm gonna break this damn thing!"
Calm down Hulk. It's solid aluminum. I do love the movie though.
it also looks like a tool for spraying ceilings
Threaded barrel, I’m surprised California hasn’t ban these
I wonder why no modern pistols have gone with the "fit your front sight right when you need to use it" approach?
Strange.
I can't imagine it lends itself to a lot of accuracy.
@@AesculapiusPiranha Neither does the one inch long barrel, but then again, this gun was only ever intended to be used to sneakily get yourself a much better gun from someone who had one.
When the CIA decided they wanted Roland dead, they gave Van Owen one of these and he laughed them out of the room
Warren Zevon references intensify.
Just show this to the enemy and they'll start laughing so hard you can just take their weapon. ;)
Jeez imagine a soviet seeing this and thinking to himself dang even we arm third party groups better
CIA: drops this.
KGB: drops T-34 tanks shooting AK 47s.
I had one of those when I was a kid, I had no idea what it was, and no idea where it ended up, probably in the garbage pit on our old farm It was in a workshop on the rental farmstead where we moved when dad put his land in the soil bank and we moved where we could keep our cattle and horses. I remember clearly though playing with it when I was in like the 4th and 5th grade.
I once thought about making something like this as a fun project once. I decided I like not being full of shrapnel, so I dropped it.
You test your creation from a distance...not in your hand.
3d print it. Looks like would only be 4-5 parts.
@@leechowning2712 Show me the 3D printed plastic that can survive the pressures involved in a gun. Then I’ll try it.
@@jamesharding3459 well there is an article on 3d printed guns en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_printed_firearm
@@jamesharding3459 FCG-9
He made it out of area51 with the alien blaster
My first thought was fallout
Ian, Thank you for fulfilling my long-time request for the Deer Gun.
This is such a momentous occasion.
Despite how awful this may have been and how reviled it may be to many people, I love how simple this is. Something about it is really appealing to me.
Old toy ray gun style
Why a "Deer gun", though? Other than, "oh deer, is this the best we could do?" I'm kinda also wondering, if any thought was put into, er, concealment in plain sight? The Liberator looks like a gun, this, however, could be stored among garage tools, and your regular grunt wouldn't even suspect it was a gun.
That would be, "Oh dear!" I was thinking "Deere" as in the die-cast John Deere toy tractors from the '50s and '60s. But really, did Ian explain the origin of the name? I didn't notice if he did.
I'm guessing it was a play on the concept of a simple pistol for dispatch of wounded game or injured animals by vet
@@DRNewcomb I know it's not oh deer. But no, it wasn't mentioned by Ian.
@@davem2369 That would make sense. 🤔
- Umm, is it any good?
- Sure, I bet you can take a deer with it!
This makes a Saturday Night Special look like a solid alternative choice
Pretty sure the "Saturday Night Special" moniker was just propaganda. To deny people owning firearms. Of course they'd be cheaper the a S&W model 29 and not built as well
I'm pretty sure I found one of these in my cereal this morning...
Was it in a box of Quisp?
Always a good video to watch man. Much appreciated.
That sight is simply a directional indicator for close range assassination.
I wonder if the casting molds still exist somewhere.
From memory this sounds like it was made by the guy who wrote a lot of books on firearm design.
He did mention that he worked on CIA designs..
Him or his family may have them.
I highly doubt that the casting molds for a gun made for government spooks are not gonna be owned by the government
Neon Thought let’s hope noy
You could 3d print it from hard plastic.
@@AdamAdamHDL Don't give the CIA any ideas. :)
I never thought I would see a gun that made the Liberator look like a high quality piece of hardware. Wow. Just wow.
Imagine getting killed by one of those. That's embarrassing
If two guys tried dueling each other with these guns they would die from laughter even before pulling the trigger.
Looks like someone found it at the bottom of the ocean...
It reminds me of the gun Daffy Duck would wield when he was Duck Dodgers. 🤣😂🤣
That was a great show
The most ineffective deer hunting weapon ever.
0/5 would not hunt again.
You'd have a better chance of hitting a bull in the ass with a banjo
Nice to know the MIB’s continued the research and development of this that ended up as The Noisy Cricket 🦗
2:06 [Ran a company called AMF (American Machine Manufacturing)] The same company that makes/made bowling equipment and Harley Davidson Motorcycles?
I saw a new one of these for 2020 gun line up for shot show. It is called a ALTOR PISTOL & has a price of $120.00 for .380 & $130.00 for 9mm . My guess is, more then likely, it will end up here on Forgotten Weapons. Get them now while they are cheap & then them sell in 20 plus years for big $$$.
Looks like something my dog dug up in the back yard. 🙈
Bet there is a whole bunch of them rotting away on some jungle floor somewhere.
Still too complex. Would have just put a wood grip and simple trigger on the classic tube based zip gun.
Hey Ian, just thought I'd mention, one of the M-16's assigned to me was made by GM Hydromatic Division
It was my Favorite of all the Weapons i had/used in the Army. She was a Honey and I was the first to use it.
Absolutely dead accurate.
Releasing the blueprints would be hilarious. $10 guns would be quite hilarious in gun stores
You never told us why it's called a "deer gun".
probably just a meaningless designation/nickname
Dear gun please don't explode on me
The initial testing was carried out by agent John Doe.
Probably that each was at deer cost even back then!
I’d imagine it goes with the deniability thing. Like the liberator was called a flare projector or something. “Oh this isn’t for waging guerilla warfare it’s for shooting deer”
I really want to see some of these "single shot" guns in video games. They may not be too useful but they could be lots of fun.
I can't imagine it would have been difficult to convince a good revolver manufacturer to produce an unmarked run of snub nose 9mm with some small differences from their normal production. For deniability.
The chaos gremlin in me wants to say, "You can clean the threads with a solution of lye". The nice guy in me wants to tell you that would dissolve the gun creating an aluminum solution and giving off free hydrogen gas.
Dual purpose liberator!
@@oz_jones Lol. Liberating the weapon from the gunk, and liberating hydrogen sumultaneously! You silly bugger! Thanks for the laugh!
American Machine Foundry: Your one stop shop for cigarette machines, boat parts, bowling machines and apparently one shot guns... Learn something new everyday.
You're in the third world of the 50's. The CIA offer this, The Soviets offer you an AK47. спасибо товарищ ;-) (Thanks Comrade)
Plot twist, you take this, shoot the Soviet insurgent, and take the AK47 as is the intention of this weapon. Enjoy democracy!
Problem with that. the soviets aren't going to hand you an AK47. you're their prisoner. they don't give you a gun.
Max Wilson Why go through the trouble of taking a used gun when you can just get a new one right off the bat?
Dad, Still getting ciggars , Maybe getting Milk. This is an assassin's weapon. Good luck fitting an AK in ur pocket.
Jesse James Not really the point of the weapon, the point is yoinking someone elses gun you’d be better off if you got AKs right off the bat for your revolt or something instead of, I still see your point could be a assasins weapon if the assasins location couldnt get better tools for the job
The liberator concept in general has always seemed a bit strange.
"Sir, we need a cheap, deniable way to arm the resistance. Nothing special, just enough to kill a soldier and steal their weapon."
"How about we drop them a single shot pistol that's more expensive and complex to operate than a knife and looks distinctly western, but also only works from distances that you could use a knife, and makes far more noise?"
"perfect."
idk man, knives are really hard to "operate". Just stabbing people in random places tends to hurts them, and hurt people make noise. Like, "ow, why the fvck did you just stab me". Unless you hit them in some very special places, it usually also takes them some time to die even if you score a fatal hit. Whereas putting a one-shot gun roughly onto their chest or face and pulling a trigger is real easy to do for some uneducated farmer-turned-guerilla.
I mean, the same argument could be used against your knife - "if you get within knife-fighting distance of an enemy soldier, you might as well just bash him over the head with a rock or something".
@@pdittrich good point, we should have just air dropped big rocks
@@faber8251 what about... (drum roll) rocks that explode
Why not drop some of the masses of surplus German and Japanese arms that were left over from the war. Easy to deny where it came from as they were scattered all over.
@@MrAdamfinlayson because then there wouldn't be enough room left over in the plane for the rocks.