Cycling Tour de france 1999 part 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ค. 2015
  • The 1999 Tour de France was a multiple stage bicycle race held from 3 to 25 July, and the 86th edition of the Tour de France. It has no overall winner-although American cyclist Lance Armstrong originally won the event, the United States Anti-Doping Agency announced in August 2012 that they had disqualified Armstrong from all his results since 1998, including his seven consecutive Tour de France wins from 1999 to 2005 (which were, originally, the most wins in the event's history); the Union Cycliste Internationale confirmed the result. There were no French stage winners for the first time since the 1926 Tour de France. Additionally, Mario Cipollini won 4 stages in a row, setting the post-World War II record for consecutive stage wins (breaking the record of three, set by Gino Bartali in 1948.)

ความคิดเห็น • 75

  • @FB1BB1BB1
    @FB1BB1BB1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    The good old days...No helmet, doping...Great racing!

  • @derphael_4337
    @derphael_4337 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Are we just going to ignore this marvellous piece of street art at 59:29 ?

    • @bradford_shaun_murray
      @bradford_shaun_murray ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dude that's awesome. They've even lined it up exactly with the white lines to give added dynamic effect lol
      That's so unashamedly French to leave it in the footage that goes around the world ha ha
      Helicopter camera man to producer on the ground: "Coq sur la route qui arrive, que dois-je faire!?"
      French producer: "Viva La Coq continuez à filmer continuez à filmer!"
      59:27 Love how Phil Liggett doesn't say anything about it despite how everyone would of seen it lol.

  • @DavidErdody
    @DavidErdody 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What was the result of Lance Armstrong's return to racing? Many thousands getting checked out for cancer and catching it early and glad to be alive this day.

    • @racingfuel28
      @racingfuel28 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, whether you agree or not with him using performance enhancers and doping, there is no doubt that he raised more money than most could ever hope to for cancer research. It kills me that people will basically crucify the guy for “cheating” also known as doing the exact same thing as every other person in the race, but just act like Livestrong never existed. Focus on the good a person does, not what their failures are.

  • @alahmi100
    @alahmi100 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    i would pay 500 dollars to see all the tours armstrong won in 4k

    • @matthewlemke5310
      @matthewlemke5310 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Get over it pussy

    • @armyretired28
      @armyretired28 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @xellossaxon Eddie Merckx doped and all the riders of the past and present...they just weren't caught!

    • @kalo_reefer
      @kalo_reefer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      600

    • @alahmi100
      @alahmi100 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@armyretired28 they still use doping. Lots of riders with heart problems. Doping can cause cancer or heart problems.

  • @rockhopper01
    @rockhopper01 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Outstanding upload!

  • @ChrizzzyEGolf
    @ChrizzzyEGolf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Lol, I own these dvds from 1999 to 2005

  • @ecarter202
    @ecarter202 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    the real tragedy with lance is that no tour will ever be as entertaining without him.

    • @treygray2817
      @treygray2817 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ecarter202 Lance's victories were almost always boring. Aside from 2003 the outcome was a foregone conclusion.

    • @AlonsoRules
      @AlonsoRules 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      still more exciting than Froome

    • @trickinicki1456
      @trickinicki1456 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Both guys boring, bought the best riders to form a team which escorted them to the last climb. But Froome at least rode one riskful and exciting attack at the Giro this year, Lance none in his whole career. None of them is comparable to Contador, who was the most entertaining and charismatic character.
      No doubt all three dominators were on drugs, but Contador was the coolest.

    • @trinerd
      @trinerd 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      There was nothing exciting about him.

    • @jpguthrie6669
      @jpguthrie6669 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I guess you never saw the 1989 Tour, when Greg Lemond took the lead and won the race on the last day at the finish in Paris. Never in his life did Lance have as an exciting finish.

  • @wareverwarever9200
    @wareverwarever9200 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    WOW Mario SNIFFollini!

  • @StFidjnr
    @StFidjnr 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I saw one of cickasmith's videos Mike (from SBS in aus) did the undignified ceremony of handing an aussie at one point the red lantern which is the cyclist in last place of the tour de france

  • @joesmithiii6287
    @joesmithiii6287 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    if I almost died, then given another chance to compete I would have cheated my a$$ off! I mean since it was rampant through the peleton, I mean. but I would have been nice to others, not a complete and utter tool.

    • @suminshizzles6951
      @suminshizzles6951 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which is why, in part, why he was able to get away with it for so long. Apart from being a bully and a dickhead. He had us all believing that he was clean. It was his recovery from cancer that made it credible. As much as i dont like him i will say this. Everybody was doping at that time. Nearly everybody. Everybody in the top ten was doping. Those that were not were insignificant or domestique's. As much as i dont like lance i will say that he was just leveling the playing field.

    • @uweclaunitzer7170
      @uweclaunitzer7170 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I assume I would NOT dope for the same reasons. Even more so since testicular cancer is by some experts believed to be triggered by - doping substances...

    • @matthewlemke5310
      @matthewlemke5310 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Smattless You're a fucking idiot.

  • @joesmithiii6287
    @joesmithiii6287 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    also, always liked Mapei's kits

  • @jiji1946
    @jiji1946 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    fantastic how these commentators can read the riders' minds.

  • @tranjose
    @tranjose 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Doping was and is still the preserve of European sport. The overwhelming majority of the methods were developed in Europe.

    • @keirfarnum6811
      @keirfarnum6811 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      xellossaxon
      Not the case. All of the American pro cyclists have stated they never used PEDs until they went to Europe. But it depends on the sport: certainly professional sports such as baseball and football and anaerobic track and field sports were rife with doping. But Russia is the country in which doping was most prevalent since it was state sponsored during the Soviet era and recently before Sochi. Most people associate PEDs with strength oriented sports (especially in the US) and not aerobic sports and it really was the European cycling that pioneered the use of PEDs for aerobic sports. And cycling especially has a long history of using these drugs; it was thought by many that the sport was so difficult that it was necessary. They really didn’t think of it as cheating; they thought of it as medically necessary just to be able to do it. Back when I was racing mountain bike in Alaska (during the 90s) I didn’t even know that steroids could help in a sport like cycling; I thought of it as something that only helped with developing strength and muscle mass so I never even considered that it might be helpful for an aerobic sport.
      One of the reasons I like alpine skiing is that PEDs don’t help and most athletes don’t bother using them; and even if someone did, it wouldn’t make a difference. Alpine skiing is all about technique and psychology. Of course conditioning is important and helpful, but it’s not what determines who wins.

  • @user-ls9oz6ch8x
    @user-ls9oz6ch8x 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If only Lance had won two or three, then said, ‘I want to help cancer patients like myself’ and done that. But he couldn’t do that.

  • @mikes3109
    @mikes3109 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Were Beltran and Contreras Armstrong's teammates later on?

    • @ChrizzzyEGolf
      @ChrizzzyEGolf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, Beltran was.

    • @suminshizzles6951
      @suminshizzles6951 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChrizzzyEGolf Postal had a habit of buying the competition.

  • @adrianj78
    @adrianj78 ปีที่แล้ว

    55:16 start of coverage of stage 9 to Sestrieres

  • @telmolicious
    @telmolicious 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    U can here the fakeness 😂 Im so surprised.. Its not like ive been taking doping or anything like that...... 😂😂🙈🙈🙈

  • @MSJ860
    @MSJ860 ปีที่แล้ว

    The days of dope.. The good old days

  • @karlpartridge9546
    @karlpartridge9546 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    looked way cooler without helmets

  • @Silligk
    @Silligk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does anyone else think that no helmets gave a little more "character" to the riders? I fully understand a helmet being required for safety regulations and all that but I wish it wasn't so

    • @johandust6926
      @johandust6926 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, by far. In my opinion, they should allow not using helmets during climbs again.

    • @UnivegaSuperSport
      @UnivegaSuperSport 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes. The impact of seeing a full face and head and the variety of faces and heads can't be underestimated.

  • @damiencallaghan9389
    @damiencallaghan9389 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1999 - Twenty years ago... The Memories
    David Walsh - The Journalist who wrote Seven Deadly Sins said
    "Our cancer has returned" - Meaning Lance Armstrong AND HE WAS RIGHT
    Phil Liggett and Paul Sherwen MUST have known what was going on - They sound so innocent

  • @cojobi
    @cojobi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Glad that they solved the doping issues! HaHa.

  • @ajconstantine3593
    @ajconstantine3593 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    20:25 😂😂😂😂😂😂🤘

  • @StFidjnr
    @StFidjnr 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    25:45 abandoned the race

  • @wamba7717
    @wamba7717 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, you gotta be brave and you gotta be strong "puke"

  • @trumpinator9295
    @trumpinator9295 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Armstrong was Perfektion in Doping. Even Ullrich had not any Chance.

    • @leeshackelford7517
      @leeshackelford7517 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ulrich was doping, too.
      The bottom line, Armstrong training was the difference

  • @bradford_shaun_murray
    @bradford_shaun_murray ปีที่แล้ว

    1:11:50
    1:31:15
    1:44:09

  • @villy27
    @villy27 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Armstrong was testet positive after day one. If the UCI had not obscured the facts, he never would have won any tour.

    • @rishabprasad7633
      @rishabprasad7633 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      is this when Lance used the cream excuse?

    • @uweclaunitzer7170
      @uweclaunitzer7170 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rishabprasad7633 Yes. Similarly, he would not have been allowed to start at the Tour in 2001, since he was tested positive on EPO prior that year. "Thankfully", UCI covered it up...

  • @anthonyx3576
    @anthonyx3576 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    37:36

  • @alex9046
    @alex9046 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:15:04 it was interesting, alright

  • @richardjohnson4696
    @richardjohnson4696 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Raise your arms at the finish line if you have one testicle and are a cheater. Yep.

  • @alfpacino2630
    @alfpacino2630 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    the greatest cycling swindle!

  • @nonvaxetfier
    @nonvaxetfier 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    ARMSTRONG LE DROGUE

  • @paulsingh9043
    @paulsingh9043 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lier and a cheat, he knew exactly what he was doing, moreover the team were supplying the drugs and administering them, glad this dope fiend got caught out, he was a real nasty piece of work. I wouldn't spit on him if he was on fire!

    • @dw-kf5fd
      @dw-kf5fd 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha mostly everyone in every sport is on stuff. You're ignorant.

    • @paulsingh9043
      @paulsingh9043 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dw-kf5fd fair enough, but he shit on slot of people in the way, just my opinion.

    • @leeshackelford7517
      @leeshackelford7517 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They ALL lied about doping...