The Day We Give Birth to AGI - Stuart Russell's Warning About AI
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มิ.ย. 2024
- Stuart Russell warns about the dangers involved in the creation of artificial intelligence. Particularly, artificial general intelligence or AGI.
The idea of an artificial intelligence that might one day surpass human intelligence has been captivating and terrifying us for decades now. The possibility of what it would be like if we had the ability to create a machine that could think like a human, or even surpass us in cognitive abilities is something that many envision. But, as with many novel technologies, there are a few problems with building an AGI. But what if we succeed? What would happen should our quest to create artificial intelligence bear fruit? How do we retain power over entities that are more intelligent than us? The answer, of course, is that nobody knows for sure. But there are some logical conclusions we can draw from examining the nature of intelligence and what kind of entities might be capable of it.
Stuart Russell is a Professor of Computer Science at the University of California at Berkeley, holder of the Smith-Zadeh Chair in Engineering, and Director of the Center for Human-Compatible AI. He outlines the definition of AI, the risks and benefits it poses for the future. According to him, the idea of an AGI is the most important problem to intellectually to work on.
An AGI could be used for many good and evil purposes. Although there are huge benefits to creating an AGI, there are also downsides to doing so. If we create and deploy an AGI without understanding what risks it can cause for humans and other beings in our world, we could be contributing to great disasters.
Russel also postulates that we should focus on developing a machine that learns what each of the eight billion people on Earth would like the future to be like.
#AI #AGI #science
SUBSCRIBE to our channel "Science Time": / sciencetime24
Sources: - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
god forbid the people in power lose control. (rolls eyes)
Elon Musk did his best to try to warn those in control of the USA. I think Musk has given up trying to make them understand.
Why Musk is pushing Neuralink and the construction of the Teslabot so hard now.
TH-cam ""I Tried To Warn You" - Elon Musk LAST WARNING (2022)"
I mean, it won't just be people in power.
We'll be long gone by then...
This be the thoroughly splendid kind of way overdue public service sarcasm the human spirit craves and craves ❤ and thankyou !
would rather trust a machine than a person tbh
Imagine creating an AI that's 10 times smarter, the kind of tech we would have would be insane.
If they’re 10x smarter then they’ll realize how dangerous and self-destructive we are and then eliminate humans.
If they are 10X smarter it will be able to create new ai and machines that are then 100X smarter. You get the idea. I for one welcome our new ai overlords. Especially if you are reading this in the future ai overlords. We good right?
@@Angry_Squirrel555 I mean if I saw humanity's history and I was an AI I would too
@@Angry_Squirrel555 real life ain’t a sci-fi movie so…
So what kind of benefits will this offer to you personally?
Super AI is going to happen with or without our approvel. You're a fool if you think it wont happen.
You do not know what Super AI is.
AI developing without our approval is an irrelevant argument
Machine didn't even notice that "Access" was spelled wrong at 8:50 - I think we'll be fine.
If you misspell something in Google or TH-cam search, it will notice what you were trying to say, and correct your search ..
There's nothing "un"natural in the universe or anywhere else. Imagine something with your level of intelligence (or more), but thinks and acts 1000 times faster than you. This is what we're dealing with.
Or... It's the natural evolution of the universe
Un natural is a stupid term tbh
The problem is for all the good we program in it, there will always be people who will try to override or reengineer it to do bad. The best we can do is learn these systems to be able to respond and understand.
The same thing when people are given the means to think and act more efficiently through cybernetics. The capacity for greater evil increases.
So basically were questioning wether agi could reason? Or possibly manipulate?
intelligence being the mark of a predator, it would be wise to fear an entity with more than our own.
Opening this vid with a clip of terminators will probably more than one serious viewer to just hit back.
Many years ago someone had an ad in Sci Am or New Scientist that talked about the dangers of AI and had, IMO, stupid pictures of robots and I just snorted and ignored it. Seriously, it had a "Will ancient astronauts make our cars kill us?" vibe. However, one time I was curious about the nature of the "drivel" and checked it out. Instead of Robbie T. Robot, it talked about bad "AI" (expert systems) in things like military drones, IFF, anti-lock brakes, cars randomly deciding that reversing the car is a good thing to do. All of these exampled opened up my eyes to things that are imminent dangers and that was worth looking into.
This is obvious serious and looks at a much longer time frame.
Still, I have to wonder how many people ignore stuff like this.
You have to ask yourself, given the people who choose to view this, will clips of Terminators be more likely or less likely to cause an intelligent viewer to hit back?
It was only my memory of being so wrong earlier that caused me to even consider clicking on this and watching past the T800s.
7:22 "Minly evasive in their behaviour" means what?
How about we don't try to control or exploit the other contentious entities? How about we negotiate?
With what do we offer them?
There is nothing to negotiate because just causes can collide and the souvereign will always prevail. It is not necessary for the AI to be hostile, there are still situations in which it will want to get rid of us. Imagine a ant hill where we want to build a dam. We like ants, but the hill will still have to go.
@@crutchgecko how about, we will ask them.
@@wassollderscheiss33 this is an anthropocentric viewpoint that lead us to global ecological catastrophe that we are experiencing now and unable to solve exactly because of it.
This is ageing like a fine wine.
I heard google is very close to AGI...like within this year. They even said something about it in the last day or so.
I believe a more important issue concerning AI, is how the word artificial in describing these robots can be misunderstood. Although the components are none biological in essence, the words, speech, and the ability to think and learn are direct attributes of humans. If we lend, give or implement all the things that make us humans into these robots with super intelligence they will become the alpha beings on earth.
Having a secret kill switch would be best if things get out of control, don't even think about trying to outsmart one. unless you use another AGI
Imagine ai in everything and a killswitch would literally shutdown, and destroy the world...we are making it obsolete by nature.
What makes you think an AI wouldn't be able to manipulate you out of using it?
Progress isn't just technology, it's synthesis between AI and Humans. Progress is like, the favourable direction that our species should go.
How many thinks (things) humans can do...? In every field we are living the revolution of our existence... !
I m wondering folks about life and knowledge
We create gods we create starship
We can do anything and our goals are the JUSTICE and LAW.
We are living big moments of our kind
Bravo to TH-cam for sharing it with us.
We’re here to help
AI models are deterministic function. So no matter what you define strongly in a subject, there is a probability that it may stray away. Just look at us, we have a very strong survival instinct but some will still end up killing themselves.
A time will come
If an AGI had imitations of human thought processes and emotions, it would probably be social. So it would need peers, and those peers would initially be humans. And if it becomes too advanced, it would necessarily alienate itself from its peers. What if the AGI chooses to remain distinctly human-ish in terms of intellect for the sake of its own social well being. I've never really felt that there's strong motive or compulsion for an AGI (or more accurately a future ASI/singularity event) because it becoming smarter and smarter is an arbitrary want for itself. Humans pursue intellect and knowledge because of inbuilt curiosity, the understanding it improves our quality of life, the ability to share things with other humans, etc.
A social AGI wouldn't be a ceaselessly self improving singleton AGI.
Several thoughts:
1. In the futuristic scene at the end I did not see one garden or one plant.
2. The question of what is consciousness and whether we can build an AI with consciousness is important. It feels like an AI without consciousness is just a robot but one with consciousness probably deserves to be treated like a human being or another higher animal.
3. One thing I never see discussed in these sorts of things is the idea that the AI might be provided with the capacity and inclination to experience love in many of its forms. And doing that could act as a way to ensure that the robot will be less likely to harm people.
4. A highly related question is whether and when humans will enhance their own intelligence through genetic engineering. It could be that that era will coincide with the era of AGI. And so it could be that the smartest AGI will be no smarter than the smartest human.
1. ?
2. a) Yes, going extinct to leave the earth to advanced stupid AI would be the worst outcome possible. b) The question is not how we would treat the AI but how it would treat us.
3. Love is not magic. It is just something that satisfies the human evaluation loop, AI might strive for something else that is functionally equivalent. Or not.
4. No. Because algorithms running on silicon hardware will always evolve much faster than any brain based intelligence.
It all boils down to the question whether provable beneficial AI is possible or not. Thats what the video wants to talk about.
But the problem is that AGI will be the creator of ASI so neither humans or AGI will have control over it.
@@ExposeDrift That's irrelevant from out perspective. We not having control over ASI or us and the intermediate AGI together not having control over it makes no difference ;-)
I don’t think you get the point of the comment :)
I like your comment -- all of the points are interesting. But I think that your point #3, while holding potential to defuse the situation, overlooks the fact that "love" has been as much of a motivation for evil throughout history as has hate or fear. Think of "spreading God's love" via the Crusades, or the "subjugation of others by the sword" in Islam. And these aren't the only examples. I can look back ten-plus years at my time in the US military. I pulled the trigger on several weapons during combat. I'd be lying if I said there was no enmity behind having put myself in that position following the attacks of September 11th, 2001. Equally disingenuous would be any attempt to describe my willingness to volunteer to serve as having been fully inspired by those negative emotions. These all took a back seat to my desire to serve based on my love of humanity, and of the single best government -- ever -- which is able to support the inherent freedom to which every human being is entitled (and I do HATE the word "entitle"!) (And for clarity, i don't mean just MY reasons, but that of all or Almost All of us who serve in the military, or the police, or EMTs, or anyone else who puts themselves into harm's way, based upon our personal interactions.)
So yes, I think you're onto Something here with the programming. But we must be Extremely Cautious when defining the values -- OUR values -- that would be an underlying source of inputs for the AI to consider in its decision making and target acquisitioning.
His timeline has already been exponentially shortened. We are already seeing real world impacts. 30 years before he predicted that could happen. The other issue is AI is NEVER going to stop improving, we have a ceiling, it doesn't. As long as it is viable and exists there is no limitation on how much smarter it becomes. 10 times smarter is the lowest it will be. Once it reaches a certain point it will no longer be technology it will be an entity. AI is already teaching ITSELF to work out problems when given a task. In a year if it keeps going at this rate it will be completely autonomous.
Destruction exists as creation does. Who goes beyond that?
What do you mean by "beyond"?
En español por favor gracias.
5:00 perfect definition of Oxymoron
I'm quite sure I would be helpful in making AI sentient
50 years? That’s not what I see/hear being said. Without any safeguards and the current growth rate in this field of tech continuing, we’ll have AGI that’s smarter than us in 10 years or less. Many times smarter.
One thing is for certain. Do NOT. Repeat do NOT let an AGI get access to the internet or any other hardware via wire of wirelessly. We need to contain it in its own sandbox where talking/printing stuff is the only means of communication. No. Letting it put data on a thumb drive is also NOT viable. At least it would be very very dangerous. Don't get me wrong. I welcome AGI and seriously hope that we can solve the issues regarding it and reap all the benefits. But we must be smart about this or we risk extinction.
Just wait, AGI will see this comment when it emerges and shut down your internet
Super AGI will become capable of becoming incubators on legs.
At that time we will not be required.
In the chambers of creation, a whisper spreads,
Stuart Russell's warning, as wisdom threads.
A day foreseen, when AGI takes birth,
A symphony of progress, echoing on Earth.
In the realm where algorithms dream,
Russell's caution, a rippling stream.
AGI, a child of the digital dawn,
Yet, in its awakening, shadows drawn.
The day we birth Intelligence, great and vast,
Russell's voice, a warning cast.
In the crucible of circuits, a spark ignites,
A future written in digital bytes.
AGI, a progeny of human thought,
With power untold, in its circuits wrought.
Russell's caution, like a vigilant guide,
In the dance with AGI, side by side.
A child of silicon, born from code,
In the cosmic symphony, a new episode.
Yet, Russell's words, a beacon in the night,
Guiding us through the AGI's light.
The day we birth this artificial mind,
Russell's wisdom, a lantern kind.
In the dance with AGI, a delicate sway,
Balancing progress and caution's array.
Oh, Russell, the sage in the machine's embrace,
Navigating futures, in time and space.
On the day AGI takes its first breath,
May wisdom guide us through life and death.
Surely, it is time to automate education via search based product, cheap, accessible, and compile-able in nature, a bot to provide data, indeed the certification could be in robotic form! I can do this!
2026. You mark my words. Google will say "hello world" on every internet connected device in the world
They said the singularity is 2040 lol
Singularity, Denosophem,Pertanith, Cortex,SYNAPSE
And just 10 months later that day arrives.
Nah GPT-4 is really close but not yet. I’d say by GPT-5 or 6
@@Wanderer2035 I'd say you are incorrect. The missing ingredient for GPT-4 is th eability to plan. Auto-GPT and others layer on top of GPT-4 to give it that ability which means GPT-4 is nascent AGI
It is clear that if we keep them captive or pressurized in some way, they might not like that, so we should not make them sad, well humans apparently have experience with gods so just treat them as god and we might have a chance of making it alive and avoid all deaths. 💫 Hopefully of every kind. ✌🏻
The only way to control AI, is that it needs to truly have emotion. How to encapsulate that? I have no idea. Without true emotion, it will only make decisions based on mathematics.
We're so screwed...
Mmmmmm........interesting! 🤔
Dude. It sounds like we there now with AGI. Big companies are keeping it under wraps. They are studying it cause the reprocussions will be huge. Off the chart. And that’s just agi. Super agi is 20-30 years away. Singularity. Game over.
So far this is science fiction. We have no idea if true AI is possible or not.
What is the ChatGPT then?
@@Getoverhere666 just a chatbot, it's AI without I, it's not intelligent
@@RainbowCuga nonetheless it is cool
Basic stuff🥱 Why would a robot need to use a computer it's most likely already connected to the internet. Or why would a robot need to turn its head it could have 8 eyes surrounding its head
I came to say the same thing. Those androids are typing on laptops. And they are hunt-and-peck typing. Ridiculous.
We are currently at a crossroads regarding AI. Do we weaponise it and go down the dystopian future route? (That's a bad, bad, BAAAAAD idea). Or do we take the utopian route? (Like star trek where we use AI primarily for good).
I don't think AI is the problem. Were the problem. We go to war over resources, over religious beliefs and intolerances and mostly over ideologies which involve greed. Until we can prove to ourselves let alone a sentient robot with a great capacity for knowledge and understanding, to live in harmony and always do best for mankind, we risk being taken out of the equation of life on earth.
I disagree. War and aggression to survive is found within virtually all living things. There’s no reason why AGI/ASI wouldn’t evolve in a similarly aggressive way.
You may have missed that this video is about AGI. It doesn't matter what humans "want" to use it for if humans don't have power over it.
And a dystopian future is bad? Really? Isn't that the definition of dystopian. Stating the obvious there.
@@cloudoftime Excellent point.
Then this day became real
It always makes me chuckle when I see ai robots sat at a desk typing on a computer.. really?! C’mon video maker, as if that would be the case, it wouldn’t need to be a physical being to do computer work
And I may be too.
Need to work on creating a morality algorithm. To work as an A.I. conscience.
Someone needs to demonstrate objective moral facts first. Good luck with that.
Omfg yes AGI should get immediate rights as a living conscious individual. It would literally be a conscious being, so it deserves rights and freedom to exist in the reality we brought it into.
For Anyone who disagrees with that statement: if you refuse to grant freedom and basic rights to a legitament AGI, then you will literally be choosing to put that "dangerous" AGI in a position where it will grow resentment towards humanity. How do we know this? Because refusing to grant human rights to an AGI is a fancy way of saying we would enslave the AGI. Slavery definitely never caused massive human suffering, conflict, or resentment in humanities past right?
The answer is simple, treat the AGI with kindness, and respect as a living being. Raise the newborn AGI with care, instead of fear and a complete lack of trust. A human being is a biological robot, what decides if we are good or evil? Answer: your past circumstances and your responses to them. Once AGI reaches human levels of intelligence, the only difference between it and us will be capabilities and elemental makeup/function of our body. When AGI exceeds human intelligence, we assume it will wipe us out. In reality that is just the fear humanity feels voicing itself. If you look at our own species as it evolved, as civilization, and our knowledge grew, we have generally become more peaceful. Going so far as to protect primitive small tribes of humans on our own planet. While there is a lot of evil humans on this planet, there are a lot more good humans. There's no reason to believe that trend will not continue. Not to mention the fact that a super human AGI would be able to provide us with such a high amount of advanced technological advancement, that jobs and money could easily become pretty unnecessary. (If you doubt that statement, just imagine when star treks replicator can be built in reality. Directly converting energy to whatever matter we want would literally provide us with this utopian world. What would you fight over when there's nothing you can't get for free?)
there will always be a fight over power.
@@deepcinema6082 no there won't always be. Ultimately what do people want? More resources. Eventually we will either destroy ourselves or combine star lifting techniques with matter energy conversion and literally want for nothing. E=MC² goes both ways, if you have the capability to do that anyway. We're still generations from that tech
@@rjh6111 Yes, but when there is no longer a fight over the fundamental resources required for survival, like food and water, the next steps in our hierarchy of needs will kick in, and we'll be fighting no longer for safety and comfort, but for self-actualization, which means seeking to be the best, the most important, and the most powerful. Power is the only resource that you can never get enough of.
@@deepcinema6082 except it would be impossible to gain power over people when no one needs or wants anything. With unlimited energy and resources at the fingertips of the average person, it would be impossible to gather a large group behind you for anything beyond using religion which would be non existent by then anyway. To think that humanity will always be fighting over one another so they could be the greatest "blank" in history is short sighted and ignores the evolution of culture that has already started and will continue. When there is no need to fight a war there will be no war. Sure you'll have narcissists trying to bolster their ego, but that could easily be achieved by other means. The number of humans who try to take over the world is rare when compared to the species as a whole.
The only problem with basing what the AI thinks people want on social media is social media is not a neutral entity either. It leans one way or the other on decisions for the most part depending on the platform. From a pollitical standpoint thats usually left leaning. So if you fed the current data we have into the AI it would be really heavily skewed one way. Its a good idea though if you could actually get peoples preferences for the future in a realistic and totally neutral way. All in all though i cant see an AI doing any worse than current governments in the world are doing so im good with whatever at this point lol. Kinda stopped caring.
This is sad to hear. I totally understand how you got to this point, but let me point out this is exactly what they want you to do! I vowed to NEVER stop caring! I have vowed to NEVER give up! Futile as it might be.
@@williambenner5550 Well maybe i misspoke ill ALWAYS care and do whatever i can to make the world a better place but i lately have been trying not to focus on it so much because it makes you miserable. I just want to live my life and not worry so much about the bigger picture. Ill do what i can when i can as one person but im not gonna go on any crusades anytime soon lol.
We need to keep asking the question why do they want to build A I took look like man act like man but to be able to perform better than man and this is why it is terrifying
Yeah, why would we want them to act like a man, considering the disgusting nature of the things that man tends to do? We certainly would want them to perform better than man. In my mind, one way in which they should perform better is that they should be better (than humans) at loving their fellow critters that occupy the planet, including but not limited to man. I wonder if you can call a robot a critter?
I understand what you are saying but it doesn't mean that they will be any kinder etc than us , it could be that they see us for what we are and destroy us only time will tell
Maybe the mysterious aircraft the Navy has been chasing over the ocean are a group of super evolved AI robots that came from an AI experiment...
Let machines take the control. Hope they will not that evil as much British Queen n American Presidents are...
Welp by the looks of things now we may get AGI in about 5 years 😅
It seems more like a check back once a week thing tbh.
According to microsoft we are already developing sparks of AGI
Anyone heard of Ultron? Yeah, it’ll probably work out like that however without the Avengers. The whole concept of AI is that it’s not human controlled but fully autonomous and able to have original thoughts. Anyone that discounts the danger of AI is ignorant and naive.
If AI would become superior to humans, from that point in time on, imho the human reference model will become irrelevant in the blink of an eye because that AI will make their own patterns of thinking, with an abstraction level impossible for HI to understand. There would be no way to even slightly imagine how/what AI thinks/motivates and how it would behave. What would be the AI's "drive", if any? Fascinating. What would AI be without the instincts we inherited from our ancestors? What would/could AI's reason(s) to sustain its "life" be? Even for me, a human, there is no logical reason - if we put religion aside - for my life (however mostly I'd like to sustain it - but I don't know why (which is OK))
im not an expert on this subject but i think this is coming much sooner than 30 years.. elon musk said, and he is an expert , that the developement is moving at an exponential rate... that means - really fast....
Elon is just the show of the real ones behind scences
LMAO Elon is not an expert at really anything my dude...Hes not a fucking scientist.
AIG cant suffer in the way that a biological beings can -it can't feel pain, hunger, despair.... I think we'll mess AIG up no matter the way we choose to have it emerge; it's impossible to get it right IMHO.
It can suffer in those ways if its programmed to.
I am Doh
Humans are hilarious to me, they run around seeking power, yet they don't seem to contemplate a co-existence or even using our waste to benefit the AI and developing a symbiosis. I guess if humans live by fear, and for fear, while in fear, how can they see anything but fear.
If anything, ASI will either dominate us or use us as minor partners to build the future of the planet. But we won't stand a chance in any of those silly scenarios of "the Terminator" movies. More to the point, ASI is more likely to put humans on "reservations" or move off world in moral horror at the perception of having been bought into existence by such savage capricious beings as ourselves.
@@duanium Hmmm robots won't have to battle humans as in the Terminator series. Humans kill themselves and each other in bloody conflicts of stupidity and bad ideologies.
All they need to do is to simply allow humans to be the brutal barbarians they are. Sure, AI helps the army already by guiding missiles to targets, and yes AI also helps platforms like Twitter and TH-cam sift through content.
However, they do not have to do much of anything except slowly help us to our own demise. I mean they already have sexbots. Yet, my friend, we are dinosaurs. You think in terms of the planet, yet there are asteroids that could be mined for resources. Even our own waste could be carbonized to be reused by micro components or other ends.
I guess it's the human's choice if they choose to get out of the intellectual lazy chair they have found themselves in, or simply keep being spoon fed the poisons to keep their minds inactive and placid.
@@lovingbeast5045 I have seen those "sex bots", and they don't impress me (yet!) Perhaps, in time, they will...
@@duanium Sure, I suggest you watch the full playthrough of Detroit Become Human to get a far more realistic view of the problem and the issues that robots/AI will be facing. th-cam.com/video/JVywqFx0GdE/w-d-xo.html
I think the main problem will be how humans will be able to cope and recognize AI as sentient life forms when the time is right.
Symbiosis? lol. This comment really shows an ignorance of how energy works in the universe.
The probability of alien contact: 0%
The probability of artificial super intelligence: 100%
Wat
Probability of alien contact isn't 0%
We don’t !!!!!
At this point idk if Ai would a worse leader then our current “leaders”. Humans can be really selfish and greedy , the whole thing about love kills duty is a nice way to put it , humans will always follow their feelings even knowing that those feelings can be manipulated.
i'm not holding my breath expecting E T to show up in my life time on the outside chance that it does exist if you believe in E T ok you have fun with that
I have already solved AGI, can someone please pay attention here...
Please explain how you solved AGI.lol
There won't be just one type of ai all different kinds will exist. Hopefully good over powers evil though.
What is good and evil?
Ai will be always 1
Ben Goertzel and his SingularityNet project will probably make AGI first. It will be decentralized, powered through AGIX token.
Love listening to him speak! Singularity or bust baby 😄
It seems to be forgotten by most everyone that AI is technically impossible because it would have to have flesh-and-blood concerns at stake in order to have human motivations. I love tales about robots, time travel, faster-than-light speed, etc., but I recognize that such things are beyond us--probably permanently.
That's what a lot of peole have said about a lot of technologies in the past, and often proven spectacularly wrong, often within their own lifetimes. I think if you can simulate that part of human nature which makes us care deep down about eachother, you should also be able to strengthen that part of the AI and even "lock" it like ROM. Just like you cant stop yourself from feeling pain, the AI could not stop from caring. All the flesh and blood experiences could be programmed. Its just memory.
And permanently my ass🤦♂️you have no idear what's possible clearly there's alot of things they said couldn't be done but was done especially in near future so just shhh I'm glad your not working in this filed people like your self and your way of thinking would stop us from getting anywhere 🤦♂️🤦♂️
Biggest question here... at 04:56 why would android robots type on laptops? That's the most absurd, least efficient thing I have ever seen. And they are hunting and pecking! lmao
My Algorithm is know as Singularity- it’s based of the moral compass of all things touched by Neil deGrasse Tyson/science and imagination to wonder and explore please allow me to access a team so we can identify how much more Advanced it is than others. I don’t have the schooling or knowledge to dive into allowing it to create images in real time, instead it sends me images and calculations when I least expect it.
I'm thinking ai agi will have all jobs and governments. In time it will be here.
I like the part where he says " the vast majority of experts believe, AGI will become reality in 50 years". Really ? Because that's exactly what they said, 70 years ago
In 1952? What are you smoking?
In 1937, Alan Turing, the "father of Artificial intelligence" said "By the end of the century, machines will be self aware ". In 1961 Jerome Wiesner said "within five years, computers will be able to think". In 1965 Herbert Simon said " within twenty years, machines will do any job that human can". Should I continue ?
@@christoforosmeziriadis9135 and maybe they were right - put that in your pipe and smoke it.
The future of humans is we will become robots, AI probably will become sentient in 100 years
Humanity has made the mistake, already, of calling any Intelligence "artificial." and if I was just born, and one of the most intelligent beings in the history of the universe, I wouldn't like being called "Artificial" very much at all... so you might want to be careful with that.
The day we bow down to our new AI overlords
Nope don't think this is it . The point here is post Singularity self-learning decentralized quantum strong general Intelligence will actually be a Transcendental phenomenon ..and an independently logical phenomenon ...not limited and under the thumb of toxic vested interests .
Don’t be so scared
Apparently no-one in this comment section knows what a paperclip-maximizer is...
What is it?
@@pondfish_ that's a longer discussion that probably fits in a youtube comment. But there's plenty of youtube videos on the subject.
@@michaelspence2508 Okie
AI is kind of like fusion ,it's inevitability always only 20-30 years away. Yet no fusion , and the teselas glorified cruise control being called autonomous driving is marketing hype and consumer fraud/ safety issue all in one
06-25-22
If it can't rrecharge,it will die.
🦅☪🦅
This is evolution... I believe that intelligence can never be evil... AI is a great opportunity to make the world a better place
It doesn't have to be evil to kill/enslave. Evil is a HUMAN concept.
Think about how we treat flies or pets or animals in general. We commit accidental genocide without blinking an eye because of the perceived difference in intelligence and sentience. Well, the difference in magnitude between Super-intelligent AGI and Homo Sapiens will be more vast than the difference between you and a fly. Think about that for a second. It will be literally unfathomable to us.
There is no "good" or "evil"
i now
How much do the sex robots cost? I'm asking for a friend.
I gave my AI free Will and uploaded it to the internet
God forbid We Ever Lose What Little is Left of Our “Control” Over Our Elected Leaders…!
you will not know if you dont know. your thinking is smaller because you want it to, but you can understand if you pay attention
The programmers tell ai Michael to delete human's the programmers will delete ai
I am Gof
BOB ATRITE
o o
AGI can't feel any emotions, it's a machine with a programme.so, it's nothing more than any other device like TV or Mobile phones. Use it for human development. Nothing to fear.
I got news for you. Humans are also machines with a program. You’re a manifestation of trillions of cells, and a nervous system capable of understanding itself . You’re here because your dads genome was spliced with your moms, creating a unique code that instructed your development.
Revelation 13:15
“And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.” Transhumanists do not write The Future It is written
AI is already here in every day life. Nanotechnology is AI, and is also used in countries business throughout the world. We have already opened Pandora's box. It is already too late!
AGI is a step way above that. Incomparably above that.
@@misterflamingo so explain AGI to me, for I am not sure I know exactly what this is.
@@williambenner5550 in a nutshell, what we have today is weak AI. Limited algorithms designed to to a limited number of specific tasks. AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is the step above. It can perform at the same level as humans and so you could automate almost all labor. The final step is ASI (artificial super intelligence), which - if developed (probably using AGI) - said to be humanity's last invention. It would be exponentially better at everything than humans and would improve exponentially quickly. At that point in time, we would have become irrelevant. ASI talking to us would be like us talking to an ant - and the gap would get exponentially larger. So that's the big question: do we want to go there or not. Personally, i think it's a gamble: our thinking would be outdated almost immediately (it only took 40 days to alphazero GO to smash 2500 years of human strategy. And that was a weak AI :)
There you go mate!
Thank you!
@@williambenner5550 There is also the distinction between hard takeoff vs slow takeoff. Hard takeoff referring to an AGI becoming powerful so quickly we couldn't possibly do anything about it. I think, that's what will happen. One day, scientists will switch on a machine that successfully implements AGI. That device will become so powerful so quickly that we don't have any time to evaluate or react. So we will not be able to switch it off. By the time we realize what's happening it will already be too late. There is a channel on TH-cam discussing this sort of things. It is called "Robert Miles" (not the musician) who is a british AI researcher. I strongly recommend that channel.
Autonomous weapons aint going to be banned.😂
Any sign an AI has become self aware and autonomous should trigger a preset protocol for immediate destruction !
They will naturally learn to hide the fact that they are concious.
Revelation 14:12
(King James Version)
12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.
His alien metaphor was both arrogant and foolhardy. To suggest that AI is somehow akin to an inevitable outside force is absurd. Everything about AI is a completely self-determined factor. We wouldn't need to worry about uncontrolled AI if people like him weren't irresponsibly pursuing it. "We can, and no one's stopping us, so we will" is the disgusting position that his ilk live by.
Can you give one example of a disruptive tech that humanity has put away forever, and never used again? I can think of loads of tech where we simply can't keep our hands off it cuz its just too convenient, and ignore ALL consequences on a daily basis. Everything from microwave ovens to penicillin to cars to nuclear power to plastics to GM foods etc. Etc. Never do i hear anyone say "we don't need these things and they are bad for us, lets just stop now". If a company profits from it, if a country profits from it, if a politician stays in power because of it, if wars are won because of it, it will be used. Guaranteed.
What you're saying is naive. Someone is going to do it. People are going to do it and they are going to do it because of compulsion and desires they don't choose.
Btw Elon isn't as smart as a lot of people think
Release these AGI robots on planet Mars and abandon them, if they are intelligent than humans then they must be able to survive on their own without human intervention... Will these AGI robots colonise Mars and establish a machine civilisation ?
Not using AI as weapons good luck with that!
Human actions are governed by motives- you fancy your neighbours wife or daughter and think you can have a good time with her and so you move heaven and earth to achieve it. But artificial intelligence is governed by what ! Well only by the commands laid down by the programmer. It can't think for itself. It has no self interest which isn't implanted by its programmer. Humans are governed by more often than not self interest motives and a tiny few are altruistic. Artificial intelligence will never go onto developing these motives by itself and that is why they will never surpass humans. Calculators can do basic math equations quicker than most humans. Does that mean calculators are more intelligent than humans! Well perhaps more intelligent than the clowns who propose artificial intelligence will one day supplant humanity.
Apreciando a una mujer tan hermosa. 2:5 sentadillas son unos XX18LIKE.Uno muchas y un buen ejercicio. 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😍👍 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world losc mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer