How Effective is the Pantsir?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024
- The Pantsir is a highly flexible, short range air defense weapon. It's finally began to see operational use in Syria.
I started a merch store. Get cool products & help support the channel!
teespring.com/...
For business inquiries/sponsorships - gregr1251@gmail.com
If you'd like to help support me continue to create videos, you can do so here...
Patreon (Monthly) - / covertcabal
PayPayl (One Time Donations) - www.paypal.me/...
Discord - / discord
Amazon Prime 30 Free Trial - amzn.to/2AiNfvJ
Microphone I use = amzn.to/2zYFz1D
Video Editor = amzn.to/2JLqX5o
Military Aircraft Models = amzn.to/2A3NPxu
Military Strategy Book = amzn.to/2AaqwST
----------------------------------
Credits:
Footage:
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
creativecommon...
The NATO Channel
Department of Defense (US)
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
KCNA - North Korea State Media
Music:
BTS Prolog - Kevin MacLeod - incompetech.com
Tunguska Image
Author: Leonid Dzhepko
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
Tracked Pantsir Image
Author: Vitaly V. Kuzmin
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en
Great video as always man!!
I think the S-300, S-400s are effective, but not the Pantsir.
mobile.twitter.com/clashreport/status/1233474077374976000?s=20
Bombed Pantsir
@@editschannel1716 Yes, Pantsir is bad, S-300, S-400, Tunguska, Shiika, Buk, Kub, and Tor are better.
@@coastalcapybara pantis is litterly a Upgrade of the tunguska just Looks worse
Hey mat
We are missing your videos
Thank you for your high quality work and your ability to admit what you do not know for certain. You always create well researched videos that continue to impress us!
Thank you and have a wonderful day!
Well said
@vctjkhme well 0% on hits cause couldnt lock cruisemissiles
In all, 105 weapons struck the Barzah Research and Development Center outside of Damascus, the Him Shinshar bunker, and a storage site near Homs.
"Taken together … these attacks on multiple axes were able to overwhelm the Syrian air defense systems," he said.
McKenzie also said that Syrian air defenses fired up to 40 surface-to-air missiles "without guidance," and that they were "largely ineffective" as they had not managed to shoot down any US aircraft or prevent the intended targets from being destroyed.
The Syrian Air Defense Force controls four air defense corps, eleven air defense divisions and thirty-six air defense brigades, each with six SAM battalions. It is equipped with 650 static S-75 Dvina, S-125 Neva/Pechora and S-200 launchers, 300 mobile 2K12 Kub, Pantsir S-1 and Buk launchers and over 4,000 anti-aircraft guns ranging from 23mm to 100mm in caliber. There are also two independent 9K33 Osa SAM regiments, each with four batteries of 48 mobile SAMs. An unknown number of S-300 system were delivered to Syria in 2018.[1]
We already felt abandoned. Glad to have you back !
Worth the wait brother-
His videos are always non-bias and very informative.. but I hear you 🤣, lol.
🇹🇷 BayraktarTB2 💣💣💣= Pantsir ☠☠☠☠☠☠
th-cam.com/video/7H7JoENyY4g/w-d-xo.html
I like your neutral and unbiased attitude and a neutral approach towards any topic. You are more open for new probability which makes you look and behave in different way. Keep it up.
This is a decent technical assessment based on available info without bias well done.
Was destroyed yesterday by turkish drone in Syria when was active.
Fake video u w...
You are fake Pretorian.
It was a fake video
paco 1738 even russia admitted that 2 pantsirs were hit, idiot
PRETORIAN İtsn’t
Pantsir: Who are you?
Bayraktar TB2: I'm your nightmare!
Pantsir: What will you do to me?
Bayraktar TB2: Don't be afraid. You will not feel anything!
😂👍
hhhhh
I hate it when my antiaircraft systems start to target birds. That’s my hunting not my robots!
Very effective in Battlefield 3. Keeps them damn spawn campers out my fuckin base
Damn robots, not only do they take our jobs, now they’re taking our past times as well.
Great for feeding the troops though
not so: th-cam.com/video/_1ehI0iCHf4/w-d-xo.html
@Hammer 001 Wtf son!? Greece autonoumously operated the S-300? Dont bullshit me, they even didn't use the goddamn System that has been bought! And how Come you claim that they could operate it themselves from day 1? No one can operate a exported SAM System that they haven't been in the design or manufacturing process.
turkish drones destroyed it easily in Idlib syria
Their new drones have machine guns....scary.
Naah its fake
@@pascojm6816 how so?...there are numerous reports stating otherwise.
@@scottleft3672 reports? I also heard them but i have my ways for more info
@@pascojm6816 It is not fake, all sides confirmed it...
Tyrkish drones TB 2 destroyed 3 PANTSIR S-1 in northern Syria.
Its fake
Its real
@@editschannel1716 , evidence ?
@@makschelyaba3214 www.defenseworld.net/news/26433/Turkish_Drone_Strike_Destroys_Syrian_Army___s_Pantsir_S1_Air_Defense_System#.XoDIakqhmUn
last pharagraph, former Russian officials statement.
“The Pantsir might’ve either used up its ammunition reserve, or it was simply turned off. It wasn’t battle ready,”
@@muraxz , its fake news. photo and video - fake. car model - fake
The Turkish unmanned aerial vehicle hit the 17-million dollar Russian-made pantsir s2 system with a $ 20,000 missile MAM-L missile ... Turks make very good aircraft ... :))))))
Turk : my sultan said it, must be true, also let's go support the terrorist because why not?
@@dylanhaze1455 relax man) it is confirmed by also Russian Empire:)
Sihahahahaha😄😄😄
@@dylanhaze1455 fuck the tsar and fuck you euroweaks
You must mean turks buy very good aircraft.
My cousin have Kamaz truck 20 years old...after resent Floods all mercedes trucks was full of water but not Kamaz,ugly but still a beast...
you moron Wurlag
Even russians living in Russia prefer to buy Mercedes civilian truks than Kamaz civilian trucks, actually Kamaz civilian trucks have poor reputation of being extremely unreliable even in their domestic home market of Russia. Mercedes military truks have excellent reliability but I really doubt your cousin had chance to drive military grade Mercedes truck unless he was serving as military driver
@@marjanperveinis8355 everything is possible in russia
@@Inbokssoftwere russian armed forces do not operate Mercedes military grade truks
@@marjanperveinis8355 I didnt say they did
Pantsirs are great targets and their rotating radars are only effective at scaring away flies and mosquitoes.
Wtf, I am of no sides but you made me laugh into tears. Fuucking very nice joke.
But he's wrong jokes or not.
AK-79 Well considering the inferior export version managed to down more than 30 Turkish drones since the start of the year because the Turks are literally making them run out of ammo by just chucking drones at them I would reconsider your comment
Slavman Dimitri the are no exports versions right from the Russian stockpiles
@@yuu9258 Israel Air Force destroyed 2 of them Turks destroyed 4-6. Azerbaijan Air Force destroyed 6 s-300
When you see a russian pantsir, stay away, there might be åa Turkish drone in the air.
hahaha :D
Good one
Syria has the export version. The Russian Pantsir, and other russian defense systems, are untouched because it is not an export version and it is meant to work with a lot of other defense systems. Pantsir on its own can do only so much. If it is easy to attack these systems then why do they always fail to attack the russian Pantsir?
@@zjpdarkblaze prove that the export version differs.
@@zjpdarkblaze In all, 105 weapons struck the Barzah Research and Development Center outside of Damascus, the Him Shinshar bunker, and a storage site near Homs.
"Taken together … these attacks on multiple axes were able to overwhelm the Syrian air defense systems," he said.
McKenzie also said that Syrian air defenses fired up to 40 surface-to-air missiles "without guidance," and that they were "largely ineffective" as they had not managed to shoot down any US aircraft or prevent the intended targets from being destroyed.
The Syrian Air Defense Force controls four air defense corps, eleven air defense divisions and thirty-six air defense brigades, each with six SAM battalions. It is equipped with 650 static S-75 Dvina, S-125 Neva/Pechora and S-200 launchers, 300 mobile 2K12 Kub, Pantsir S-1 and Buk launchers and over 4,000 anti-aircraft guns ranging from 23mm to 100mm in caliber. There are also two independent 9K33 Osa SAM regiments, each with four batteries of 48 mobile SAMs. An unknown number of S-300 system were delivered to Syria in 2018.[1]
Pantsir s1 is original just like s-300. Kys.
Not effective... Turkey and Israel destroyed many Russian Pantsir and BUK SA-17 with Armed Drones in Syria. 😂
The syrian operators sucks, that's what happened
"On 21 January 2019, an Israeli air force attack destroyed two Pantsir-S1 systems.[64] One of them run out of missiles and had called for re-supply ; the operators were waiting a little distance away from the system and one of them had left his mobile phone in the operator’s chair which was sufficient for Israeli intelligence to track and destroy the system.[65]"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantsir_missile_system#Operational_history
@@internetisinteresting7720 Turkey did better than Israel actually. Turkey first deployed their KORAL Electronic Warfare Jamming Vehicle in Syria. 200+ km range. They confused,disabled every Russian AA. And the UCAVs bombed the Russian Anti Aircraft Systems. Some sources even claim that one S-300 got hit as well. :))) Russia is a Paper Tiger.
@@icemanchambers1207 Russia whas not operating thouse systems, call me when Turkey destroy with a drone an anti-air defense system operated by russians.
@@internetisinteresting7720 actually your explanations do not hold water. Yes Israelis did destroyed inactive pantsir, but they also destroyed active one too that was firing missiles. Turks destroyed at least 2 of them and if we are to believe Russian sources one of them was destroyed in Libya where Wagner terrorists operate them, that means Russian soldiers, also in Syria explanation is that Turkish ECM pods jammed it while in Libya it was destroyed even without those ECM pods deployed. One thing is certain, Pantsir is not as good as Russians are trying to present it and all their "explanations" do not hold water.
What is even worse unlike Israelis who used stand off weapons to hit and destroy pantsir, Turks used slow flying unmanoeuvrable unstealthy drone armed with unproppelled guided bomb that needed to be very close in order to be launched, well inside pantsir range...
@@armija I support "Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham" and rebels groups. I lie to my people to make believe in a victory when in fact we suffered a terrible defeat...
Who am i ?
In their intended role, very effective & should be treated as such.
Treated by a HARM missile! :P
Do a video on Russian military electronic warfare.
Very interesting
You are obsessed with Russian junk. He should do a video on Operation Rimon 20 instead.
Yes! They really developed some interesting systems. Like the artillery EW shell. Meant to disrupt communications.
Boring on operation rimon 20.
Israeli F-15I & F-16I ain't gonna get close near the S-300. The F-35I ain't gonna get close to S-400. Russia deploy EW vehicle to jammed enemy airborne radar, awacs, cruise missile, uav, and satellite.
Russia would just use the Su-35S to chase the F-35I away or attempt to shoot it down as warning not to come near their military base.
@@Armored_Kong Reports of the F-22 vanishing from the air in eastern syria whenever the Su-35 takes off...
If you think about it, then such a system is needed for any army. The idea is great. In this video, the first modifications of Pantsyr-C1. Today it is a significantly modernized system with additional functions, identified shortcomings have been eliminated, and with new missiles against drones (they have a smaller container and are installed on top of the main missiles).
Those issues related to Pansir system in Syria are NOT of technical nature, but rather caused by human error... I think we can all agree that the Syrian Army is pretty deficient in its ability to properly operate the tech that the Syrian government purchases from Russia or other countries... dont know why that is, maybe carelessness or maybe something else...
Also, there are several different variants and modes of operation that Pantsir has... one of the modes of operation is a fully automatic mode where it basically acts as a IRON DOME (KUPOL) where the airspace is completely denied in a specific half-sphere ... so it can be large radius, low altitude (10km radius at 2km height) or it can be high altitude/narrow radius (5km radius at 10km height)... just imagine different *bubbles* in airspace which are covered for specific types of air targets... and pretty much shoots down anything and everything it deems to be a threat within that specific *bubble*... but for the most part the system is designed to be a *cooperative mode* between between Human operator and the Automatic detection system. If the operator is NOT paying attention to the scanner and the system is in semi-auto mode...guess what...nothing happens...
@Haitham Murshed LMAO... Why would Russia or Russians be scared of Jews in Israel??? That makes no sense at all... Russia is like 1000 larger than Israel if NOT MORE... Has every imaginable natural resource... and has 20 times the population and Largest Nuclear Arsenal in the world...
Why would Russia be afraid of Israel or the Jews...nonsense...
Jews or Israel dont control Russia... they control US foreign policy in Middle East...
Always great stuff, articulate and detailed.
It makes you wonder though how many SEAD assets had to be used to get the Pantsir's engagement rate down. We necessarily don't hear how much of a pain in the ass the Pantsir complexes were to overcome. Cruise missiles fly low but are awfully slow (and don't jink to avoid interception), I for one am prepared to believe we lost quite a few to Pantsir. We leak like a sieve, if a story "got out" about lots of cruise missiles getting shot down, the likelihood is that intel is coming from our own operational personnel.
1 HARM missile of a HIMARS rocket should do the job!
No Russia didn't show any evidence of 1 shot down except for 2 or 3 that whet astray!
Give it stompy legs and it would make a great looking mech.
+ Russia: Pantsir S-1 exists
- Turkish Drone: I am about to end this man's whole career
15 Turkish drone destroyed in LIbya so don't get too excited.
@@mistergeopolitics4456 serious 😂😂 Drones just smashed 10 Pantsir S1 in Libya during 48 hours, as 20 of May. Cry Russo fan bois🦃
Please talk about North Korean artillery positions
Search for ‘Google earth North Korean artillery .kmz’ file its nuts
The April 2017 airstrikes targeted more than three sites, the Russian MOD said there were more than three impact sites, they had a detailed list of every cruise missile that was shot down and by what, every cruise missile that didn't make it due to technical malfunction, and to he ones that landed. I think upwards of twenty or thirty hit, or so they said, that was out of almost 100 missiles. It was a long time ago, I don't remember all the deets.
I personally prefer you doing individual systems, I like hearing your analysis and opinions.
Who would win? Pantsir or mud.
ukraine
The only time it's been destroyed is when it's been switched off and inactivated and unmanned and not activated and just parked out in the open
This Pansir system is the best delicacy appetizer for Anatolian Eagles (Turkish drones). The best Turkish delight in the Libyan market you can get for the Eid Alfitri!
The thing about anti-aircraft weaponry isn't the quality of the system, but the number of units. The best system is useless if it runs out of missiles and the worst system can give full protection if there's enough units of it around protecting the would-be target location.
They're really really op in BF4 :(
FrogMstr lol
You stupid
FrogMstr thats another similar system lol , the tunguska
I was about to make this comment.
Your mom's op
Good to see you back
Actually, there's at least 2 which where found abandoned in Ukraine:
1. Stuck in mud - tyres popped off the rims - it was later torched by locals
2. Another one in good running condition - simply abandoned.
update: according to oryxspioenkop blog tracking Russian equipment losses 4 units were captured or destroyed.
Well done, sir. Thank you for doing your videos.
Main nutrition of the bayraktar TB2 😁
XD
lol less than 5 systems have been destroyed for cost of 22+ tb 2s stupid
Nothing's perfect. And the operators can make all the difference. You can't put an idiot in a Ferrari and expect him to win a Grand Prix.
Also I don't understand why people find it hard to believe Syrian air defense shot down numerous cruise missiles. Umm hello, cruise missiles have been shot as far back as Gulf War 1 by soldiers with machine guns.
True. The thing I look for is evidence though. Maybe they did, maybe they didnt. Right now, I see no proof they did (I'd love to see the evidence to the contrary though). But you are absolutely right. I think alot of people underestimate the importance a well trained crew can make.
@@CovertCabal I enjoy your channel and like the analytical work you do but surely you can't be serious when you say "I see no proof"! There are videos of intercepts and there are videos of shot down missiles. There are also videos of the damage to the sites that were hit by the missiles and they show nothing consistent with what would be expected of sites hit with over 100 missiles! Everything is available on TH-cam. Suggest you take a look around.
Syria is an Arab dictatorship - you can't believe anything they say, especially about their military "achievements". It lies even more than Russia.
@@pacus123 There are no videos of intercepts. There are videos uploaded with the title "intercept", but which don't show anything that looks like an intercept.
That's right, there is nothing that is perfect and indestructible, but if we are objective and realistic ... What is said and video clip similar to the Pansir system, currently does not exist when talking about the air defense of the short and medium range ... Pansir, is certainly number 1. There are also Tunguska and Tor systems. These are the best systems in the short and medium range, air defense, not by some of their capabilities, but by all means, from radar, radar range, range of cannons , the rocket range ... It was like this to someone or not, it's so ... I do not understand why someone it can not believe that a large number of cruise missiles have been shot down ... in 1999, Serbia was overthrown, that means more than 40 cruise missiles were over 20 years ago, and over 40 Unmanned aircraft various manufacturers and variants .... And to systems, watch now Bofors 40mm and the Praga 53/59 30mm system ... Like the mid-range Neva 125 and Kub 2k2 ... As well as theamong other things, three combat planes, such as F-16 and F-117A ... There's one in the museum in Belgrade. Destroyed by Systems from the 50's, 60's and 70's of the last century?!? Why could not someone do it today, with 10 times, more modern and more advanced, and above all better systems, such as Pansir, Tor ... And even though these systems, the untrained Syrians are left in the middle of the runway, , which is clearly visible and the radar does not work on the record itself ... For destroyed cruise missiles, there are recordings, organized an exhibition, destroyed cruise missiles in Syria ...
Shots of destroyed cruise missiles and unmanned aircraft in Syria
www.intermagazin.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/DbnvM4mWAAM7mOp.jpg
th-cam.com/video/omS7jKfaBSg/w-d-xo.html
Tomahawk missile destroyed in 1999, in Yugoslavia / Serbia.As well as some of the destroyed planes
Tomahawk missile destroyed www.ekspres.net/drustvo/pala-kod-cetinja-i-raspala-se-ovako-je-oborena-prva-tomahavk-raketa-lansirana-u-agresiji-na-jugoslaviju.
F-117 destroyed en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_F-117A_shootdown#/media/File:F-117_(Canopy,ejection_seat,wing;_shot_
th-cam.com/video/XmqLyn4Q15U/w-d-xo.html
F-16 destroyed th-cam.com/video/iGCnEqDJpsE/w-d-xo.html
This channel is like the infographics show but without propaganda and biased opinions. Keep up the good work
After that mass USA/NATO missile strike, Russians published hit percentages of various systems, and while Pantsir s1 and Tor and high persentages of hits, Buk's were in 30-40% range, S-200 had 0% and other USSR systems had 5-15% hits. So considering defense was not made by Pantsir S1 alone, it is logical that many passed through while Pantsir had high hit rate.
I really like this system, it's so handy.
Turkish $100k missile (Shot from Drone) takes out these $75 million Pantsirs S1 in batches, videos can be found on TH-cam
@Franc is Is it true that the MAM-L or the MAM-C cost $100k?! I doubt it. They are only small laser-guided glide bombs lacking rocket motors. If this figure is true, then it would be idiotic that the Azerbaijanies use one of those each time they would like to destroy some cheap Armenian field truck, would not that be?
Umm dumbass. Panstir is worth 15 million. One of those Turkish drones costs $5 million. You need to fire at least 10 of those Turkish drones to overwhelm the Panstir. That's $50mill spent to kill a $15mill target.
Thank you for not using one of those terrible speech readers! Good video.
Turkey drones say Hi 😊
Untraind Syrian crew is the fault
Put russian crew inside of that thing with 2 jears of traning the will now what to do
Same with Giving random nation turkish drones with out training the fucing loss that thing fast
@@rayotoxi1509 In all, 105 weapons struck the Barzah Research and Development Center outside of Damascus, the Him Shinshar bunker, and a storage site near Homs.
"Taken together … these attacks on multiple axes were able to overwhelm the Syrian air defense systems," he said.
McKenzie also said that Syrian air defenses fired up to 40 surface-to-air missiles "without guidance," and that they were "largely ineffective" as they had not managed to shoot down any US aircraft or prevent the intended targets from being destroyed.
The Syrian Air Defense Force controls four air defense corps, eleven air defense divisions and thirty-six air defense brigades, each with six SAM battalions. It is equipped with 650 static S-75 Dvina, S-125 Neva/Pechora and S-200 launchers, 300 mobile 2K12 Kub, Pantsir S-1 and Buk launchers and over 4,000 anti-aircraft guns ranging from 23mm to 100mm in caliber. There are also two independent 9K33 Osa SAM regiments, each with four batteries of 48 mobile SAMs. An unknown number of S-300 system were delivered to Syria in 2018.[1]
Cry untrained
@@irseeker9989 fired up to 40 Sam missiles without Guidance ??
From where did you get this articel
And dont belive all Shit shown on The news and News websites
@@rayotoxi1509 76 missiles struck the Barzah Research Center in Damascus, including 57 Tomahawk Land Attack Cruise Missiles (TLAM) and 19 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile-Extended Range (JASSM-ER) air-launched cruise missiles.
22 missiles impacted the chemical weapon storage facility west of Homs, including nine TLAMs - all from U.S. ships - eight Storm Shadow air-launched cruise missiles from UK aircraft, three Missile de Croisière Naval (MdCN) cruise missiles from French frigates, and two SCALP air-launched cruise missiles from French aircraft.
Seven French SCALP missiles hit the associated bunker complex near the second target.
Air assets operated from bases throughout the region included US Air Force B-1B bombers, which fired all 19 JASSM-ER missiles, escorted by Air Force fighter jets.
The operation “significantly crippled” Syria’s chemical weapons capabilities and despite reports of evacuations of some production equipment and other materiel, some fixtures were likely too large to move to another, safe location.
U.S. Marine Corps Lieutenant General Kenneth McKenzie, the Director of the Joint Staff, said the Syrians had been unable to have any “material interference” in the operation and all the missiles reached their targets.
- McKenzie said there had been no indication of a military response from "actors" within Syria, but that American troops in the country remained ready to defend themselves.
- He described the mission, which was coordinated so that the 105 total standoff weapons all hit their targets around 4 AM local time in Syria, as “precise, overwhelming, effective."
Theres more on that.
Also there were picture of fully fucked chemical shit
It's not bad it just seems that the radars hade problems with small drones and cruise missiles but all they learned in Syria has been implemented in the new SM version with new AESA radars and new missiles.
That was a Pantsir on the runway. It’s not an odd location at all, it’s a strategic and tactical location. The Russians were using it to determine Israeli accession and targeting times/sequence for their Percision guided munitions. Knowing this, they could hone the ability of the Pantsir to respond in the quickest and most efficacious manner. The real work was done by the nearby Pantsirs/air defenses well hidden/less obvious collecting data from the one on the runway. They put it on the runway, again, because that’s the one The Israelis would see first and target first, and those times are important to the Russians and the Pantsir defenses !!!!
Joe Mikey They could probably also drive it around while firing back in the event of an attack
So it was a sacrifice, clever😏
Unfortunately the real work by the nearby Pantsirs didn't come either.
One hell of an expensive sacrifice
There were people manning that Pantsir. Using it as a "dummy" doesn't sound so...clever. I recall one Syrian soldier dies and a few wounded. Then again, who knows with Arab countries and their soldiers...
Might be a good system, but you gotta keep the tires maintained.
i have to say Tor M2 is one of the most impressive AA Systems out there.
Pantsir: No one can stop me!
Bayraktar Drone: Come here lan amk çocuğu
Pantsir: CYKA GO BACK GO B...💥💥🔥
i love when people say im sure you all know what it is, and this is literally the first time i've seen it.
I don't know if you have mentioned this before but the two guns are actually double barreled.
Could you please make an updated version why the pantsir faired so badly against turkish drones.
22 tb2s where shot down in different operations just to destroy 2 systems. I'm talking about the confirm hits because Turkey is based in propaganda
@@FRATTELO from what I have heard it was 1 pantzir down and one damaged. And tis was the Syrian air defense. That in the end is is not so good .
@@solidsnake0408 1 destroyed and one damaged ok then but the operation was that I just told 22 tb2 against 2 systems
@@FRATTELO yep . Further more having in mind the quantity of the attackers I assume that they where taken down by saturation.
it was so effective against those drones in ukraine
These short documentaries are excellent and objective overviews -- keep up the good work; very much appreciated!!
Israel says it works better if you turn it on first.....
Yea, they was lucky there, hadn't been for it was for that, those pilot's wouldn't could comment anymore
@@udontknowme7798 - aside from your horrible english, there's no pilots in the planes use by Israel. it's suicide drones.
@@gendarrion911 your english is equally horrible.
@@udontknowme7798 There are literally videos of Israel destroying active Pantsirs as well, so...
@@johanlassen6448 found none of them. Provide links.
At the Syrian air base 2017, pantsirs were operated by Russians instructed not to interfere with the American strike. Although, it cannot be told whether the Russian government ordered their troops not to shoot, it is likely that the only air defenses used were the S 200 missiles operated by Syria. It is likely that some missiles were shot down, but as you said a lot definitely made it to their target
It is true though that pantsir has underperformed compared to the other anti air systems. Which is why I think they are developing new models
pantsirs was designed to see and drop anything that comes close to it. it has UHF radar capable of tracking targets as small as 0.01 square meters.
and about the ONLY ONE that Israeli managed to destroy:
the admin cut the video of Israel targeting the pantsier in Syria into two separate screenshots.
I've seen the whole video. the crew were outside smoking or some shit which is visible in the full video. just google it. even one tries to run back but he was too late.
and this dude shows it like the system failed to track target.
Pantsir is a relatively new system, and this was its first operational use, much less against a capable enemy like the US and Israel.
It is natural for any new system to show many shortcomings, and have them fixed one by one with time. This is exactly why Russia used the Syrian war to test many of its new systems.
Pantsir will take a lot of time and money to mature into a polished weapon system. Of course, sometimes the problems may be so fundamental that they require a major redesign and it is cheaper to ditch the whole design an try again. We don't know if this is the case with the Pantsir.
Israel's destroyed the Pantsir multiple times now, and even filmed it, without breaking a sweat. I think it's fair to say that it's ineffective and obsolete against a modern airforce. Russia usually overhypes its systems as a way to sell them to its third-world client states.
@@lan6947 the system was clearly unmanned in the first instance and reloading without cover from other units in the second, these are point defence units to be used as part of an integrated layered group. They are not survivable, alone in open territory as stand alone SAM batterys.
he cut the video of Israel targeting the pantsier in Syria into two separate screenshots.
I've seen the whole video. the crew were outside smoking or some shit which is visible in the full video. just google it. even one tries to run back but he was too late.
and this dude shows it like the system failed to track target.
@@mac6899 hey I'm from the future. The pantsir was destroyed multiple times on footage again but this time they were clearly operational. One was actively trying to engage targets. I believe it's massive failure is more than likely from EW jamming the same thing that allows Israel to dance around the S-200. But that's just speculation
@@lan6947 and israel never ever overhypes its systems, as we can see in Gaza
I can confirm this... the Pantsir kicked my ass several times in Battlefield 3
UPDATE (5/21/20): In total, 13 Pantsir-S1 systems have been destroyed in Libya!
5 more is destroyed in Libya by Turkish UAV's. Easy peasy!
3 Pantsirs destroyed in Libya. 15 Turkish drone shot down since the start of the year.
@@mistergeopolitics4456 This Brian must be a Russian cyber-troll. It shouldn't not be hard to accept defeat or fail when it happens. Turkish Drones just destroyed 10 Pantsirs in Libya during 48 hours, as 20 of May.
@@mistergeopolitics4456 Let me give you a link: twitter.com/clashreport/status/1263250605621030912
Go to this link, follow Clash Report. We have live footages of destroying active Pantsir-S1 systems, systems that shot down during transportation, even systems that are destroyed in bunkers! In total there were 13 Pantsir systems that have been massacred by Turkish UAVs in the last 2 days. Crazy right!? I'm sorry mate but we do have evidence, what do you have?
Nevertheless, If we assume 15! drones are shot down, LMFAO, It is just a low budget drone, no human, nor an operator were harmed! Comparing a 15 million-dollar system to a not even a million worth drone is another argument that I don't even wanna emphasize on lol. Let's not be a hypocrite, just applause the one of the biggest success on war history.
@@dunyamalibabakishizada7744 8 Pantsirs have been destroyed all together so far. 15 drone shot down. You call me a troll ? I'm just stating facts, you're the troll, acting like a hopeless fanboy.
Sounds like a good intermediate prototype.
Pan sear is how to trap the flavor in a thick steak before you cook it
Mike D The steak is better than this cheap ass system. Israel destroyed this system at will. It’s shit
Rookie it’s not shit, though I would be wary of Russians over claiming its efficiency. Those vids show drones attacking these machines when they are vulnerable.
@@31069johnny Israel also destroyed the USS Liberty at will. And you are supposed to be allies of the USA? rofl.
Make steak not war....medium rare.
Pantzir S1 is in Syria,footage shows Pantzir S2 while Pantzir S1 was covered.
he cut the video of Israel targeting the pantsier in Syria into two separate screenshots.
I've seen the whole video. the crew were outside smoking or some shit which is visible in the full video. just google it. even one tries to run back but he was too late.
and this dude shows it like the system failed to track target.
'Bout god damn time you uploaded! Now review some North Korean hardware please :D love your channel!
As always, great video.
That thing is badass
No it's just bad
@@sharonishere you could have said its an Ass
Pantsir S1 is upgraded do SM using discovered faults in Syria, specially this in regard to defending from certain slow moving UAV. Israel used this to keep their suicide drone long enough over the area of Pantsir operation,waited until it used all the ammo and hit it when it was offline, waiting for resupply. Syrian crew incompetence helped a lot as they did not have any backup AD unit covering the area and left the truck out on the open in the middle of a runway while having a smoke break ...
@@leonleonov8418 There was one video where another Pantsir was overwhelmed with missiles, yes. The drone that recorded the footage didn't destroy the unit , it was done by another missile seconds earlier. But what;s new there, any system can be saturated with missile. Israeli Iron DOme gets saturated all the time by home made rockets from Gaza or Lebanon and nobody calls it a shame. They are still good systems. Only naive people think there is an unbeatable system. Syria problem is they have no layered defense and Russia won't give them due to close ties with Israel.
I think this was the one which Israel destroyed in Syria
Israel overwhelmed it with 60 smart cruise missiles. Have you read how the Hamas fired dumbed rockets to israel? Iron dome had a hard time intercepting all those rockets.
@@carlosdomingo1453 haha and you believed that shit? 60 cruise missiles for this? lmao. iron dome didn't have hard time, it's known fact any battery have 20-30 missiles and shoot 2 missiles at target to make sure, hamas can do math unlike you dummy. they shot a lot..
@@shaulsharabi2637 just go and read some news. Hamas missiles landed on Israel land. Just use you little logic in your head if you have and think how can hamas missile landed on Israel if the iron dome is so damn effective.
@@carlosdomingo1453 IDF said 87% of the missiles were intercepted, without Iron dome with that amount of rockets they shot (up to 600) they could destroy half of sderot maybe, but than they will be turned into a parking lot.
@@shaulsharabi2637 now that's ridiculous. I will return your fucking word to you. DO YOU BELIEVE WITH THAT SHIT? 600 SHITTY MISSILES.
Turkey destroyed 15 pantsir in lybia 😂😂😂
And 9 pantsir in syria 😎
@Odyssey 💋 va tinformer au lieu de dire des annerie
The thing about the video is: The Pantsir wasn’t on active duty. Shooting down some inactive weapon systems isn’t something special. It’s an accomplishment but none I‘d brag about.
My opinion about some of those experts: I personally don’t trust them. I rad so many different articles from so called experts about so many different weapons that I started to mistrust these articles. I rad articles about how good or how bad the NATO tanks like the Leo-2A6, M1A2 Abrams or Challenger-2 is. There are also articles that claim that the F-22 is a total failure or that the Zumwalt is a success (we all know that this ship isn’t really a success). I wouldn’t rely on such articles but that’s just my opinion.
Anyway, glad you uploaded another video. I really enjoy watching them and I hope you’ll keep it up, we’d all appreciate it. Stay safe and healthy buddy! Best regards from Germany.
what about 21st jan
Which is harder ? Avoiding it , destroying it , or stealing it ?
No weapons system is perfect and in most cases comes down to the competency of its operators. In the right hands I'm sure the system is quite efficient. Having said that, there a threat many systems in syria and only one successful strike was touted in the media. One assumes these systems are number one on the kill list for opposing air campaigns so it stands to reason they are more formidable than anyone cares to admit
Ngl it looks pretty comfortable in the Pantsir
When you see a russian pantsir, stay away, there might be a Turkish drone in the air.
Or stay away from propaganda news , the Turkish said they destroyed 8 pantsir but in the region were only 4 and only 2 got destroyed so I would take those news with a grain of salt if there are no proofs
44 baryaktars fallen in lybia . Lybia has only 4 pantsirs 🤣😂🤣😂
Imagine being some random Syrian bird and getting shot down by a fucking Pantsir because it misidentified you as a target.
Who's here after Turkey wrecked couple in Libya? Lol
Turkey also lost 15 drones in Libya since the start of the year.
@@mistergeopolitics4456 1 pantsir 30 millon dollar 1 turkish bayraktar drone 500k dollars not same thinks .
@@nidalsancak8181 WRONG. 1 Pantsir $15 million 1 Bayraktar $8 million.
Brian Granville those drones belong to the GNA and were sold to them, so its no loss for Turkey. And the cost of an Bayraktar is not more than 5 million $.
@Ani061me15 No it's not. Turkey lost 20+ drones and 3+ air defense systems in Watiya a few months ago. Here's the proof www.lostarmour.info/libya/
Nice video man. 👍👍👍
The best conbination
C-400 and pantsir-S1.
Perfect sistem !!!
if you add "Thor" - you can fight with aliens
and add S-350 just in case and maybe Buk also and in future also S 500
In all, 105 weapons struck the Barzah Research and Development Center outside of Damascus, the Him Shinshar bunker, and a storage site near Homs.
"Taken together … these attacks on multiple axes were able to overwhelm the Syrian air defense systems," he said.
McKenzie also said that Syrian air defenses fired up to 40 surface-to-air missiles "without guidance," and that they were "largely ineffective" as they had not managed to shoot down any US aircraft or prevent the intended targets from being destroyed.
The Syrian Air Defense Force controls four air defense corps, eleven air defense divisions and thirty-six air defense brigades, each with six SAM battalions. It is equipped with 650 static S-75 Dvina, S-125 Neva/Pechora and S-200 launchers, 300 mobile 2K12 Kub, Pantsir S-1 and Buk launchers and over 4,000 anti-aircraft guns ranging from 23mm to 100mm in caliber. There are also two independent 9K33 Osa SAM regiments, each with four batteries of 48 mobile SAMs. An unknown number of S-300 system were delivered to Syria in 2018.[1]
that truck is like 5*2 pixels on google earth, nobody can identify that
Depends on historical imagery, corroborating information, and the skill of the analyst
Great content!
Watch Sunday's video from Israel's air strikes on Damascus. Pantsir missed, and then missed again. It then got hit twice by precision glide bombs. Extrapolate that result to other air strikes to find the probability of Russian claims of success. We now have at least distinct individual video of Pantsir being completely incapable of performing it's stated mission.
It could not defend itself, much less defend the area to which it was assigned.
Cause having 20 missiles coming at you from all angles is gonna stop them. It took israel 40 missiles to hit 2pantsirs so good luck with that
@@cosmonautbilly9570 The missile which shot down the Israeli F-16 was a SA-5. Not the Pantsir system.
@@hooman008 I know there are two separate Pantsir air strikes in that video. That is because two Pantsirs were destroyed along with six SA-2 and SA-5 sites. In addition to a radar destroyed.
You blind idiot.
I love your channel!!!
The Pantsir shot down all 500 missiles of the 100 missiles launched at Syria!
It was even able to intercept and destroy all missiles that haven’t not been launched yet!
lol right hahahaha I get your joke
Welcome back!
Hahah pantsir is garbage, waisted money.
It has shot down dozens of Turkish drones so it's not garbage. It's just a matter of the Turks overwhelming the airspace with drones, not caring how many they lose.
@@mistergeopolitics4456 pantsir cant work as a standalone system its vulnerable to EW. thats how turkey and israel hunt so many
@@canb5517 Pantsir is not meant to be a standalone system but looking at the big picture, 15 Turkish drones have been shot down in Libya since the start of the year so it's not useless and it does work. But I mean look at the size of the radar it has, it can only do so much, especially an inferior export version.
@@mistergeopolitics4456 15 is a very speculated number and the unit cost of bayraktar tb2 is so much less than pantsir and buk. its clear that lna wont be able to cover their air space with these systems. thats why bae now donates mig29s to lna. its also speculated that turkey will deploy hisar-o systems so we shall see how the battlefield will evolve in the coming weeks and months :)
@@mistergeopolitics4456 the Pantsir used in libya is UAE ones which helped Cofunded the system in 1999 and baught 100 of them in return, so its not an inferior export model. also Turkey used koral Jamming system to neutralise its threat & not ust used sworm of drones as u may of assumed, and just to add to this turkish UAVs have destroyed more than seven pantsir in less than 48 hours in Libya, in what is known as the Pantsir massacre
so yeah turkey has proven more than one time that it can target the system
/watch?v=kog6F0mFdK0
Last heard that one of this system was taken out by the Israeli Airforce in Syria. How they got around it seems to be classified and the Russians are not acknowledging its loss.
Turkish ANKA-C and BAYRAKTAR TB-2 armed UAVs destroyed many russian SA-17 BUK and SA-22 Pantsir air defence systems in İdlib, Syria
TRTRTR🇹🇷💪🏻
welcome back
Hope they come with a user manual so the Ukrainian farmers can put them to use
Especially when their air defense keep getting withered down.
"This may be subjective, but it looks awesome"
Nah that's just a fact
Turkish drone has destroyed 8 panstir in less than 3 days
Proof?
You forgot to mention that Putin has had cancer for the 20th time. And the Russians are running out of ammo, again 😂
Everyone have forgotten the fact of how Syrians dont have integrated air defense. Crew is probably not the most capable. And Syrians operate S1 version. Not upgraded models or S2 variant.
Do a video on the iron dome since 400 rockets were shot into Israel yesterday
Hezbollah homemade rockets barrage attack is not really impressive now is it?? Imagin hobbie rockets with explosives strapped to it.. and there you go.
The Iron Dome System is very very impressive stuff bottom line BUT... very expensive too and luckily ... Israel has plenty of US War Slush Aid..
What on would like to see is a Iron Dome VS Patriot VS S400\S300
@@barbosaguzman6101 agree I'm not asking for a video about hamas rockets made from telephone polls
@shareofhonor how many of those 25k missiles are actually battle worthy? ... you understand the logistics and equipment required to fire all those at once or even succession of batches? ... Iran would be firing those over many countries- Qtar, Syria, Iraq for example and risk escalating troubles for themselves?
Just hitting you with some reality here mate no drama..
I may be one of the only ones who didn't know what this system was when I first clicked.
Good job ,good video
What about the hundreds of drones that were shot down in Syria?
Surely that can't count to 19% of effectiveness?
Lmao u should learn maths if you think 6 is equal hundreds.And you sir if you believe when putin says "tHeY diDnT sHoOT tHeM" you should believe erdogan too 😂
@@oklahoma7213 44 baryaktars tb2 only . Many more improvised.
Apparently the Pantsir likes to track bigger birds (as in: animals) and ignores smaller objects such as small drones. Source; some Russian journalist writing about Pantsir in Syria. Don't remember name but it's googlable.
- russia best anti Air System in the world
- IAF Pilot: Hold my hummus
חחח
@Ben Silva never Said that. Israel studied the enemy weaopons and their weakness first before they Take IT out
Hummus is a Palestinian dish
@@user-rd5nc1nb9fhummis is middle eastern food. Many jews lived in middle eastern countries before they were persecuted by the Muslims.
There is No such Thing as Palestine 🤣
@Ben Silva Anti-Radiation missiles are your friend. SEAD is a thing.
Commander: How's the new anti-air system working private?
Soldier: It is really good,the enemy is shitting their pants,sir.
Favorite victims and cannon fodder of the Turkish Bayraktar
Only after 50 bayraktars been destroyed. Then you get one kill and are like cheering loudly! DUMBASS!
@@pacus123 the problem is that drones are comparatively cheap as fuck. I don't think it's a fair comparison though because export versions of the USSR and later Russia have historically always been downgraded
Once that thing goes over a bump it lookz like its gonna fall apart
Is this the same defence system with was destroyed by Israel in Syria ?
3:42
You can see in the video that Israel released the Pantsir radar was not turned on.
This system could be overwhelmed with a few missiles and be taken out
That's what Israel does in Syria make the Pantsirs give away their posistion and fire all their missiles then strike when the Pantsir is being reloaded.
Numbers of these S1 Pantsir of Russua in which they supplied to Syria have knock down by a Israel cruise missile Deliliah . Thd forerunner of the Pantsir S1 is the Shilka carrier is also a Radar guided anitacraft guns
@@wetlettuce4768 can you name any sam that is capable of shooting anything down without missiles?
@@ГеоргийМурзич Considering SAM means surface to air missile no I can't.... However there are several anti air systems that can use cannons to shoot down incoming threats, Pantsir is one of them with 4 rapid firing 30mm guns.
pantsirs was designed to see and drop anything that comes close to it. it has UHF radar capable of tracking targets as small as 0.01 square meters.
and about the ONLY ONE that Israeli managed to destroy:
the admin cut the video of Israel targeting the pantsier in Syria into two separate screenshots.
I've seen the whole video. the crew were outside smoking or some shit which is visible in the full video. just google it. even one tries to run back but he was too late.
and this dude shows it like the system failed to track target.