FINALLY The S-500!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- Go check out kommandostore....
Sign up for their mailing list and get 10% off first order!
We started a Podcast - Tac Ops - / tacops - or find it on any typical podcast location
For Business Inquires - CovertCabal@Ellify.com
If you'd like to help support me continue to create videos, you can do so here...
Patreon (Monthly) - / covertcabal
PayPayl (One Time Donations) - www.paypal.me/...
Discord - / discord
Names at the end are of supporters at Silver Level on Patreon, and $10 or more on PayPal
If you would like to have your name kept private, feel free to send me an email, or contact me through Patreon
Amazon Prime 30 Free Trial - amzn.to/2AiNfvJ
Microphone I use = amzn.to/2zYFz1D
Video Editor = amzn.to/2JLqX5o
Military Aircraft Models = amzn.to/2A3NPxu
Military Strategy Book = amzn.to/2AaqwST
----------------------------------
Credits:
Footage:
Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
creativecommon...
The NATO Channel
Ministry of Defence of Estonia
Department of Defense (US)
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
KCNA - North Korea State Media
Music:
BTS Prolog - Kevin MacLeod - incompetech.com
creativecommons...
BAZ-6909 Image
Author: Vitaly V. Kuzmin
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en
Yeah, my neighbor too threatens me with ballistic missiles. Hopefully KommandoStore and the S-500 Prometheus will fix this problem.
Put legos on his lawn
What about Nord VPN? And raid shadow legends? Do they help with ballistic missile threats?
the best will be to nuke him first
Ivan can’t even nitrogen purge fucking NVG tubes, god forbid you buy anything that is supposed to actually do anything other than exist.
I feel like the KommandoStore ad got edited.
This’ll come handy when my neighbor flies his little drone copter over my house...
😂
If kill is good
Overkill is better
If it works
🤣🤣
That thing can even shoot down satellites, lol
Once s2000 comes, it'll be able to shoot down missiles and planes before they are even constructed
S0000 will be able to time travel back to the person who developed the target.
Temporal missiles.
😂
almost as good as the anti-RPG systems on vehicles that detect and destroy RPGs before they're even fired by the user.
That’s impossi………………….
Getting excited about a weapons system... Within every man is a 7 year old and it's great.
ayy
If not for the shit salaries, I would have loved to go into missile development. It's just such intricate and extreme engineering, utterly pointless to human development but yet so satisfying.
I remember discussing the apache helicopter with friends in elementary school. Maybe you're correct.
@@gebys4559 what sorts of projects do you enjoy instead?
That’s hilarious, I’ve had that backwards for years 😂
Watching Russian missile launches in snow always has an 80’s vibe to me.
'Spies Like Us'
@@daltonv5206 Wolveriiiiines
@@TheCJUN Haha was thinking the exact same thing.... ;-)
@@JigilJigil F-16 and F-15 still rule the sky, completely undefeated. Both were designed in the 70s so they can be considered 60s technology with modern gadgets.
this didnt age well
Binkov releases a 50 second video.. mean while here we get a full 11 minutes. Awww yeah
I have generally preferred this channel
@@kameronjones7139 As do I. Binkov focuses more on being entertaining, but sometimes gets his information wrong. Cabal goes all in on his topic.
There's a sweet spot between informative and entertaining. 11 mins is not that spot. Still upvoted though.
I like both. Binkov gets into wargaming stuff, emphasizing the geographic and social implications of the scenarios he looks at. I'm not into the fantasy stuff (Modern supercarrier vs Japanese Navy), but I like his analysis of how potential modern conflicts could play out. I like this channel too. Little fluff and information is expressed very efficiently.
Binkov prefers fairy tales. He is even very late for the Sukoi LTS 😊
Irony watching this after news that it couldn't handle ATACMS
1976 built ATACMS 😅
S-500 wasn't even stationed there. That's an S-400 (2008)
R.I.P S-500
It’s hilarious watching this video 2 years later.
S-500 main purpose is to intercept priority targets, such as: awacs planes on 500km+ distances, warheads on final part of trajectory, low orbit intelligence satellites and etc. F22/35 or any other jets are not priority targets for this system, with them will handle S-400, S-350, S-300, Buk, Thor and Pantsir, depend on distances.
But all of those will be destroyed by cheap Turkish drones and Israeli suicide drones. And the Russian ppl will still live on 13000 USD a year. 🤣 Which Western country are you living in?
@@joshc.1871, i live in Moscow - the capital of Russia ))) You, buddy, should more use your own brain instead of listening the trash-talks from the west politicians. And of course, should watch west TV less than you actually do it. Dollar of course is the powerful weapon, but missiles are better in many occasions)))
@@serghw Watch the footage. You can easily see many russian systems being defeated in Syria and Armenia. Turkey is in Nato, you think that we won't pull apart and study the S400? Like we did in Greece with the S300. NATO pilots train against Russian/Soviet aircraft, and A2D weapons, while Russian pilots are lucky if they get 100hrs a year. Let's be real Russia is an arms dealer now. You sell your subs to india, your carriers to China, air defense to Turkey. How is the Kutznesov doing? Rumour has it you'll sell an S500 to india and we'll make a big deal about how we don't want them purchasing it, but the truth is we'll soon see every detail about it if we haven't already. Russia can't even make modern jets without partnerships and when those fail the jet gets shelved.
And no one worships the dollar more than Russian politicians
@@CDSAfghan The US still has no tactical answer to the S-400, all the currently operational air to ground missiles and smart bombs are ineffective against it . Besides Turkey (despite obsolete nato membership) is closer to Russia now and has no interest whatsoever to share any sensitive information with the US given the recent history of their relationships ( state coup, syria etc) and their exclusion from the F35 tech sharing. They would weaken themselves by doing that anyways, they just bought it, why would they be dumb enough to reveal its secret and lose trust from Russia for no gain.
Normal people love watching vids of cars they’ll never afford.
I love watching vids of military tech, that I’d have to steal to use.
I do both... lol
I watch because our army can buy it
@@ThatCarGuy
The name says it all my friend 😁
@@dhurjatinarayangiri1590
Where you from bro, your name sounds Desi 😎
@Tanveer Ahmed Tantray
Facts 💯
My neighbor recently purchased several D26 ballistic missiles so this will come in handy
Imagine a situation in the hood💀
@@mnemonicpieThere are SSBNs in the pools
I'll believe the S-500's prowess when I see it in action.
Until that time, it's just more vaporware, like the T14 Armata and the SU-57. Heck, its predecessors the S300 and S400 have been pretty underwhelming, as has the Pantsir. It can't even target low and slow flying drones in Ukraine, something it was specifically designed for.
Russian military equipment since the cold war appears to be more propaganda than anything else. It fails once it hits the field,
Same goes for NATO's Javelins, Stingers, M177, HIMARIS and any other weaponry, that sent to Ukraine. As they not stopping "Russian military equipment, that appears to be more propaganda than anything else".
Modern warfare is a battle of cost effectivness. You can spend $10mil rocket to take down a $5mil drone, but it is not a great outcome.
And all videos i watched, where S300 or S400 were shown "underwhelming" are in scenarios against overwhelmingly bigger threat both in numbers and cost.
Like 20 tomahawk missiles and 10 F-35 with bunch of expensive rockets. With total cost of literal $billions destroyed S-400 system with couple buks, pantsir and other AA systems with total cost less than a $billion.
Nobody says S-300, S-400, S-500 is unkillable complex of unpenetrable defense. It's just these complex systems are the BEST in terms of quality and cost.
I havent watched much about Patriot systems. But i know for a fact - its more expensive. Even if Patriot is better than S-400, but more expensive. 5 Patriots will perform worse, than 10 S-400. And why buy 5 Patriots if you can get 10 S-400 for the same price? (numbers are not exact, just to show an example).
P.S. i actually googled it. First article CNBC tells that S-400 complex costs $500mil. While patriot battery costs $1bil. Funny that i actually got numbers somewhat correct xD
By this logic, Western equipment is mostly propaganda too.
We don't have more credibility by default.
I was under the impression that the reason TB2's did so well in the early days was because the Russian AA wasn't even looking for targets as their commanding officers were lied to by command that Russia achieved total air superiority.
However the Pantsir being a disappointment is also very likely.
@@RegulatorSevenZeroSeven look, even the Patriot is a "dissapointment" if you hold it to difficult criteria. Air defense units aren't made to be 100% effective.
Even the Iron Dome has a 90% chance that reduces if overwhelmed.
If 1000 grad rockets are fired, about 100 will pass through. Does that make it a bad AA System if something passed through? Absolutely not.
This is a serious treat to birds having fun around the neighborhood
No they use ecology friendly fuel.
@@vitalegvitalegov carbon free?
1:01 to 1:04 randomly cuts all audio, not sure how or why
i noticed the same and was looking for your comment!
Same
Same
Are the rumors true that the S500 was destroyed in Crimea 6-28-2024?
I have ordered 5 for my lovely family!
what a lucky family!
For them, or against them? :-)
At the end, every air defense system has their own strength and weaknesses. Even the top line air defences has either the speciality to defend against cruise missile, aircraft, or ballistic missile
thats why you have to combine and support them with other tech
Actually China recently kind of developed interesting thing for ships (but may be done on other platforms as well). So the main benefit of this system is that it has 8 launch pods and 3 types of rockets, one against huge missiles (ballistic or cruise ones), second for height altitude or long range jets, third type is placed as 4 in one pod (meaning that it fit in 1 pod but those are 4 rockets) and those required to shutdown fast but close targets like ones which gone though first two types of rockets.
So all together it allows to target any type of threads from singe lunch station which is sound pretty cool.
Anyway those are marketing information, how good those rockets and target lock systems we don't know and I hope that we will never know.
Make love, not war, peace brothers!
@@Volodymyr_SVD Yup, American Arleigh Burke destroyers started that decades ago. Chinese copied the design. Like they do with everything else.
@otto Lincoln like what? Please, name what was copied?
Probably for the best. You can't make one for all. Small drones to slow moving aircraft for instance definitely should not be using missiles.
The S 500... The size of thing is outstanding to me.
inb4 destroyed in crimea
Damn, being a passenger on a Ukrainian airline just got a lot more dangerous.
Ukranian air defence ( the ones Who shootdown the mh17) never will have this beauty
Ukraine shot down their own plane? Got a source for that claim amigo?
@@madara8918
They be so incompetent to do that. They have shootdown the malasian mh17 and the siberian ones.
Sorry they shootdown the mh17 on porpouse to justify the biden's war
@@ignaciomunizdiaz5194 MH17 happened before Biden's presidency?
@@mattatenta1444
LOL... THE NUDLAND PAPPERS PROOF WHO BE JOE BIDEN THE ONE WHO ORDERS THE UKRANIAN COUP AND DICTACTORSHIP. OBAMA ONLY WAS THEIR PUPPET
Nice one! At 7:20 you managed to say Iranian that sounded almost correct and no like Aye, ranian.
Finally. I ordered one last night, they said it's already been ship. Now i can shoot down my neighbors annoying drone, despite multiple warning they kept violating our backyards airspace. My options were the j-20 or this, but i realized building a runway for the j-20 was very costly.
you pick the right choice bud
I haven't read the comment flow and maybe I'll repeat things others have already said. Your video lacks a lot of known info about the S-500 because it's usually in Russian. I know the language so I can add some useful insights. The S-500 WILL work in unison with the S-400 as an extra layer of defense. No, the radars for the new system are NOT an upgrade or a derivative of the S-400 radars such as the 'tombstone'. All radars are a completely new architecture with no common parts with the older systems. S-400 is after all an upgraded Soviet S-300. The S-500 search & track was tested extensively in Syria to debug the system and validate that the preset goals were met. Russian air defense thinking is based on a philosophy of a layered system divided between the air&space defense troops ( point defense) and the air defense of the ground forces in movement. S-500 will most likely come under the air&space air denese forces to protect important military and industrial targets.
Satellites is one of its important capabilities.
That's correct - the 77N6 missiles shown in the video are designed to intercept other missiles (short range ballistic, gliders, possibly ICBM warheads during re-entry). The anti-aircraft missile is called 40N6M and is an improved version of the S-400's 40N6. The S-500 system (launcher, radar, etc.) in its anti-aircraft configuration will most likely look just like the S-400 with an improved radar and improved long-range missiles that are derived directly from their predecessors.
Also, while A-235 is essentially a Russian's GBI, the anti-missile configuration of the S-500 is said to be able to work as a part of the A-235 system by adding a THAAD-like final defense layer.
It's going to be canonized as a saint by the Russian orthodox Church.
S500 is cute but you can't fool physics.
F35 flying low is untrackable due to earth curvature and stealth until it is a bit too late for S500.
Also they can be easily overwhelmed by decoys.
So nothing special when it comes to real full-blown war.
one thing that was very noticeable from this video, was how quickly the s500 missiles accelerated compared to all the other systems shown, other than that, you can only speculate about it's true capabilities. maybe Russia has figured out a way to accurately track stealth aircraft, maybe they haven't, maybe they figured a way to make a single missile perform well against multiple target types, maybe they haven't.
@@paulbarclay4114 Is there a source for this? i find this highly unlikely, but not at all impossible.
@@KHETTIUS "stealth" is a meme. it's working only, if your enemy have only one radar with specific working wave-length in operational area. if enemy have at least two or/and with different working wave-length, then "stealth" become useless. If you'll look into complectation of S-400, you'll see that there few different radars for detection of targets with different working wavelengths, and there are bunch of different radars that could be added to standart stack.
@@paulbarclay4114 sure they did.
Great analysis, you should create your own channel
maybe but i would like to know how they know that it would funktion even tho they dont have any stealth fighters for testing
Russia: NO! You can't just circumvent my epic missile system!!1!!1
NATO: haha, saturation attack with cheap glider bombs go brr
We need video about A-235 and russian anti-ICBM defences.
These "S" missiles are the reason why america couldn't fine oil in Russia although its plenty over there
And yet a German light plane landed in Red Square making a joke of what, at that time, was the most protected airspace in the world. Trusting russian products is a countdown to failure.
@@maidatenpulamea Delusional Troll
@@peaceiriere2418 go troll the history books u bluepill. The truth will set you free.
How soon before China buys few and then has a whole fleet of them? Then we can buy one on eBay for $19.99 with free shipping.
The HQ-26 already exists
I am more impressed with the capabilities of the transport trucks, boy the kind of load I could move with those ..
Think those trucks drink fuel like a horse.
@@digimaks hmmm we will use natural gas from Ukraine..cheap and clean
What most of these armchair Generals forget is that stealth is designed to BREAK THE KILL CHAIN, not make the aircraft invisible to radar (which is impossible).
The kill chain is the sequence of events and steps necessary for a SAM system to detect, acquire, identify, track and reliably guide a missile to it's target.
If ANY of the kill chain steps fail, the target escapes unharmed or undetected.
The F22 and F35 are both designed to be very good at breaking the kill chain for current and future SAM systems, and the S-500's radar is no exception.
It will fill a defence hole or relieve multiple older systems i dont agree with the razmataz
And for countering that there is the SU-57 concept, with a complete different doctrine of operation than the F22/35s despite the usual comparisons by armchair Generals. The ideia is that the Su-57 is networked with the S-400/500 to protect an area from these western stealth fighter, making it not a stealth fighter but rather an anti-stealth figther. It's known that the long wave frequency radars can detect (not track) these figthers, but then this information is passed to the airbones Su-57s throught network and they can focus their radars energy on these specific areas instead of dispersing throught wide angles and this will allow to track these fighters within much greater range, enought to start engagement in the borders of the no escape zone of air-air missiles. It's a complex task, but these networking can allow the job to be done by integrated algoritms and AI, making the sukhoi pilot just a platform operator. That's where the real complexity of these S-400/500 systems are.
@@malokegames Well, actually, the Su-57 doctrine of usage is fundamentally the same as that of the F-22 (or at least as it was planned, while the F-35 or B-2 were intended to penetrate hostile airspace), both are meant to be operated in an IADS network and do interception jobs that normal air defense cant do efficiently. Your point with large wavelength and the extent of Russian IADS (of which S-400/S-500 are only components) is indeed true and that’s indeed a domain where the Su-57 could shine better than the F-22 since it is supported by a better furnished IADS network than that of the US (which lack the quantity in their homelands despite having a good quality).
@@malokegames
Again, it all depends on the ability of the S-500 and the SU-57 to detect, track and guide missiles onto targets without becoming targets themselves. The SU-57 does not possess enough stealth to act in the manner which you have described without being detected. Furthermore, as soon as it uses it's radar to try resolve long-wave information passed to it by other radars it would be easily detectable, even by 4thGen fighters. This goes for SAM systems using their radars too.
This is why breaking the chain is so important, and why the F22 and F35 excels at it.
The S-500 might be a very good system but keep in mind the Americans intend on confidently using F35s until the year 2060. That should give you an idea of how effective it is.
@@Sajuuk As I said, focusing the Su-57 radar waves to the spot indicated by the long wave radars will make it able to track and guide missiles, it does not have the intention to be "stealth" but to hunt these stealth figthers. And as you said, as soon as the F-22/35 uses it's radar to engage the Su-57 (which they would rather avoid) it would be imediately detectable by the Su-57 or 4thGen fighters in support. I think you still did not understand the russian networking concept involving S-400 and Su-57s. Oh, and don't forget that confidentiality is the repice for failiure, that's just propaganda bs and not what really guides military decisions.
My neighbor doesn't threatened me with a ballistic missile no thank you 😂😂😂😂😂🤟🤟🤟🤟🤟
Last time I was this early, Hitler had just invaded the USSR
Many people has been waiting the S-500 for sooooo long 😁 haha
Oh my God finally!!! My neighborhood has been in a cold war for the last month. My worst one already has a B-2 spirit raider. This'll come in handy keeping it away from my home.
The S-500 is designed to work in tandem with the S-400 in the same way the S-300 did for years. It's just now the S-400 will be dedicated to aircraft, while the S-500 will be primarily for ICBM's, though it isn't uncommon for Russia to deploy multiple launchers types in one battalion, as prior to the S-400, multiple variants of the S-300 would be deployed in the same unit.
There's a chance atleast one of the missile variants has multiple warheads to engage low altitude threats with greater reaction speed than the s400.
I truly doubt that because there's really no point, they have a lot o other anti-air missile systems that do that already. This missiles are way too big and expensive to be used against unreliable target acquisitions.
@@sjwarialaw8155 The larger missile could carry a larger radar to provide better target acquisition and provide a far longer range for the multiple short range missiles within. It would come in handy dealing with large fleets of attack aircraft, drones or bombers.
@@zinjanthropus322 won't deny that is a cool idea but I have serious doubts that any country has the technology to pull that of in an efficient way.
@@sjwarialaw8155 Yes you are correct. Appearance of S-500 doesn't mean they are planning to retire S-400 and S-300. S-500 is basically an ADDITION to the already existing capabilities.
I hope the civilian version of these will be available soon here in u.s.
I'm so excited to finally have this
I'm sure it might be useful against BLM rioters ))))
@@digimaks A sling shot with a good amount of pebbles works fine against protestors imo.
Для вас будет супер высокоточная версия, которая стреляет только по афганским свадьбам ....
@@digimaksпротив ЛГБТ и БЛМ, нужно использовать дубину и огонь.
Yeah, can’t hunt ducks without this bad boy 😊
That THAAD-like system ?
Hell yeah!
@HellYeaNixon the video controdicts that
@HellYeaNixon You misunderstood the video, the S-500 by design is not intended to engage small targets which will instead be engaged by the S-400 or SHORAD elements.
Thaad sux donkey dong
@HellYeaNixon would you use a 120mm tank gun to kill a rabbit?
THAAD = 900kg, 8x Launcher, 150km ceiling
S-500 = 3000kg+ (guess), 2x launcher
Not very alike...
The Russians will probably claim to have a weapon that can blow up Jupiter
You're saying the S-500 probably won't be that useful against fighters, but that's wrong. 500 is bigger than 400, so the S-500 is better than the S-400. It's just like how the Su-57 is better than the F-22, in fact you can tell that it's equal to 1 F-35 plus 1 F-22.
Thanks for the input commie
Air defence systems are fast becoming redundant given they simply cannot operate against something they cannot see, its not just about stealth but more to do with integrated sensor networked battle spaces where carrier strike groups are able to operate well beyond their own ships sensors , operating from well over the horizon , and taking out threats at maximum range , note also example the new B-21 with its integrated technology can work in tandem with like wise air craft within a kill web of sensors and shooters , sitting right on the edge of the battle space 24/7 as a stand off weapons platform waiting to be fed target data tracks !.
This system can literally be the most powerful ever made but you can't forget the only issue with air defense is that they can all be overwhelmed no matter how advanced.
Just because it is bigger does not means it is better, the S-500 by nature is intended as an anti-Ballistic missile system which would operate jointly with the S-400 and other systems such as Pantsyr or the S-350. The S-500 is intended to intercept targets in upper-atmosphere & space so it use an entire different missile which use vectored thrust and nozzles which are quite inefficient in atmosphere. For the task of aircraft interception, the S-400 & S-350 can do just fine if not better as they would likely be much cheaper.
As a conclusion, it all comes down to the IADS network the S-500 is integrated in, if well organised, interception of a threat is likely, if not, impossible.
@@SNOWDONTRYFAN Russia and Iran already have OTH radar.
What is the blob on a stick for? So that kamikaze drones coming in at 300 km/h at tree-top height have something to spot it by from 10 km away .. This chariot is made for a type of war long since obsolete .. That of high flying large fighter-bombers.
US: Don't you dare do it
TURKEY:
Start's mass production of the new S-500
I know that this is a meme but Russia doesnt allow anyone to build their SAMs under license, not even China.
The funny part is that the main SAMs of China are copied and later improved Russian s300 missiles.
@@billwhoever2830 Turkey and Russia already agreed that Turkey will do (Joint-production) of the S-500 search it up
@@Ariez05 Это ложь. Россия не будет продавать С500 пока не будет С600 и производить и делиться технологиями тем более.
@@Ariez05 turkey is a poker face
If it was so true why Russia isn’t in control of Ukrainian 🤔🤔🤔
Once you are spotted 600 miles away from a S500 system, it’s over.
It can even intercept ATACMS... By getting hit by it.
Russia: comes out with a new weapon system.
Covert Cabal: it is shit and cannot do anything, btw American has something better or they are adding capabilities.
I'm sure you already know this is all propaganda.
+Thịnh Nguyễn Quang Your impression from watching this video is that Covert Cabal thinks this system is shit?
TBH screw them both
Yeh it's bunk propaganda, bout the only thing we know for sure is how dangerous they are to civilian aircraft.
I didn't watch the same video you did I guess...
Everyone covers S-500 in detail and no one looking at Su-75.
It seems everyone thinks it's not gonna work
Everyone been waiting for the S-500 for a decades now.
Su-75 is intended for export and will only be relevant if someone orders it that's why no one currently cares
The Su-75 for now is only a mock-up, prototypes are planned for later and it’s only then that speculations will be possible with it. I do believe it has a great potential but I think the price will be higher than 30M$ (likely 60M$ at least) and it needs to have guarantees of being successful at exportation cause otherwise it’s money thrown down the bin. Russia could buy some once it enter service to influence further buyers but it could be a gamble with no further foreign purchase, only time will tell.
Russia wanted to have a deal to export the Su-57 to India, but India didn’t want to help fund the development unless it also got the blueprints.
@@themax9913 the Russian goverment wants to buy the SU 75's
@@lukabogdanovic4658 No, the russian government did not say anything about it yet. The su-75 is a private veinture by the UAC and they are still looking for investment which is why they are so much willing to get guarantees of export.
now, ATACMS has a new target
Wow did this video not age well at all.
Everything has a counter.
And, everything Russia builds is suspect to the myriad of results that are possible from their huge budgetary constraints. peace
Its similar to THAAD, its a mid tier ballistic interceptor. Highest altitude it can go is 200 km if im not wrong, while THAAD at 150 km. Probably will be used in conjunction with the A-135, or the A-235 once it comes out, as a dedicated ABM. For SRBM this will do, or as another line of defense if its bigger brothers failed to intercept MRBM, IRBM, and ICBMs.
THAAD’s official ceiling is 150km, but we don’t know if it’s greater in actuality. Either way, THAAD-ER will be operational in a few years and should close any real or perceived gap. SM-3’s ceiling is supposedly 160 km, but again, that’s “official” and is being improved. Ruzzia still has no analogue for either GBMD for midcourse intercepts, or PAC-3 for point defense (which as we can see, is pretty impressive and vastly improved over older versions). Nor does Ruzzia have anything close to the SM-6, which can hit maneuvering fighter-sized targets at 450km, and is much more maneuverable than S-400’s longest ranged missile. These AEGIS systems also come with much more powerful radars than the Ruzzian systems because (1) the US radar tech is better, and (2) they can draw power from a whole ship (or ground installation) instead of just a truck mounted launcher. PAC-2 may not have great range, but it’s certainly not bad range. Long range anti-aircraft work over land is what the USAF is for.
@@bluemarlin8138 THAAD-ER won't likely be purchased as that would defeat the purpose of Aegis SM-3 Block 1. SM-3 Block 1A can reach 600km altitude. While Block IIA can reach 1450km to 2350km as ICBMs will climb that high. Hence why SM-3 can also be used as an ASAT missile targeting LEO satallites.
The S-500 is using a new type of warhead: A so called cope-head 🥸🤭
**Since I bought a big ass gun, all the bullies in my neighborhood suddenly turned quite polite....hmmm I wonder why**
Respect to the cosmonauts flying on these rockets to space. Doesn’t look too safe.
No Rockets ever used to take humans in space are safe, what's your point? Though Russian rocket engines are considered the best in the world, even the u.s used them for there space missions
@@thomassimeon3138
The joke ------------------------------------------>
_________________You______________
Doesn't look safe? lol Soyuz is the most safe system in the world for transporting men into orbit. And US still using russian rocket engines for their space program.
@@vadrak6197 Not anymore since SpaceX use its own manufactured engines on their own boosters & vehicles, and they did transport astronauts & spationauts (european counterpart) to the ISS.
for anyone who cant get the joke, hes calling the s-500 a spaceship. implying that there is a man inside piloting it. it doesn't look safe because its a missle.
Audio cuts at 1min for a few seconds
Russia's performance in Ukraine is showing that much of the performance of their weapons systems are wildly overblown, all bark and little bite...so color me highly doubtful until they're operationally proven.
Yeah the propaganda war got you too…when the fog of war is over you will now how powerful their weapons are…
@@elozinoemeovrode9779 if their systems are as powerful as they (and you) have claimed, then why not bring them in and end this decisively? Their struggle to achieve aerial superiority is the most glaring issue. With thr current state of their economy from sanctions, they can ill afford to prolong the conflict. For the "second" most powerful military in the world, they're looking incredibly inept right now. And it wouldn't be the first time there's been a revelation that Russia embellished its capabilities. The same thing happened after the USSR collapsed and the west got good looks at equipment inherited by breakaway SSRs.
@@Myungbean Russia has proven it can deploy hypersonic missiles whilst others only have them in concepts
@@quantumedits272 True, but have you looked up the design of the Kinzhal? It's nothing particularly technically impressive. The US and China could probably build something very similar very quickly. It seems to share a stage with the Iskander SRBM, making the Kinzhal a glorified reentry vehicle, albeit one that's fire from a plane. When they break out the Avangard, then I'll be somewhat impressed.
Well no
Most equipment used in Ukraine are outdated
T-72B3 T-80 for example
S-500: Surface-to-air missile
S-1000: Surface-to-space missile
S-2000: Surface-to-galaxy missile
S-2000 ready for when Elon gets to mars
FINALLY the S 500! Now I can get a good nights sleep again
The only thing that can detect and shoot down the invisible SU-57 is the equally unseen S-500.
S-500 works against several target types but its obvious that it is the ABM complement to the S-400.
These system are vulnerable to saturation attacks.
In 2017 the US launched 59 Tomawk cruise missiles to hit Syrian Shayrat Airfield in syn, at various targets in the same airfield. The same tactic with all missiles aiming at any S400 or S500 main radar and control units arriving at different angles would have taken them out because inferior missiles have vast numerical superiority. Not to mention precision ground artillary attacks.
Ofcourse every anti-air system in a world now is vulnerable to such type of attack. But when you compare Russia with Syria and doing far going conclusions i can reply that Patriot is absolutely uneffective due to well known cases when they even did not prevented attack and damage. But we both know that in these cases there were real people operating them poorly and standalone system never decides. Russia primarily developed S-500 for it's own defense which is deeply echeloned and S-500 will be accomplished by S-400 / S-350 / Buk / Thor e.t.c with long range radars like Voronezh, satellites, aviation radars like A-50/A-100 to detect and classify targets. Fleed, aviation and ground systems are now all integrated (like USA does) into complex commandment system which adequately protects key infrastructure objects. Ofcourse all that systems are vulnerable and there is count of weapons and military stuff which can be used to win an exact battle, but then nuclear weapons start being used and all tactics crumble into sand, because very much different nuclear ammo type can be used in different combinations neutraling almost every superiority achieved by saturation. It's like F-22 for example. If it will be used against Russia in it's territory highly likely it will be uneffective and destroyed, because of lack of it's main advantage : stealthness . As we change the territory to USA all changes to opposite outcome: F-22 becomes perfect defender in USA's sky, because it's supported by ground and sea anti-air systems, defended by other aviation so has very strong support. Now Russia does not export S-500 and inventing S-550 system, and imho S-500 will not be exported for at least decade. Every standalone system has drawbacks, while power comes with synergy.
@@glebskakovsky9475 Thank you for very informative reply :)
Countermeasures and counter-tactics are evolving. AARGM-ER fired from standoff range will be able to take out targeting radar. These S series systems are vulnerable.
Not if they shoot from far enough
Now we just need to see if it actuakly exist in numbers large enough to field it or just ge another t14 or their 5th gen fighter jet
That is why the Russians rolled out the new Abakan missile system for work with ballistic targets at the Army-2021 exhibition. Abakan is the world's first specialized anti-aircraft missile system designed to combat high-speed high-altitude targets with ballistic trajectories. Before "Abakan", no one had created specialized anti-aircraft missile systems in the world. The composition of "Abakan" is as follows: unified multifunctional radar (UMR) for reconnaissance and target designation for the guidance of missiles 98L6AE "Yenisei-E"; up to four 51P6E2 launchers with 9M82MDE missiles; power supply means.
Launcher (PU) "Abakan" - from the anti-aircraft missile system S-300V4. Its export version is called Antey-2500. This launcher in "Abakan" is only switched from a caterpillar to a wheeled one. As a rule, caterpillars are not encouraging to potential customers in the Middle East, and this is not least due to the nature of the terrain.
The 9M82MDE missile is a modified version of the product also from the S-300V4 air defense missile system. It is sometimes referred to as a "heavy" rocket.
If there are several Abakan air defense systems in the grouping, it can be assigned a command post (command post).
The performance characteristics of the Abakan air defense system are as follows: firing range at ballistic targets (min / max, km) - 12/40; target height (min / max, km) - 2/30; target speed - up to 4000 m / s; the number of simultaneously tracked targets and missiles aimed at them is 4/8.
The maximum height of the hitting ballistic targets of 30 km looks, at first glance, relatively small. However, when individual developers claim that they will make systems with a height of destruction of ballistic objects of 70-80 km, then statements of this kind raise certain doubts. The fact is that at altitudes of more than 50 km, due to the rarefaction of the air, the aerodynamic rudders of the rocket become ineffective. Beyond this border of altitude, there is already a completely different environment. And it is necessary to make for a rocket or shunting engines, and control the product using gas rudders. Technically, it is possible to solve a similar problem. Only the price of the rocket in this case will be completely different.
It is noteworthy that the "Yenisei-E" UMR steadily accompanies air objects with a very small reflective surface - about 0.01 sq. m. In the mode of firing at ballistic targets "Yenisei" is intended for search, detection, capture and tracking, recognition by trajectory signs for issuing target designation at high-altitude and high-speed targets to 51P6E2 launchers with 9M82MDE missiles.
Another undoubted advantage of "Abakan" (in view of its narrow specialization) is the minimum composition of combat units and vehicles, as well as personnel of the combat crew - 4 people.
Finally...a missile half as good as Patriot.
Does Amazon sell these or do I have to look on Ebay?
That was a great ad. Love the intro lol
I didn't know I was waiting for it!
Thank you for the research in this video!
The S10000 is already here. It goes into the Future to check what happens then returns to undo the past.
I'm not positive of this, but I'm pretty sure that Israel blew the S-400 up in Syria. The Russians said that the crew was poorly trained. I've always seen that Moscow claims they're the biggest and best at everything until they get smashed.
They didn’t
S-200 probably
but not S-400
Do you have a neighbour that's always bothering you? Since when as Russia, on the Eastern hemisphere, been a neighbour to Exceptional America? Funny I don't see any Russian ships floating about in the Gulf of Mexico or BRICS alliance circling exceptional America like The Antlantis Alliance (NATO) as been encircling Russian since the cold war.
7:26 Wow, I sure am enjoying camping here in this desert.
7:27 Wow, I am now chunky soup.
Russia has been more bark than bite for decades. No different.
Same goes for US.
@@vadrak6197 At least we can build a lot of our new toys *shrug*
@@Just_A_Random_Desk just not the hypersonic missiles lol
@@WrathOfImperium they're in development, like our 6th gen lol
@@dseyy3285 Russia did the same thing lolllll
It’s not just the missile. More importantly, the radar has to detect and lock on the target. Do they have a new type of radar that can do that to stealth fighters?
Спросите в Сербии.
I can’t wait for the S-600!
Hurry up!
Im already waiting for s-700 😏
Those modern missiles are so darn fast in their first few seconds of flight... I wonder if they can still improve on that, and how much.
S-800 will shoot down comets and asteroids 😱
Visibly s500 speed is outstanding
For some reason, Covert Cabal videos always have me in the mood to play ICBM and cover the world in nuclear warheads.
Oh... I'm always in that mood...
;)
So only Americans can build an All in one defence system against birds, fishes, rhinos, icbms, airplanes and asteriods.
I know how the system really works.
Russia developed a stare amplifier. Think of it like a megaphone for facial expressions.
So the S-500 detects a threat and then Vladmir Putin stares into the amplifier. Anything is immediately deterred. Planes, missiles, comets. It's been said that entire air armada's just crash as a result.
Can't argue against that. Sounds like it could be true.
Putin still has a lot to live up to. S400 have Stalinium warheads, no one's ever invented Putinium yet
what hypersonic glide vehicles? they're the only ones with one lol
Apparently Russia are deploying elements of this system in Crimea. If so, would it be used to counter the coming F-16's or are they plugging gaps created by recent S-300/400 loses?
And now its gone!!
The B-21 Raider will make very short work of it !..👍🏻🇺🇸
Perfect, i can finally get a surplus 400…
Russian cold launch system for missiles is a work of art.
It can also be used for meteors, it was mentioned in another video...
S-500 was designed to defeat middle range missiles at first place
The USA needs to REALLY come to grips with the reality that Russia is not 40 years behind them, or a rusty army or such. The foremost cause of defeat is under-estimating the other side.
It’s more the arm chair generals who think this way. The US military, does not. Russian is not a push over. Some Americans claim the war will be over in hours like the US has some kind of alien space tech that no one else has lol
They controll the whole internet, and everyone on earth uses the internet, so they can show off there strength and military tech and rank themselves 1st on the google military power ranking charts, but they know they just can't do it...They have all this "Power" yet they cant seem to threaten or scare China, Russia,Turkey and even pakistan isn't scared of them...
@@FusionC6 Multiple countries do have this, the so called "UFOs" you see are more defiantly some sort of Military Tech...Russia and China most defs has these as well...Not just these huge countries, multiple other countries as well...Germany and Turkey as well. They all hide these super high tech, to not give away there secrets that might show them as a threat and start to compete each other...
Decades down the line:
Russia: ‘Yes! We have developed the S-1,200, and it can finally shoot down that pesky American F-22, we’ve tested it!’
America: *Has already developed an aircraft that can go invisible by all metrics and literally teleport*
That thing looks massive and only 2, this is no SAM, shooting that at a fighter or even a reentry vehicle is shooting a battleship gun at a zero fight. Something that big and massive shooting just two birds its cleanly a satellite killer maybe capable of mid flight intercept of ICBMs before they go MRV. This is the Russian SM-3 again only a decade or so two late.
It's possible that I've missed all of the successes of the S-400, but the most intensive battleground to evaluate the S-400 has been Syria. True there are a number of nations flying missions into Syria: the US, Turkey, Israel, UK, and others and so Russia doesn't want Syria shooting down NATO aircraft even if they are attacking targets in Syria. But I have to believe that Syria would shoot down Israeli aircraft conducting missions within Syria.
Interestingly, the S-400 hasn't (at least publicly) shot down anything despite many missile and air attacks within Syria.
Syria has claimed shooting down US, UK, French, etc. inbound missiles, but Syria doesn't claim it was done with S-400's. There have been one or two Israeli aircraft shot down, but not within Syrian airspace and the pilots survived, but I have to assume that if it was an S-400 that Syria would have made that a big deal. They didn't.
So, maybe Russia has put strong restraints on Syria on how and when they use the S-400. Or maybe the S-400 isn't what it was cranked up to be. We (the public) don't know.
What we do know is that Israel has flown F-35's into Iran (presumably as a test of their air defenses) and were not detected.
We know that Israel has used its F-35's to strike targets in Syria. Again, I have to believe that Russia would want to shoot down an F-35 to get all of its technology.
So, like the video, I'm left with wondering if the S-500, which I assume is very capable and likely more effective, is more hype like S-400 than reality. The S-400, at least in a very political context, hasn't lived up to its hype.
The S-400 is in operation in many countries, but except for Syria it has not been tested in combat. And in Syria if it is supposed to shoot down hostile aircraft, it hasn't demonstrated it. The only real hostile air strikes in Syria are from Israel, and the S-400 hasn't stopped them.
Most nations over hype military stuff. Us too. Not like Russia does. It is easier when all the media is state media in the nation. Though China hypes stuff that is not even possible. I still remember a cold ray rifle the state media was talking about in China. At least someone has a sense of humor in China is how I took it. In the US we hype up something before it is done, then cancel it . :P
Can it avoid hitting civilian aircraft?
pretty sure yes because they updated the radar not like the old ones where its hard to find what kind of aircraft is that.
And they still only have 2 battalion, so a total of 4. My bet is most of them are within 100 km of Moscow.
So would the S-500 be integrated into existing S400 sites or would they be separately installed into their own specific sites?
Probably separately for now. That's to increase the range covered by aa
THANKS AND LOVE SIR SOME UPDATE ON SU 75 IF POSSIBLE
Downvote for even partially believing Russian claims about the capabilities.
Nice analysis. Thanks for the video.