I Flew a $3,900,000 Plane and It Blew My Mind (Full Debrief)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 63

  • @AirplaneAcademy
    @AirplaneAcademy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey guys! I wanted to let you know I just launched an "Insiders" Newsletter where once a week I'm sharing an important lesson I've learned in aviation, links to my latest content so you don't miss out, and links to any other interesting or helpful content I've found. I'm also working on a HUGE project I can't announce yet but I'm going to be sharing more behind the scenes info with Insiders first - Subscribe (it's free) at: airplaneacademy.com/insiders

  • @jodybevan6929
    @jodybevan6929 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best review I have watched of my favourite aircraft for my missions.

  • @kentd4762
    @kentd4762 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks, Charlie. What a great experience for you.

  • @jimjernigan3670
    @jimjernigan3670 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    This plane is one reason I keep buying lottery tickets.

    • @Rhaspun
      @Rhaspun 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Win the lottery and buy a Honda Jet. 😀

    • @acasualviewer5861
      @acasualviewer5861 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Rhaspun you'll need a second lottery to pay for the operating costs.

    • @djw621
      @djw621 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s hilarious it’s had the same effect on me

    • @tropicthndr
      @tropicthndr 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Even lottery tickets won’t help you pay for the 10,000$ a year insurance.

    • @2beesfarmstead819
      @2beesfarmstead819 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tropicthndr Its funny how people dont understand the amount of money the lottery pays out. even a "small" 30Mil would pay you 1.5 mil a year at 5%. I am sure that 10K in insurance would be affordable :)

  • @RusscanFLY
    @RusscanFLY 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What a beast of an airplane! I would never need that much airplane, but man that must be such a joy to fly!

  • @aviatortrevor
    @aviatortrevor 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I think the engine is also angled to reduce the left turning tendencies, instead of being in-line with the longitudinal axis

  • @chrisATX
    @chrisATX 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of my favorite airplanes! Great video.

  • @worldofmark
    @worldofmark 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great flying with you Charlie!

  • @jeffreybryner1196
    @jeffreybryner1196 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Charlie, absolutely love your productions. Your "sound effects" part had me laughing. As always, informative and super entertaining. Never lose that sense of humor man. I agree with the reader's comment below -- this is why I keep buying lottery tickets.

    • @AirplaneAcademy
      @AirplaneAcademy  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks a bunch Jeffrey. Glad you have been enjoying it I appreciate you letting me know!

  • @hateeternalmaver
    @hateeternalmaver 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very nice report, loving the technical detail mixed with the personal impressions.

  • @addsub49
    @addsub49 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Charlie,
    This is the first video I've seen from you and it made my day. You are just so happy and stoked to be talking about this aircraft and it really shows. 11:33 mins of watching this honestly improved my day 10 fold.
    Keep up the good work and positive attitude about life.
    -a

    • @AirplaneAcademy
      @AirplaneAcademy  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      hey thanks so much! I'm glad you enjoyed it. It's an easy airplane to get excited about :)

  • @Dan_C604
    @Dan_C604 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great presentation! Did you try the 100? Would you be willing to compare both? Thanks!

    • @AirplaneAcademy
      @AirplaneAcademy  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I did, and have some new videos about that on the channel now. The high level difference is mainly speed (900 is about 30-40kts faster) but the 100 has better short field performance.

  • @ramspace
    @ramspace 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great passion.

  • @jeffreymartin2010
    @jeffreymartin2010 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's good advice for any door.

  • @zarmril
    @zarmril 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was fun to watch

  • @Gmeech
    @Gmeech 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The power should be almost instantaneous in any turboprop. I haven't flown this plane, but if your RPM is set for take-off or landing, then when you add power, I would suspect that you are just changing the pitch of the blades which should be almost instant. Does this airplane not operate like that. Most turboprops operate like this. No spooling up the engine like in jets. You set max RPM for takeoff or landing, and when you adjust power it's instant. When you go around in the flare, the blade should go from neutral to max climb in less than 1 second. Can you advise if this plane is different?

  • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
    @GreenBlueWalkthrough 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:21 Very true like the only one I can think of that does that stuff, better even is the Bell/Boeing V-22 Osprey so yeah the 900 kodiek is very nice.

  • @rmp5s
    @rmp5s 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A plane THAT BIG rotates at SIXTY KNOTS!? That's INSANE!!!

    • @whiffy506
      @whiffy506 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      900hp is an insane amount of thrust.
      I see another pilot out here who flies a Kodiak 100, even fully loaded they rotate below 70kts. I take off a Cherokee at 70...insane.

    • @rmp5s
      @rmp5s 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@whiffy506 Yea, it's a LOT of power. About as much as my GT-R makes! Hope that stays on the ground, shiny side up, though. 🤣

    • @cleekmaker00
      @cleekmaker00 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's why the Kodiak is such a popular ride for many Missionary organizations who do work in isolated places like Micronesia and South America. Those Kodiaks can get into really tight and small unimproved strips.

    • @rmp5s
      @rmp5s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cleekmaker00 Definitely!! Very cool!!

  • @jurepecar9092
    @jurepecar9092 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Next plane to try and get impressed with: Dash-7 (if you can still find any flying) :D

  • @madisonromero3529
    @madisonromero3529 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watching this video I said the line from Napoleon Dynamite probably 20 times. "LUCKY". Seriously that plane is beautiful.

  • @دينناالإسلامي-ر3م
    @دينناالإسلامي-ر3م 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much

  • @glendavis1266
    @glendavis1266 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m suspect that Pratt & Whitney will build smaller turbines that will fit smaller aircraft like Cessna 182! They may be working on it now!

    • @SaltyPirate71
      @SaltyPirate71 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      O&N and Soloy have STCs for fitting the Cessna 210 and 206 with 450 hp Rolls-Royce turbines.

  • @danmcburney3247
    @danmcburney3247 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AWESOME 👍👍👍

  • @nyontozel
    @nyontozel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Charlie, are you in the US or Canada?

  • @joshuapatrick682
    @joshuapatrick682 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The cost of buying this likely 5 million dollar rig (with listed options) is more of a “hold on, this isnt a plane for doctors and lawyers” this is a serious financial commitment. The per 100 hour fixed cost is 171,000… ready for it? Not unless your money makes you money….

  • @SpaceFrawg
    @SpaceFrawg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:40 Three TV screens... ABC, NBC, & CBS ? :)
    These have cable.
    These go to 11.

  • @mehmetvural8095
    @mehmetvural8095 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    have a nice day. cruising speed 400 km/h. range 1500 km. I want to own a sightseeing plane for 2 or 4 people. new. What is the average total price? thanks.

  • @juliojames5986
    @juliojames5986 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With small tires….and fairings, 900 HP. What market or purpose is the target for this airplane ?

    • @davidmangold1838
      @davidmangold1838 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s great for going into short strips in the Bahamas and carribean, with full load of passengers and cargo.

  • @baomao7243
    @baomao7243 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks way fun

  • @CascadiaAviation
    @CascadiaAviation 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gonna get a job flying one Charlie? 😀

  • @Natemire
    @Natemire 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not in Kansas anymore eh? Is that a Cessna reference? Lol

  • @ecossearthur
    @ecossearthur 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤ me some Kodiak

  • @MattMorris481
    @MattMorris481 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only worrisome part about a turbine is the dreaded hot start one of those and you just spent a half a million dollars or more on PT6A-140A.

  • @augggie
    @augggie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No crapper, Deal Breaker

  • @reallynotpc
    @reallynotpc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just a guess, but I feel you may have rather enjoyed that.

  • @joshuapatrick682
    @joshuapatrick682 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is using a turbine to drive a propeller cheating? Probably but its fine

  • @dinocaminos
    @dinocaminos 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    its the copy of the caravan

  • @Hedgeflexlfz
    @Hedgeflexlfz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3.9m for single engine fixed gear is stupid

  • @tropicthndr
    @tropicthndr 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too bad it’s 8000 lbs, because all the best little towns to visit all across America have weight limits on the their runways that are under the 8000lb limit. Which makes all these capabilities useless for anything other than commercial contract work.

  • @patrickdillon-h1o
    @patrickdillon-h1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's so frustrating why don't they show the instruments up close,wings level etc,too much talking

  • @TheSithTeacher
    @TheSithTeacher 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too expensive

  • @redblack8414
    @redblack8414 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    ''This airplane is so cool''. ''What's so cool about it''. ''The coolest thing that I have seen''. What about improving your vocabulary? Using the same word dozens of time in an 11 minutes video is pathetic.

    • @Casey093
      @Casey093 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Yeah, everything being "cool" is not very helpful in a review.

  • @Poopshit420
    @Poopshit420 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Now fly a dollar store plane.