Spaceflight Science
Spaceflight Science
  • 18
  • 391 845

วีดีโอ

Big Data Analytics For Business
มุมมอง 9795 ปีที่แล้ว
What is (big) data? What are analytics? How does it all apply to business?
CYTZ Take-off - Porter 474 - Bombardier Q400
มุมมอง 4847 ปีที่แล้ว
CYTZ Take-off - Porter 474 - Bombardier Q400
[Review] Camping Food - Hurry Curry Chicken by AlpineAire
มุมมอง 1767 ปีที่แล้ว
MEC: www.mec.ca/en/product/5040-964/Hurry-Curry-Chicken
Everyday Science - Cold and Hot Water Plumbing
มุมมอง 4347 ปีที่แล้ว
Due to a water leak, I discovered just how far into the hot water "domain" the cold water supply is fed. It turned out to be a pretty big surprise for me!
Aircraft Wing Configurations
มุมมอง 22K8 ปีที่แล้ว
[In a few minutes] I'll cover different wing configuration aspects like wing sweep, aspect ratio, etc.
Airplane components/Parts of an aircraft
มุมมอง 3.9K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Covers all the major components of an aircraft, from wings to control surfaces and landing gear.
Aircraft Engines
มุมมอง 11K8 ปีที่แล้ว
[In a few minutes] In this new series, I will explain a fundamental concept on aviation, aircraft or aerospace as simply as posssible. Here I'll cover the three basic types of aircraft engines - piston, turbine and electric
Accuracy and Precision
มุมมอง 74410 ปีที่แล้ว
Are accuracy and precision the same? Are they different? How so? Find out!
Liquid Rocket Engine Cycles
มุมมอง 83K10 ปีที่แล้ว
An overview of the various liquid rocket engine propulsion cycles.
Great Circle Distance
มุมมอง 102K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Calculate the distance between two cities.
Position & Motion
มุมมอง 4.1K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Preamble video - Recommended you watch these before the others.
Coordinate Systems
มุมมอง 3.4K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Preamble video - Recommended that you watch these before the others.
Special Orbits
มุมมอง 3.3K11 ปีที่แล้ว
These are baked on Thursdays only.
Common Orbits
มุมมอง 5K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Can be found here, there and anywhere. Go find one.
Classical/Keplerian Orbital Elements
มุมมอง 128K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Classical/Keplerian Orbital Elements
The Physics of Stable, Closed Orbits
มุมมอง 10K11 ปีที่แล้ว
The Physics of Stable, Closed Orbits
What is an orbit?
มุมมอง 13K11 ปีที่แล้ว
What is an orbit?

ความคิดเห็น

  • @mjr1965
    @mjr1965 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The greek letter for the anomaly is "nu", not "mu". Mu is a completely different letter.

  • @mohamedfaisal6202
    @mohamedfaisal6202 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks

  • @conned
    @conned 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If N-S/EW method is more than actual air distance,it's ok, more conservative for fuel mgmt, 3%cont. Thanks for your easy to understand method, truly a maths genius

  • @LendrainResearch
    @LendrainResearch 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    8:48 to completely determine the orbit one parameter is missing. Its the location of the perigee / argument of periapsis (little omega). It is the angle from the RAAN to the perigee as you mentioned afterwards. The true anomaly locates the exact position on the orbit

  • @zooziz5724
    @zooziz5724 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you. What a brilliant video. Exactly what I needed

  • @parthprajapati4647
    @parthprajapati4647 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beautifully explained

  • @nimetullaherensarioglualum6843
    @nimetullaherensarioglualum6843 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a clear explanation !!!

  • @quantika72
    @quantika72 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like until the day the three body problem is resolved, orbits will continue to be a physical impossibility

  • @GeorgePlant-c5c
    @GeorgePlant-c5c ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the best explanation of orbital elements that I have ever had the pleasure to rendezvous with.

  • @RedInk-ey9hx
    @RedInk-ey9hx ปีที่แล้ว

    😂😂

  • @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426
    @hafizuddinmohdlowhim8426 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is one mistake in this video. The intersection point between orbital plane and equatorial plane is the vernal equinox.

    • @mjr1965
      @mjr1965 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The intersection between the orbital plane and the equatorial plane is a line, not a point and it does not define the vernal equinox.

  • @carlatteniese2
    @carlatteniese2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don’t you mean the length of the lines denoting the periapsis and apoapsis? These distances don’t possess radii.

  • @gman7011
    @gman7011 ปีที่แล้ว

    I spent an hour trying to get the pros and cons from other videos on the wing placment, and none of them where able to explain what you did in just a few minutes! Thank you a ton!

  • @sarath4815
    @sarath4815 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks you very much

  • @tallnavyguy5382
    @tallnavyguy5382 ปีที่แล้ว

    It would help to have a Playlist on TH-cam comprised of your videos on orbits.

  • @tallnavyguy5382
    @tallnavyguy5382 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video, I love it! However, you gave the wrong ratio for the mass of the moon as compared to the Earth. The Earth is in fact, 81 times more massive than the Moon. You stated that there is a factor of 4 difference. This is incorrect. However, if you consider their relative sizes, then that is true -- the diameter of the Moon is 1/4 that of the Earth. You are assuming that the Moon has a density of 1, which it does not -- the Moon has only 1.2% the mass of the Earth.

  • @fepatriot
    @fepatriot ปีที่แล้ว

    How would you calculate the distance from Toronto to Johannesburg without using the assumption that the earth is a globe?

    • @marcg1686
      @marcg1686 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh look, a mindless flattard who doesn't understand the implications that his stupid belief has for distances that are in fact verifiable.

  • @EM-sx6jn
    @EM-sx6jn ปีที่แล้ว

    "You know that this is an eliptical orbit because, 1. I said so".. This is America, so drop the childish arrogance. You are not in Bangalore anymore. 😝

  • @DevineOne
    @DevineOne 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    interesting. Each degree is 60 nautical miles. Therefore 60x120.228 = 7213.68 nm. Converting nm to km = 13359.74 km. A bit closer to the real answer. Your final equation is the same to calculate the angle of a celestial object at a specific location and time. I've been learning celestial navigation formulas the past week so searching came across your video. Nicely explained.

  • @captainduct5082
    @captainduct5082 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Heey, it's been a while since you've uploaded, how's everything man?

  • @solankiyagnesh4328
    @solankiyagnesh4328 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Angle for argument of periapsis is explained wrong. It continues to go more counter clockwise till it reaches to the most nearest point to the earth. Can you check it once again?

  • @grumbledig1730
    @grumbledig1730 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro I just wanna play fuckin Kerbal

  • @rabhyapersonal8053
    @rabhyapersonal8053 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best

  • @prathameshmore4739
    @prathameshmore4739 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was brilliant. Thank you so much.

  • @koceilamehalaine6328
    @koceilamehalaine6328 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good stuff. Y did yt waited so long to suggest it to me. Yt->2gulag

  • @skryyper6706
    @skryyper6706 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful thanks

  • @viktortrantobrauner4829
    @viktortrantobrauner4829 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much omg

  • @GeoScientist121
    @GeoScientist121 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    OMGGGGGGG where were you when I gave my Satellite Geodesy Exam...... This could've made it super clear.

  • @carltonbauer2779
    @carltonbauer2779 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The most clear definitions I have found. Thanks much.

  • @samaryadav5943
    @samaryadav5943 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You very much for the explanation

  • @priyanshisharma8332
    @priyanshisharma8332 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for a clear explanation! I was stuck on this topic for so long and finally got the understanding.

  • @Jeff-vi2of
    @Jeff-vi2of 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Minor mistake by 10:43 : the Unit actually is m^3/(kg*s^2)

  • @kannanraja3258
    @kannanraja3258 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing

  • @pukhrajmansion8445
    @pukhrajmansion8445 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    GREAT 👍

  • @wawrow_-
    @wawrow_- 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    where liquid rocket engine eevee

  • @BadenBadenSwitzerBaden
    @BadenBadenSwitzerBaden 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do we know this? First, because I said so. Second, because it looks like it. Love it! Very well explained video, thank you!

  • @zabairghafoor888
    @zabairghafoor888 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    is the first method also known as a rhumb line ??

  • @zabairghafoor888
    @zabairghafoor888 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just helped me while being on search for this for like over an hour !!!

  • @feelingzhakkaas
    @feelingzhakkaas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome and fantastic explained

  • @Dabeliboss
    @Dabeliboss 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the ascending node for an orbit which lies in the equatorial plane? Or does it not exist??

  • @prational
    @prational 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent! Thanks

  • @money6292
    @money6292 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been researching vids abt piston vs turbo prop engines for about 2 days by now You answered every question I had And even gave me info I didn't know I needed. Fucking thank you man.

  • @cabdolla
    @cabdolla 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great simple presentation! Bravo!

  • @sheetsha
    @sheetsha 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow....It's been hell of ride since all these years .....Almost ten years...Have seen lots of S curves with him....😇😇😇our little classified secrets....😘😘😘

  • @JetStation
    @JetStation 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation.. thanks for your hard work

  • @karthigamanivannan7922
    @karthigamanivannan7922 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clear explanation 👍⭐

  • @alexsandramenesesdasilva7872
    @alexsandramenesesdasilva7872 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very very nice!! Thankss

  • @ANukeWithLegs
    @ANukeWithLegs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    When I quit War Thunder I will just Bust the Door of the Office that gives plane licenses and tell them that I have 10k hours in WT and 4k of them with Jets

  • @whywouldyousaythat2648
    @whywouldyousaythat2648 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is amazing!! After researching for more than 3 hours, this is the first time I actually understand the topic. Thank you so much :)

  • @richardcollier1912
    @richardcollier1912 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    15 persons believe the Earth is flat.