- 100
- 264 854
Philosophy Animal
United Kingdom
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2020
Humans are the only species on earth who seek meaning for their existence. Why? Awareness of death makes us philosophical, and stories sooth us, like babies wrapping themselves with a security blanket.
This channel takes a chilled approach to philosophy . Humans are no gods, nor creatures of gods, but animals with too big a brain and a tiny heart, so life is a little terrifying at times. But don't worry, life is short, so is suffering.
Please subscribe. Or not, that's also cool.
This channel takes a chilled approach to philosophy . Humans are no gods, nor creatures of gods, but animals with too big a brain and a tiny heart, so life is a little terrifying at times. But don't worry, life is short, so is suffering.
Please subscribe. Or not, that's also cool.
วีดีโอ
The Tibetan Book of the Dead - Summary
มุมมอง 6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video I will summarise the Tibetan Book of the Dead, a major text of Tibetan Buddhism
The Egyptian Book of the Dead - Summary
มุมมอง 2.2K2 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video I The Egyptian Book of the Dead
Philosophy of empiricism - John Locke and David Hume
มุมมอง 6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Philosophy of empiricism - John Locke and David Hume
Philosophy of rationalism-Descartes and Leibniz
มุมมอง 1.8K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Philosophy of rationalism-Descartes and Leibniz
Just a few questions … “Men are biologically hard wired to compete”-what is your evidence please? I don’t understand the sperm analogy. Is this to show that because men have surplus sperm they are also surplus whereas women only have one egg per month they are not surplus? Sperm also carries the sex of the baby and so girls are also excess to requirement in the fertilisation process. Until recently one of the biggest mortalities for women was childbirth - and it was this way for centuries. How does that that fit with your historical reading of gender relations and men being predominantly exposed to risk as they are more expendable? You also realise that for a huge part of history women didn’t choose their mates. It was their male guardians who did that - so the whole women shaping the traits of men and hypergamy (not that you mentioned that) was actually shaped by male social structures. How do people like Jordan Peterson factor that in? And finally how is there any hard empirical support for evolutionary psychology? All I s see are hypotheses which cannot sufficiently be supported or refuted, but are presented as fact. It’s not scientific and yet the proponents claim to value empirical support.
This was very interesting and informative as always. Much to learn here.
So good to hear your voice. Always brightens my day.❤ I already know this video will be great!
Neither. I believe the purpose of life is to survive. Individually and as a species (which helps us as individuals). Knowledge (our big brain) & happiness (i.e. connection with others & belonging) simply help us survive... but that still remains to be seen as dinosaurs existed for 165 million years and homo sapiens are only at about 200,000 years.
Bro in Buddhism,there is no soul, more specifically there’s no me. Consciousness is like electricity ⚡️
Rationalism is not 'we know the world because we know' ; rationalism is, 'we get closer to knowing the world because we deduce.' It doesn't reject the empirical - it builds on it. Empericists simply refuse to think.
Those who waited exercised prudence, one of the four principle virtues.
Western philosophy <<<<
Usually, "anti-psychiatry" does not refer to Szasz, who disagrees with them. It is led by a man named Laing.
I think psychiatrists take a very long history from most patients taking upto 2 hours before admitting them. If the actors in the experiment were lying in this initial period leading to a misdiagnosis, there would be a good chance of over-treatment later. Quite possibly the psychiatrists would be dealing with new patients and wont have time for detailed talks with all of their inpatients every day. An analogy i can think of is immigrating to another country. If you manage to illegally migrate to a different country, getting through rigorous border security, it can be difficult to weed out the illegal immigrant, as no-one would naturally suppose such a person was there. Psychiatry seems to be an area of medicine where doctors rely on the patients as much as patients do on doctors.
❄️☃️❄️
Why not physics and metaphysics? The space between is ultimate truth.
The Cycles is the Macro while Linearity is the Micro
In Indian philosophy there are 6 orthodox schools and 3 unorthodox schools. The unorthodox schools are Charvaka, Jainism and Buddhism. The Charvaka are interesting imo because they rejected the idea of god, atma (soul), karma and rebirth. In essence they were proper atheist who only believed in empirical knowledge and didn't believe in anything beyond that. It's also called materialism.
Thanks for specifying that "Western" philosophy originated in Greece. And acknowleging that the East have its own philosophy
Y..yes? Who doesn't and why?
Time is linear.......praise Jesus Christ forever ❤SE7EN sum goodvthings here though.....
Bad news. Non-fiction writers also experience a trance like state. A lot of non-fiction is intuition and interpolation.
Good video! Thanks
Confucianism is sick bullshit. The other two are respectable.
nice
All of our analytical models are based on the idea that progression is linear. Progression is really circular based on the life cycle. I am born, i grow, i degrade, i die. Everything that exists follows this cycle including societies and civilizations. We believe in linear progression because we want to think that immortality is achievable one day. We resist ourselves and delusuon is born from fear. Our progress is constrained in a paradoxical way which seems to anger some people tremendously but it is what it is.
Misleading to call the cyclical view of history (not time) as "Eastern" given that most pre-Christian Western philosophers saw history as cyclical as well.
1. 言え,「かれはアッラー,唯一なる御方であられる。 2. アッラーは,自存され, 3. 御産・なさらないし,御産れになられたのではない, 4. かれに比べ得る,何ものもない。」
イスラエルの神を恐れる。 #イザヤ 29:23
*_Debunking Descartes: A rock cannot think... yet there it is. Well, it was either that or he had come to a h3r3t¡c4l belief that he was in fact g0d as described by the burning bush to Moses in the Exodus. An egotistical thought, for certain, and although dead and gone... he lives on through his words._*
Could you cover stoicism please?
This video sorta rubbed me the wrong way. Saying that Plato sat in a cave? and your explantation of his videos downplays his philosophy and especially metaphysic part. Making it seemed surface level when it was a lot deeper plus you make it out to be that Aristotle is the linear progression of Plato when in reality he was not a platonist and Platonism continues further with other philosophers.
Aristotle wished he never learned under Plato. “Who can i go to, To judge Plato” Then who can i go to judge who judges Plato. I guess ?? “He, Himself, I” .
Diogenes & Socrates 🐐
How do we already know but he’s telling us something . That’s manipulation next thing you know he’s telling you what you know. “Like gay isn’t bad it’s in our nature”.
Oh Bhai ye toh shuru hote hi khatam hogaya😅
shop studied budd
Islamic science???? Yeh right……. Islam is shit
do we really know what death means how do we experience non existence death for the religious is merely a transition while for the non religious its some vague state of consciousness I just dont think that we can know what it means to not exist .Heidegger worries about his burial place and his legacy proves this to me
Thought this was going to be about daw software
Maybe it’s linear (ray line) but the line starts at ‘now’ and the arrow goes into eternity.
I also like the idea of being flexible a fluid.
One of the best and oldest religions with such a rich history!!!! Great video!!!!
Only elitism is right. I look at some disgusting people and they shouldn't be equal to us. some people are simppy animals. But we shouldn't account race , or age , or ethnicity or religion but the quality that a person has instead to make it fair.
I am Japanese. Buddhism in Japan is different from other Buddhist countries. It has a history of working together with Shintoism. Shinto deities were considered to be another form of Buddha, and Buddhist priests also worshipped at the shrine. Therefore, Buddhists in Japan are also Shintoists.😊 The Japanese view of religion may be difficult for people overseas to understand.😅
Makes me wonder why Japan wanted to separate the two when the Meiji restoration sprung up.
The separation of Shinto and Buddhism during the Meiji era was a government policy. The purpose of this separation was to make Shintoism the sole state religion in order to realize the ideals of the restoration of the monarchy and the unity of ritual and government. This policy was implemented very strictly, but in the end it did not work.
Was Darwin a jew?
As a Japanese native, this explanation sounds funny to me.
Taoism is the best follow by Buddhism. I don't like Confucianism at all. too rigid.
John Locke was an ideologist, while David Hume was an empiricist. ChatGPT ❤🎉 Resolved in favor of Hume
I resolve it on the side of Hume. John Locke was an ideologist, while David Hume was an empiricist. ChatGPT ❤🎉
You should read “The Death of Socrates”, based on historical evidence. Socrates was anti-democratic and classist (looking down on the working class / trade). He taught the men who went on to oppose a harsh dictatorial rule on Athens. Many died in this period. This was why Socrates was put on trial. Study the facts don’t just repeat trite stories.
Pragmatism isn’t really related to empiricism or rationalism
Thank you🙏
so good, u too underated its crime
New videos!?
Do angels what is the deal😅o I'll be here exactly what's going on😮 what's going on with United States with the people living here for a year for decades everything is wrong not sensitive nothing 0 empty
Vintages for decades real jew ❤