Philosophy Animal
Philosophy Animal
  • 100
  • 264 854
Jordan Peterson on Gender
Jordan Peterson on Gender
มุมมอง: 67

วีดีโอ

Psychology of the sexes
มุมมอง 152หลายเดือนก่อน
Psychology of the sexes
Personality & Intelligence
มุมมอง 136หลายเดือนก่อน
Personality & Intelligence
Anti-psychiatry
มุมมอง 63หลายเดือนก่อน
Anti-psychiatry
What is intelligence?
มุมมอง 72หลายเดือนก่อน
What is intelligence
Paradox of psychology
มุมมอง 1212 หลายเดือนก่อน
Paradox of psychology
Why Free Choices Make Us Anxious?
มุมมอง 620ปีที่แล้ว
Does modern anxiety stem from our freedom?
The Tibetan Book of the Dead - Summary
มุมมอง 6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video I will summarise the Tibetan Book of the Dead, a major text of Tibetan Buddhism
The Egyptian Book of the Dead - Summary
มุมมอง 2.2K2 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video I The Egyptian Book of the Dead
NIetzsche philosophy
มุมมอง 6722 ปีที่แล้ว
NIetzsche philosophy
Kierkegaard philosophy
มุมมอง 3242 ปีที่แล้ว
Kierkegaard philosophy
Schopenhauer philosophy
มุมมอง 4122 ปีที่แล้ว
Schopenhauer philosophy
Sartre philosophy
มุมมอง 2912 ปีที่แล้ว
Jean-Paul Sartre philosophy
Marx Philosophy
มุมมอง 2782 ปีที่แล้ว
Marx philosophy
Hegel philosophy of history
มุมมอง 1.4K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Hegel philosophy of history
Kant philosophy
มุมมอง 4072 ปีที่แล้ว
Kant philosophy
Philosophy of empiricism - John Locke and David Hume
มุมมอง 6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Philosophy of empiricism - John Locke and David Hume
Philosophy of rationalism-Descartes and Leibniz
มุมมอง 1.8K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Philosophy of rationalism-Descartes and Leibniz
Foucault philosophy
มุมมอง 2182 ปีที่แล้ว
Foucault philosophy
Bertrand Russell Philosophy
มุมมอง 3352 ปีที่แล้ว
Bertrand Russell Philosophy
Heidegger philosophy
มุมมอง 2832 ปีที่แล้ว
Heidegger philosophy
Montaigne Philosophy
มุมมอง 5382 ปีที่แล้ว
Montaigne Philosophy
Erasmus philosophy
มุมมอง 3622 ปีที่แล้ว
Erasmus philosophy
Francis Bacon philosophy
มุมมอง 5832 ปีที่แล้ว
Francis Bacon philosophy
Rousseau philosophy
มุมมอง 1692 ปีที่แล้ว
Rousseau philosophy
Voltaire Philosophy
มุมมอง 1812 ปีที่แล้ว
Voltaire Philosophy
Thomas Hobbes Philosophy
มุมมอง 1452 ปีที่แล้ว
Thomas Hobbes Philosophy
Machiavelli Philosophy
มุมมอง 1222 ปีที่แล้ว
Machiavelli Philosophy
Sun Tzu philosophy
มุมมอง 4082 ปีที่แล้ว
Sun Tzu philosophy
Confucius philosophy
มุมมอง 2362 ปีที่แล้ว
Confucius philosophy

ความคิดเห็น

  • @Nitesky-t8x
    @Nitesky-t8x 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just a few questions … “Men are biologically hard wired to compete”-what is your evidence please? I don’t understand the sperm analogy. Is this to show that because men have surplus sperm they are also surplus whereas women only have one egg per month they are not surplus? Sperm also carries the sex of the baby and so girls are also excess to requirement in the fertilisation process. Until recently one of the biggest mortalities for women was childbirth - and it was this way for centuries. How does that that fit with your historical reading of gender relations and men being predominantly exposed to risk as they are more expendable? You also realise that for a huge part of history women didn’t choose their mates. It was their male guardians who did that - so the whole women shaping the traits of men and hypergamy (not that you mentioned that) was actually shaped by male social structures. How do people like Jordan Peterson factor that in? And finally how is there any hard empirical support for evolutionary psychology? All I s see are hypotheses which cannot sufficiently be supported or refuted, but are presented as fact. It’s not scientific and yet the proponents claim to value empirical support.

  • @wiseone1013
    @wiseone1013 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was very interesting and informative as always. Much to learn here.

  • @gracefitzgerald2227
    @gracefitzgerald2227 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So good to hear your voice. Always brightens my day.❤ I already know this video will be great!

  • @KevinRStrauss
    @KevinRStrauss หลายเดือนก่อน

    Neither. I believe the purpose of life is to survive. Individually and as a species (which helps us as individuals). Knowledge (our big brain) & happiness (i.e. connection with others & belonging) simply help us survive... but that still remains to be seen as dinosaurs existed for 165 million years and homo sapiens are only at about 200,000 years.

  • @ravindurajapakse7270
    @ravindurajapakse7270 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro in Buddhism,there is no soul, more specifically there’s no me. Consciousness is like electricity ⚡️

  • @fusion9619
    @fusion9619 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rationalism is not 'we know the world because we know' ; rationalism is, 'we get closer to knowing the world because we deduce.' It doesn't reject the empirical - it builds on it. Empericists simply refuse to think.

  • @2Hesiod
    @2Hesiod หลายเดือนก่อน

    Those who waited exercised prudence, one of the four principle virtues.

  • @_VISION.
    @_VISION. หลายเดือนก่อน

    Western philosophy <<<<

  • @2Hesiod
    @2Hesiod หลายเดือนก่อน

    Usually, "anti-psychiatry" does not refer to Szasz, who disagrees with them. It is led by a man named Laing.

  • @aravindappat
    @aravindappat หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think psychiatrists take a very long history from most patients taking upto 2 hours before admitting them. If the actors in the experiment were lying in this initial period leading to a misdiagnosis, there would be a good chance of over-treatment later. Quite possibly the psychiatrists would be dealing with new patients and wont have time for detailed talks with all of their inpatients every day. An analogy i can think of is immigrating to another country. If you manage to illegally migrate to a different country, getting through rigorous border security, it can be difficult to weed out the illegal immigrant, as no-one would naturally suppose such a person was there. Psychiatry seems to be an area of medicine where doctors rely on the patients as much as patients do on doctors.

  • @felicitytoad
    @felicitytoad หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❄️☃️❄️

  • @InfiniteWealthMinds
    @InfiniteWealthMinds 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why not physics and metaphysics? The space between is ultimate truth.

  • @singaporeghostclub
    @singaporeghostclub 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Cycles is the Macro while Linearity is the Micro

  • @bletwort2920
    @bletwort2920 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In Indian philosophy there are 6 orthodox schools and 3 unorthodox schools. The unorthodox schools are Charvaka, Jainism and Buddhism. The Charvaka are interesting imo because they rejected the idea of god, atma (soul), karma and rebirth. In essence they were proper atheist who only believed in empirical knowledge and didn't believe in anything beyond that. It's also called materialism.

  • @bletwort2920
    @bletwort2920 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for specifying that "Western" philosophy originated in Greece. And acknowleging that the East have its own philosophy

    • @thieph
      @thieph 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Y..yes? Who doesn't and why?

  • @SE7ENTODDCOOK
    @SE7ENTODDCOOK 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Time is linear.......praise Jesus Christ forever ❤SE7EN sum goodvthings here though.....

  • @anonymike8280
    @anonymike8280 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bad news. Non-fiction writers also experience a trance like state. A lot of non-fiction is intuition and interpolation.

  • @Miawallce80
    @Miawallce80 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video! Thanks

  • @evangelion045
    @evangelion045 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Confucianism is sick bullshit. The other two are respectable.

  • @AaronFalkenstein
    @AaronFalkenstein 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice

  • @seth956
    @seth956 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All of our analytical models are based on the idea that progression is linear. Progression is really circular based on the life cycle. I am born, i grow, i degrade, i die. Everything that exists follows this cycle including societies and civilizations. We believe in linear progression because we want to think that immortality is achievable one day. We resist ourselves and delusuon is born from fear. Our progress is constrained in a paradoxical way which seems to anger some people tremendously but it is what it is.

  • @karlstriepe8050
    @karlstriepe8050 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Misleading to call the cyclical view of history (not time) as "Eastern" given that most pre-Christian Western philosophers saw history as cyclical as well.

  • @SaladMohamed-n5h
    @SaladMohamed-n5h 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1. 言え,「かれはアッラー,唯一なる御方であられる。 2. アッラーは,自存され, 3. 御産・なさらないし,御産れになられたのではない, 4. かれに比べ得る,何ものもない。」

    • @aclark903
      @aclark903 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      イスラエルの神を恐れる。 #イザヤ 29:23

  • @JohnnyAngel777
    @JohnnyAngel777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *_Debunking Descartes: A rock cannot think... yet there it is. Well, it was either that or he had come to a h3r3t¡c4l belief that he was in fact g0d as described by the burning bush to Moses in the Exodus. An egotistical thought, for certain, and although dead and gone... he lives on through his words._*

  • @IowaLanguages
    @IowaLanguages 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could you cover stoicism please?

  • @profile1172
    @profile1172 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video sorta rubbed me the wrong way. Saying that Plato sat in a cave? and your explantation of his videos downplays his philosophy and especially metaphysic part. Making it seemed surface level when it was a lot deeper plus you make it out to be that Aristotle is the linear progression of Plato when in reality he was not a platonist and Platonism continues further with other philosophers.

  • @Stephverry
    @Stephverry 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aristotle wished he never learned under Plato. “Who can i go to, To judge Plato” Then who can i go to judge who judges Plato. I guess ?? “He, Himself, I” .

  • @Stephverry
    @Stephverry 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Diogenes & Socrates 🐐

  • @Stephverry
    @Stephverry 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do we already know but he’s telling us something . That’s manipulation next thing you know he’s telling you what you know. “Like gay isn’t bad it’s in our nature”.

  • @SuhanaKhan-b4k
    @SuhanaKhan-b4k 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh Bhai ye toh shuru hote hi khatam hogaya😅

  • @tkvideos1009
    @tkvideos1009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    shop studied budd

  • @siliyemoodislam
    @siliyemoodislam 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Islamic science???? Yeh right……. Islam is shit

  • @oldterry9476
    @oldterry9476 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    do we really know what death means how do we experience non existence death for the religious is merely a transition while for the non religious its some vague state of consciousness I just dont think that we can know what it means to not exist .Heidegger worries about his burial place and his legacy proves this to me

  • @Danefrak
    @Danefrak 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thought this was going to be about daw software

  • @l.g.harris8505
    @l.g.harris8505 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe it’s linear (ray line) but the line starts at ‘now’ and the arrow goes into eternity.

    • @l.g.harris8505
      @l.g.harris8505 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I also like the idea of being flexible a fluid.

  • @fightronin3753
    @fightronin3753 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the best and oldest religions with such a rich history!!!! Great video!!!!

  • @FlavioSkoti
    @FlavioSkoti 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Only elitism is right. I look at some disgusting people and they shouldn't be equal to us. some people are simppy animals. But we shouldn't account race , or age , or ethnicity or religion but the quality that a person has instead to make it fair.

  • @yA-bv8qv
    @yA-bv8qv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am Japanese. Buddhism in Japan is different from other Buddhist countries. It has a history of working together with Shintoism. Shinto deities were considered to be another form of Buddha, and Buddhist priests also worshipped at the shrine. Therefore, Buddhists in Japan are also Shintoists.😊 The Japanese view of religion may be difficult for people overseas to understand.😅

    • @Taiyo_Jingu
      @Taiyo_Jingu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Makes me wonder why Japan wanted to separate the two when the Meiji restoration sprung up.

    • @yA-bv8qv
      @yA-bv8qv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The separation of Shinto and Buddhism during the Meiji era was a government policy. The purpose of this separation was to make Shintoism the sole state religion in order to realize the ideals of the restoration of the monarchy and the unity of ritual and government. This policy was implemented very strictly, but in the end it did not work.

  • @jesuscrispe8466
    @jesuscrispe8466 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was Darwin a jew?

  • @Yoshi.Koseki
    @Yoshi.Koseki 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a Japanese native, this explanation sounds funny to me.

  • @igweogba6774
    @igweogba6774 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Taoism is the best follow by Buddhism. I don't like Confucianism at all. too rigid.

  • @Ramkumar-uj9fo
    @Ramkumar-uj9fo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    John Locke was an ideologist, while David Hume was an empiricist. ChatGPT ❤🎉 Resolved in favor of Hume

  • @Ramkumar-uj9fo
    @Ramkumar-uj9fo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I resolve it on the side of Hume. John Locke was an ideologist, while David Hume was an empiricist. ChatGPT ❤🎉

  • @markgoodwin6695
    @markgoodwin6695 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You should read “The Death of Socrates”, based on historical evidence. Socrates was anti-democratic and classist (looking down on the working class / trade). He taught the men who went on to oppose a harsh dictatorial rule on Athens. Many died in this period. This was why Socrates was put on trial. Study the facts don’t just repeat trite stories.

  • @Ryan-so4xl
    @Ryan-so4xl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pragmatism isn’t really related to empiricism or rationalism

  • @bad8brains8
    @bad8brains8 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you🙏

  • @fufo1204
    @fufo1204 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    so good, u too underated its crime

  • @zoran69ser
    @zoran69ser 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New videos!?

  • @catalinamarquez6937
    @catalinamarquez6937 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do angels what is the deal😅o I'll be here exactly what's going on😮 what's going on with United States with the people living here for a year for decades everything is wrong not sensitive nothing 0 empty

  • @catalinamarquez6937
    @catalinamarquez6937 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Vintages for decades real jew ❤