วีดีโอ

Would love to use an image as my password but I don't know how to use Plain Sight Browser Extension or how to install it on a web browser.

Thank you, works very well ⭐👏

Hey, i was finally able to get it working. Youll Need to have a view things downloaded like VS Studio, Node, VsCode(makes it easier for me than CMD or PowerShell, and Python, the hardest thing to figure out and it took me five hours was the dependencies, particularly Plasmo, it must be installed in order for the browser extension to work, and youll keep getting an error about it, youll have to go to their documentation to get the install command(forgot what it was, sorry i think "pnpm install plasmo" and you should be able to run the production build and load the unpacked file to chrome/extension. you might have to refresh the login page if you try to log into the same site over and over to admire the image pass at work. haha

just do like... @media (preferes-dark-mode: dark) { :root { color-scheme: dark; } } @media (preferes-dark-mode: light) { :root { color-scheme: light; } }

awesome editing skills! Btw, do you think this is better to use rather than use 2 step verification? I have a bunch of accounts with different passwords that I have to keep them in a paper to even remember them, so do you know if this method is more secure than 2 step-verification?

garnet is written in C#. what a fucking JOKE.

hey! installed your extension and tried it, is there any way to make it not asking for password input popup whenever i dragged the image to login form? i want it seamless and just straight login to account

I can't find a tutorial on how to actually do this, i seek suggestions and help

extension you made just doesnt work. maybe im doing something wrong but regardless a tutorial would be nice

just use Infinite Craft Inserter extension

↗️↘️↗️↘️↗️↘️↗️↘️↗️↘️↗️↘️

4:16 Transcode, Compress and Edit basically AND audio or video file in the universe

How do I set up plainsight?

jeez, i somehow thought, the guy would actually fix ffmpeg, got really excited, then, it was just the website *sigh*

docs on the page would be useful, and search with a shortcut (ctrl+k)

You can make the hero section more useful by making the "convert" section on the right interactive - the ".mp4" and ".avi" buttons can be transformed into menus where you can choose whatever format you want. Hell, even make the "Convert" word a menu and showcase different operations you can perform with ffmpeg.

For such a "nerdy" open source tool, the official website looks actually very nice and clean

underrated channel

Can you redesign Debian's next time?

Excellent redesign, however it's missing dark mode - an absolute must for websites that have a developer audience

and now do av1an 😁

amazing

I feel click-bated. I don't want to watch yet another website redesign.

This is a pretty good design, but im not sure if the principle suits FFMPEG. Using testimonials and such makes it seem like youre trying to sell FFMPEG to me, not that its a free and crucial tool. I know you highlight that in the video which I appreciate a lot, but i think there should be more focus on contributors, open communication, stuff like that. In this version, especially with the venture capitalist aesthetic (which is not a bad thing!) i have conditioned myself to search for a "pricing" entry in the navigation bar

what people don't get about ffmpeg is that it really has no limit to how many filters you can stack and when using complex mode, your graph need not be a single linear pipeline, but you can do different operations to different parts and then splice them all together You can actually also do full alpha-mask compositing of a video on top of another video while mixing the bg audio. This means that for a small subset of video editing, you could have a video editor which transpiles a user-edited timeline of clips and effects into a single giant ffmpeg command which would run so much faster because ffmpeg actually knows how to operate with streams on a file level. you can add a 10 second intro and outro to a 10h video INSTANTLY because it can do some voodoo with the files themselves and just splice them together without actually decoding most of the video. Concatenation is O(1) complexity The current way all video editors work is that they use ffmpeg to split all input videos into what essentially boils down to a folder full of images* . Then they go through the timeline and for each frame stack all of the effects and render the image into an output folder. Then call ffmpeg again to take all those images and encode them into the user-specified format. This is dumb. Like, really really dumb. With modern hardware that has support for accelerating the decoding of all of these formats, one should reasonably expect that unless you are doing 3D raytracing or anything like that your video should render in about the same amount of time as it takes to watch it. But as I'm sure any of you who have used any video editor ever, from the piece of crap that is kdenlive, to the industry standard adobe premiere, which is still mostly single-core after them having promised multicore support in like the 2010s (even davinci resolve, which has some gpu acceleration cannot simple concat and rescale operations faster than real-time) with ffmpeg, it is common to encode at 5-8x the real speed of the videos unless you are using some very agressive compression. ffmpeg is not just a piece of software that makes google 38 billion a year, you as a regular guy can use it, and it's great save a few commands as scripts and you can now instantly compress that video that is just too big for discord to accept without firing up your entire editor, or using one of those garbage on-line video converters that are full of ads and guess what ? are running ffmpeg themselves too XD * | (some use more clever buffering methods but essentially they all use images as the operating representation)

great job!

You just tricked me into watching an ffmpeg tutorial

Insert “I hate modern web design I hate modern web design” schizo meme here

The intention is great but to be honest, the new design gives the impression of a corporate site seeking investors. While it looks good, it conveys a completely wrong message. Don't overlook this in your next projects! Design with purpose rather than for looks.

now you just need to compile it with wasm and embed it into the website

Only objection I have is, whenever I want to download an open source tool and the website doesn't look it its from the 80s I turn around and leave the site bcs I think I fell into a copy-cat site.

Okay i thought you will redesign mpreg genre

the thing is what people who use ffmpeg want direct, concise docs, not good looking websites, honestly it doesn't matter at all great lookings website are for startups

this is so awesome. we really need this

Subtitles automatically turned on and ffmpeg was written different each time xd

at first I thought you were making a local site to manage ffmpeg in graphical mode instead of using commands

06:31 I am surprised that remuxing (like convert mp4 to mkv but do not reencode video and audio) is not common task.

04:08 does "Learn More" go to same page as "Documentation" in real ffmpeg website?

I thought this video is about redesigning ffmpeg itself (like cli, logs)

It look nice

This man cant redesign the arch forums.

Great style in the video. I love that you included the command line for how it's used. Minor touch. Great

Do YAML next, god knows they need a new website lmao

Nice video ❤

You should do a pull request, just so it is out there.

Inb4 some old fart shows up saying how they liked the crappy-old outdated design better. This seems to be a trend on almost every redesign video I see.

best tutorial for ffmpeg!

Just need a documentation page and viola

I want this to exist in just the about section of ffmpeg. The current ffmpeg webpage is so elegant

You know its good if the dev abandoned being fancy 😂