วีดีโอ

Génial !!!!

Wow thank you

Thank you for helping me to understand /having deep clear image of a zoom hypothesis- of 5 of them with good examples. Your presentation, remind me of school life experiences in learning English. Really interesting and meaningful.

Great message providing clear understanding about differences of acquire and learned

I’ve been struggling to understand Krashen’s theory and now I get it! Thanks for uploading this video! You have made it very easy for me to understand it’s meaning and how it’s applied in the real world! Thank you!

Yeah, we don't need any language teachers now, thanks. We don't need any language schools or universities. THEY'RE OLD FASHIONED AND DIDN'T DO A GOOD JOB, ANYWAY! INSTEAD OF PAYING US UNIVERSITY FEES, WE JUST PUT THEM ON A PLANE AND SEND THEM TO THE COUNTRY WHOSE LANGUAGE THEY WANT TO SPEAK. Sure, I'm out of a job but the student doesn't have to learn grammar, which I'm too stupid to learn.

We don't expect a seventy year old to listen, like a baby, and go, "googoogaagaa." Krashen's practice is anti-academic because it takes rational, conscious learning and throws to feeling, gesture emotion, anti-intellectual thinking. Krashen's "theory" replaces science and knowledge with oblivion and ignorance.

The best description at all this is a good teacher .thank you so much

kudos to your student

Merci!

Thank you very much for such wonderful explanation . We really appreciate it . Looking forward to posting other videos about other theories .

I remember this book and I loved it in school and I've been to Japan.

Adults do not learn the same way that children learn. The brain before lateralization is a different place than the lateralized brain. Children absorb unstructured input like a sponge. Adults hang new information on previously acquired information. Children aren’t concerned with “why”. Adults have to know “why”. Children aren’t concerned with structure. Adults are ruled by structure. What is needed are structured language “input” programs aimed at adults and the way adults learn.

Not only is this person a great lecturer, she’s also a great story-teller!

If think the presenter's name is Joan Wink. She is amazing! I truly like the water lily analogy.

Thank you Professor Wink. Can I cite this video in a presentation I'm preparing? I'd need to know when and where it was held.

This is why language learners tend to have a sophisticated background in reading ,yet the find it difficult to utter a single meaningfull sentence .

I can't imagine anybody who has learned another language being on the other side of these hypothesis, all seems like common sense and obvious. Man it was easy in the 80's to sound smart.

Helpful video in the acquisition of language. I realy inspired. Thank you so much

I love the wheels analogy 👌🏽💯

can i take you home??I love how she explains!

Pretty beautiful demonstration, Who’s the speaker please ??

I loved this! thank you so much

What planet do these people live on? How can you expect an adult learner to wait for years but uttering their first words in the target language? What's possibly even worse is the number of people who actually share these ideas. Have any of them ever learnt or taught a foreign language?

Incredibly helpful explanation! You are one of the best teachers I have ever come across, thank you so much for this. Please keep uploading more linguistics n SLA related lectures

Brilliant! Thank you a lot

Thank you for your clarity. I read the information provided by my professor and just wasn't "getting it." Now I understand it so much better! Thank you!

I am so happy. Thank you so much ❤

Wonderfull! At school, I was nicknamed after this character many, many years ago. So glad to find this beautiful short story. Thank you!

Great explanation

Thank you Joan! Great ideas and summaries.

Excellent mam thankyou 😍

Thanks, I have this theory on two subjects. Both teachers did not teach this theory properly!

I think the effect of the affective filter is drastically underestimated. It's important to note that the affective filter isn't just activated by being nervous about speaking but can manifest in different ways, such as being frustrated with the acquiring process, caring about 'why' too much when hearing words and phrases, actually placing too much emphasis on the fact that you should be acquiring this language. The most amazing English as a second language acquirers i know never gave a damn about acquiring the language, it just happened to them through a need to acquire. Being annoyed, exasperated, feeling like you're behind or slow, being bored, feeling overwhelmed, this all plays a huge role in the affective filter in my opinion. I feel it myself when i dog on myself for not knowing more, it stunts my acquisition and always affects my understanding when listening. I also feel (can't prove it but i just 'feel' it from experience) that listening is the biggest determining factor of actual receptive and active fluency. For me, reading always gives me the words and phrases but it's the listening that really saturates my brain and makes me understand without even having to think about it. When i am saturated in content that has an aural component my brain begins to switch into L2 mode. I can't do it because i have a family, but if i were to do nothing but listen to/watch my L2 during all my spare time for like a year straight i believe my brain would change and simply accept my L2 with no fuss at all. I already feel this work with very little effort when i immerse for longer periods of time. It works like magic.

Thank you! It was interesting and useful!

0:35 The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis 3:38 Input Hypothesis 4:26 Monitor Hypothesis 4:58 The Natural Order Hypothesis 6:11 Affective Filter Hypothesis

Your explanation are beautiful like you mam. I have no words to say it's a crystal clear explanation I have never ever experienced that 🤩 thank you mam

Was krashen really the first one who thought about acquiring a language or did he just coined that term?

I want to make clear I do not disagree with a word you say and I am a huge admirer of Krashen. I don't think he's ever said anything I disagree with. I do think, however, like so many other theories of language learning too many people think it is THE golden key. It is not. It is A golden key. Language acquisition is the ideal but VERY time consuming and much harder than people suggest. People need to be realistic. The contact hours needed for this method should not be underestimated. Remember as babies we are totally immersed in our language but still take several years to produce even basic sentences. As a teaching method in school it is fun, relevant and effective but the average teacher sees each class for only a few hours a week. Krashen's method unsupported by anything else requires much more time than that. You said your husband was effectively communicating after 2 or 3 years but really only with very specific vocabulary in very limited circumstances. The 'truth' is that language acquisition requires a lot of exposure, it requires carefully graded and well researched topics individually relevant to each learner, which a teacher faced with several classes of 30+ teenagers would find pretty impossible to gather. Krashen enthusiasts have always been a bit too vague on source materials especially for less commonly studied languages. I would say from experience (I have learnt about 12 languages) that if you want to 'acquire' a language the Krashen way within a year or two you will need to commit to at least several hours a day every day. You will need to find accessible materials which are stimulating and at the right level i.e. comprehensible input. You will need help and advice to do that. Don't get me wrong. I actually believe that learning the basics can be done in a variety of ways both traditional and not traditional but that fluency probably only occurs once you commit to something like Krashen is suggesting i.e. longterm exposure to the target language. I studied Polish for several years but only become fluent by spending a LOT of time listening to especially graded podcasts that I listened to for at least an hour or two a day. I recently watched a video of an American language teacher demonstrating how he acquired conversational Arabic in a little over a year using the method. It was very impressive BUT he was an experienced linguist, he put in hundreds of hours of practice, he had the help of several native speakers and went to study in Egypt for several months. Do you see what I mean? If you are leading a normal life, with a job and kids and other responsibilities 'acquiring' a language in this way without any back up from a variety of other methods, including grammar, is not a walk in the park. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I love Krashen but I'm wary of anyone saying 'hey, we've found the perfect way for you to learn a language'. There isn't one.

ধন্যবাদ দিতে কার্পণ্য করতে নেই। Thank you so much.

Is the monitor in monitor hypothesis is the literal monitor device or the verb monitor? Thanks

Thank you so much! That was real "comprehensible Input"! ;)

Wonderful explanation. Thank you!

nice mam

Thank you so much,this is helpful

Amazing explanation. Thank you

I enjoyed and learnt a lot from your video. Muchisimas gracias!!!!

I have been struggling understanding all of this and God brought me to this video!! I cannot say thank you enough for this video!! I now understand!! Best teaching of this I've watched! Especially the example at the end. Can't forget it!

thanks, I really learned a lot!! now, I understing better the differences between acquisition and learning ☺

thank you so much!