I never got why exactly Sam was mad at Lisa. He was the one who broke of the engagement to go work for Bartlett. He makes some comment about not being "celebrity enough" or some such for her, but it was BS and she said as much. Does he feel guilty for abandoning her?
Traylor Howard looks like a woman I went to college with. She was a Chemical Engineering major and was in my Dynamics class. She got up in a huff and left class never to come back except for exams. God, she was brilliant and didn’t suffer fools. She married another friend of mine. Jeeze, I should check in on them.
Still waiting...It won't be the government that cures cancer. Researchers at some pharma company will do it. Hopefully the government won't steal their IP in the name of "compassion and fairness".
Historical accuracy is not a strong suit of the show. Reference CJ talking about the battle of the bulge in her "Women of Qumar" tantrum. Some estimates have that frame count much higher. It wasn't idealism that won WW2. We were an industrial juggernaut on a leash. Great Britain outproduced Germany in every major arms except for tanks and they came close to that as well.
Everyone I know dies from "cancer" actually they die from radiation or chemo. I may be the first to actually die from cancer but we will never know. Cancer patients live 4 times longer if they do NOT get treatment
I think the scientific community is already pretty committed to curing cancer. A federal government decree would just create more bureaucrats, and probably more taxes.
All I hear, all I see, all day, every day now, when I watch The West Wing, is Aaron Sorkin's voice. Everyone sounds like Sorkin, all the time. Very difficult to distinguish- the bad guys are always room temperature IQ.
I think that is one of the greatest challenges for good authorship: how to create distinct characters. And another challenge: how to create compelling antagonists. For the first, I've actually considered playing around with machine learning models used for author identification to see if they can be coerced into "translating" my writing into multiple different "voices". For the second challenge, I think Arnold Vinick is a good example of doing it right: a smart character who genuinely believes what he clams and who can engage in inelegant discourse with people who disagree with him, not just a paper caricature of an ideology the writers oppose (without actually bothering to understand), who just screams catch phrases at anyone different than them. To do that well in a story like this, the authors need to actually understand the views of both the protagonists and antagonists, they need to write them so that the audience sees both as rationally persuing a goal that is seen as reasonable. Done masterfully, the audience will be sympathetic to *both* sides, wanting both to succeed, and thus be troubled by knowing that that is impossible, that for one to succeed, the other must fail. I think that is why antagonists are so often "bad guys", villains; it's so much easier to write for opponents where the audience is supposed to hate them, even despise them. Where their motives are so reprehensible that the whole audience says "thank God that's not me" (and then secretly hopes that's really true).
@@benjaminshropshire2900 Vinick was also written as elegantly as he was *after* Sorkin had left the show, so it didn't surprise me in the least that they generated a Republican candidate that wasn't a total Bush-Lite farce.
Because there was no reason to keep it. As beautiful as it is, it was just another part of a speech that was ultimately scrapped. At least, that is the narrative and the point of the story.
@@srednivashtar5432 Slightly misleading. America had the Army Air Force (USAAF) which became the USAF. And the Naval, Marine, and Coast Guard aviation during WWII.
Sam Seaborn was the heart of that ensemble that ran the day to day for Jed Bartlett. Why TPTB ever decided to drop Rob Lowe denies reason. I never ever liked Will Bailey. He hadn’t been through it all; slogging through the trenches to get to the White House. He was the new kid, and drug his step-sister along. Just...strange. Sam was my boy.
I think it was Rob Lowe that pulled the plug. As I have heard the story, initially TWW was going to have him as the main character and he was paid a salary to reflect that and the fact he was probably the most known actor (excluding Martin Sheen - who was meant to have a much smaller role). However the show became more of an ensemble and the other actors’ salaries increased to reflect this, but Rob Lowe’s didn’t or increased less so. I think he left because it was sort of a pay dispute Edit He said he didn’t feel respected when the others got a pay raise and he didn’t.
@@brontewcat Rob Lowe cut his rate to take the show. When the rest of the cast banded together to get their raise, the studio didn't do the same with his as they had already been playing him more than the others. This, asking with friction behind the scenes spelled the end of Sam on the show. There's more to the story that I can't remember off the top of my head, but check out The West Wing Weakly Podcast for the rest. They interview Rob Lowe while going through the first season.
TPTB didn't pull the plug on Rob Lowe, Rob Lowe did. He got further and further sidelined in a show that was initially written to have him as the main character.
He was forced into the show by the network brass who began dictating how much airtime his portion of the scripts should be and it's part of why Sorkin himself left the show. Sorkin thought The Newsroom would be different and with his track record the same antics wouldn't occur but of course they did and he said he won't do TV anymore after the Newsroom...
The best part is is every fact he gave was total malarkey , the Air force didnt exist until after ww2 , we built 300k planes and there's no long term money in cancer cures
Added to which cancer is multiple diseases. As I understand it, it’s not about curing it’s about successful treatment so that the various cancers do not kill you.
the funny thing is that Sam is supposed to be this great speechwriter, or ' freak' as he is later called... but all the amazing things he wrote were really written by Sorkin. This isn't like a show where someone is famed to be a great athlete or doctor or whatever... they actually had to show Sam's genius at writing.
One of the ways Sorkin helps create that illusion is by shortening the time and effort it takes Sam to come up with words. In the "freak" scene you refer to, for example, Sam is supposed to have come up with those remarks "on the way over, in the car"; in reality it probably took Sorkin days if not weeks to come up with them, and multiple redrafts.
Which means when characters call Sam a genius, Sorkin is actually calling himself a genius. One of several reasons it's a little hard to like Sam as much as Sorkin and Lowe want him to be liked.
@@jerodast you’re overthinking it Yes, Sam is a written character and a lot goes into him. Doubtful Sorkin knows everything that Sam “knows” off the cuff. There’s research and drafts then the final product that so many of us like. I don’t think Sorkin is writing this just to call himself a genius
I'd like to think that Big Pharma wouldn't do that, but we're talking about an industry that profits on misery, an industry that changes a drug for a tablet to a capsule so they can get 17 more years of patent protections.
@@stevechance150 and that's what they would do with a cancer cure - make the cure expensive and make sure they kept the patent. Improvements that lead to fewer side effects also get you money. I'm a researcher in this field and I know some of the industry players and the attempts to seek a cure are not cynical, they are heartfelt and genuine. There's still more than enough profit to be made. Just because you're "cured" of cancer once doesn't mean you can't get it again, and with increasing frequency the longer you live.
You're right. Lowe could never get over the fact that the original intentions for the role changed and that Richard and Brad and Alison and Martin were just doing far more interesting things with the material than he was and inspiring Aaron more. It's a shame that he never learnt to be part of the team and accept that he wasn't *The* star.
@@renafox4481 God help us. In spite of the Sorkin's brilliant writing, this was a democratic fantasy. After the disgrace that is the last 15 years of the Democrat Party, a reboot of this show would be a joke.
I'd favour a continuation of TWW with an independent President taking place after Bartlet's, Santos' , and Vinick's terms in office. This leader would be dealing with dem Senate majority leader Sam Seaborn and his wife, rep House Speaker Ainsley Hayes-Seaborn. I picture this series to be what I feel "Designated Survivor" should've been before the show went off the deep end.
@@duncanwebb9450 Ainsley would probably take his name and not hyphenate. Being Southern and conservative, tradition would be very important to her and she would not see taking her husband’s name as degrading in any way.
Way to make stuff up to try, unsuccessfully, to make your point. If you took the time to actually watch the video you would know he never really said that.
@@bazonka1 He did keep making comments about possible treatments when he had no qualifications. If you watch some other world leaders (the ones that are respected) giving press conferences at the time they did not comment on cures/treatments etc but left that to those who were qualified.
@@bazonka1 Here is what he said (all in 2020): January 22: “We have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China. It’s going to be just fine.” February 2: “We pretty much shut it down coming in from China.” February 24: “The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA… Stock Market starting to look very good to me!” February 25: “CDC and my Administration are doing a GREAT job of handling Coronavirus.” February 25: “I think that's a problem that’s going to go away… They have studied it. They know very much. In fact, we’re very close to a vaccine.” February 26: “The 15 (cases in the US) within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero.” February 26: “We're going very substantially down, not up.” February 27: “One day it’s like a miracle, it will disappear.” February 28: “We're ordering a lot of supplies. We're ordering a lot of, uh, elements that frankly we wouldn't be ordering unless it was something like this. But we're ordering a lot of different elements of medical.” March 2: “You take a solid flu vaccine, you don't think that could have an impact, or much of an impact, on corona?” March 2: “A lot of things are happening, a lot of very exciting things are happening and they’re happening very rapidly.” March 4: “If we have thousands or hundreds of thousands of people that get better just by, you know, sitting around and even going to work - some of them go to work, but they get better.” March 5: “I NEVER said people that are feeling sick should go to work.” March 5: “The United States… has, as of now, only 129 cases… and 11 deaths. We are working very hard to keep these numbers as low as possible!” March 6: “I think we’re doing a really good job in this country at keeping it down… a tremendous job at keeping it down.” March 6: “Anybody right now, and yesterday, anybody that needs a test gets a test. They’re there. And the tests are beautiful…. the tests are all perfect like the letter was perfect. The transcription was perfect. Right? This was not as perfect as that but pretty good.” March 6: “I like this stuff. I really get it. People are surprised that I understand it… Every one of these doctors said, ‘How do you know so much about this?’ Maybe I have a natural ability. Maybe I should have done that instead of running for president.” March 6: “I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship that wasn't our fault.” March 8: “We have a perfectly coordinated and fine tuned plan at the White House for our attack on Coronavirus.” March 9: “This blindsided the world.” March 13: "I take no responsibility.” March 16: “This is a pandemic. I felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic.”
It's kind of a moon shot reference. A politician says "we will go to the moon, because it is hard", and they did it! With that said, that was a technological push, with science to back it up; finding cures for disease is a scientific push, with technology to back it up. Tinkering towards a goal is probably easier than finding a secret about the world that nobody's ever found before.
It's been a long time since anyone commented here, but America needs to rise again. COVID-19 is engulfing our planet, in Europe we are just holding on. American exceptionalism can save millions of lives. Help us. Find a vacinne. Please.
@@Tim.GsyBloke I know. Just disappointing. I refuse to pay for a treatment that doesn't result in a cure. And yes, I am dealing with such a problem now. I've chosen to risk death rather than continue treatments. In my case, it will be a race to see if a tumor flares up and blinds me while killing my brain - or it spreads to cause fibrosis around my aorta or shuts down my kidneys.
"all [100] of them are caused by something different". I don't think that's true or relevant. Cancer is abnormal cells growth resulting in tumors. I want these cells destroyed, I don't really care what "caused" them to switch to abnormal growth. So what if radiation from my cellphone caused them?
Actually the Air Force was part of the Army back then as the United States Army Air Forces. The Airborne were the paratroopers, then and now part of the army.
If only the people who actually work in white house were anywhere near that smart, rather than the petty, shallow, vindictive, unfeeling, unthinking people who really are.
We don't vote for "smart." We vote for whomever gives the best raw meat soundbytes. If "smart" won elections rather than "Lock her up!" and "Build that wall!" then we'd be getting smart candidates.
I never got why exactly Sam was mad at Lisa. He was the one who broke of the engagement to go work for Bartlett. He makes some comment about not being "celebrity enough" or some such for her, but it was BS and she said as much. Does he feel guilty for abandoning her?
Traylor Howard looks like a woman I went to college with. She was a Chemical Engineering major and was in my Dynamics class. She got up in a huff and left class never to come back except for exams. God, she was brilliant and didn’t suffer fools. She married another friend of mine. Jeeze, I should check in on them.
Easy foe Barlett to make that promise since he probably won't be the president at the end of the decade.
Neither would JFK have been when he promised America would land on the Moon by the end of the decade.
@Daniel Dickson had he not been assassinated, he would have been around till early 69. No doubt he would have been reelected in 64.
that's how it works, you highlight it and press delete
Still waiting...It won't be the government that cures cancer. Researchers at some pharma company will do it. Hopefully the government won't steal their IP in the name of "compassion and fairness".
Steal it after the taxpayers paid for most of the basic research that gets us to a cure?
And in real life republicans block stem cell research because of zygotes
The only problem with what Sam said is the US didn't produce 100,,000 planes. It produced almost 350,000 planes.
Historical accuracy is not a strong suit of the show. Reference CJ talking about the battle of the bulge in her "Women of Qumar" tantrum. Some estimates have that frame count much higher. It wasn't idealism that won WW2. We were an industrial juggernaut on a leash. Great Britain outproduced Germany in every major arms except for tanks and they came close to that as well.
I don’t wanna be that guy but I will be. This chick is nowhere near Sam Seaborns league, dudes a stud.
Thats not the problem… the problem is that juan has plan A,B,C…Z. And 28 years to prepare.
Here is Sam’s dress rehersal for the presidency
so... Joe Biden stole this speech?
Everyone I know dies from "cancer" actually they die from radiation or chemo. I may be the first to actually die from cancer but we will never know. Cancer patients live 4 times longer if they do NOT get treatment
We don't want to cure cancer it makes to many powerful people too much money
CJ is his Compassion?...Last thing CJ is .Is Compassionate
I think the scientific community is already pretty committed to curing cancer. A federal government decree would just create more bureaucrats, and probably more taxes.
They can't do research without money.
All I hear, all I see, all day, every day now, when I watch The West Wing, is Aaron Sorkin's voice. Everyone sounds like Sorkin, all the time. Very difficult to distinguish- the bad guys are always room temperature IQ.
I think that is one of the greatest challenges for good authorship: how to create distinct characters. And another challenge: how to create compelling antagonists. For the first, I've actually considered playing around with machine learning models used for author identification to see if they can be coerced into "translating" my writing into multiple different "voices". For the second challenge, I think Arnold Vinick is a good example of doing it right: a smart character who genuinely believes what he clams and who can engage in inelegant discourse with people who disagree with him, not just a paper caricature of an ideology the writers oppose (without actually bothering to understand), who just screams catch phrases at anyone different than them. To do that well in a story like this, the authors need to actually understand the views of both the protagonists and antagonists, they need to write them so that the audience sees both as rationally persuing a goal that is seen as reasonable. Done masterfully, the audience will be sympathetic to *both* sides, wanting both to succeed, and thus be troubled by knowing that that is impossible, that for one to succeed, the other must fail. I think that is why antagonists are so often "bad guys", villains; it's so much easier to write for opponents where the audience is supposed to hate them, even despise them. Where their motives are so reprehensible that the whole audience says "thank God that's not me" (and then secretly hopes that's really true).
@@benjaminshropshire2900 Vinick was also written as elegantly as he was *after* Sorkin had left the show, so it didn't surprise me in the least that they generated a Republican candidate that wasn't a total Bush-Lite farce.
the bad guys are the protagonists, Aaaaron Sorkin is just that out of touch with reality.
@@NathanJosephCole Liberals produce this show, "conservatives" produce The Potwins.
The flagrant justice fittingly object because mary neurologically heap off a overconfident locket. abundant, glossy story
Why did he delete
I believe that he hit ctrl-z to add back what he deleted.
Because there was no reason to keep it. As beautiful as it is, it was just another part of a speech that was ultimately scrapped. At least, that is the narrative and the point of the story.
Cute.
Between January of 1940 and August of 1945, the United States manufactured 300,317 military aircraft.
It didn’t, however, have an Air Force, with the USAF not forming as an independent service until 1947.
@@srednivashtar5432 Lowercase air force I guess :)
@@srednivashtar5432 Slightly misleading. America had the Army Air Force (USAAF) which became the USAF. And the Naval, Marine, and Coast Guard aviation during WWII.
@@eddietat95 so, what you’re saying is that the USA didn’t have an Air Force in WW2 then...
@@srednivashtar5432 Army Air Force is upper case Air Force...
Sam Seaborn was the heart of that ensemble that ran the day to day for Jed Bartlett. Why TPTB ever decided to drop Rob Lowe denies reason. I never ever liked Will Bailey. He hadn’t been through it all; slogging through the trenches to get to the White House. He was the new kid, and drug his step-sister along. Just...strange. Sam was my boy.
I think it was Rob Lowe that pulled the plug. As I have heard the story, initially TWW was going to have him as the main character and he was paid a salary to reflect that and the fact he was probably the most known actor (excluding Martin Sheen - who was meant to have a much smaller role). However the show became more of an ensemble and the other actors’ salaries increased to reflect this, but Rob Lowe’s didn’t or increased less so. I think he left because it was sort of a pay dispute Edit He said he didn’t feel respected when the others got a pay raise and he didn’t.
He chose to leave
@@brontewcat Rob Lowe cut his rate to take the show. When the rest of the cast banded together to get their raise, the studio didn't do the same with his as they had already been playing him more than the others. This, asking with friction behind the scenes spelled the end of Sam on the show. There's more to the story that I can't remember off the top of my head, but check out The West Wing Weakly Podcast for the rest. They interview Rob Lowe while going through the first season.
TPTB didn't pull the plug on Rob Lowe, Rob Lowe did. He got further and further sidelined in a show that was initially written to have him as the main character.
He was forced into the show by the network brass who began dictating how much airtime his portion of the scripts should be and it's part of why Sorkin himself left the show. Sorkin thought The Newsroom would be different and with his track record the same antics wouldn't occur but of course they did and he said he won't do TV anymore after the Newsroom...
Just like the second world war, you can’t stop it you can only fight it.
Totally agree re the fight against cancer. But as regards World War 2.... with the benefit of hindsight.... not so sure
The best part is is every fact he gave was total malarkey , the Air force didnt exist until after ww2 , we built 300k planes and there's no long term money in cancer cures
Added to which cancer is multiple diseases. As I understand it, it’s not about curing it’s about successful treatment so that the various cancers do not kill you.
We did have an Air Force during WW2. It was under the command of the army and called the army air corps. But it was the Air Force.
the funny thing is that Sam is supposed to be this great speechwriter, or ' freak' as he is later called... but all the amazing things he wrote were really written by Sorkin. This isn't like a show where someone is famed to be a great athlete or doctor or whatever... they actually had to show Sam's genius at writing.
The Galileo 5 speech does that.
One of the ways Sorkin helps create that illusion is by shortening the time and effort it takes Sam to come up with words. In the "freak" scene you refer to, for example, Sam is supposed to have come up with those remarks "on the way over, in the car"; in reality it probably took Sorkin days if not weeks to come up with them, and multiple redrafts.
The west wing had 25+ writers.
Which means when characters call Sam a genius, Sorkin is actually calling himself a genius. One of several reasons it's a little hard to like Sam as much as Sorkin and Lowe want him to be liked.
@@jerodast you’re overthinking it Yes, Sam is a written character and a lot goes into him. Doubtful Sorkin knows everything that Sam “knows” off the cuff. There’s research and drafts then the final product that so many of us like. I don’t think Sorkin is writing this just to call himself a genius
What was edited out at the end of this video is Sam hitting CTRL-Z getting back all that text he just "deleted."
And then CTRL-A and setting font to comic sans
Cancer- If I cut down the tree, I make money from it but once. I f I merely trim it back, I'll make money from it for the next thirty years.
I'd like to think that Big Pharma wouldn't do that, but we're talking about an industry that profits on misery, an industry that changes a drug for a tablet to a capsule so they can get 17 more years of patent protections.
@@stevechance150 and that's what they would do with a cancer cure - make the cure expensive and make sure they kept the patent. Improvements that lead to fewer side effects also get you money. I'm a researcher in this field and I know some of the industry players and the attempts to seek a cure are not cynical, they are heartfelt and genuine. There's still more than enough profit to be made. Just because you're "cured" of cancer once doesn't mean you can't get it again, and with increasing frequency the longer you live.
Saddest moment, when Sam decides to hit delete, instead of “archive”.... 😞
Back in the day you paid by the floppy disk
Sam Seaborn was the worst character on the show. It was a vanity role for the actor.
Couldn’t disagree more...
You're right. Lowe could never get over the fact that the original intentions for the role changed and that Richard and Brad and Alison and Martin were just doing far more interesting things with the material than he was and inspiring Aaron more. It's a shame that he never learnt to be part of the team and accept that he wasn't *The* star.
Um.....Mandy???
@@mattschwisow9982 Pardon me?
@@seanwebb605 The worst character in the show was Mandy. No contest.
Please re-boot The West Wing with a President Seaborn.
I’d watch that... as long as Sorkin writes it.
They're working on it!
@@renafox4481 God help us. In spite of the Sorkin's brilliant writing, this was a democratic fantasy. After the disgrace that is the last 15 years of the Democrat Party, a reboot of this show would be a joke.
I'd favour a continuation of TWW with an independent President taking place after Bartlet's, Santos' , and Vinick's terms in office. This leader would be dealing with dem Senate majority leader Sam Seaborn and his wife, rep House Speaker Ainsley Hayes-Seaborn. I picture this series to be what I feel "Designated Survivor" should've been before the show went off the deep end.
@@duncanwebb9450 Ainsley would probably take his name and not hyphenate. Being Southern and conservative, tradition would be very important to her and she would not see taking her husband’s name as degrading in any way.
And now, we have a president that encourages people to drink bleach to cure a virus that, in his own words, is a hoax.
Way to make stuff up to try, unsuccessfully, to make your point. If you took the time to actually watch the video you would know he never really said that.
@@bazonka1 He did keep making comments about possible treatments when he had no qualifications. If you watch some other world leaders (the ones that are respected) giving press conferences at the time they did not comment on cures/treatments etc but left that to those who were qualified.
@@bazonka1 Here is what he said (all in 2020): January 22: “We have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China. It’s going to be just fine.” February 2: “We pretty much shut it down coming in from China.” February 24: “The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA… Stock Market starting to look very good to me!” February 25: “CDC and my Administration are doing a GREAT job of handling Coronavirus.” February 25: “I think that's a problem that’s going to go away… They have studied it. They know very much. In fact, we’re very close to a vaccine.” February 26: “The 15 (cases in the US) within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero.” February 26: “We're going very substantially down, not up.” February 27: “One day it’s like a miracle, it will disappear.” February 28: “We're ordering a lot of supplies. We're ordering a lot of, uh, elements that frankly we wouldn't be ordering unless it was something like this. But we're ordering a lot of different elements of medical.” March 2: “You take a solid flu vaccine, you don't think that could have an impact, or much of an impact, on corona?” March 2: “A lot of things are happening, a lot of very exciting things are happening and they’re happening very rapidly.” March 4: “If we have thousands or hundreds of thousands of people that get better just by, you know, sitting around and even going to work - some of them go to work, but they get better.” March 5: “I NEVER said people that are feeling sick should go to work.” March 5: “The United States… has, as of now, only 129 cases… and 11 deaths. We are working very hard to keep these numbers as low as possible!” March 6: “I think we’re doing a really good job in this country at keeping it down… a tremendous job at keeping it down.” March 6: “Anybody right now, and yesterday, anybody that needs a test gets a test. They’re there. And the tests are beautiful…. the tests are all perfect like the letter was perfect. The transcription was perfect. Right? This was not as perfect as that but pretty good.” March 6: “I like this stuff. I really get it. People are surprised that I understand it… Every one of these doctors said, ‘How do you know so much about this?’ Maybe I have a natural ability. Maybe I should have done that instead of running for president.” March 6: “I don't need to have the numbers double because of one ship that wasn't our fault.” March 8: “We have a perfectly coordinated and fine tuned plan at the White House for our attack on Coronavirus.” March 9: “This blindsided the world.” March 13: "I take no responsibility.” March 16: “This is a pandemic. I felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic.”
Having some politician saying we want to cure cancer isn't the hard part.
It's kind of a moon shot reference. A politician says "we will go to the moon, because it is hard", and they did it! With that said, that was a technological push, with science to back it up; finding cures for disease is a scientific push, with technology to back it up. Tinkering towards a goal is probably easier than finding a secret about the world that nobody's ever found before.
It's been a long time since anyone commented here, but America needs to rise again. COVID-19 is engulfing our planet, in Europe we are just holding on. American exceptionalism can save millions of lives. Help us. Find a vacinne. Please.
why was this scratched? I cant imagine unprecedented funding against the most lethal cancers. what would it look like and what results it could bring?
The problem with curing cancer is is that there are over 100 types of cancers and all of them are caused by something different!
True, but there is s pattern to how most of them work. I am surprised that we haven't cured cancers yet - or at least most of them.
@@mikemesser4326 because there's more money to be made in treatment than there is in cure.
@@Tim.GsyBloke I know. Just disappointing. I refuse to pay for a treatment that doesn't result in a cure. And yes, I am dealing with such a problem now. I've chosen to risk death rather than continue treatments. In my case, it will be a race to see if a tumor flares up and blinds me while killing my brain - or it spreads to cause fibrosis around my aorta or shuts down my kidneys.
@@mikemesser4326 I hope you're doing okay...
"all [100] of them are caused by something different". I don't think that's true or relevant. Cancer is abnormal cells growth resulting in tumors. I want these cells destroyed, I don't really care what "caused" them to switch to abnormal growth. So what if radiation from my cellphone caused them?
Joe Biden these days.
Sam is president Bartlet's idealist. Toby is his moral center. C.J. is his compassion. Josh is his ambition. And Leo is his walking stick
The ultimate American idealist! Loves the military, loves war, loves the rich, hates the poor.
and charlie is his heart
That's why when they showed the future, Bartlett had a regular walking stick, because Leo wasn't around anymore.
@@ClarinoI At that point he'd also lost (and I guess partially regained) Toby, and Sam.
This was excellently put
Actually wasn't the Air Force in ww2. Army airborne.
Army Air Corps
Actually the Air Force was part of the Army back then as the United States Army Air Forces. The Airborne were the paratroopers, then and now part of the army.
If only the people who actually work in white house were anywhere near that smart, rather than the petty, shallow, vindictive, unfeeling, unthinking people who really are.
We don't vote for "smart." We vote for whomever gives the best raw meat soundbytes. If "smart" won elections rather than "Lock her up!" and "Build that wall!" then we'd be getting smart candidates.
Bevan +and would we have gotten better had she won?no.
Well, they don't bring their shallow ideology into the TH-cam comment section, so they're a lot smarter than you
Bevan Yeah, because "Hope and Change" is so brilliant. You assholes voted for an unqualified idiot because he is black. Don't lecture us.
@@MrJamberee If Obama was unqualified, then what in the hell does that make Trump.
That moment you realize Rob Lowe and Patrick Dempsey have the exact same voice.
Rob Lowe was initially going to Derek Shepherd but he refused and Patrick got the role. They both have that idealist McDreamy charm working for them.
Aaron sorkin is the king of dialogue scenes
too many "yea's," but I agree
I wonder if whomever wrote this years SOTU, was a TWW fan,.
category pets and animals?
This is fucking stupid. Thank you for wasting a tiny slice of the internet.