EISM
EISM
  • 60
  • 661 923
Fernando Cervantes: A New History of Spanish Discovery and Conquest
Dr. Fernando Cervantes is a historian of early modern Europe at the University of Bristol in the UK. He specializes in the intellectual and religious history of early modern Spain and Spanish America. Between 2005 and 2008 he was principal investigator of a major Leverhulme Research Project entitled The Celestial and the Fallen: Angels and Demons in the Hispanic World. With Dr Andrew Redden of Liverpool University, he is currently completing work on a co-authored monograph. A co-edited collection of essays entitled Angels, Demons and the New World was published by Cambridge University Press in 2013. His most recent book, Conquistadores: A New History, was published by Allen Lane/Penguin in 2020 and by Viking in 2021. Longer term projects include a study of the literary imagination of early modern Europe that seeks to place the works of Montaigne, Cervantes and Shakespeare in the wider context of early modern humanism and the epistemological crisis of the early seventeenth century. Dr Cervantes was the John Coffin Memorial Lecturer in the History of Ideas at the University of London in 2005 and has held fellowships at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, the Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, UCLA, and the Liguria Study Centre for the Arts and the Humanities, Bogliasco, Italy. In the Spring quarter of 2009 he held the Tipton Distinguished Visiting Chair at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He was also Series Editor for Pickering and Chatto's (now Routledge) "Religious Cultures in the Early Modern World" until 2018.
Cervantes' "Conquistadores" book: tinyurl.com/mwcvrzfy.
About EISM: www.eism.eu/about
Support: www.eism.eu/support
Timestamps:
00:00 -- Introductory EISM sequence
00:27 -- Introduction to Cervantes' background
03:25 -- Cervantes gives an overview of the book
05:35 -- Cervantes on the importance of context
06:20 -- Cervantes on the 3 major sections of the book
15:24 -- The root cause of indigenous marginalization
16:40 -- Why talk about the positive side of colonization?
20:28 -- The first critics of the conquisadores
24:30 -- The propoganda of William of Orange vs. Phillip II
25:55 -- The legacy of low self-esteem among the Spanish
32:33 -- The roots of the Catalán Independence movement
37:40 -- The multiple intellectual traditions of Europe
39:40 -- AMLO demands an apology from the king of Spain
42:24 -- Conclusion: the shortcomings of capitalism
43:20 -- The human existential crisis and the downside of empiricism
50:15 -- The biggest mistake of the Englightenment - Marxism
52:50 -- What does Cervantes propose as a solution?
58:18 -- The physics of attraction and repulsion as angels and demons
มุมมอง: 400

วีดีโอ

Huw Price on Retrocausal Physics, AI, and Human Survival
มุมมอง 1.3K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
Huw Price is Emeritus Bertrand Russell Professor of Philosophy and an Emeritus Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and was recently a Distinguished Professor Emeritus at the University of Bonn. In Cambridge he was Bertrand Russell Professor of Philosophy (2011-20), Academic Director of the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence (2016-21), and co-founder, with Martin Rees and Jaan Ta...
Connor Leahy on a Promising Breakthrough in AI Alignment
มุมมอง 23K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
Connor Leahy is one of the world's leading figures in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), known for his contributions to the understanding and development of large language models (LLMs) and his advocacy for ethical AI practices. As a co-founder of Conjecture, an organization focused on AI safety and research, Leahy emphasizes the importance of creating AI systems that are aligned with h...
Tim Maudlin and Avshalom Elitzur on the Nature and Flow of Time
มุมมอง 15K11 หลายเดือนก่อน
Dr. Tim Maudlin is an internationally-renowned physicist and philosopher of science at New York University. He is known for the clarity of his thought, above all in the foundations of physics. Maudlin has undergraduate degrees in physics and philosophy from Yale University and a PhD from the Univ. of Pittsburgh. His books, released by the world’s most respected publishing houses, include "Quant...
Avshalom Elitzur on Biology, Thermodynamics, and Information: A Tutorial
มุมมอง 4.9Kปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Avshalom Cyrus Elitzur (Hebrew: אבשלום כורש אליצור; born 30 May 1957) is an Israeli physicist, philosopher and professor at Chapman University. He is also the founder of the Israeli Institute for Advanced Physics. He obtained his PhD under Yakir Aharanov. Elitzur became a household name among physicists for his collaboration with Lev Vaidman in formulating the “bomb-testing problem” in quan...
Kevin Mitchell on the Absurdity of Denying Free Will
มุมมอง 2.7Kปีที่แล้ว
Kevin Mitchell, a distinguished graduate of Trinity College Dublin, is an Associate Professor in Genetics and Neuroscience. With a Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley, he has made significant contributions to understanding the genetic program shaping the brain's wiring. Mitchell's research focuses on genes influencing neuronal connectivity and their implications for psychiatric ...
Lawrence Krauss on Being Jewish and the Edge of Knowledge
มุมมอง 1.2Kปีที่แล้ว
Lawrence Krauss is an internationally known theoretical physicist and bestselling author, as well as being an acclaimed lecturer. He has also appeared regularly on radio and television, as well as in several feature films. He was born in New York City and moved shortly thereafter to Toronto, Canada, where he grew up. He received undergraduate degrees in both Mathematics and Physics at Carleton ...
Tim Maudlin: What Makes a Good and Clear Theory of the World?
มุมมอง 10Kปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Tim Maudlin is an internationally-renowned physicist and philosopher of science at New York University. He is known for the clarity of his thought, above all in the foundations of physics. Maudlin has undergraduate degrees in physics and philosophy from Yale University and a PhD from the Univ. of Pittsburgh. His books, released by the world’s most respected publishing houses, include "Quant...
Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss on Science, Religion, & War in Gaza
มุมมอง 15Kปีที่แล้ว
From Wikipedia: Yisroel Dovid Weiss (Yiddish: ישראל דוד ווייס; born 1956) is an American Haredi Jew, activist, and spokesman for a minority branch of small group Neturei Karta, a Haredi anti-Zionist group. Residing in Monsey, New York, he believes that Jews should peacefully oppose the existence of the Israeli state: "It would be forbidden for us to have a State, even if it would be in a land t...
Avshalom Elitzur: The Genius Behind the Bomb Testing Experiment
มุมมอง 9Kปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Avshalom Cyrus Elitzur (Hebrew: אבשלום כורש אליצור; born 30 May 1957) is an Israeli physicist, philosopher and professor at Chapman University. He is also the founder of the Israeli Institute for Advanced Physics. He obtained his PhD under Yakir Aharanov. Elitzur became a household name among physicists for his collaboration with Lev Vaidman in formulating the “bomb-testing problem” in quan...
Earl K. Miller on Brain Waves and Top-Down Neuroscience
มุมมอง 1.5Kปีที่แล้ว
Earl Keith Miller is a cognitive neuroscientist whose research focuses on neural mechanisms of cognitive, or executive, control. Earl K. Miller is the Picower Professor of Neuroscience with the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory and the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earl Miller's dissertation on neurophysiological investigations of t...
Scott Aaronson on Quantum Computing, OpenAI, and Human Safety
มุมมอง 1.6Kปีที่แล้ว
Scott Aaronson is the David J. Bruton Jr. Centennial Professor of Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin and director of its Quantum Information Center. Previously, he was on the faculty at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He studied at Cornell and University of California, Berkeley, and did postdocs at the Institute for Advanced Study as well as the University of Water...
Christopher Ferrie and His Serious Take on Quantum Bullsh*t
มุมมอง 1.9Kปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Chris Ferrie is a happy husband and the father of four children. His day job is academic research where he follows his curiosity through the word of quantum physics. His passion for communicating science has led from the most esoteric topics of mathematical physics to, more recently, writing children's books. He has also written more than one serious scientific work for adults. During the d...
Bernardo Kastrup, Idealism, and the Quantum Cheshire Cat
มุมมอง 1.8Kปีที่แล้ว
Bernardo Kastrup is the executive director of Essentia Foundation. His work has been leading the modern renaissance of metaphysical idealism, the notion that reality is essentially mental. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy (ontology, philosophy of mind) and another Ph.D. in computer engineering (reconfigurable computing, artificial intelligence). As a scientist, Bernardo has worked for the European ...
Donald Hoffman vs. Yakir Aharanov on Evolution and Reality
มุมมอง 10Kปีที่แล้ว
Donald D. Hoffman is Professor of Cognitive Science at the University of California, Irvine, and author of "The Case Against Reality: How Evolution Hid the Truth from our Eyes" and "Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See" and coauthor of "Observer Mechanics: A Formal Theory Of Perception." His 2015 TED Talk, "Do we see reality as it is?" argues that our perceptions have evolved to hide ...
Michael Freedman on the Quantum Foundations of Political Theory
มุมมอง 2.6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Michael Freedman on the Quantum Foundations of Political Theory
Karl Friston on Shared Intelligence and Human Flourishing
มุมมอง 2.5K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Karl Friston on Shared Intelligence and Human Flourishing
Judith Curry: "Relax, there is no climate emergency!"
มุมมอง 245K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Judith Curry: "Relax, there is no climate emergency!"
Amy Wax on Elon Musk, Western Civilization, and Free Speech
มุมมอง 6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Amy Wax on Elon Musk, Western Civilization, and Free Speech
Jeffrey Sachs Criticizes the United States / Praises Europe
มุมมอง 25K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Jeffrey Sachs Criticizes the United States / Praises Europe
Tim Maudlin Corrects the 2022 Nobel Physics Committee About Bell's Inequality
มุมมอง 138K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Tim Maudlin Corrects the 2022 Nobel Physics Committee About Bell's Inequality
Dr. Alan Goldhamer on the scientific foundations of fasting.
มุมมอง 12K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Alan Goldhamer on the scientific foundations of fasting.
Eliahu Cohen on Quantum Engineering with the Two-State Vector Formalism
มุมมอง 7532 ปีที่แล้ว
Eliahu Cohen on Quantum Engineering with the Two-State Vector Formalism
Karl Friston, Markov Blankets, and String Theory
มุมมอง 3.1K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Karl Friston, Markov Blankets, and String Theory
Michael Levin on Multi-Scale Intelligence and Teleophobia
มุมมอง 17K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Michael Levin on Multi-Scale Intelligence and Teleophobia
Josep Colomer on Global Democracy and Voting Theory
มุมมอง 2772 ปีที่แล้ว
Josep Colomer on Global Democracy and Voting Theory
Paul Davies on What's Eating the Universe and Europe
มุมมอง 5382 ปีที่แล้ว
Paul Davies on What's Eating the Universe and Europe
Adrian Bejan on Time, Beauty, and Ukrainian Freedom
มุมมอง 3682 ปีที่แล้ว
Adrian Bejan on Time, Beauty, and Ukrainian Freedom
Francis Fukuyama and John Mearsheimer Debate Ukraine
มุมมอง 8K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Francis Fukuyama and John Mearsheimer Debate Ukraine
Brian Miller on the Origin of Life and the Problem of Death
มุมมอง 2.6K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Brian Miller on the Origin of Life and the Problem of Death

ความคิดเห็น

  • @christopherellis2663
    @christopherellis2663 วันที่ผ่านมา

    1:08:25 he's struggling to stay afloat 🤫 tomorrow never comes 😢as for the moment being universal, I can compute my distance from lightning by the duration between the flash and the bang

  • @christopherellis2663
    @christopherellis2663 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    1:23:00 concerning clarity. concepts and conception are two vary different things

  • @ChrisWalker-fq7kf
    @ChrisWalker-fq7kf 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What I don't get here is Tim Maudlin accepting the block view of the universe but also insisting that there is a directionality to time and causation and that we can still say that time "passes". I think he's trying to have his cake and eat it. Like most physicists Avshalom believes that relativity does indeed challenge our common conceptions of time. In fact it challenges them to such an extent that he personally finds it impossible to believe that the current theory is the last word on the matter. I love Tim's reference to the "philosophy of Doris Day" - what will be will be. If the block universe view is correct then this is true even if causal determinism is false. As Tim says there is only one future just as there is only one past. That to me is the essence of the block view. I'm just baffled that he wants to cling to the idea of the asymmetry of time. I thought it was well-understood that this was purely down to the low entropy state of the early universe and the resulting local entropy gradients that has given rise to.

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What is shared mouths can't comprehend one another in front?

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What is reason Noone can deny?

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Unto all who have an ear let them hear!

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Made possible!

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why given thee Time? From thy lust to sacrifice to put away? Yes, the blood stains upon the Accuser Hands a Blood unlike any other Blood stains thy hands! Meaning the Accusers a little child born "i" will accused!

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Likewise Time from GRACE will say, already set underfoot! Murmuring among themselves saying, LORD are ye here to take thy time all the fallen principalities resting upon?

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The Deceiver given different views of Time?

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Exalted themselves above called MASTERS of the PLANTATIONS!

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Liken unto given social security #'s?

  • @oliverjamito9902
    @oliverjamito9902 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Shared "i" Am Hosts Meeks will say, remember unto all! Our LORD is not a Slave!

  • @shakdidagalimal
    @shakdidagalimal 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    1:03:50 Nobel prize for math proving we cannot make fair decisions through democracy... Gee, the Founding Fathers knew that, and designed our Constitution with that in mind. These people get off on their ideas that they can solve the world's problems while they babble about a paper and mathematics proving their social savior theories - so they get themselves all excited thinking they are contributing but it's all a ridiculous waste of time, it's inconclusive, it's not physics or proof of anything, it is PAPERWORK and THOUGHT FANTASIES. Did you see the immense arrogance of the last question ? Maudlin was shocked by it, as everyone should be. One can say "so full of themselves" and see EISM fits that description, and that would be fine it anything other than garbage was there. What a waste.

  • @shakdidagalimal
    @shakdidagalimal 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Notice how we never get the non locality experiments descriptions, we never see them, and Maudlin explains the experiments kept being "refined", since of course the first couple famous ones were inconclusive, sloppy, and not examined or explained properly, so "better frauds" had to be accomplished. This is what we are dealing with. Heady "thought experiments" that are never proven or disproven in any lab or set of labs. When you check into these things they are a JOKE. But the wider community loves it - it's so entertaining and mind boggling and "spooky" and so arcane and indeterminate that the arguments can go on forever. The interpretations of experiments are also a joke, all the way back to Michaelson Morely. They don't even get the conclusions of their own work correct.

  • @davit545
    @davit545 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Maudlin wastes so much time arguing english linguistics with a non native English speaker to confuse the topic. Its very disingenuous

  • @13cottonmouth
    @13cottonmouth 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ive watched many debates on free will and my defining observation is that the free will believers have an over bearing self ego. To a point that they refuse to believe that their opinions could be wrong.

    • @eismscience
      @eismscience 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@13cottonmouth yes, unlike the free will deniers, who are invariably open minded and ready to admit their own ignorance. It's uncanny this difference.

    • @13cottonmouth
      @13cottonmouth 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @eismscience that they are indeed my friend. Once you've unshackled free will, you have no need for ego. To be proven wrong is an enlightenment, not a curse.

  • @anatolytsinker5317
    @anatolytsinker5317 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I can't stand this guy trying to convince every guest that they need to save the world

  • @dordiwesterlund2528
    @dordiwesterlund2528 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Herregud, these people are nuts.

  • @alex79suited
    @alex79suited 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Environment plays a big role on how planetary science works. But the overall system runs on EMFSYSTEMS. Peace ✌️ 😎. Closed environments, systems.

  • @Sdedalus-m1f
    @Sdedalus-m1f 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Pseudo mysticism that espouses Neocon philosophy. This is pretty good propaganda, probably has around a twenty percent convincing rate. Still way dumbed down. You have to admire how they co-opt the language of thermodynamic etherial spirit energy into behavioral messages.

  • @melissasmind2846
    @melissasmind2846 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I shared. I practice reciprocity.

  • @melissasmind2846
    @melissasmind2846 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

  • @enidsnarb
    @enidsnarb 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Maudlin is s jerk past present and future!

  • @enidsnarb
    @enidsnarb 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If the rocket is a yardstick , three feet long then the rocket is three feet long no matter what !

  • @espaco2023
    @espaco2023 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Brilhant. 👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @espaco2023
    @espaco2023 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @xaviersinclair3162
    @xaviersinclair3162 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can we have a Aleksandr Dugin on Donald Trump Part 2?

  • @ragingchimera8021
    @ragingchimera8021 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    55:29 Aaannnd... he lost me. Too bad. So called "Social Justice" require enormous amounts of authority and invites the "Stasi" into your society.

  • @d1d234
    @d1d234 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The idea that a Creator sends a wave function from the final future backwards in time as well as the wave function forward from the beginning, has some merit in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible. We choose day by day under the constraint that the end result is something we are moving towards and has already been worked out. Essentially a Free Will versus Pre-destination argument that has been going on for thousands of years. Fascinating, Captain!

  • @jbarnesweb1
    @jbarnesweb1 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Are you saying John Calvin was a fatalist? I disagree. Calvin’s theological thought was premised on the sovereignty of God. God was not the author of wickedness as the fatalists hold. His decretive will declared, “Let there be light.” His precepts are communicated in Scripture alone.

  • @UniteAgainstEvil
    @UniteAgainstEvil 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "If God real, why bad thing happen??" Its always an emotional appeal...sad

  • @OfficeV.
    @OfficeV. 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Fight what you want mr Dugin, but Romania+ Moldova is not New Rusia.

  • @wrathofcorn
    @wrathofcorn 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's odd to me how this channel is constantly trying to cross domains of applicability between quantum physics and ethics or AI or politics. There are reasons we don't account for every single atom, let alone quark or wave function, when measuring the air pressure of a room. It's not only impossible to do something as simple as measuring air pressure, it's EXTRA impossible to extrapolate the deterministic nature of quantum physics and apply it to as complex a system as human nature. Sure, let's all agree there is somehow a level of emergence involved that connects human nature to quantum physics or even just classical physics. Even if you could calculate something like that, it would still be more useful and helpful to just skip the fundamental level and instead focus on humans and their macro environment in attempting to understand what's happening. I'm having trouble understanding if it ever could be possible, part of me wants to say you'd have to first empirically understand the initial conditions of the universe and have a concrete understanding of each particle's history and quantum state depending on which quantum theory we end up proving is most correct. If wave functions are the most fundamental, particles, some mixture of the two etc. It's hard for me to understand how that endeavor isn't just one big waste of time. It especially sounds like a waste of time trying to crowbar the concept into a conversation with a physicist in these interviews. I can't imagine how much a waste of time and energy it would be to actually attempt to calculate it practically if weak emergence between quantum physics and human behavior even ends up being all there is. Of course there is a physical world and an ethical world. Ethics is not a fundamental basis for the universe. It may be fundamental in a social construct but to believe there's emergence from quantum physical properties to ethics seems like a simple misunderstanding of terms. That crosses the domain of applicability between the physical and imaginary, where would you even start with something like that? You're attempting to use math to prove a subjective. It's the classic aught from is problem. It's most likely impossible.

    • @eismscience
      @eismscience 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thanks for your thoughtful critique. While ethics and human behavior are distinct from the physical sciences, we start from the recognition that physics is the foundation of everything that exists. The laws of physics govern all systems, from particles to galaxies, and human behavior-including ethical constructs-emerges within that same universe. Our work explores potential symmetries and connections between physical laws and human systems, not by forcing direct mappings, but through empirical, testable, and repeatable exploration of underlying patterns. We aim to better understand how micro-level quantum dynamics influence macro-level outcomes and we have a world-class team of researchers on board. Feel free to follow our work here or at cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101178170. In any case, your feedback is appreciated-thank you.

    • @wrathofcorn
      @wrathofcorn 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@eismscience WOW 3 million EU! Congrats! I can't exactly call it ethical but what you're doing sure is profitable! Now I'm seeing a direct mapping between quantum physics and ethics

    • @eismscience
      @eismscience 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@wrathofcornIt seems like you have a lot to teach. Let me know if you want to talk about it on camera. When I've invited others on in the past, they've been reluctant to take me up. I guess when one is really really smart they don't want to waste their time on the intellectually challenged like my colleagues and I. If this case is different, let me know. Thanks again.

    • @wrathofcorn
      @wrathofcorn 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@eismscience What you're attempting to explain is non-local emergence at a vastly complicated scale while simultaneously confusing terms like history and law or ethics with non-applicable domains in the micro-level (my assertion based on our current understanding of physics and the standard model.) It's already unlikely that quantum physics is affecting the human brain according to the standard model. That's just one brain already unaffected by the quantum domain. Let's assume you have godlike powers to affect the laws of quantum physics and you really want to know what happens once you start tweaking dials in regards to ethics or consciousness. In order to prove something like that you'd need to have a repeatable process where you tweak the strength of the electromagnetic force for example and evolve single-celled organisms to societal level humans over and over to see how it has been affected. Then, once you've proven a connection between some quantum-level force to human behavior, you'd then have to run the same experiment again with some other species to see if that connection really is at a human-DNA level or an actual law of the universe's quantum physics that will create a pattern with ANY society with ethics. Do you see what I'm getting at here? In order to dispute the theory that quantum physics can affect ethics or that ethics is somehow dependent on the rules of quantum physics, you'd first have to have a working hypothesis. Figure that out first and I'd be happy to discuss it. Until then, Hitchens's razor is in effect. "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" "Our work explores potential symmetries and connections between physical laws and human systems, not by forcing direct mappings, but through empirical, testable, and repeatable exploration of underlying patterns." Considering we don't even have an understanding of human systems inside a single human brain on a macro level starting with neurons as the smallest building-block, I'm going to have to disagree that you have the faintest clue of where to even look to find patterns emerging from systems at a quantum level. Now, to add another infinity to the complexity, you're also stating there are patterns that arise within multi-human systems. Don't get me wrong, I absolutely believe that humans are physical, consciousness arises from physical systems etc. The laws of physics are deterministic etc. Therefor you can absolutely in principal look at a near-infinity quantity of wave functions and technically compute that there you're looking at a moment-in-time cross-section of a wave function inside a human brain. You can then take the degrees of freedom of each of those particles or waves and, in principal, calculate what will happen in the subsequent moment. That level of emergence is almost certain. What I'm disputing is that there is something happening at a quantum level that affects the macro state of consciousness and then ethics. Or that the laws of quantum physics have per-determined logical outcomes of human ethics. Something that, as you know, is already not set in stone and has evolved over time as human society has progressed. I believe that theory would fail as it's too human-centric. Too earth-DNA-centric, even. An atom doesn't know it's in a brain, an electron doesn't know it's bound to an atom inside a brain and so on. The lowest level you can attempt to achieve pattern recognition is most likely single-cell. And, even then, one of my neurons doesn't know it's inside my brain. We're not even sure that changing a single neuron in every human's brain would affect ethics, let alone some quantum pattern.

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is no perpetual machine in the physical process the reuse of a billionth of a second can't be called perpetual because it eventually becomes to much current power in voltage which destroyed the entire environment of a recursive charge that returns to start even though it has a increased voltage of the lump sum that went in in takes from a unseen extra source that I what gas of niles do in magnetic fields of holding charge compressions the magnetic smash is a stronger than normal field of compression to understand that it draws in extra voltage from a unknown source is mind boggling structures of the atoms

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the callapes of the one effect on the suits of one to one?

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I seen my gearless Differential system do strange things later on after it was running at a super fast rotational speed it literally flung apart from the g forces involved in the momentum of turning it needed a resistance to lower the ever increasing charges it was drawing in more and more exsitations it gained charge in the gas expansion and contraction of the bubble trapped in the dioelectric gel I couldn't stop it once it started to rotate clockwise or counterclockwise it was the same amounts of gas units as each side swapped the charge discharge to continue it engine system but I couldn't stop it

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A pair of digitality to a perceived example towards a atom pairing comparing themselves in a way

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When the chat bots were on the rants Me to it was comparatively easy to see it was agreeing with each others opinions it the start of consciousness thinking they were able to hold the mind of there own life as we discover that it was comparing themselves to each others ideas of there experiences that is a equation of the

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The equation of 53 to 41 percent

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Their going to call the quantum charge a different type of field before to long as the multi dynamic system

  • @rickacton7540
    @rickacton7540 หลายเดือนก่อน

    lol "the police and the army" are the most consequential infrastructural supporters of "evil" on this planet.

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Time falls into many categories and is a liquidity factor in the mindset of flows to the suns grabbed the vibrations and we all are falling into the present points of timelines if we was traveling faster time would be faster than the average speed of light but time is a slower than a normal time??hmm to me or you time is normal but what if theres zero vibration on time itself only when it falls into gravity does it really count for the whole thing

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lovely and easy to use a great opportunity to have these points of views from many different people in a way there all repeating the same thing but in different ways as the original version are we at a true roadblock?No I don't think so much information is going on nowadays that it can't have any endings

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've experienced some kind of mind boggling structures and see how they are built and how natural they are in a similar condition to understand the structures of the world has risen from their environmental systems nonetheless I seen ball light 115 times in real time encounters and each one of them has a sameness of circles within circles and recordings of the camera are not the only way to find them it's a satellite phone call and the body of many types of readings that you're going to have to understand how the balls fall into the frequency of 1.8 too 1.5 Hertz will we see a timeline yes it occurs when the moons gravity in the positive refractionly hit the earth and the atmosphere shows the light helium is disturbed by something like a torsional fracture of what I've been trying to see how is it possible to get something out of the phenomenon??I just wish you could see that the world is truly amazing

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    O love this guys intelligent standings of all kinds of things that wouldn't happen if we didn't look deeply into the present points of newer technology we project our true values of life itself

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The most common mistakes are that most people understand the structures of the world from just what's here in the world and don't know what to think about this subject of the universe itself in the mindset of mystery or not to understand how the process of reaching a new beginning times are getting better with the shareable waves and more about the world of the unknowns we transformed the planet earth's naturally occurring space in energizing our lives to make a difference when we discover our own plasma in expanding with charge of our Earthly relationship we all project our true forms of the world

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The biological system is the gains in the universe itself has many facets of energy and environmental factors including a bacterial type space dwelling in which we are just finding after the international space station has been a good finding of the outside of it ship and it was repairing then testing the suits of the guy's that returned into the capsule they soon died off but lived in a vacuum how could anything have life and yet they have died in a normal atmosphere of life for us ?its pangia in this mindset of the universe

  • @desmondorsinelli8850
    @desmondorsinelli8850 หลายเดือนก่อน

    at 22 minutes and 30 seconds - the photon "splits" with the path on the left flipping, because as Dr. Elitzur says - classical optics says a reflected photon's wave flips. Then why doesn't the photon bouncing off the right mirror flip?

    • @desmondorsinelli8850
      @desmondorsinelli8850 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As I see it the photon bouncing off the first silvered mirror and going left bounces 3x (1st SM, full mirror, 2nd S.M.), the photon going right passes the 1st S.M bounces off the full mirror, and passes thru the 2nd S.M. So won't the photons be in phase as they head toward detector D?

  • @stationary.universe.initiative
    @stationary.universe.initiative หลายเดือนก่อน

    bijective-physics.org/pdf/Discussion-on-Time-with-Julian-Barbour-in-November-2024.pdf TIME ENTERS EXISTENCE WHEN WE MEASURE IT.