วีดีโอ

waiting on funding.......but have been given until february 2019 to start.

@@johndefriee1982 They only have 5 days. looks like its not going ahead. what a shame.. probably going to get that green spiral monstrosity instead.

@@MrGlazed crown needing partners to build.......was just looking at the web site.

I really wish it gets built but it’s July 2019 and we haven’t heard anything

Poor blind dog wouldn’t get far, I think you’re one of the many ones that end up on our Bondi rescue for under estimating the ocean here in Australia. Even on a calm flat day it can be dangerous. And FYI, I was with this company at the time of the rescue and can 100% confirm it was a legitimate rescue, in fact, CASA law states you are not allowed to fly a drone over someone’s head unless for an emergency situation such as this one. This exact company who I won’t name got their arses kicked by CASA for doing the same thing in a promo with major TV station here in Australia not long after this.

Also FYI you’re probably wondering how us pilots did the training, we go to an approved training area such as football fields or the beach and use cones on the beach as a drop point, or sometimes they put a dummy in the surf and you do it by that.

@@MiahBudoehy …you’re not a “pilot”….Lol ! I live in Australia and am a very experienced ocean swimmer.

@@cspace1234nz UAV Pilot is a pilot mate, still though, that blind dog you’re talking about wouldnt of made it through the shoreys that day! Lennox Head beach is where this took place which can get dangerous at the best of times

@@MiahBudoehy …all beaches can be dangerous, as we know an inexperienced swimmer is at all times just 15 seconds away from drowning. I’m just having you on a bit, anyone who helps with surf safety is a hero in my books

The 'larger idea' is that people really don't like being deceived and saying this is a 'rescue' when it's a training exercise is deceptive, not to mention disrespectful. This organization relies heavily on public support, respect goes both ways, at least it should.

хахахахаххааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааахххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххххааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааа

максим 11111111111111111111111111111111111000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000111 рублее

The drone wouldn't be able to pull the rescuees, but maybe a rope attached to the floatation device, long enough to reach the shore so that the humans can take over. You'd need quite a long rope, though, and that stuff gets heavy when it gets wet... A bigger drone (those that can actually lift a grown person) would be able to handle this, but i don't think that there are that many of those out there - or that they'd have the budget for a couple of them.

Que tal um helicóptero de plantão?

Bem pensado!

I'd also add that one of them (the guy on top of the video) is wearing a pair of fins, so... Yeah, something smells fishy... Maybe it was only a test

It's a conspiracy by our new drone overlords!

I just checked my schedule and also asked my colleagues, no conspiracies currently in the pipeline.

Also, you know, the description says that it's footage from a trial ;)

Also, you know, the description says that the swimmers were in trouble ;) I don't think you'd describe somebody as actually "in trouble" if it was only a trial, would you? The news article that brought me here specified that the (still running) trial mentioned above is about using drones for this purpose in general, and that this was (supposedly) not part of the trial, so it would have been an actual rescue mission using tools that are not officially approved yet. But hey, the manufacturer doesn't care, as long as he gets the publicity and the agency in charge will have to answer for using it... if, you know, it wouldn't be all staged anyways.

H S

The Future was 4 years ago when i designed this for my HSC... check my video lol.

yeah

RedTyrian Your side lost the vote. Gay marriage will be legal by Christmas, and not one single aspect of your life will be affected by gay Australians getting married.

Only by a slim margin, and you are right, I won't be affected, only the poor youth that will be sodomized by your kind. Now they are free to get married polluting the terminology of marriage, and with that more freedom in choice of who you people want to sodomize via foster, IVF, or underage kids from some poor third world country. Good luck with that.

kay jay oh I forgot to add troll.

kay jay as I said slim margin, even counting the multiple votes by individuals in the gay lobby, bigot, homophobe, whatever, I'm not as sensitive as you poorly brain developed mutants. Go munch carpet, it's what you do best.

RedTyrian If you believe everyone for marriage equality has to be gay....then according to the postal survey, you're living in a 61% gay country. LMBAO!

Democracy is, in theory at least, about the will of the majority triumphing. Again, in theory, this postal survey is about the will of the majority. Showing crowds of people sending in their opinion poll forms, therefore, is an appeal to democracy.

no just means you are putting your own religious beliefs or life views above the rights of OTHERS, even though they have nothing at all to do with (or change) the quality of YOUR life. Dont know about those other things you list, but it certainly makes you selfish. This has nothing to do with 'Naturally' Law, but 'Civil' Law.

No, it's not the meaning of marriage that is being changed, it's the legal definition. These are two very different things. Marriage will still be a commitment between two people. And please don't make bullying accusations you can't back up. Nobody is holding a gun to your head. Nobody forced you to watch this advertisement. If you want to vote no, that's your prerogative.

what an absolute load of rubbish. You do know there are other way to make a family. Adoption, Surrogates and the like. Gay people do it all the time anyway, well for those of them that are interested in that lifestyle (spoiler alert: they are arent all interested in that). PS so according to your grand logic does that mean straight people who are married and who have no interest or cant have a family, arent married in your eyes?! Marriage isnt about making babies, it isnt only about love, it is about two people committing to each, to spend their life together... having babies and being in love is a by-product of that. Sexual preference doesnt stop being human beings being able to commit to each to other. And if you are so petty in your life you can only be happy by coming between teo humans and their commit to each other, the flaw lives within you, not them.

the thing you are calling a fact has only been one since 1994, in our country. Countries all over the world has been redefining them for almost a decade and their societies still function. Pretty much when someone says something is a 'truth' actually translates to 'the only reality i want to believe'. Whether something is true, is based on someones opinion of what is right or wrong, your truth is only true to you and people of likeminded thoughts. That doesnt make you right. Nor does it make you wrong. It just means you have an opinion.

you do know things have changed through history? Slavery is wrong now. Woman (in theory) are now equal in all ways. Though some loser males still dont see it that way. We know longer burn people at the stake, have public executions. You mention about kids, once upon a time, woman used to be forced into marriage at an age when that was legal, they were property, children. We used to arrest and imprison gay people. We use to have no police and if you go back long enough we didnt have justice. A commoner was the property of their Lord. See the flaw in your argument yet? HINT: Morality is not fixed. Human social evolution, keeps doing exactly that, evolving and adapting. So by all means keep going on about history, while the rest of us understand, that while those things are fixed in time, morality adapts from those lessons.

What's wrong with the spires they can't get rid of it's for phones and and tv towers

P.s there is hate 😀

I would also recommend it

You deserve a dislike this is disgraceful

Grzegorz Gronkowski at least they make more money than you fucking idiot

Grzegorz Gronkowski they arent shut the hell up