วีดีโอ

😅speak for yourself. We the people do not need your hypnosis, and I am assuming that someone is paying you well for pushing that bs on us.

where i can find whole video

What is the video? It’s distracting at best. Distracting like hell. If You don’t have original video stoppage (would be best), just add subtitles or anything else useful. Don’t add some associative AI garbage

why cutoff video before the big reveal? nasty

Can we upload someone talking without an inane, annoying soundtrack? Unwatchable.

Terrible subtitles

6:05 wow i used to work here. What are the chances you would show this in the video 😅

he just said a whole bunch of nothing that isnt common sense.

In-line with entrepreneurs

Dear Mr Taleb, what's you opinion about "thought tinkering' .. i.e., "thought experiment" (gedankenexperiment)?.. Thank you i am really enjoying your perspective here 🙂

Buy otm options - both puts and calls, sell otm further than the otm puts and calls that you bought. Needless to say, buy more than the sell to avoid ruin. Unlimited upside and limited downside.

Nassim speaks from the Top to the Down, 🎼Go Tell It on the Mountain

I have promted ChatGPT to elaborate on Agressive Tinkering. It gives me a very good insight

Yeah , I think it will be useful some kind of backtesting. It's very vague the definition of speculative, span from bitcoin to OTM options

Perfect summary of all his books!! Thank you!!

Which book do you recommend of Taleb?

Dear Mr Taleb, I'm a great fan of you. One question: about our habit of eating meat, do you think we are all fragislists because we don't kill the animal we eat? How can we get along with this?

Real

Brillant

The question at 12:50 really puts this video together.

What possessed you to put that music track on this?

I think you would be a lot better off knowing how to tinker in a way that can be replicated and also who already tinkered the tinkering you are about to attempt. For that you could use the scientific method. It's a great guide to tinkering efficiently. I see a bit of the hypomanic in Nassim here. Seems to have mellowed with age since. It's a bit like watching an obscure and esoteric con man here.

He talks like every Professor. Nothing concrete, just all these ideas.

Great stuff!!

Thanks Nassim for the sharing. Greatly inspired by your thoughts. On a softer humorous note, incremental irreverent observations about markets are certainly anti fragile 🙏🏽

Where can i find the original video?

media christine? Or did they mean 'mediocrestan'?

This guy is a genius but he is not quite the communicator the world needs. One day a writer will distill his theories into some easier to grasp concepts and buzzwords and will change the world

Why was noone laughing at this 9/11 joke , I almost died

A lot of nonsense spoken in an authoritative fashion.

This guy is funny. loving his work.

Brilliant

What an idiot! The old man has no idea about what he is talking about. He clearly does not understand Bitcoin and the underlying technology. I doubt the old man even know what a hash function is. The old man is clearly unaware of his own ignorance, which is deep and large about this topic. he speaks up as if he knew anything and attacks anyone with a different opinion and deeper knowledge. What a disgrace

I think a better and more universal term is 'idolatry,' and I would agree that many have made an idol of bitcoin. But people make idols out of everything. That's our fallen nature as humans. Whatever Nassim loves in this world, like money, there are definitely many who idolize that thing. It doesn't render the object of idolatry irrelevant, wrong, or without value.

This video didn’t bring much substance as I think there is something much more important in this presentation that has been pulled from the full piece.

Taleb is right. As an experimental physicist who did real science I can confirm: 1) science breakthroughs are often driven by new technology becoming available (think: ok, we got this new tech toy, what can we do with it? A bigger laser, lets shot it at stuff - and see what happens.). Once you find some new phenomenon by plaing with the tech, you start thinking about how to explain it - aka make a scientific theory. There are very few examples where a theory was developed first and then experiments confirm it later - those are the "big wins" for science - like Einsteins theory of relativity or the Higgs boson. 2) It is very uncommon to plan and then discover some scientific insight. Most of the times you are looking for something but you stumble on something entirely different by chance. Real science doesn't work like a tech tree in computer games. Commercial development works like that (it HAS to) - throw insane resouces to improve metric X and eventually you will improve metric X. Scientists for the most part don't do such boring endeavours. So yea, Taleb is mostly right - unless you are Einstein or Peter Higgs.

The translation is very bad. You are better of without it and the music. The content is top notch.

This brilliant man doesn’t need your terrible stock music in the background pounding away, take note!

Boring speaker. Bad jokes too. I like some of his book but he has the same problem. Try’s really bad jokes trying to be really witty but aren’t funny.

@FinanceStrong please revisit the captions, they're really not very good

I can never understand this guy 😂

I'd be interested to see how this strategy has performed over the past decades.

You have eliminated him teaching, showing garbage instead! You need to see his graphs to understand

9/11 was an inside job...

What book is he talking about here?

link to full lecture?

Very pro dopaminergic exploration

What s the original video where Taleb speaks?

over the last (more than) 40 years I have read many, many books. I read every day. I am qualified in a number of scientific disciplines. I read the majority of his book on antifragility. I stopped about 2/3 way through, because by that time it had become abundantly obvious to me that the entire book was simply anecdotal. I don't dispute that at some times, some systems are what he terms 'antifragile'. The problem is that he presents no cohesive theory about the differentiation between fragile systems and antifragile systems. It is all just based on anecdotes and examples. This does not constitute a theory. So, bottom line, interesting concept but not really useful as far as I can see.

A fascinating man with the public speaking ability of a babbling toddler. Read the books.