วีดีโอ

Fair enough, your choice.

@@CrawPhotography Ya, I also totally get they want to sell more lenses but I think they will also cause people to dislike the brand, people that were loyal.

Very jelous haha, would have loved to be so close!

For me the pulsing issues have been far less, it does lose focus at times, but it doesn't pulse anywhere near as much as it did before I updated the settings, I am a lot more confident in the ability of it now, with the latest R7 firmware and these settings, then it has been in the past. Of course its not as fast as say the rf 100-400/500 would be, but its still pretty great considering how much of a budget option it is in comparison. Especially when compared with the 100-500.

Thank you so much for the complete information! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻💯@@CrawPhotography

I've decided to basically have no music if im talking going forward, there was a lot of complaints about it.

I have the eye detection mapped to one of the buttons on the back of the camera, so I can basically enable it when I need it rather then using it all the time, I do a lot of aviation and eye detection is basically no use for that use case. As for using these settings on the r10, Id assume that they would work fine, however that camera may be a little slower then the r7, not sure.

Not sure what is happening on your end, but for me the issues are much less frequent and when they do happen, it doesn't seem any better or worse in that way, sensor noise will be a thing on APSC from any brand, some less then others, the R7 shows it more because of the higher pixel count. I've taken over 40 thousand pictures with the R7, and compared to the 7D mark II I had originally, the noise isn't close. The r7 is leaps ahead, but heat haze on distance subjects is a thing. Its part of the atmosphere. Also noise is evident when you crop in a lot on any camera, again higher pixel count of the r7, makes that more pronounced. You have the 1.6x crop from the sensor and then when you crop in, in general, it would be even worse. The fact is if you want less noise, your better off with a full frame camera like the r6/r5 but no camera is 'perfect'.

@@CrawPhotography oh i know all the technical stuff about and could write a thesis about it , but short is very simple . getting rid of those videofeatures is a must if we want to get good PHOTOcameras , the speed of processor and transfer needed for those video features ruins the quality by introducing parasite noise ,there is a reason why usb and other cables must get more shielding the faster they transfer and in camera there is no place for that. also a reason why i didn´t go higher than the A7riii sony , what good does it do me when a 60 mp looks worse after denoising than a 42 or even my 36 pentax , say what you want but denoising destroys details and when i get my composition i want it as good as possible and not effed up by a technical deathroute forced upon us by some youtubers who should get a good camcorder with even better videoquality due to their sensors being optimized, vidoe on photocameras where meant as little bonus not a feature,at least in the beginning . and the r7 is a prime example of that ,not to forget it also has the iq destroying aa filter only video users are really wary about. but in general canon (that i loved ) is making quite some crap like all the others at the moment. same goes for AF ,why bother with a superb precise AF if that precision gets destroyed by aafilter and postprocessing. yes composition is more important , but why accept worse iq of said composition for an increase in price of the camera?

I love my R7. Sure, there are a few things it could do better, like tracking and taking so long to come up after going to sleep. Noise starts being an issue at about 3200 iso, but that's not bad for an APS-C camera! Before that a light use of noise reduction software is all that is needed, if anything. I have never had a single client complain about noise or "softness" from having used noise reduction software. These are things only other photographers might notice or care about, and the software is getting better and better every year! I have a friend who refuses to shoot even his R5 over 800 ISO because he says the noise "ruins" the image! I don't see it. My clients don't see it! Some folks will never be happy!

@@alansach8437 having a cheap pentax kf too , k1m2 also but not the point, the kf is a 700€ apsc whose image quality up to 6400 is great , the r7 iq is abysmal compared to it ,heck even my old canon 2000d or rebel something in the us makes more appealing pictures,so it is not the apsc the real problem but that unhealthy obsession of video that induces extreme electrical parasitic noise ,plus my cheap pentax also does pixelshift ,even with mild movement correction mode, in superb quality , i can’t simply find even the slightest reason of that cameras existence. A camcorder makes better vids for less money and let that hybrid crap in the cupboards ( bad video and photo 🤦🏻) . And about some folks never be happy , i accept such a quality from 500€ cameras but never from a hyped 1500€ one, there is always a limit to letting corporation screwing people and most newer canons should not be praised so artificially to get them to understand we want quality for our money and not simple blind brand loyalty. I pay , so i expect an equivalent for it , r10 300 , r8 500 and r7 700 , that is their real worth.

@@alansach8437 A lot is down to person preference, I've used this camera at stupid iso late at night and it performs considerably well for an APSC, I just wouldn't have even got the image on the DLSR equivalent like the 7D mk II which is what I had before it. Noise is something people really no longer need to worry about, Even lightrooms built in noise reduction is perfectly fine, the problem is some people overdo it, like maxing it out and seeing weird results, rather then having it at 30-40 which provides good results depending on what the image is like, and also how far you crop in.

music is not going to be part of any videos going forward where im speaking.

Thanks for the comment, for me the in body stabilisation is something I've yet to play around with, I haven't done much video with the camera, but what I had done was shot at 600mm zoomed out, without the stabiliser and that was pretty shaky, mainly from me trying to keep on target. As for images, I'm not sure how much a benefit it would be, thought it may have been nice to actually have that while shooting under 1/100th trying to get prop blur on planes, most of what I'm shooting is fast action birds/jets, so I tend to have high shutter speed anyways, which doesn't really benefit from it.

@@CrawPhotography thanks for your reply. I will ask someone who has an R7 if I can have a go. I do the fast action stuff like birds and wildlife but normally use a gimbal on a tripod or monopod to help me track a subject and hopefully focus on the eye. I guess this might be easier on an R7. Ive noticed a substantial improvement in picture quality from the guys at the nature reserve who have upgraded to R7 from 7Dii.

@@christophermason7735 The new mirrorless tech definitely helps. I think the R7 II is probably going to be on the way in the next year or two also. So could be worth holding out unless you cant wait.

will be working on this going forward, reading from a screen that is away from the camera means having to keep checking, thanks.

@@ElBoyoElectronico I've uploaded a new video without the music

That's a very strange problem, I've never ran into this as I use 128gb cards and don't usually get close to filling them, I also tend to shoot so that both cards are being utilised in case 1 happens to fail. It could be worth seeing if others are having the same issue on reddit etc.

noted.

Will fix this in future videos. Will try to remove the music in TH-cam.

@RebeccaFang-i6b I've listened to the entire video on multiple devices, I can still make out every word I am saying, is there a specific point in the video where this issue is?

@@CrawPhotography I understand every word you say and those I dont are regarding accent. Though Id argue that the music and especially the kind of music is a bit distracting, especially when the first song gets to the more busy parts. Also the song itself is awful but thats subjective I guess. Second song is fine. damn, why did I write a small analysis? I dont even own a R7. lol anyway, thanks for the video.

@@CrawPhotography I can hear you but the music makes it very distracting and not pleasant to listen to

@@RebeccaFang-i6b Thanks for the feedback, ill keep it in mind going forward.

​@@thisisfela Thanks for the feedback, ill keep it in mind going forward.

Yeah definitely. Had similar issues with it and it really was embarrassing with the shuttet being audible. Just glad it's resolved

Well have updated firmware and it has made no difference so have sent a video to Canon to show the camera shooting for about a second after l have removed finger from shutter so be interesting see what they say. The R7 in hindsight appears to be a camera slapped together very cheaply, for example old slow sensor and cheapest sounding shutter l have ever heard and no third wheel, and l do hope the mark ii is a higher end camera and obviously more expensive.

@isotechimages.9130 I'm sorry you are still having this issue. I haven't run into since updating the camera on my end. Hopefully they do find a fix for you. I'm hoping the mark ii will be on another level too, but we will have to wait and see I guess

Thankyou for subscribing, thats awesome, how are you finding it?

I had the 7D mark II also, still have it, though the sensor is a little scratched, I will gladly make a video on the settings ive used to get the best out of the R7 and the Sigma 150-600C

@@CrawPhotography That would be great.

@johnr6218 I will make sure to lower the volume more in future

@james123j1 true, I've found it invaluable for certain scenarios, but the post processing definitely brings my want to use the feature down drastically, it seems the r5 ii will have it done right... I'm hoping it comes to other cameras as a firmware update, but I don't think so somehow

I've not heard of it not working with auto focusing, even without the optimisations I didn't have a scenario where the lenses just didn't auto focus at all, it was inconsistent at the least, but you could tell it was working, my best suggestion would be to make sure the settings switches on the lenses are working and maybe even format the lense software, reset to default to see if that fixes anything

That is something I will be doing in future, I've done it some of the previous videos and intended to keep doing it going forward :)

Glad it was helpful! I was unsure on how useful it was actually going to be, but I've been able to capture some images i'd have never got without it. So its useful, just a shame its a little bit annoying to get them onto the computer to edit but tbh, its something if I use, im willing to put in the extra time it takes.

Oh thats cool, I haven't really tried that but maybe its something to try in the future, I prefer hearing the audio from the scanner myself, just so I know whats happening wherever I am. But its cool that you can use it while doing video/photos on the camera too

The sigma dock changed the way the camera works by a long way. It helps a lot and I'm glad to know that the lenses work well on the R5 as well. Like I said for me I can't tell if it the r7 being funny with its autofocus sometimes, or the lens itself. I'm partial to blaming the R7 from the experience of other users, even with canon lenses

Thankyou, hoping to get into the whole swing of doing more vlogs and other things

Thankyou very much

Haha yes! I was not expecting that, especially not with most of them going north, think I must have gotten one of the late movers. Was definitely a bit special, shame it was so far away but still got a decent result.