- 32
- 1 054 303
Eugene Kim
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 2 ก.ย. 2011
www.usfca.edu/law/faculty/eugene-kim
วีดีโอ
Evidence-05: Probative v. Prejudicial (FRE 403 part 2)
มุมมอง 5K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Evidence-05: Probative v. Prejudicial (FRE 403 part 2)
Evidence-04: Probative v. Prejudicial (FRE 403 part 1)
มุมมอง 10K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Evidence-04: Probative v. Prejudicial (FRE 403 part 1)
Evidence-03: Relevance (FRE 401 part 2)
มุมมอง 4.1K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Evidence-03: Relevance (FRE 401 part 2)
Organization - Jurisdictional Split Analysis
มุมมอง 3.4K11 ปีที่แล้ว
An explanation of how to organize a memo for a jurisdictional split analysis
Organization - Factor Analysis
มุมมอง 4.2K11 ปีที่แล้ว
An explanation of how to organize a memo for a factor analysis
Organization - Elements Analysis
มุมมอง 6K11 ปีที่แล้ว
An explanation of how to organize a memo for an elements analysis
Rule Synthesis - sample memo
มุมมอง 18K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Discussing a sample IRAC memo that involves a rule synthesized from multiple cases
Introduction to Rule Synthesis
มุมมอง 20K11 ปีที่แล้ว
An introduction to rule synthesis for legal analysis
Binding and Persuasive Authorities (Stare Decisis)
มุมมอง 38K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Binding and Persuasive Authorities (Stare Decisis)
Introduction to Cases / Anatomy of a Case
มุมมอง 17K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Introduction to Cases / Anatomy of a Case
Thank you Prof. Kim. This was very helpful.
Great video! This is so helpful, thank you.
Amazing Video
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Thankyou amen ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Awesome ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Actually is like acting.
I have to assume you are teaching 4th graders or below. This is the way you speak. I found it insulting, so I didn't sit through it. Probably good info, though.
This is from 11 years ago and it is still helping me understand irac so succinctly! Thank you so much
Your a great teacher keep the videos coming
What about the 8 district?Does it have any smaller district court
Thank you very much I am on my way to am exam but this is perfect
Thank you for explaining this in an easy to follow (simplistic) manner. How you’ve broken the app/analysis into elements has really helped me breakdown my IRAC.
Thank you soo much 🎉🎉
🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thanks
Thanks
Queen, Mwanda, John and forward are lawyers who offer legal services to small and medium enterprises SMEs. On may 5 2023,an article was written in the daily newspaper of the looming insolvency of Queen and Associates. Prior to this article, Mwanda handled a big case of a transactional business firm, which had other businesses with Queen and Associates deposited a huge sum of money for the case's and paid Mwanda a sum of 150,000 pula for his good work. Mwanda used the money to purchase a car for himself. One month later, the transnational firm sued Queen and Associates including Jane as partners for wrongful legal advice which led to major loss. The partners did not want this action to affect the good will of the firm and they expelled Mwanda. As a professional corporate and student , discuss the legal issues and advise Queen and Associates on the matter. Elaborate that case study using IRAC please
Eugene KIM simple the best
Awesome!!!
Thx sm!
Bro why do you have like 3 minutes worth of unskippable ads?
awesome. because I hear '9th circuit' alot with all this gun control foolishness going on (here in Washington State) I just thought there might be a map of that someplace. Random pick on your video. What an eye opener, and my view of the court system has been widened to say the least. Thanks. Will continue my education.
Amazingly excellent explanation❤
this is not a silly example!! This is the best example That explain the often confusing IRAC method to anyone who want to understand it. Well done.
This was so helpful! I could never find a video that explained circuit courts until I found this. Thank you for the informative video!
a bear to a cat ah no haha
Thank you!
excellet sample🎉thanks!
Thank you.
This was extremely helpful in understanding the layers of precedent and how it can be both binding and persuasive depending on the breakdown and then the SCOTUS eventually trumping all. Would you be able to use an example that's not federal in its genesis next time? Perhaps tort stemming from from a civil court? Very new to this. Thank you for the clarity and bless you sir.
excellent video! thank you very much!
Where's the military fall in this diagram?
wow!!! so so helpful! Thank you!
Hi Mr. Kim! Thank you very much for your dedication to providing such a formative purview of this methodology! IT HELPED ME SO MUCH!!!
Watched about 10 videos explaining the IRAC, and this was the most helpful and best explanatory. Thank you!
Thanks
😊
I swear what a great explanation, thanks a lot sir, you got it, thanks thanks.
great explanation of this process! Thank you!
dang this is like khan academy for law
Thank you this really helped me a lot 🙏