วีดีโอ

What hair is this? What is it for? And the finger leaking thing? What happened?

What stage of consciousness includes horrible wigs? (I mean, come on. Someone has to state the very obvious aberration.)

14:00

Would love to have a link to the Wheel if Awareness that includes the segment on bending the spoke.

Good at coleslaw sanders to push back on theory vs male wearing women coke sniffing attire

33.00 I have heard Ken Wilber tell this story several times. And it is simply not true as he describes it. For one thing, the event was not the end of the relationship between Jung and Freud, not at all. Freud and Jung met for the first time in Vienna in 1907, where they dove into intense conversations about the human mind. Jung later said they spoke for 13 hours. What followed was an intense correspondence, and it was the start of a professional collaboration and personal friendship that lasted until 1913, when professional disagreements between them led Jung to resign from his position as chairman of the International Psychoanalytical Association - an organization that they had founded together. They met in September 1913 for the last time. The conversation Wilber refers to took place in 1910 (see Jung’s memoirs). It is a false assertion that they never spoke to each other again after that. That is simply wrong. How Wilber can claim that so definitively (‚they literally never spoke to each other again, not one word for the rest of their lives‘) almost leaves me stunned. As I said, the final break did not occur until 1913. He also quotes the conversation itself inaccurately: Wilber claims that Jung wrote about it in his memoirs that 'Freud did not realize that what he (Freud) called occultism was everything I was interested in in my life'. When in fact Jung wrote: 'What Freud seemed to mean by "occultism" was virtually everything that philosophy and religion, including the rising-contemporary science of parapsychology, had learned about the psyche.’ Wilber should either keep quiet about the conversation in question or get a correct picture of it based on the numerous literature available. It would also do him no harm to read Jung's memoirs, especially his chapter on Freud. And then, Mr. Wilber, you may recount the event truthfully.

Thank you Dr Dean Ornish. I read your book 20 years ago. 6 years ago i switched to a vegan lifestyle. Thank you for your inspiration

The Battle for Consciousness Theory: A Response to Ken Wilber's Hijacking of Sri Aurobindo and Other Indian Thought on the right

Chade-Meng Tan, former Google software engineer known as the "Jolly Good Fellow," discusses his role at Google, where he helped develop the mindfulness program Search Inside Yourself. He reflects on his background in Singapore, learning programming at a young age, and eventually joining Google. The "Jolly Good Fellow" Title (04:07 - 07:49): Tan explains how his humorous "Jolly Good Fellow" title originated as a joke at Google but was approved by HR. It eventually gained recognition, appearing in The New York Times. The title was a playful alternative to the company's more formal career ladder. Search Inside Yourself Program (10:46 - 14:53): Tan recovered himself from depression through transformative power of meditation eventually " the Search Inside Yourself " mindfulness curriculum at Google, which became extremely popular among employees. Mindfulness and Compassion (16:40 - 30:56):a study that demonstrated how mindfulness and compassion training increased altruistic behavior. Tan emphasizes how mindfulness naturally leads to compassion. Now, He is focusing on spreading Buddhist teachings and his ongoing projects. He’s working on making early Buddhist teachings accessible through his website, buddhism.net, and is exploring ways to offer an online curriculum based on his book Joy on Demand.

I dont understand these videos. because the same series of questions are being asked from Ken wilber and he has to repeat the same answers every time. why not just read the book ? then if you have any geniune questions, that are not disscussed in the book and is relevant to today's affairs, then make this meetings.

Does Ken think he's a girl now?

So beautiful! Thank you

Thank you BJ you change my life

Excellent discussion- many thanks

And yet he had the free will to do this interview.... The total hypocrisy... Everyone is a hypocrite at some level, including these people. Please stop listening to these people and believing they are Gods. They aren't.

I heard MMY said Nader was worth his weight in gold and thats what he got when he succeeded as leader of the movement. Don't know if this is true, but he seems to be a good man.

Father, Son, Holy Spirit. the first 3 stages of Consciousness as discussed in Genesis and The 3 Veils of Negative Existence. All material things are but manifestations of the intercourse between the masculine and feminine principals of consciousness, which are but extensions of the original, eternal, Supreme Consciousness. Consciousness is all and all is consciousness

Materialistic Neurologists do Not know the source of human Consciousness.

such an enlightening podcast, it really gave me some missing pieces to my life puzzle!! How exciting that is for me. Thank you.

Thank you Jim and BJ

🕊️✨This was so inspiring! Thank you 💓

I’m so excited to discover your show!

36:58 "Hurt people hurt people."

This was a great episode. Thank you for sharing 😊

Even if you are fully familiar with the woods from the trees locally that are common there but the forest extends around the world in multifarious types and environments.., move 5 miles in any direction and you start over. Which is why you can imagine what you think you understand about local events seen through the lens of Eternity-now, looking at the logarithmic Perspective Principle of pure-math relative-timing ratio-rates motion Actuality, you can come to the realization that you know what your relationship is locally and how unique the state of condensed wave-particle matter quantization is in unique Totality, but this is purely functional thumb rules attributing magical-functional judgement of actual cause-effect behavior to the logical location-based Bose-Einsteinian Condensates that result, from information following functional integration, in a POV position, No-thing definable absolutely except superposition logic limt zero-infinity sync-duration vanishing-into-no-thing numberness. Actuality includes philosophy and all Nomenclatures, which requires an identification system such as Euler's Unit Circle modulo radial-resonance fields of cause-effect Lensing, conic-cyclonic interference positioning resonance bonding Fusion-Fission orthogonality, or Entanglement chemistry, depending on how you approach the topic. Flash-fractal recognition of e-Pi-i QM-TIME Eternity-now allows for i-reflection containment in phase-locked coherence-cohesion, optional arrangements according to your freedom to re-cognise WYSIWYG. Any longer rehash of the narratives is tedious, and I know we're all getting impatient, ..for our age.

More of this please !

Dr. Doty, Thank you for sharing this very interesting interview with Eric Stanley. I enjoyed it so much. While you made Eric cried, his story in turn, made me cry as well.

It definitely inspired me 🥺🥺🥺🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🙏🏽🙏🏽

I’d love to meet Chad I just saw him first time on Nextflix Mindfulness series. I’m a Happiness Trainer from Happiness Studies Academy run by Tal Ben Shahar ❤ loved this makes happiness skills & science so easy.

I enjoy this! Thank you for your time and sharing!

Is it possible that reward and punishment are useful, not so much to reward or punish the behaviour just completed, rather to encourage or deter it happening again in the future, thus shaping the predictability of a subject going one path or another? I’m not in favour of punishment/reward but just attempting to get this argument straight in my own head so I can file it as decided.

Just found this podcast and I am excited to start listening to all the episodes. A person I though of that I would find interesting to have on would be Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett as she has a background in both neuroscience and Buddhism. Thanks!

Safe,seen,soothed...

AHHH YES. I first became familiar with your work Dr. Doty. Stanford. In conversation with Thubten Jinpa. The compassion program. Yes! So pleased to be introduced to you the The Magic Shop

Excellent!

"I try to avoid the despair." :)

(49:47) "Where did that intent come from in the first place ?"

Promo_SM

Excellent pod cast on no free will. Thank you both .

I love this topic - but it does my head in!

Anyone who looks at the universe with all of the knowledge we have attained about it, with any perspective on deep time and space, the evolution of life, our infinitesimal place in it, and thinks there's meaning here needs to go back and do another full review. Believing in meaning has as much weight as believing in Santa Claus. This isn't cynical any more than saying we're all going to die is cynical. It's simply an undeniable fact. But seriously, absolutely find whatever is meaningful to you, and savor it. That's all the meaning there will ever be.

It's just a ride

I love her work. Thanks Dr. DOTY!

Great session

I brought up this fascinating discussion with my mother, and she referenced how the Chinese Three Character Classic outlined something similar, where each person has no evil or good but rather a product of everything

Just because Sapolsky says there's no free will doesn't mean it's true. It's only his opinion.

Professor Sapolsky says there's no justification for praise and blame, but goes on to remind us that people can change. How are we to motivate preferable change in others, if not with praise and blame? 🤔

I too was surprised to hear that Sam Harris was called a compatibilist. I think there is a bit to this though. These resources helped me unpack this claim: [1] Sam Harris's blog post "Reflections on free will": read the paragraph that starts with "Seriously, his main objection to compatibilism" [2] A Sam Harris subreddit post "It all comes down to what you mean by truly": read the post and into the comments

So basically we're just chocolate loving Auditors in the Pratchettonion sense,

He looks like God… in cartoons. 😉