วีดีโอ

5:37 Prince figured all that out sooo long ago. The man was special. It's too bad more people didn't realize just how special Prince was until it was too late. There will never be another like him. He was easily in the top 25 greatest guitar players of all-time. Easily.

very good style

What are the chords?

What effect is this?

Wow! You were able to get a patch that sounds like it's from a CS80. Not as deep as the CS80 but it does sound rather nice.

Nice work! Subbed ya!

I use a tone generator as an external oscillator for my ringmodulator pedal. What kind of modulation will I have If I introduce a possitive DC offset?

This just puts a smile on my face❤❤❤

Boneworks ahh chords

I had this little keyboard around 2010 or 2011. I sold it. It has a pretty good sound.

You might be the only person yet to Synth our Stan. I’m working on a Harris and the Mare on the MC-101.

Nice job. I actually like this mix better. The og is kind of muddy and not mixed well

prophet 5 rev 3 when new had the patch factory installed i can do it perfectly on my rev 2

This kind of testing with terrible fake timbre, looking at intervals in a vacuum and not in real music yields the kind of deep confusion about intonation as you are promoting in these videos. Also at 4:28, you are playing a 3-limit Bb yet you are calling it an A#. A# in Pythagoren tuning is above the 12 tet version. If you would like to test intonation it must be with good and realistic timbres and in real musical context. Testing them in different musical scenarios. You cannot limit yourself to 12 notes either, spelling and the subsequent tuning is essential. ou cannot make the mistake of calling a Bb, and A#. You need to know when to use A#, and when to use Bb. This goes for all enharmonic notes; they are not interchangeable. The reason I am so irritated by videos like this one, is that what you are teaching is convincing enough for people who don't know better, and by it, you are robbing them of making good music and robbing others from listening to that good music which will never be made. 5 limit tuning, on top of sounding out of tune, is not practical, 12 tet is practical but only a poor approximation of True Intonation, and no intervals save the octave are pure, and even that is not the case on octave stretched pianos. Only True Intonation (3- limit tuning with notes and chords spelled correctly and tuned according to their spelling and placement in the chain of 3/2 fifths), is both practical and fully in tune, both harmonically and melodically at once.

What you said at 2:22 is a complete lie, that everyone seems to chant on repeat, I believe because there is witchcraft around the topic to keep everyone playing out of tune. The 81/64 is the just major third in real music, the 5/4 is simply the 5th harmonic. Check out the examples on my channel, sheet music on screen with audio, all with the 81/64 major third, it is not only passable, but fully in tune and ideal and just, even in chords. The 5/4 is terribly flat and creates an incoherent system of pitches that is not musical nor practical when put through its paces and tested in many musical scenarios. Pythagorean just intonation, what I call True Intonation, is perfectly in tune, so long as you spell notes and chords correctly according to their proper placement on the chain of 3/2 perfect fifths; and it is totally practical even on acoustic keyboards and guitars. If you can overcome the lie of the 5/4 major third, you will already be ahead of myriad of other musicians. True Intonation is how man naturally hears music. It is perfectly understandable to our brains, with all octaves being the powers of 2 , and all pitch classes being all the powers of 3. Thas's it. Adding 5's, 7's, or higher prime limits, does not add anything to your system except confusion and incoherence. This video is utter confusion. First, you are using terrible fake sounding computerized timbre, to try and make the 81/64 sound bad, when in natural sounding timbres it sounds wonderful. And even with the awful harsh timbre you used to demonstrate it, it still sounds better than the 5/4, so you had to put a sick emoji over it to convince people that it is bad. Videos such as this make me sick, truly. Pythagorean thirds are pretty much unusable? Look at the songs on my channel. You have been lied to, and you have brainwashed yourself and then passed that on to others through this video. And all of the people who do not know any better, are praising you for it. Listen I get it, I was duper by the 5/4 trap for 9 years before my ears were opened and my understanding enlightnened. But you really need to study a lot, and remove this video, it is totally wrong, and you are leading many musicians down a path in which they will never understand tuning or the inner workings of music. And will never have the joy of making music that is in tune and listening to music that is in tune. I know that what you are saying is what the whole world preaches, but it is still very wrong. As someone who teaches, you are obligated to know what you are talking about. And if you make a grevious error such as this, you should make a follow up video correcting the error. The 17 note vicinity teaching is important to understand. True Intonation Gb through to A# in a chain of fifths in C major. All these notes can appear in C major and its relative modes wihtout demanding the ear to hear that the key has changed or without it sounding out of tune. There are not 12 notes in western music, there are 17 per tonic chord, per octave. 7 diatonic notes, 5 flats from the undertone series and 5 sharps from the overtone series. This is what is displayed in sheet music, and this is what sounds the best to listeners. 12 tet is approximating True Intonation (Pythagorean), and its major thirds are too FLAT, not too sharp. If you are having trouble hearing the 81/64 as in tune (as was the case for me), this may help: really try and listen horizontally, that is, listen to each voice in every chord, moving from one note to the next, all while SIMULTANEOUSLY listening vertically to the harmony in a given instance of time during real music with realistic good timbres. This is how a man holistically listens to music before he is conditioned to only listen to intonation in the vertical access in a given moment irrespective to what came before or what will come after, not experienceing and checking the music over time. Music happens over TIME. It is not an isolated interval or chord. It is ordered sound over time, and the intonation must be checked and judged in respect of time. The listening must be reawakened to this horizontal dimension of listneing, not just chord moving to chord, but every voice in every chord moving to the next, and then the next, and the next notes. This may be difficult to do if you have been interested in intonation for a long time and have long time believed the 5/4 to be the just major third in music. But once that part of your listening becomes active again, all of a sudden it will just click. And 3 limit will sound not only usable but perfectly in tune both harmonically and melodically. Likewise the 5 limit tuning will be difficult to hear as in tune after that. The good thing about this is: True Intonation IS practical on acoustic instruments in EVERY key, even on keyboards and guitars, with full ability to modulate freely, anywhere. The 5/4 and men believing it as the major third, has led to all temperaments and alleged paradoxes in tuning, and ultimately basically all music being totally out of tune..

please tell me you have a full cover of this song🙏

That was amazing!

This would have been a very interesting video, but the examples are far to short to fully experience what techniques he used. Now it's rather 'see what I know' than 'see how it works'. Delay, tuning down and creating accents in the first song all get (less than)1 second, 2 at the most. "Show, don't tell" would be my advice.

Please post settings!

Did you program the bassline into the SH-01a and clock it to the 808?

excellent - thanks!

Muito bom

Very cool

I'm gonna comment something here that might sound negative but I promise it's supposed to be encouraging... It's wild to me that you (whoever you are) would dedicate so much time producing such a cool breakdown, but then not spend a single second engaging with these comments 🤔 you (whoever you are) have so many fellow music nerds expressing appreciation for this profound knowledge but then it took over a year for someone like me (whoever I am;) to come along and take 3 seconds to 👍 like everyone's comments at the very least... It just seems like if you're passionate about this stuff (which clearly you are) that you would also want to boost your algorithm a little bit more and engage with the few people who took time out of their day to reciprocate said passion. Just a thought ♡

this is amazing, thank you

Loved the Doves Cry beat - one of my favorites of all time - excellent breakdown

A synthtuber with useful content. If you are a beginner, this is something you should watch instead of "My new favorite Synth today" "Still relevant in two.days ago?" "Best Synth?" "Why i sold my favorite synth from yesterday?" "X vs y - no patches to compare" "My favorite factory patches" "Masterclass - how to program a saw wave?" "Why are you still a beginner 10 years later"? Stop watching these gossip trash and learn your instrument.

As a sound designer this has been an extremely helpful distinction in the taxonomy of sonics. You have earned a new subscriber

I use lots of JI customized chords in my tunes. In "Sorcière" it is particularly audible @ 6m49

This was a very good video You CANNOT Mention DEF JAM Without mentioning RUSSELL "RUSH" SIMMONS. (NOTE) The Book Can't stop Won't stop is FULL OF INCONSISTENCIES HISTORICAL ERRORS AND FLAT OUT LIES.

Great INfo!

We all want some peace and quiet.....

been looking for this for ages. such a groovy cover wish you recorded a full version with the distortion bass included

LOOK AT YA

No drum sheet?

Great video. Very informative. I’d always wondered if there was any fallout from Melle Mel’s use of Cavern’s Liquid Liquid. I naively assumed 99 might’ve received some retro publishing royalties when the song took off, but had no idea it went to the courts. Naive is the right term to use, because I’ve since learnt that Sugar Hill weren’t particularly ethical in their dealings with some of their own artists, so why would do the right thing by a small label with little money/backing to prosecute. I’d wager that Sylvia had money in other places and the bankruptcy was only a cop out to avoid paying 99…. but that’s just a guess.

u da man !

your patreon seem to have disappeared, the patch parameters aren't accesible anymore?

You did a Great Job on this.. being a Musician and Prince Fan... I learned some cool things watching your video - keep up the Excellent work!

On “let’s pretend we’re married” it’s not a tom, it was a cowbell tuned down

0:23 - Starting with that sine wave, I immediately heard this - th-cam.com/video/rnf0q1zOTXs/w-d-xo.html

Wonder whats in Pauls mind when writing this tune😂

Sophie would have love this so much 😢

Aww i love It so much

What drums are being used?

Your comment at the end about biological preference was great. Do you have any related ideas regarding the common saying that "harmonics are found in nature"? In that there is something "natural" that causes the harmonic series to arise as a phenomenon outside of possible human preference for patterns, and potentially a bias towards simpler patterns which are more readily identified?

I have the OG Volca Sample and Volca Beats. This is an immense help to me. 😁😁😁

Truth is sacred , free will is sacred Free speech is sacred

1ST RUNNER UP

Cristmas? 👀🙄 Mas qual é a progressão que foi usada?