วีดีโอ

Wii U wasn’t dogsh:t coming from someone who still owns one

I did not know the game was designed this way. I have seen gameplay of the game when it was first released but I did not remember it looking this trivial to collect moons. No wonder this game just kind of disappeared while Breath of the Wild had amazing content being made for it over the years before Tears of the Kingdom.

They focus on lawsuits to make money. They are very unethical in the name of greed. And these lacking games are simply made to give themselves grounds for lawsuits on patent and copyright, as you can see clearly in the Palworld case now.

@@Jasperr9999 Okay

@jaydedowling9252 except I did complain about the gameplay too? Also you realize that presentation quality is a huge part of game feel right? Like an action game running at 12fps is not going to PLAY as well as the same game running at 60fps. Gameplay, performance and presentation are all tied together. It's like an album being mixed incorrectly and then saying "just enjoy it for the music" when the mixing is directly affecting the quality of the songs.

@@bossrushgame thats true but I feel I presented my point wrong so let's flip the argument around for clarity... (and this is completely hypothetical btw) Let's say you had enough money to buy a $60 game... You see that one game has great visual presentation and full 60fps with no frame drops, but the main gameplay is tired, repetitive and uninspired... The other game seems to be praised for its solid gameplay mechanics and impressive replay value but has lesser framerate, the game looks like someone smeared grease on the screen and there is a chance to stumble into a handful of glitches... Which one would you buy?

​@@bossrushgame Incorrect, games can actually have separate framerates for visuals and control inputs. They can also have varying framerates of different objects on screen and separate sections of games as well. The N64 Zeldas have 3 different framerates for the actual gameplay, pause menu and file select screen

@@AkameGaKillfan777 Yeah and even Some of the FF games did this on ps1 where menu was 30-60 fps while gameplay was like 15-20 fps

It can not fix the issues with Nintendo's unethical decision making.

Especially if you see how badly Nintendo treats their fans and competitors.

I feel like Sony and XBox just are not playing the same game anymore, although they did make some big mistakes fundamentally. And I regret supporting Nintendo more than anything else.

@ I can see what you mean. The only company that stands above them all isn’t necessarily a good company.

The video is garbage and the only good points he makes are points every single Nintendo youtube ever have already talked to death about. Everybody critiqued Nintendo switch sports, how games like Battle League and Golf were lackluster and got no support, the flaws of Botw and Totk, and even titles like Odyssey get flak at times over stuff like lame completion rewards or the varying quality of the kingdoms. The same goes for Mario party Superstars and Super Mario Party. He's not doing or saying anything revolutionary here. Also, his standards seem very inconsistent regarding what he considers a "good port" vs a bad one since he was perfectly willing to praise the megaman legacy collections(collections the fandom is split on since the X version has severe input delay and can't fully support the snes aspect ratio making it look way uglier). They are glorified emulators in a sense and are only valuable due to price and ease of access(since they bundle the games up in one cohesive whole). But yet he says a whole new mode(that is surprisingly substantial), a third tier of boost that completely changes the way the game plays for certain characters, and having all the DLC from the previous game bundled in(while also lying about everything being unlocked) is apparently "barely passable". Not to mention, his thesis was that the games were lazy, greedy, and incompetent(the third of which implies that they don't function or are just poorly put together), yet the only games in this list where that really applies is for Pokemon and the rest of the time he just spends making shallow critiques of some games he doesn't think are perfect which isn't relevant to his thesis whatsoever. He himself admits that Mario's moveset in Odyssey is the best in the series so OBVIOUSLY, it's not COMPLETELY lazy and it runs really well so OBVIOUSLY it's not incompetent. Which isn't fully owned by Nintendo anyway. Only explanation on why he did this was because he's sloppy with his video writing. And everyone in the comments has already clowned on the dude for undercutting the whole thing with Xenoblade. And the most embarrassing part is that he identified MONSTER FUCKING HUNTER as a Nintendo game when it's CAPCOM. Also let it be known that the price argument for modern Nintendo is a bit dodgy since their games always costed an arm and a leg, even back in the nes days. Super Mario Bros 3 costed 49.99 back in the day. Fairly low until you adjust for inflation and find out that in today's cash, that would be 120 dollars. Not to mention the only reason why Pikmin 3 for the wii u cost 20 bucks was cause the value dropped(which makes sense since nobody bought the wii u). On launch, it was around 50-60 bucks. And one can argue that was too much since the game was criticized for being way too short and way too easy. That's why it was often considered to be a casual mess of a game that just looked pretty by some of the fans. If he's pissy about the price and why the games rarely go on sale, that's the fault of the economy and just high demand for Nintendo products in general. The video was under-researched, shallow, dishonest and is nothing more than a glorified slop rant whose only good points have been made a billion times before. If you want a youtube who actually does a solid job criticizing Nintendo, go to Demeech or hell, any channel that makes weekly video on Nintendo cause a lot of them have PLENTY to say about the antics of their favorite company(spoiler alert, it isn't pleasant).

Just like Disney

@@crystalbry4741 At least disney has some tact to not attack fan projects or other indie titles: Nintendo by comparison is never satisfied or happy.

@@BruhaTheImp yes but they didn't put spiderman on a kid's grave when the parent's asked or mulan 2020 filming in concentration camps etc.

@@crystalbry4741 Both big oofs. that disney simply can't excuse...

@@BruhaTheImp yep

YES, when they announced the last update… I couldn’t believe it, they never finished the game

​@@lucapagnozzi1077 I'm not exactly an avid Animal Crossing player, and I only ever played AC: Welcome To The City before New Horizons, so... what exactly is missing?

Yea I feel the old Nintendo stuff like, a generation ago, was plain more polished and finished and content packed and usually was at a lower price, especially the Nintendo selects

@@ghcfuj77557 call it a hot take but i prefer playing Mario Kart Wii over Mario Kart 8, 8 Deluxe sure there are less tracks but at least the game was more polished , did not have the coin power up and the Mii's did not sound like chipmunks and also had a decent rewarding outfit B version for beating all the staff ghost times im also just not a fan of constaintly having to buy a subcription just to play online i played Wii and DS , 3DS and never once had to subscribe to something

​@@KeiraLunar it's all just preference. I could make similar complaints about older games, honestly.

​@@ghcfuj77557 Bro really considers Mario Tennis: Ultra Smash and Animal Crossing: Amiibo Festival to be better games

The base model is still being sold at full price

@@3dsfan2002 everything nintendo made always sold full priced. Switch hardware is over decade old right now. Paying 300-350$ for switch at this time is beyond stupid

​@@heins9185 Try actually owning a Wii U, or a Virtual Boy

I know right. Like how does anyone buy the next pokemon game? Especially in this economy

I wouldn’t say that but Ehh. Sometimes.

I wouldn’t say that but Ehh. Sometimes.

Lol yes it is. What else could it be?

@@batmanbud2 jump around beat em up sim

They should've realized it with Sword & Shield. In fact they should've known how scummy Pokémon's business model has always been when 90% of their games have 2 separate versions you have to buy at full price to have everything.

Blud, I know adults who still consider nintendo the best in terms of exclusive. What exclusive does the ps5 hav- oh wait nevermind.

@@Howellatthemoon25 nintendo fans are fickle to bring up exclusives, because they consist of the same franchises, which is fine, but is running on worser hardware, and is compenstated with gimmicky gameplay except for totk

​@@missjeane-s1p Kids like you who think people's ages are supposed to represent what their likes and dislikes should be get looked down on by real adults.

@@missjeane-s1p "gimmicky gameplay" isn't that supposed to be what games are about ? people want to play games for the fun gameplay, not movies disguised as games

@@KevZ7. not if it breaks the flow of the gameplay and immersion, totk also borrowed from 'movie games' theorically speaking, when it has a few qtes, and the ending of the final boss where you press a button to dive

@@DoktorSammich I mean, I'm pretty sure that expression goes back to BC, but if the only content you've ever consumed is comic book movies and harem anime I can see why you'd be confused

Ooh, big flex. The point is that it’s just lazy, cliche writing.

​@@DoktorSammich Do you even know what both of those words mean?

This isn't mentioning how much more content the wii gives when you mod it.

I hoped they would improve what was already in botw BUT NO, they gave us an empty sky and an empty underground, wow 10/10

@@lucapagnozzi1077 Despite what Nintendo claimed, that empty sky and underground ( as well as the cave system ) were also made with ai, which is why there's the same 6 giant ball sky islands, the same X/+ shaped islands in the corners of the sky and the SAME fucking shrine orbs plastered everywhere.

​​​@@dragnjames2190 so they lied about not using ai. It doesn't surprise me but do you have a title of where you saw this information at?