วีดีโอ

Saw ufotog in his magi pod theatre. Short demo film but brilliant. Images hang in the air. Hyper real. Amazing sound. And it's a brilliant story. Mind bending. An artist who made his own tools to tell stories better. I guess you gotta be there.

where can I watch Night of Dreams please? I cant find it anywhere

anything more than 24 is introducing something akin to carrier waves in sound. People embed garbage into it further controlling the audience through what Trumbull sought after 'emotiona' response. Things aren't clear by the naked eye in real life at fast movements.... that's why it looks horrible in higher frame rates 'clear' in movies. It is an effect..a film shouldn't be shot entirely in this high FPS.

parece eu

RIP DT 🙏

Douglas Trumbull was and is an utter genius!!! RIP you legend!!

I think most of the comments missed the point, I'm pretty sure he is saying shoot at 60 or 120fps etc. and then master at 24fps but have the ability using showscan processing to retain detail but still have motion blur as data is not being lost by only shooting at 24fps. I don't think he was after the 48fps Hobbit like look.

In 360p (!)

yeah... no.

the down side to 60fps was film handling. you would need a lot of film and big storage drums to hold the film. just imagine projecting a movie that's 2 hrs long at 60 fps. that's what killed it. ive seen movies at 60 fps and it looks lifelike.

#QGCURIOSO

FAKE

Qg curioso

Vim Pelo QG curioso kkk

Smile.dog

alguém do QG cusioso?

Criatura extremamente bizarra serio mesmo 😲😲😲😲

what weird animal is this?

Medo

QG curioso porra

QG curioso

Vim pelo QG curioso

Its so sad the the HQ 60fps version of this is lost

Boy oh boy Trumbull couldn't have been more wrong huh? Remember when certain blu-ray features were 60fps and everyone complaining and feeling weird watching the movie? Yeah 60frames sucks.

Apparently Trumbull did a 60 fps / 70 mm test on a roller-coaster back in '79 or '80 and presented it to studio execs to show them what Showscan could do. It was meant to have blown their minds. Would love to see that footage.

No idea if anyone is still watching this in 2020. But Trumbull has been trying to push 60 fps on 70mm film since he did Brainstorm back in the early '80s. In the end the studio allowed him to do the' hyper real' scenes he wanted on 70mm which contrasted with the 35mm for the rest of the scenes but he had to keep it at the standard 24fps. To me the images just looked wide-screen with a fish eye lense effect.

old / outdated material here but still good ... however, sometimes a little motion blur is added to some frames intentionally, in some 3d or 2d animations for example, in order to make it more 'film-like' thus looking more 'realistic' since regular film viewers are used to it ... probably, Douglas Trumbull and people like him trying to reduce / remove motion blur want it for industrial and technical uses of cinematography where the sharper the image the more details are visible and needed too ...

So I get filming in 120 means you can drop frames in post to recreate a lower frame rate, basic maths right? But how do you get around blurring? I might want motion blurrng at 24fps but if my original source was 120fps my shutter is presumably 1/240 (or there abouts) which means when I drop frames to get to 24fps each remaining frame is shot with a shutter of 1/240 and not 1/50 which would have been the optimal for source at 24fps so does my new interploated 24fps footage now look really choppy because of the high shutter speed?

Wish I lived near Doug so I could finagle my way into seeing his theater and his demo reel. All this makes me think about Phil Tippett and his animations for Star Wars, introducing motion blur into stop motion animation. Logical next thought of course, is, animating at 120 frames a second. Oh boy. Back to go motion. Philosophical thought is can the mind learn to store information more efficiently, and most importantly, retrieve it at some higher success rate. Reality. A frisbee.

A monumental waste of time. Not only does the human eye not care. But neither do people watching a movie. Give me a compelling movie over a higher frame rate, and I could care less what you shoot the film at. Guys like Trumbull forget that a film which truly matters is the one with a compelling narrative. Not the frame rate it was shot at, or the camera that was used.

This is genius.

24 frames per second is a hangover from mechanical movie cameras. It is no longer needed.

Unfortunately, he's too late. HFR beat him to it, and it was soundly rejected. Maybe if he had gotten his way with the film version of Showscan, it would be different now...

This is great and all, but this video does need to be reuploaded with better framerate and quality.

I love that prop. It's kinda cute.

no visualize my final video

no visualize my video

It's 2016, and it's sad that this - VERY low-quality video, of a VERY hI-end High-quality imaging/film system is shown - NOT close to even 'analogue'-quality images, but, WORSE (the 'highest' quality is 360p!). I've 8k video monitors (yes, 'TV's - and, I DO need them, for my work), and a couple of 4k's, as well, and it's such a shame, because I ALWAYS wished to see ShowScan at it's best. From what I understand, (Mr. Trumbull's original) ShowScan, and the later Showscan Film Corp., and THEN (phew!) Showscan Entertainment are kaput. I thought this was amazing when I first heard about it (when I was VERY young), and now - grown, this technology - or, more accurately, the IDEA OF what ShowScan can do, is more relevant, and now, easier-than-ever to actually commit to!

By the way, the brandnew H.265 or HEVC codec supports framerates of up to 300 fps! The end of peasantry is near!

die antwoord

says this is for chappie but I never saw it in the movie?

I want an 8K 120fps with no shutter and 17.1 sound. Now. The technology is there. You want my money? You want me back in the theaters? Do it.

I want to see this movie!

Nope...

Apparently this is for Chappie

They still have to make... a GOOD movie.

Expo in 1967 was the first 70mm early imax large format projection. This projection & theatre technology was produced by Canadians.

this is linked to a movie that should be released either during the middle of next year or maybe even later a film called Chappie and in South Africa a chappie is a famous bubblegum we all used to love to chew on and is still available for purchase in South Africa hope this helps enjoy

I hope this is for an upcoming movie of Blomkamp's. I can't wait!

We may see action at a "higher frame rate" in our natural vision. But motion is still blurred, having such a smooth image without any motion blur just looks off putting