วีดีโอ

Super dense regions of space are stars that cannot violate the fundamental law that there needs to be two electromagnetic field (line) vectors away from the bulk mass of the celestial object. Prove that there exists a “black hole mass” that ceases this fundamental law or stop talking about black holes.

Your photons will create electrons and positrons, because your photons in that tiny space are only gamma rays photons. If you want to build a black hole from photons, then avoid such scenarios (the creation of gamma rays photons) to succeed! The trick is to focus on tiny space without magnifying the frequency of the photons, which is not impossible in the sense of tachyonic dynamics.

That just means that you can’t make a SMALL black hole

I did a quick read of your paper. It seems your prediction is highly dependent on the Schwinger effect which has not solidly been proven to exist. You also mention wavelength of 10^-22 is needed. While rare, some ultra high energy cosmic rays with energies of 244 exa electron volts has been detected. A wavelength of about 5.08x10^-27. Well below the 10^-22 wavelength mentioned in the paper. So, even if Schwinger effect did exist, if enough super high energy cosmic rays just happened to converge on a single point at the same time in space would it form a black hole? Maybe I missed something and have to read the paper again.

¿Y si la luz se concentra dentro de un confinamiento magnético?

Black holes are based on a mathematical misconception. G.R predicts dilation not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of G.R. predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A "time dilation" graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no singularity/black hole at the center of our galaxy. It can be inferred mathematically that dilation is occurring there. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for galaxy rotation curves. The "missing mass" is dilated mass. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. To date, 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 have been confirmed to show no signs of dark matter. This also explains why all planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates, not 3 times normal. The concept of singularities is preventing clarity in astronomy. Einstein is known to have repeatedly said that they cannot exist. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc.

fyvvp vur.fyi

Very good speech