วีดีโอ

@@adamboyd7327 that makes a lot of sense for sure. It's going to be interesting for sure. Thanks, amigo! :)

@@SuperKanuuna I tried but they didn't reply to my emails

@@JohnDoe-df2zz same here. It's just insane when you hear the sounds and look at where it's coming from. Love them! Thanks for watching

@@Data1Data1-v1k for $10? Go for it!

@@carrickdubya4765 hello. Room correction is great but of course there are limitations..now it should certainly help with your case but the better you position your seats and if you can help with room acoustic trestmeenta all that will always make the room correction work easier. I much prefer the 3800h the longer I have been using it but you would need to buy Dirac for it though. Do you have more than one subwoofer? Thanks

@@vaskodimoski5690 I would buy the Denon unless it's like more than $300 over the Onkyo personally.

@@samsnyder2888 you could but you will want like a MiniDSP to be able to integrate them better because ported reverses the phase around the tunning port which will very likely created some cancellations. So ideally better to stick with sealed or ported for simplicity.

@@AexoeroV well the 2600h has Audyssey xt while the 3800h has xt32 so that alone will make a BIG difference when you performed the calibration. And if you add Dirac later, then even more. So from my perspective yes because of the far superior calibration it will make a good difference.

@gabrieltechreviews8185 i see, i wont add Dirac, as far as i know it costs a lot!

@AexoeroV black Friday deals help but still xt32 will be far superior to your current Audyssey so you will notice the difference :)

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 okay, thanks for your opinion!

@AexoeroV you are welcome

@@mikeschmidt2339 it's surely going to help but if you feel your speakers are lacking then maybe upgrade those first. As for bass control, if you have more than one subwoofer then it will surely be great otherwise is not a useful in my opinion

@@luatdang1733 I didn't feel either had a big advantage but if you like to push it then maybe the rsl 12s so that the port is facing away from you this less port noises? Honestly, for music I would likely grab the sw15 not ported or your room is note huge or dual of those on sale right now. I love the sealed subs because of the slower rolloff and no port chuffing

@ my seating position is 11ft so I think the sealed sw15 will be a better choice. Thanks for your suggestion!

@luatdang1733 glad to help. They are all great but I feel for your setup and music you will enjoy the sealed more and if you go duals even better for nice room responses (if properly integrated) Thanks for watching!!

@@lennartl6662 ok so for sure I would buy the 3800h if I were you and I would just add Dirac when on sale. As far as needing an amp with the 3800h the difference in power between the 3800h and 4800h is so small that if you REALLY need more power then you would have to add the amp either way. And yes I didn't hear anything dac related that was worth the extra for the 4800h. Sure it measures better but at a level where we humans already cannot tell a difference anyway. :)

@@zalllon thanks for your feedback

@@marcsmith3739 how you liking it? Or did you just order right now

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 i just ordered it now….i’m getting it Wednesday

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 0:34 I have THAT battery headstrap for USA 10$!!! what do u think?

@@TheHaydenAlexander thanks 👍 it has a changed a lot from that and under a major renovation currently

@@TheHaydenAlexander never 🤣👍

@@Bemx2k mhm I havent check on that. Thanks for the tip..I will look into it

@@joakimsoderquist9513 if you go by paper specs yes, if you actually listen you won't tell them apart on a blind test 😉

@@retromograph3893 thanks a lot for the kind words. Yeah man I am pretty much against that kind of imagination 😂😂 if I hear something I say it..if I THINK I hear something but not sure I also say it that way. I prefer to be 💯 honest and not come up with stuff just to pretend I have super hearing that others don't have 😁👍

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 Nice! I'm a professional mastering engineer and it always cracks me up how hifi guys talk about sound, because it's all just total nonsense..... i always wonder if it's only self deception and confirmation bias, or if they're consciously making stuff up in order to sound autorotative and justify themselves! 😂

@@retromograph3893 probably a little bit of all of that 😂😂😂

@@retromograph3893 i monkey could become a professional mastering engineer if it wanted to and makes no difference to if you are wrong or right which you are clearly wrong. all av receivers have a different sound this is just an obvious fact that only a very deaf or ignorant person would not notice.

@@huyly5339 I owned a few of svs which I thought I mentioned in the video too among other brands. They were a great deal back when they started but they are not now. There are much better options these days. I don't have anything against brands but if one can get better performance for the same or less money from other brands, why would I recommend svs? If you like svs that is fine, we all have the option to choose. Thanks

@gabrieltechreviews8185 bro, it's not like I am a big fan of SVS, it's just that the Stark Sound is so much cheaper, so I just wonder if you had compared the 2 brands, I actually opened to any brands that's considered best bang for the buck, but I really like your response and appreciated your knowledge 👍.

I kind of having the curiosity that how the Stark sound performing wise compared to the more expensive SVS 👍 .

@@huyly5339 well the most expensive svs is no slouch but the problem is at those prices there are better options like psa, ryrhmik, JTR etc. I used to runs big JTRs before but now I prefer my quad 15" Starkes and let my Tactile devices deliver the vibrations which means less SPL, less hearing loss and happier wife upstairs 😁👍

@gabrieltechreviews8185 when I looked at the Stark Sound warranty, it's only a 2 years while others like Monolith, RSL, and SVS offer 5 full years which make me pause a little bit 😀

@@MattyDaddy14 thanks so much. I am starting to shoot the updated HT room video this weekend which will of course include the 4 subs now :)

@@arielstereo5484 I only tested the rZ50 and 4800h but based on how much mature and stable the Denon 3800 has been over my time owning the rZ50, I would go with the 4800h Although personally I rather get the 3800 and buy an amp if you just wanted extra power. Thanks!

@@weakpig I have not tried the sw10 unfortunately although I have considered one for my small office. At the current $50 price difference vs the sw15 though, I would make space for the 15 instead lol Not sure if you can make the 15 work but the price difference is worth it at least as I for sure know how it performs. Then again, I have tried the sw15 and sw15p and both have been great so I would expect the sw10 to be as well. But as I have never tried it, I cannot give it a 100% seal of approval. 😊

@@yasenpen thanks for the information!

@@jamesdelling5902 thank so much. I'm using this a.co/d/6EJflOE I am getting ready a video showing all the changes to the room and the sofa with more powerful TR parts. :) Thanks for watching!

Oh nice!!! What else are you running?

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 Well with the help of one of my buds who has a audio shop around the corner he's going to give me a bunch of stuff to try out, speakers, subs, etc. should be fun! I have a pretty nice stereo set up, Convergent Audio Tech, preamp, Acoustat electrostatics, PlanerP3 tt. but that's all staying separate. Thanks for your review. I almost sprung for the RZ50 999.00 right now, but it seems like there are some issues so I passed and went with the Denon.

@@Phis213 well I haven't done any riding that long not at least for my workouts (hiking, treadmill, boxing, hockey) my ultra is doing better than the classic 6. Maybe another viewer can provide feedback more similar to your activity. Thanks!

@@boriskey7841 hello .somehow I never got this notification, sorry. If you want to "feel" a sub at low levels you can either place it vnf (very near field) or get a transducer like buttkickers, Dayton BST - 300ex or diy ones. Thanks for the kind words

@@arielrodriguez6980 I honestly don't recall as I only remember using either the android app or the laptop. I will have to retry tonight. Sorry

@@arielrodriguez6980 thanks for the kind words. RZ50 is 20hz-20khz, so full. :)

@@arielrodriguez6980 I prefer Dirac. I have a short video about it too :) th-cam.com/video/da7_YcMUTsE/w-d-xo.html Thanks

@@SonicgraceVR hello sure I want to do a new round of accessory update.

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 thanks, can you give the email address that i can send you an email with our product details?

@@cs-ge5kx what's making you go back and forth?

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 is it worth it 👌

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 I like to have the newest and greatest every year but I'm really debating if it's worth it this time

@@ExposedRoot fully agree with all your comments. I wasn't expecting to like it this much, specially the bezel but like you said, just the tip of the finger around it and the haptic feedback completely sold me on it Thanks a lot for sharing your experience !

@@elliott44597 mine is still doing great but I will report back if I have any issues.

Why are u

Its my first smart watch, but I charge when I shower in the morning (wear during sleep), then charge when i get home after work. Twice a day but for 30mins per charge, usually down to 65-70% lowest. Guess it depends on charging habbits and usage, fyi, I leave all features on.

@@scooterinthewoods2662 yeah that is a simple way to do it for sure and efficient :)

Thank you for the kind words. I am sure is a great watch as well. :)

Yes finger's crossed. The Classic 6 was randomly laggy then it would get smooth again for a long time and suddenly lag even after a reboot. It was odd but not often, at least mine. Like you, I am hoping these new models completely get rid of that :)

@gabrieltechreviews8185 the 4,5,6 all used essentially the same CPU with some minor tweaks so it's about time we get a massive boost in the watch area. I'm super hopeful this time around. They refined their phones/ tabs so now watches are all thats left:)

@@Iyswift indeed, I would expect a bigger jump this time for sure. I will be keeping an eye on mine to make sure the sudden stutters are a thing of the past :)

@gabrieltechreviews8185 so far I haven't really had any and it's been 2 weeks. It's honestly super impressive. And coming from a Watch4 this battery is WAY better. Is yours still good?

I dont have that model but maybe I, or one of the viewers can offer some advice. I was looking at this: manuals.denon.com/AVRX2800H/EU/EN/DRDZSYyrtgycpw.php

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 Thank you. I will post my questions as soon as possible.

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 Hello Again. Here's the issue: I am only running a simple 5.1 setup with a new Denon X2800 - which pretty much functions like a 3800 - and the only source that's connected to the receiver is a Panasonic UHD Blu-ray player via HDMI. When we watch discs with 5.1 soundtracks, the Denon automatically engages either the Dolby Surround upmixer (for Dolby sources) or the DTS Neural:X upmixer (for DTS sources). Now, I could switch to the direct sound modes for those signals, such as Dolby Digital, Dolby TrueHD, DTS, DTS-HD, etc., but I leave them engaged so two channel soundtracks, whether mono or stereo, are automatically steered properly into the center and other appropriate channels. If I DON'T leave the upmixers on, I would have to press the green button on the remote every time I switch discs and need to use the upmixer for a stereo/2.0 channel track. Now, I'm concerned that the upmixers are doing something or changing something when I use them with regular 5.1 soundtracks - but I'm not sure because there's nothing to "upmix" when using a 5.1 channel system and listening to a 5.1 channel soundtrack. Do you see what I'm asking? Do these upmixers alter the sound of 5.1 tracks when engaged on a 5.1 system, or are they ignored because there are no speakers to "upmix" to? Also -- how does leaving the Speaker Virtualizer on in the setup menu affect the Dolby Surround/DTS Neutral X upmixers, if at all? I know this setting is for creating a pseudo Atmos effect with a 5.1 system, but does it directly affect the upmixers when engaged? We have in ceiling surround speakers (for normal 5.1 surround), so should I be using the Virtualizer at all?

@@chrissheldrick4073 hahaha I will take that for sure 😅 thank you for watching and commenting:)

@@roland2371 you know, after calibration I don't think you will go wrong with either for music. Hard to tell differences imo so that wouldn't be something I would use to pick between them personally

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 thanks a lot..

Sadly not handy enough just some basic stuff. I wish though as it would be awesome to get even those flat packs I have seen :)

@@bingdong8571 thank you!! I have to post a new video as several things have changed from my Tactile gear 😃👍

Glad to hear you are enjoying it. Thanks for watching!

Dang that means a lot from someone running those beasts that are the JTR 4000!! Thanks for sharing

@@gabrieltechreviews8185 it actually was neck and neck with distortion with cap and my buddy funk sub until 30hz. Of course this is within output limits and the jtr and funk have a lot more output. But we were seriously impressed with the starke.

@@Ctripp2448 this feedback is invaluable to have a reference point so I am going to pin this Thanks again!

Just curious, why did you not go with the ported version?

@@ts6640 lower group delay, no port noise and small sealed room with room gain in getting 11 hz extension.

Thanks