Sketchy EBM
Sketchy EBM
  • 24
  • 714 679
Sexual Abuse Awareness and Prevention – Sensitive Professional Practice Approaches
In this video we outline what constitutes sexual abuse, warning signs, ways we can empower, protect and help our patients feel safe.
Further resources:
www.cno.org/en/protect-public/preventing-harm/sexual-abuse-prevention/
www.crto.on.ca/pdf/PPG/Abuse.pdf
www.integration.samhsa.gov/clinical-practice/handbook-sensitivve-practices4healthcare.pdf
www.ohrc.on.ca/sites/default/files/policy%20on%20preventing%20sexual%20and%20gender-based%20harassment_2013_accessible_1.pdf
www.cpso.on.ca/admin/CPSO/media/Documents/physician/polices-and-guidance/policies/maintaining-appropriate-boundaries-preventing-sexual-abuse.pdf
www.cno.org/en/learn-about-standards-guidelines/magazines-newsletters/the-standard/may-2018/Sexual-abuse-Act-steps-up-patient-protection/
www.collegept.org/members/practice-advice/boundaries-and-sexual-abuse-faqs
www.health.harvard.edu/blog/trauma-informed-care-what-it-is-and-why-its-important-2018101613562
thischangedmypractice.com/aces-adverse-childhood-experiences/
trauma-informed.ca/trauma-informed-organizationssystems/organizational-self-assessment/
มุมมอง: 2 819

วีดีโอ

COVID vaccination for children and consent
มุมมอง 8933 ปีที่แล้ว
In this short video, Dr. Anthony Crocco describes how consent is always obtained before vaccination.
UPDATED VIDEO AT: www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjWkZmpL1sM
มุมมอง 40K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Updated video at: th-cam.com/video/BjWkZmpL1sM/w-d-xo.html
Information transfer at care transitions
มุมมอง 3.3K5 ปีที่แล้ว
In this Sketchy video we review why information transfer at care transitions is important, what the terms mean and how this can be done safely every time.
Patient Identification
มุมมอง 42K6 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video we review proper patient identification, also known as client identification. Why is this important, what is acceptable and not acceptable, why two identifiers are required, and when are the riskiest times for patient identification.
Surgical Safety Data Reports
มุมมอง 1.2K6 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video we explain some of the nuances of surgical safety data reports. We review odds ratio, centile boxes, your data and more! Enjoy!
SBAR+ Communication Tool
มุมมอง 19K8 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video we discuss the SBAR communication tool that can help clinicians communicate better! Better communication = better care! Please evaluate at: www.surveyshare.com/s/AYACG7D Enjoy!
Ontario pay for performance - 90%
มุมมอง 1.9K8 ปีที่แล้ว
Please evaluate at: www.surveyshare.com/s/AYAEV4B Also see: www.sketchyebm.com In this video I explain how the Ontario government uses "90%" to decide if a mid to large ED is performing well. What do we have to do to beat this "90%"? Watch and find out!
Simple Regression (with minor error at 5:55 - residual line should be vertical!)
มุมมอง 36K8 ปีที่แล้ว
FYI: Minor error at 5:55 (the residual line should be VERTICAL!). Thanks @Alan! In this video we look at what is meant by regression analysis and specifically at simple linear regression and simple logistic regression. Enjoy!
Lost (to follow-up)
มุมมอง 18K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Evaluate at: www.surveyshare.com/s/AYAUE4A Please visit: www.sketchyebm.com In this video we review the concept of "lost to follow-up". What is the potential effect and what is attrition bias? Enjoy!
Four Horsemen (Discharge instructions)
มุมมอง 1.4K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Please evaluate at: www.surveyshare.com/s/AYA9EHC See: www.sketchyebm.com In this Eminence-based medicine video we discuss important discharge instructions!
N = 1 Studies
มุมมอง 17K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Please evaluate at: www.surveyshare.com/s/AYA9UGC See also: www.sketchyebm.com In this Sketchy EBM video we review the BEST RESEARCH METHODOLOGY EVER! The N = 1 study! Never heard of it? Well, it is almost never done, because of the logistical issues... but good to know about anyways... Enjoy!
Clinical Decision Instruments - Episode III (IMPACT ANALYSIS)
มุมมอง 3K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Please evaluate at: www.surveyshare.com/s/AYAMETC Please see website at: www.sketchyebm.com In this episode of Sketchy EBM we look at the final stage of development of clinical decision instruments - impact analysis. Why we do them and how they're done is explained. Enjoy!
Clinical Decision Instruments - Episode II (VALIDATION)
มุมมอง 3.6K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Please evaluate at: www.surveyshare.com/s/AYAMEMB Please see website at: www.sketchyebm.com In this episode we look at validation of clinical decision instruments. Why is this important? How are the done? What we should look at to make sure they're done well?
Clinical Decision Instruments - Episode I (DERIVATION)
มุมมอง 5K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Please evaluate at www.surveyshare.com/s/AYAKE9D Sketchy EBM is found at: www.sketchyebm.com In this episode we look at the process of deriving clinical decision instruments (CDIs). The major limitation of this type of research is discussed. Enjoy!
How I read a paper!
มุมมอง 95K9 ปีที่แล้ว
How I read a paper!
Risk
มุมมอง 39K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Risk
Intention to Treat
มุมมอง 157K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Intention to Treat
Differences
มุมมอง 6K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Differences
Knowing NNT
มุมมอง 47K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Knowing NNT
Disclosure
มุมมอง 3.6K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Disclosure
May Madness
มุมมอง 1.6K9 ปีที่แล้ว
May Madness
Bias is Bad
มุมมอง 39K9 ปีที่แล้ว
Bias is Bad
EBM Explained
มุมมอง 132K9 ปีที่แล้ว
EBM Explained

ความคิดเห็น

  • @JobHannah-n2c
    @JobHannah-n2c หลายเดือนก่อน

    Viva Lodge

  • @OrhanPatır-w8b
    @OrhanPatır-w8b หลายเดือนก่อน

    McDermott River

  • @JaneToby-r3j
    @JaneToby-r3j หลายเดือนก่อน

    Prince Street

  • @MegEmily-p3j
    @MegEmily-p3j หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kris Shoal

  • @GaryWilliams-v7q
    @GaryWilliams-v7q หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mellie Inlet

  • @fzhnxg-g4d
    @fzhnxg-g4d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mercedes Skyway

  • @RobinHardy-x4x
    @RobinHardy-x4x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    15242 Estella Shoal

  • @SandeeChrislip-n7p
    @SandeeChrislip-n7p 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Medhurst Locks

  • @PansyAldrich
    @PansyAldrich 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    647 Abernathy Turnpike

  • @MichaelBrian-o8n
    @MichaelBrian-o8n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Padberg Route

  • @jp32123
    @jp32123 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is incorrect... ALL noncompliant patients are excluded in per protocol, not just the ones from the experimental group

  • @paulsunny
    @paulsunny 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is great information. Thank you

  • @wolvenar
    @wolvenar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Isn't it sad that evidence-based medicine is ignored in favor of political will?

  • @lujain5048
    @lujain5048 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perfect !!!!

  • @lujain5048
    @lujain5048 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best ever !! Thank you

  • @lwanzorosemaryv2927
    @lwanzorosemaryv2927 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This helps with learn how to read some photos of Ariana grande

  • @lukewarmamericano
    @lukewarmamericano 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you, i finally understood those terms for the first time.

  • @nirmalaa2082
    @nirmalaa2082 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro I am searching for "Electronic beam machining" and I got this video 😑

  • @TheHadesShade
    @TheHadesShade ปีที่แล้ว

    how can a lowst to follow up be bigger than the effect size? They are different kind of numbers.

  • @TheHadesShade
    @TheHadesShade ปีที่แล้ว

    Does lost to follow up harm the internal validity of a study? Does an intention to treat analysis correct this internal validity flaw?

    • @sketchyebm3043
      @sketchyebm3043 ปีที่แล้ว

      It does impact the internal validity and ITT doesn't correct it but, rather, is the 'least worst' way of dealing with it. Researchers need to make a decision about what to do about non-compliance data and sometimes other techniques will be used that inadvertently (or intentionally!) distort the results...

  • @finnkay2832
    @finnkay2832 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro i clicked on this for electric Body Music /:

    • @sketchyebm3043
      @sketchyebm3043 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry about that... in another universe I mix music...

    • @finnkay2832
      @finnkay2832 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sketchyebm3043 Okay

  • @N___________
    @N___________ ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this the same as 'N = 1 Studies' and the commonly seen 'N-of-1 trials' in current journals? In the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence, N=1 is classified as Level One (N-of-1 trial with the patient you are raising the question about, or observational study with dramatic effect). Does this mean there is currently a higher chance of publication in journals? What are the prerequisites for its publication? For instance, does it require not only visual analysis but also statistical analysis? thanks

    • @sketchyebm3043
      @sketchyebm3043 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great question - I have not seen an N=1 trial published, but have only heard of them used in the clinical environment to help with individual case decision-making... It uniqueness to the individual is it's greatest strength but would likely preclude any meaningful generalizability to a broader group.

  • @Mariamaltameemi-ii2io
    @Mariamaltameemi-ii2io ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you do that?

  • @RobertWF42
    @RobertWF42 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is Intention to Treat becoming a "buzz word" in data science? A team in my analytics department at a large insurance company claimed they'd conducted an "ITT" study. After reading their paper, it was clear they had run a case-control analysis on observed data, not an ITT RCT. Maybe "Intent to Treat" sounds fancier?

    • @sketchyebm3043
      @sketchyebm3043 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry to hear - hopefully it's not becoming a buzz word! In medical research it does imply sticking to a certain methodology.

  • @alvarotaveras7751
    @alvarotaveras7751 ปีที่แล้ว

    nbme 20 hahaha

  • @ianheckford5116
    @ianheckford5116 ปีที่แล้ว

    Epic Bacon man

  • @marieber
    @marieber ปีที่แล้ว

    You can't skip the Intro because the last paragraph includes the hypothesis, the outcomes, etc.!

    • @toasty-tv
      @toasty-tv ปีที่แล้ว

      that's a great point, and i would agree that the video does kind of gloss over it

  • @lakshmipathykm8422
    @lakshmipathykm8422 ปีที่แล้ว

    EBM is well explained with illustration..lots of regards from chennai india

  • @iamgoddard
    @iamgoddard ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! But why an intention-to-treat group is better than a per-protocol group in minimizing biases of protocol-violating subjects is asserted but not explained. On its face, the opposite would seem more likely. If half of the controls used the treatment and half of the treatment group didn't use the treatment, any efficacy of the treatment should be undetectable in the intention-to-treat groups but could be uncovered in the per-protocol group. No?

  • @genuine_meteen9169
    @genuine_meteen9169 ปีที่แล้ว

    👉Y was it in per protocol, just 75% instead 100%, and the experimental group get 100%, wen it was the experimental group affected and 1 fall out from experimental group happened? Pls explain

  • @TrainLikeaRanger
    @TrainLikeaRanger ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a great channel! 5 videos in so far, huge help! Great work!

  • @tophersuwita
    @tophersuwita ปีที่แล้ว

    I am still confused how if we don't know the "satisfaction" (the outcome in this video) of the dropped out subjects? In this video, you explain like the researchers know about the dropped out subjects outcome. For example, 100 subjects in control group vs 100 subjects in experimental group are followed for survival after 5 years. If there are 10 dropped out subjects in experimental group and (for the sake of simplicity) the rest of them is alive, how should we calculate the survival rate of experimental group? PP analysis: 90/90 = 100% ITT analysis: 90/100? And how about if I study their mortality rate? PP analysis: 0/90 = 0% ITT analysis: 10/100 = 10% (we count the dropped out subjects as "failure") or 0/100 (because we only include the dropped out as they were randomized, without any outcome)? Thank you

    • @sketchyebm3043
      @sketchyebm3043 ปีที่แล้ว

      You've asked an excellent question. ITT helps with non-compliance and directs us as what to do with the data that is generated with non-compliance. My examples illustrate how, depending on their data, ITT minimizes (but does not eliminate) the impact of non-compliance. Missing data is another problem altogether, which is a disaster because it really undermines the validity of the research. For this reason we often put (arbitrary) limits on how much data can go missing before we forfeit the results of the study. I hope this helps!

  • @spintius3752
    @spintius3752 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation. Thanks!

  • @Amy-sy1gl
    @Amy-sy1gl ปีที่แล้ว

    Great sketch and info! I am here from The University of Maryland School of Pharmacy with the MS in Medical Cannabis Science and Therapeutics program. So intrigued to be learning about this. I liked that you mentioned the risks as well. Thank you.

  • @mohammedabusalem4211
    @mohammedabusalem4211 ปีที่แล้ว

    genius

  • @zombietrash416
    @zombietrash416 ปีที่แล้ว

    I came here cuz I thought he was gonna talk about Electronic Body Music.

  • @TamraDavy
    @TamraDavy ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a difference between evidence-based medicine and evidence-based practice?

  • @yashpatel2523
    @yashpatel2523 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good and clear explanation

  • @roomanaseher2844
    @roomanaseher2844 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please make more videos on clinical trials concepts? Your explanation is super simple and comprehensive.

  • @roomanaseher2844
    @roomanaseher2844 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Extremely helpful. thankyou so much!

  • @mishaelm224
    @mishaelm224 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @thefakenews3150
    @thefakenews3150 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does this have to do with Electronic Body Music?!

  • @TXRoeJogan
    @TXRoeJogan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still not a straight answer

  • @ahmedhani9499
    @ahmedhani9499 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU FOR THE VALUABLE INFORMATION. I HAVE A QUESTION REGARDING THE FIRST AND SECOND EXAMPLE. IN THE FIRST ONE 50% CHANCE OF GETTING A FATAL MI : IS THIS A 2 NNH NUMBER NEEDED TO HARM FOR THAT DRUG. OR IS THERE IS ANOTHER TERM ? IN EXAMPLE 2 IS THERE A TERM THAT DESCRIBES THE HIGH COST FOR A TREATMENT? . THANK YOU SO MUCH

  • @Kordon87
    @Kordon87 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    BASED BASED BASED REEEEEEE

  • @thebuttons72
    @thebuttons72 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This helped ALOT for my assignment this wk thank u dr!!!!

  • @thebuttons72
    @thebuttons72 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Omg thank u so much dr

  • @sheristone4200
    @sheristone4200 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So helpful! Sketchy EBM you may get me through my doctoral program

  • @Joseph-je7vp
    @Joseph-je7vp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow! thanks for the great video!!!!!!!! :) I have to subscribe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\( ̄︶ ̄*\) (づ ̄3 ̄)づ╭❤~ (○` 3′○ ) ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

  • @dr.paddlesmack2054
    @dr.paddlesmack2054 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    are there specific names for the bias you mentioned in each example?