วีดีโอ

It’s a bit larger of a foot print than the previous PSQ. If you are looking for a hand sized bible that may be your best bet. I believe this Bible is better all around and is a perfect size carry Bible. The readability will be better on this updated version as well.

Glad you enjoyed it

It is a matter of truth and Islam is not the Truth.

Good question, I don’t think it will hold up. Mine starting peeling after a few days which was pretty dissapointing and I had to return it

The Bible

Thanks man! Looking forward to it

No day 7 the pest

Don’t buy it if you don’t need it lol.

Rather buy old bible like 1775 one, in it they shows that sunday was/is the 1st day of week and the year starts around march, not january. We have to DIG for the truth. Go back in time to the original

This Bible I purchased on my own!

It’s a paste down!

⁠paste down paper a presume then. Some mfg will use synthetic for a paste down. Preventing the paper from ripping the the spine. Similar to how lockman does the nasb leathertex

They tell you exactly what is updated.

@@vigilantezack what do you mean by updated? The bible does not change. I need to have verse Matthew 17,21 . Some trabslations do not have it 'Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting. ' that verse is a 1st check if a translation is trustworthy. Then, is the question about the name of the lord. Is just 'Lord' written or the real names like jehova. You can get a Christian with every bible, but most of the newer versions are sadly not the real truth anymore.. 😥

⁠@@ralfmeier6460if you can’t read Greek and Hebrew then you need to have a translation thats majority. Its already been proven that though the the critical text is 94% identical to the majority, the 6% will is VERY important. The Westcott and Hort influenced Bibles contain the verses they once omitted in footnotes. Nothing is exactly missing but nothing is right either. If you’re going to take the time to footnote the verse you might as well include it where it was DIVINELY INSPIRED to be. The verses that they claim are not in the earliest manuscripts, them Alexandrian ones, get annihilated by the early church fathers!!! Every last verse they omitted like the adulterous for example was quoted by early church fathers almost 150 years BEFORE the W&H manuscripts were created. You see they tried to silence the Majority text with “Oldest” manuscripts one the basis that there wasn’t anything older… but the dummies forgot they recorded the words of the church fathers!!! Get yourself a good Ruckman Reference of a Common Mans Bible! Jump into one of them. You can read the W&H stuff but do it as a means to add to your OWN interpretation. Good Luck Brothers and Sisters. Ruckman Reference! He’ll steer you the right way.

@@ralfmeier6460 Yes, the bible changes to update the language. How do you think it's translated into all the languages of the world? Do you know what translators have to do to make sure phrases and sentences are carried between languages so that the meaning isn't lost on them? You know how hard it is to translate cultural "sayings" that other languages don't have? If an American says "I'm parched", there might not be perfect word-for-word translations in every language and even if there is, it might not mean the same thing to the other people. It might translate "I'm dry dirt" which is not going to get the meaning across unless the translators do a good job adopting these into the language, especially the language doesn't have both the equivalent words, and equivalent "saying". That said, when publishers update scripture, they are doing so to fix translation issues, make less clear language more clear in modern English, update archaic language that nobody uses any more, make smoother sentence structures, become more accurate according to scholarship and reviewing of more manuscripts, or even just to fix printing errors, misspellings. The problem with your kind of thinking is you assume conspiracy about everything instead of realizing that language changes over time and it's ok to update translations of books. Matthew 17:21 was not "removed" from bibles, it isn't there because by all accounts it's not original, it was added to scripture most likely. The translator notes on the NET say this: --- "Many important MSS (א* B Θ 0281 33 579 892* pc e ff1 sys,c sa) do not include 17:21 “But this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting.” The verse is included in א2 C D L W ƒ1, 13 M lat, but is almost certainly not original. As B. M. Metzger notes, “Since there is no satisfactory reason why the passage, if originally present in Matthew, should have been omitted in a wide variety of witnesses, and since copyists frequently inserted material derived from another Gospel, it appears that most manuscripts have been assimilated to the parallel in Mk 9.29” (TCGNT 35). The present translation follows NA27 in omitting the verse number as well, a procedure also followed by a number of other modern translations." --- There is no grand conspiracy to destroy the blessed KJV. It's just that the verse likely was never there in the first place. The theological concept of 17:21 is not lost, as the idea is still shown in Mark 9:29. This isn't some conspiracy to destroy a core doctrine or something. KJV is a fine old translation that served the English church for a good while. But it was not based on a vast survey of available manuscripts. It was based almost entirely on the word of one man Erasmus. Well guess what, we can do a lot better than Erasmus now.

I prefer a Bible that doesn't have extra stuff that was clearly added to address the current days of issues of that time. KJVO'ism is not rooted in earnest study or research but in pride. The oh-so-common belief of "the other Christians have it wrong," but we're the "real" Christians.

The paper is okay, its the same paper in every thinline printed in China. Its a 30gsm rougher feel.

I love your channel and I have a question for you can you shoot me an email? nathanielginsterblum@gmail.com

The Thinline is the perfect form size for me. If ghosting typically bothers you I wouldn’t recommend this Bible. The ghosting is there and it isn’t line matched. It’s not terrible, but if you’re picky it’ll bother you. The alpha is line matched, same font, and a bit smaller. I like the Thinline better because the Thinline footprint is my favorite but alpha wins out in readability and practicality.

The Bible is the most historically verified work of literature and the first book ever printed. Mohamed came hundreds of years after Jesus and denied the bodily death and resurrection of Christ.

@@nateginsterblum Just because the Bible is the first book printed does not mean that it is not corrupted. We Muslims believe that Jesus Christ lives in the sky with his body and soul because Allah Almighty says so in the Quran. It was Judas Iscariot, not Jesus, who was crucified

@@ahmet8518 The falsehoods of the Quran are easily seen. Just one example is Surah 20:85-88, 95: “He [Allah] said, ‘We have tempted thy people since thou didist leave them. The Samaratin has led them into error.’ Then Moses returned…and we cast them [(gold) ornaments], as the Samaritan also threw them, into the fire.’ (Then he brought out for them a Calf, a mere body that lowed; and they said, ‘This is your god, and the god of Moses, whom he has forgotten.’)…Moses said, ‘And thou, Samaritan, what was thy business?’” How can a Samaritan have led the Israelites astray at the time of Moses (approx 1400 B.C.) when the city of Samaria was founded by King Omri about 870 B.C.? The Samaritans did not exist until after the exile of the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the resettlement of the area under King Sargon II in 722 B.C. with non-Israelites who then adopted a syncretism (mixture) between the religion of the Jews and their own polytheistic background. The Samaritans did not exist until 530 years after Moses. By this mistake alone, the Qur’an can be rendered unreliable and certainly not an inerrant work of God. Sura 34:50 commands Muhammad to say, "If I go astray, I go astray only to my own loss," which is a severe factual error in the Qur'an as well as contradicting the teaching of the Qur'an in a number of other verses. The Qur'an attacks those who worship anyone besides God (e.g. angels or prophets) because those can neither create, nor give life, nor cause anyone to die. Yet, the Qur'an explicitly states that one angel or several angels are causing certain people to die [Sura 4:97, 16:28, 32, 32:11]. Muhammed is a known con artist who stole and lied as he sought fit. Islam is not spread by the teaching of apostles but by the sword. Islam relies on violence and oppressiveness, not truth. Statistically, 84 million Muslims today believe violence against civilians is justified. It cannot stand on the truth of its own claims, and must result to violence to stay relevant.

You've never read the Bible.

man, that would be wild. It may be true