วีดีโอ

Gavin's case, " you dont need to be infallible in order to discern that which is infallible" seems to me pretty solid.

Yeah shameless has a video saying Mary saves you. I'm not joking

Jesus wasn't Catholic. Neither were his followers. Biblically, they are known as Christians. Leave it like that

Atheism fails to get off the ground. By default, it puts a halt to living

Yeah, there is a huge Constitutional Imperative about there being a separation of Church and State; however, most true power is Economic and Financial. Therefore I would look for Christ to set up His own Banking System. If the Christ Bank proves to provide solid returns on investment, then, well, it is proverbial in the Economic Community that Good Money drives out Bad, and the Christ Bank would soon have an effective monopoly on Economic and Fiscal Activity, just those activities that have always defined the Societal and Civilizational "Ruling Classes", and the Ruling Classes have traditionally been understood as being foundational to Political Control. Yeah, for the Christ Bank to control Free Democracies, It would only need to pay out Donations to those who would Bow to the Way of Christ. So, yeah, where there is a Divine Will, there is a Way, even given the present Political norms.

Dang, spot on!!!

Haha... catholics believe Mary is sinless(against plain scripture)and call protestants gnostics... good case of the pot calling the kettle black.

This video goes nicely with Apostolicam Actuositatem. And that document should be promoted!

It's a complicated question. Secular society isn't Gnostic. They really want a religion thats relevant to daily lives. Hence Laudato Sii. Hence Novenas for health and healing (super rare to find an intention for the salvation of souls). Hence the perverse prosperity Gospel

not just catholic, but all human have gnostic tendency. because gnostic idea related to controversy, conspiracy, and gossip

HOW did the youtube algorithm landed me this video? I am as atheist as they come lol

There are a billion Catholics, it would be more surprising if we didn’t find a bit of every heresy in a sample size that large.

Agree completely. Thank you for this!

Really appreciate this video..Insightful.

You've greatly inspired me, Chris. I live in Canada and want to see how I can have a Catholic political presence here. Another excellent video. God bless you.

Waiting for the Christero's policy toward Hindus and Muslims living in America.

You expect too much from Chad Pecknold.

There is no strong case for classical Protestantism; it is baseless. This is why classical Protestantism has collapsed into liberalism, fundamentalist-evangelicalism, spiritual-but-not-religious-ism, and atheism-or else reversion to Catholicism.

“He has day and night, he doesn’t have Netflix” lol

@Chris Plance, I enjoy your content and that of RT and others. I am Catholic because I believe Jesus established the papacy. Pope Francis is the Pope. No doubt about that. It feels wrong to label the Pope as incorrect even on non-magisterial statements. In light of Pope Francis being a trained theologian, who knows the Gospel and dogmas of the RCC and encourages people to evangelize, it is difficult to hear the words at Singapore. I don’t know what happened there. Jimmy Akin makes a great point to read in context. Agreed. However, The Pope’s words are not just that all religions are a path people take to try to find God. The original text appears to say they are all “paths to reach God”. The languages example implies that all religions are equal because they are just ways of speaking about the same referent, namely God. The problem is that God has given His people a “pure speech” to call on His name (Zeph 3:9) and every language in heaven will say ““Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb” (Rev 7:10). The Pope’s words sound like we should have no quarrels in dialogue BECAUSE all religions lead to God. They are all basically grasping the same substance just using using different languages. This is incorrect. Sacrifices to idols are offered to demons. Buddhists reject an eternal Creator. Muslims reject that Jesus is the Son of God who died on a cross for us. Etc.

In order for your idea to be viable, America would have to be converted, throw out the Constitution, and reorient to be fully integralist. The reason you have an issue with the American solidarity Party's platform, their second sentence as you mentioned, is because their party does not intend to throw out the Constitution. It intends to work within the framework of it. In case you forgot "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."

Epic. JA for the win. Thanks for sharing brother!

This is such an AWESOME interview, so great to see your passion for scripture!

Masterclass in popesplainery

The Protestant reformation is a presumptuous indulgence contrary to the relatively measured Catholic indulgences for money well invested.

Yes, it's reasonable, and Catholics need to be charitable when they interpret the Holy Father's thoughts. But I wonder what the young people in Singapore thought he meant since it shocked me. Blessed Pope Pius IX condemns these false statements in his Syllabus of Errors. "15. Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true. - Allocution “Maxima quidem,” June 9, 1862; Damnatio “Multiplices inter,” June 10, 1851. 16. Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation. - Encyclical “Qui pluribus,” Nov. 9, 1846. 17. Good hope at least is to be entertained of the eternal salvation of all those who are not at all in the true Church of Christ. - Encyclical “Quanto conficiamur,” Aug. 10, 1863, etc. 18. Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church. - Encyclical “Noscitis,” Dec. 8, 1849." www.papalencyclicals.net/pius09/p9syll.htm

I see how you interpret the scripture.. but I interpret it quite differently 😮

God Bless Pope Francis 🙏

Pathetic defense of the bishop of Rome, gaslighting at its finest.

Was St. Paul wrong to correct St. Peter??

You guys are assuming as the pope said "all religions are equal, regardless knowing and deliberately rejecting the catholic faith you will be saved". Remember only God can judge the heart and yes i agree that pope francis should elaborate more after his statements in order to avoid confusion

Orthodox here. I feel the distress in the hearts of my Roman Catholic brothers. I want to remind you one of the greatest dangers in the dogmatic innovations of Catholicism compared to orthodoxy. Pope Leo XIII, in the following passage, condemed any attempt to oppose the directives of a reigning Roman Pontiff to those of previous pontiffs : _Similarly, it is to give proof of a submission which is far from sincere to set up some kind of opposition between one Pontiff and another. Those who, faced with two differing directives, reject the present one to hold to the past, are not giving proof of obedience to the authority which has the right and duty to guide them; and in some ways they resemble those who, on receiving a condemnation, would wish to appeal to a future Council, or to a Pope who is better informed._ (Epistola tua, June 17, 1885). This means that every time a new Pontiff contradicts previous ones, the previous beliefs are cancelled and replaced with the new ones. I hope you grab the danger your Church has set herself into. Don't be fooled. Francis has an agenda. And this agenda is the universal pan-synchretism of the new world order. With everything new declaration he makes the orthodox Church more relevant. Kyrie eleison ☦️

Pope Francis also said they (religions) are a way to arrive at God. So hes not just saying they are paths but he is saying that they will get you there. If you ask the average person on the street what Pope Francis meant the majority of them will come to the conclusion most of us have and that it doesn't matter what religion you are and that is heresy. If you want me to be charitable, fine, then he needs to clarify himself. But he hasn't he has doubles down on hia statments calling multi-religions treasures. Has there ever been a Pope that has had to be defended against accusations of heresy as much as him? Are we just all wrong? Meanwhile Father James Martin is still a Priest while Bishop Strickland has been fired. Actions speak louder than words.

Peace

Amen bro! Great video!

Sad to see many Catholics want to cancel the Pope for a statement given to a very specific audience in a very specific context.

I respect Jimmy's attempt to defend the Pope, but I don't buy his conclusion. The Pope said that religions are like "different languages to get there [to God]". Well, it doesn't matter what language you speak. So - following the analogy - it doesn't matter what religion you have. They all "get there". The Pope was simply wrong.

Michael lofton had a way better take.

This does not help. It hurts. It shows that we are manipulators of data to save our name. Awful

I keep floating between both the charitable way and want Pope Francis to be more clear in his teachings

Pope is also a head of the state and gives statement as a statesman, cannot be compared with faith on world stage.

Yeah, I'd love to be able to buy this . . . but . . . I think the simpler interpretations are true. Gotta jump through too many hoops to make this not look like a wolf in sheep's clothing. Look up Sam Shamoun's take on this. WAY more reasonable.

We look foolish when we defend the pope for doing and saying bad things. Is catholicism boiled down to being a shill for the pope or for seeking and defending the truth?? Its hard enough to be a convert or even stay catholic, but then the pope has to say sh!t like this. Is it too much to ask for Francis to not seemingly spout heresy??

Loving your content. Thank you!

Gaslighting

"All religions are a path to arrive at God. They are like languages to arrive there. But God is God for all."

It used to be one-on-one with the priest, before Vatican 2.

Was waiting for a catholic response to the Bible project. thank you 🙏