I thought so too, but ran it in CNF and got the exact same results. I guess she just skips some steps by letting two terminals in a rule. As for the starting variable appearing on the right side of a rule, I don't know how this affects the algorithm.
Hello, out of all the videos I watched yours was the easiest and simplest to follow! Really helped us understand the concept without needing complex symbols or any fluff Thank you for being a good teacher
imagine thinking a tutor that lets you understand the concept is bad. This is why we get pretentious pricks who just spew complicated formulas without teaching anything
I like the diagram, the voice but it must convert the Context Free Grammar (CFG) to Chomsky Normal Form (CNF) before executing the algorithm
Chomsky: Am I a joke to you?
Thanks it really helped 🤝
thank u, it helped a lot
hey guys ... this is the best method to understand cyk.... and one thing i wish is use a example sum that doesnt have many "null"
Thank you !
Well explained. Thanks
This is not how you do it. You need to use the values from the table rather than referring to the rules for every substring
this helped so much thank you
I can't give enough thanks to this person shortest and simplest guide for CYK on YT
thank you so muchhhhh simplest explanation so far
Shouldn't you first convert the CFG to CNF? you can't use CYK when a variable produces two terminal symbols.
true
I thought so too, but ran it in CNF and got the exact same results. I guess she just skips some steps by letting two terminals in a rule. As for the starting variable appearing on the right side of a rule, I don't know how this affects the algorithm.
Most definitely. But you can get "lucky" and the algorithm can still work. But generally, you have to.
Hello, out of all the videos I watched yours was the easiest and simplest to follow! Really helped us understand the concept without needing complex symbols or any fluff Thank you for being a good teacher
this is the first time I outsmart a tutor. pathetic one, really.
imagine thinking a tutor that lets you understand the concept is bad. This is why we get pretentious pricks who just spew complicated formulas without teaching anything