วีดีโอ

Simple answer: yes by using read option game with duo and maybe a #2 slant on one side behind it as well Long answer: since you don’t have that blocking back, instead of kicking out the end you should probably read the end, the only other thing I could think of is using it to see if the backers come downhill on the double teams the first couple of times and using one of the first RPOs aka #2 on one side run a simple 3 step slant behind it to the spot the linebacker on that receiver’s side vacated.

^ I’m also saying this presuming you mean 10 personnel with the receivers in a 2x2 alignment. Out of 3x1, it would be #3 on the trips side running the slant.

As already said in responses, yes you can, but you have no one to kick-out the DE, so it usually has to be a read option of some kind (if you have a six man box). If you get a five man box, I'd have a call to let you get a hat on a hat.

Thank you coaches!!

Hey, sorry for not seeing this sooner. Give this link a try. I drew it up against under, over, odd stack, and odd with 4-techs. imgur.com/a/0vshoR1

To me, duo differs from veer in terms of the speed and development. Veer is supposed to be a fast hitting player, where getting up to the LB's quickly is crucial, and it's all about speed, often because the dive back is coming right away. Duo is more akin to a "reverse inside zone," where you're using more conventional linemen techniques, such as the duck waddle, where you're often shuffling off the line looking for double teams and to pick up backers as they attack their gaps. With that, the back is also coming slower, because they're reading whether to attack the A or B gap (or C gap if there's a TE). I don't have a preference of duo over power or vice versa. It really comes down to what I want to do as a team, and if I have competent pullers. Power is more viable in the long run IMO, but duo is a good base/start. I understand the difference is that duo is power...but the backside guard and playside tackle exchange assignments (BSLB and PSLB).

Hey, what questions do you have? Before emailing you, I want you to know that I've never had the opportunity to coach this play in real life, nor have I played or coached with a team that has run this. The info in this video comes from my own observations and searching/reading the internet, and learning from the Coach Huey forum.

That’s perfectly fine. I respect your honesty. I coach 8 man. I wanted to show you what I have drawn up and pick your brain.

Sounds good. @@michaelharris5695

I want to, but working full time now plus volunteer work is making it hard. I'll take requests!

If a DT can run your back down in a stretch play away, through traffic, you might need a different back. I’d either go with toss to how wide, or pin and pull (downblock from PSG and C on Nose and MIKE, and pull BSG, and cut the BSDT; have your BST go foot-to-foot with your BSG if necessary)

I know this is years later but just in case anyone is still curious…if you have a backside 2 tech and a LBer in backside A that is blitzing then that answers your question. The 2 Tech has to either pinch A or slant to B Gap to be sound. So if your expecting the backer to blitz backside A your guard will pick him up and the tackle can cut the 2 that will slant away. Or if the 2 Tech pinches A then the backer will have to shoot backside B to be sound and your tackle will pick him up. Hope this makes sense.

There isn't. Some people just prefer to call it one or the other.

Justin Schnurer thank you

His response is inaccurate. It's not over preference to call something 200 vs 2 when it comes to Jet protection in the West Coast System - there is a substantive difference. Understand that WCO passing is rooted in rhythm (qb drops correlating with WR route depth/ultimately aggressiveness of blocking). So when you add "00" to the end of 2 Jet, you've created a 3 digit system - the 3 denotes a 3 step drop/quick-game minded blocking. You see the same thing in other standard protections such as "22" or "71" - when you tag a "3" before them (322, 371), the entire play from a timing perspective. So while a "200 Jet Y Stick U Over" and "2 Jet Y Stick U Over" sound roughly the same, you'd end up in a nightmare scenario if the QB took the wrong drop during each respective concept.

Sprint Option im not sure if thats correct for the jet protection. I know you can add a three to certain protections such as the 20 series and what not to make it a 3 step drop but every playbook ive read doesnt correlate with what you said about jet protection. And the other guy said the same thing in the comment section and the other guy gave his reasoning for it being false which seems pretty true

Nicholas Pfarner www.playbookexchange.net/playbooks/Offense/01130301-WestCoast.pdf Check page 16 for an explanation. Alternatively, download one of Gruden's, Holmgren's, Walsh's, or Shanahan's playbooks, they all will denote the difference in protections. The distinction between the 2 is clear and important! Moreover you'll see both 2 Jet and 200 Jet in the same playbook - which isnt trivial, because making random distinctions for no reason would be confusing. Normally 2 Jet is used for longer plays (2 Jet Dino Y Shallow Cross), while 200 is almost always used for slant/stick concepts (200 Jet X Slant, 200 Jet Y Stick Lion). But you will never see a 200 Jet Dino or 200 Jet All-Go Special; the protection would be suicide.

Eli Halaby I typically explain an overload as any time when a team has a numbers advantage on one side of the field (for both offense or defense). Some times on paper/board it may not present as a true overload, but game planning and film may find that it's still a threat for an overload. In the video, it's split with three defenders on each side. However the offense's right side is under more of a threat for an overload, hence why I called that the overload side.

An overload is simply where one team has a number's advantage or shows signs of pressure. In this case, an overload is when the defense has outnumbered the offense in an area of a field, or has matched the offense up with numbers, and all the matched up defenders are showing signs they are going to rush/blitz

Louis Mayall Not really. This protection was almost exclusively for 5-7 step drops (and was the most preferred for 7-step). Plus the play Rogers checked too would not be in the 3-step category.

In the West Coast offense any protection with three digits is a three step drop, so yes 200 jet is a 3 step drop