วีดีโอ

Interesting. I wonder what is result thrust in newtons.

Inertial propulsion is real, but I wonder why so few people is interested about it. There is no serious support from anyone if you want to do something with the situation of nowadays propulsion systems used widely in the world. I think that collective thinking in science and technology is the reason this propulsion is still in preliminary stage of development. There is no talk in media about that and almost nothing in social media. It is hard to understand why people are interested more about politics and war or even topless girls than inertial propulsion... The topic of inertial propulsion is base thing if we want to break today limits of space tavel and if we will encounter the real problems on our planet, the inertial propulsion might become the only way to solve our trouble situation.

Welcome on my channel, I hope that my information will be interesting for you.

Thanks a lot, that you are believing in my concept.

No, I am not the only one.

Thanks for your wise advice.

No, all is rigid here.

@@LepszyNikt nice one

Yes, but audio would be helpful here, I think. Nevertheless, that's how it came out.

Bardzo interesujący kanał. Uważam, że energia magnetyczna jest dostępna od zawsze, problem technologii uzyskania z niej energii mechanicznej i elektrycznej tkwi w podejściu do niej i w zmianie obecnego kursu technologicznego.

Definitely something happens in the world lately in technology.

I don't know, but I believe that rumors are not created without circumstantial evidence.

@@LepszyNikt Almost everything free energy that is marketed as really easy is a scam. Anything that "just need assembly", easy to build, no tuning, etc. is pretty much all a scam. I'm pretty sure my simple Skinner machine works, but I need to build a bigger test model. Just looking at it makes me tired though.

Assumptions are such. You can be sure that once I get enough money to build it, I will build it immediately. And I will show the way it operates here on my chanel.

Look at the description under this video: th-cam.com/video/eV5YgzA_1uc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=RiYlpUvVidBefM4e

@@LepszyNikt masses pull upper and lower arms by centrifugal xforce" and compress spring. When spring compressed enough whole system would be in equilibrium. All forces cansel eachother in one circuit: mass, spring, arms(chain and lever it doesn't matter), on each rotor you have three circuit, which balance rotation, so you can use only two masses without any problem. Basically whole system is just centrifugal governor with minor changes.

@@oberguga The force coming from centrifugal force by use of rotation acting on the spring is not compensated.

@@LepszyNikt why? It seems that it should be compensated. Maybe new video with schematics, force diagrams etc can help.

@@oberguga Because from the bottom there will be still active and effective force coming from rotation and during this is going on the spring will try to decompress in both directions but from the bottom will be always force which will be transmitting the force toward the top. This force will be free of canceling.

And yet there are several videos on YT where people are trying to do such an invention obtaining some positive results.

I don't know I am only preparing to build this. Right now, I can't say if it will be working as I want. This system can be dangerous in operation because it can throw outside parts of the chains if something would go wrong.

@@LepszyNikttrata de hacerlo simétrico y que el giro de uno se cancele con el otro para que puedas percibir mejor el empuje que genere

You have now an explanation in description.

@@LepszyNikt Thanks! Now that I see what you have written, I am also sceptiacle that this will do what you intend. I would encourage you to build a physical mockup and trial it - experimentation is the best way to learn. That said, I think you will find that your system with the weights will not produce an "anti-gravity effect" because not matter how fast the counterwights spin and press up on your spring, you will always have an equal and opposite reactive force in the form of gravity against your system. I am sorry, but you cannot beat the laws of physics. Nice model and simulation though - thank you for sharing. 😊

@@ofar4452 I will take the risk.

@@LepszyNikt I wish you nothing but luck and success in your endeavors - wherever they lead :)

@@ofar4452 The force coming from centrifugal force by use of rotation acting on the spring is not compensated.

This civilization doesn't know everything yet and what I am trying to do is harnessing what we don't know right now even when it seems to us that we know something in hundred percent. There is no such a physics which can forbid me to check for eventual discrepancies in it. I am not trying to brake fundamental laws I only want to try something new because I am bored about conventional physics and all what this physics trying to do is not suitable for real human needs especially in space travel. Scientists are not telling truth because they have their duties coming from money of their headmasters.

You sound exactly like i did in early high school when i was still undiagnosed.

I know that from the point of view of conventional science I am nut. I can only cooperate with the same nuts as I and I know that. Nobody will help me besides those kind of people.

@@blakes8901 We will see about that. For now, I am only capable of doing small experiments and parts but soon I will be able to do welding, machining bigger parts and 3D printing big parts.

You need to see a psychiatrist. I am serious. It keeps going downhill, and eventually you'll be willing to believe anything without substantiated evidence, just because someone used some fancy science mumbo jumbo to "explain it to you". I legitimately used to believe Bedini generators actually existed when i was at my worst. I wouldnt be surprised if you do too. I want you to take a moment to think about the fact that most of the forums that discuss topics like this also lean HEAVILY into religious discussion on the side. I once forgot to respond to a dude's DM on one of those forums for about a week and he freaked out because he thought the government was out to kill him. Please at least talk to a psychiatrist. Good luck.

It depends on what you are seeing here.

​@@LepszyNikt⚠️ God has said in the Quran: 🔵 { O mankind, worship your Lord, who created you and those before you, that you may become righteous - ( 2:21 ) 🔴 [He] who made for you the earth a bed [spread out] and the sky a ceiling and sent down from the sky, rain and brought forth thereby fruits as provision for you. So do not attribute to Allah equals while you know [that there is nothing similar to Him]. ( 2:22 ) 🔵 And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful. ( 2:23 ) 🔴 But if you do not - and you will never be able to - then fear the Fire, whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the disbelievers.( 2:24 ) 🔵 And give good tidings to those who believe and do righteous deeds that they will have gardens [in Paradise] beneath which rivers flow. Whenever they are provided with a provision of fruit therefrom, they will say, "This is what we were provided with before." And it is given to them in likeness. And they will have therein purified spouses, and they will abide therein eternally. ( 2:25 ) ⚠️ Quran

For sure.

Don't you mind you are so pessimistic.

I'm not being pessimistic, I'm just stating the truth. Saves your time and effort. Please do not take this pessimistically. You shouldn't get used to praise. I think technologists should have discussions based on facts. This device obviously doesn't work. Something more progressive is needed. You didn't show me a video link that doesn't work?

I may be too decisive. Under certain conditions, an imbalance may occur, resulting in some levitation. I hope you succeed.

@@space_minor3633 Talking that something is not working have the same value as talking that it is without making a proper experiment.

@@space_minor3633 As I have said in my channel earlier, I am only trying to do an investigation whether inertial propulsion will work because none of rich people or serious scientists in my generation was willing to undertake the topic for finding real solution. If certain people would stop their research before finding the right solution just because someone is not trusting in the invention he is trying to do, we would still be using horses and mules in transport.

I don't forget, but the upper rods are stiff, and they are guiding the weights, so they have only an ability to incline with relation to central axis. But off course I am not in hundred percent sure whether this will be working as I want. Maybe this video gives you the food for thinking more: th-cam.com/video/vZ7d9f8IOCU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=29zjVTbo_nKuHNaM and this wideo with spring visible on central axis: th-cam.com/video/gCFYAR3LYmg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MhcjuOQ08WBCisIj

This inventor in the second video has applicated the chain and this is not bad idea.

Centrifugal force similarly to Lorentz force is independent kind of force, so it is active in closed propulsion systems.

If the spring were shorter due to the collar were placed half a distance of central axis system would probably take off the ground. By the way, this is my earlier concept which I have been thinking about several years ago: th-cam.com/video/C1-xMYig0p0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=DZrbtp9tdygKsDRB

​@@LepszyNiktI watched the video you linked. A counter-rotating movement is seen due to the reaction. I couldn't see the levitation effect. The reason is that when the chain rotates, it becomes taut and resembles a stick. When the spring contracts, it pushes up and down with equal force. The forces cancel out.

Nice to meet you on my channel but I am not an entrepreneur. All my concepts are in preliminary stage, so I can't cooperate. It is nice that you are working on advanced technologically projects. Whether I am making mistakes this will come out when I will manage to gather required money to test my ideas.

@@LepszyNikt Whoever builds such a system, the rule to understand is simple. You cannot produce energy without getting energy from outside with a disc that rotates continuously and whose angle does not change every second. Of course, if you try this, you will understand the subject better. At least 2 different resonance angles are needed to generate energy. This video system has 1 fixed vibration resonance. Therefore, it acts as a kinetic capacitor (temporary energy storage). It does not provide additional energy to the system. Everything is within physics. There is no energy created from nothing. Existing energy is utilised in the best way. Gravitational energy is present everywhere. In my design (ARES), the robotic and mechanical system, whose angle changes every second, provides this.

@@SINANOZYOLDAS This is no free-energy device. I know that energy can't be created from nothing. This is powered by electric motor. What I wanted to present is quite simple because I was only concentrated on centrifugal force distribution control by this device.

@@LepszyNikt Thank you.

This should in my assumption to generate linear thrust from centrifugal force, so in my assumption should be useful in propulsion every kind of vehicle both aerial and space also sea ships. All these trials are only attempts to find something else than rocket propulsion and jet propulsion because nothing new is happening in the field of propulsion in the last 60 years what can be disappointing according to our science and technology. Such a attempts was already performed by such researcher like Tolchin, N.L. Dean or O. Carr. There is no practical use from such propulsion due to science, science is not interested in improvement of these solutions until now. The technology only is improved by people who are less involved in standard science. This technology won't be adjusted for mass use until the situation and approach for this won't change. I have wish to improve this technology to commonly use for the people, but for now my general situation is not allowing me for much more than creating drawings and preparing works in my laboratory.

I hope that would work but I think also that some troubles will be occurring like too much ex-center geometry of the system and it's easy to make such a mistake in building such a device just like you have said. I should start to build this but for now I am in the stage where I am preparing my basement for my laboratory - expansion of the lab, so I have a lot of organising work to do. I don't expect that will work at once.

This is not so easy to test it. Precision could be crucial here. I should be able to do such conical shapes on my CNC mill from brass, but I first must pay somebody who will set my equipment to the state ready to work. Those weights should have an opportunity to join from two the same parts for placing the ball bearings inside and should have drilled rectangular hole along its lengths and should be joined by screws and nuts. If I would bicycle wheel, I would have to change to much for obtaining my goals, so I prefer to do it from the scratch. The point is that the weights should have conical shape at one axis this is base improvement according to my earlier inventions, so the moment of inertia should be maximal on the axis. I can also build this in small scale for decreasing the cost of the checking of the device.

Não, este torno não possui alimentação automática.