วีดีโอ

School man

Garcia Amy Taylor Sandra Williams Anna

Brown Michelle Jackson Kenneth Anderson Nancy

Autonomy is basically the freedom to do and act as you choose. It's essentially not being controlled by someone else. Sovereignty typically is defined as “not being ruled by another nation or kingdom” - so at first glance, the two words are very similar.

Thomas Mary Jackson Margaret Brown Brian

Martin Cynthia Williams Gary Young Helen

Thanks

"We, the SCOTUS, comprised entirely of 9 white men, hereby rule that the racist laws which allowed us all to be 'Honorable' Justices of the SCOTUS, which founded our racist nation on the tenets and principles of racism, are an insurmountable wall that must always stand between our racism and the true, complete, and absolute value, rights and privileges of a human being who is not of our race - but not the responsibilities, because we are racists and our nation is racists. All hail and forever live out racism in the United States of America. Because we said so." -- SCOTUS, of March 6, 1857, paraphrased to tell the real truth of this nation's insane, barbaric, and absurd history. When we say, "Only in America," apparently, we mean it. This is why we need term limits. There is currently a lot of disagreement among some American people as to the validity of our current Vice President of the United States of America, Kamala Harris, to be eligible for POTUS. Racists see a black woman (after questioning her blackness), and assume that she is African-American (she is not, rather, her father is Jamaican, and her mother was East-Asican Indian), whose ancestors were slaves (it doesn't appear that way, but rather, that one of her Irish ancestors apparently *owned* slaves, way, way, way back in the never-nevers of time). The Dred Scott Ruling does *not* apply, because her heritage is wholly *not included* in the entirety of this case, in the first place, and because Congress over-turned Dred Scott in 1868, by adding the 14th Amendment, which does apply to the circumstances of her birth and her parentage, as well as her parents' then immigration status. She was born in Oakland, CA, on October 20, 1964, to Donald Harris and to Shyamala Gopalan, her mother (see below Donald's info from WikiPedia). The pertinent information about them is as follows (from WikiPedia)... Donald Jasper Harris: "Donald Jasper Harris was born in Brown's Town, St. Ann Parish, Jamaica, the son of Oscar Joseph Harris and Beryl Christie Harris (née Finegan),[7][8] who were Afro-Jamaicans.[9][10] As a child, Harris learned the catechism, was baptized and confirmed in the Anglican Church, and served as an acolyte. Harris's paternal grandmother, born Christiana Brown, told Harris that she was descended from Irish-born plantation owner Hamilton Brown (1776-1843), who founded the local Anglican Church where she is buried.[11] Hamilton Brown owned at least 1,120 slaves, most of them on sugar plantations in Saint Ann Parish, and was "instrumental in the importing of several hundred labourers and their families from Ireland to Jamaica between 1835 and 1840".[12] " "At some time prior to May 2015, Harris became a naturalized U.S. citizen, and reportedly has a residence in Washington, D.C.[16][45][46][42]" Shyamala Gopalan: "Shyamala was born on December 7, 1938, in Madras, Madras Province, British India (present-day Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India) to P. V. Gopalan, a civil servant, and Rajam, her mother. Her parents were from two villages near the town of Mannargudi in Madras Province." "In 1958, aged 19, Shyamala unexpectedly applied to the master's program in nutrition and endocrinology at the University of California, Berkeley, and was accepted. Her parents used some of their retirement savings to pay her tuition and board during the first year." "In the fall of 1962, at a meeting of the Afro-American Association-a students' group at Berkeley whose members would go on to give structure to the discipline of Black studies, propose the holiday of Kwanzaa, and help establish the Black Panther Party-Shyamala met a graduate student in economics from Jamaica, Donald J. Harris, who was that day's speaker.[14] According to Donald Harris, who is now an emeritus professor of economics at Stanford University, "We talked then, continued to talk at a subsequent meeting, and at another, and another."[14] In 1963, they were married without following the convention of introducing Harris to Shyamala's parents beforehand or having the ceremony in her hometown.[8] In the later 1960s, Donald and Shyamala took their daughters, Kamala, then four or five years old, and Maya, two years younger, to newly independent Zambia, where Shyamala's father, P. V. Gopalan, was on an advisory assignment.[8] After Shyamala and Donald divorced in the early 1970s, she took her daughters to India several times to visit her parents in Chennai, where they had retired.[8][15]" "Shyamala died of colon cancer in Oakland on February 11, 2009, at age 70.[6] She requested that donations be made to the organization Breast Cancer Action.[6] Later in 2009, Kamala Harris carried her mother's ashes to Chennai on the southeastern coast of peninsular India and dispersed them in the Indian Ocean waters.[18]" The current question before the United States Internet Court of Opinion (USICO - yes, that's made up hogwash, but so is the Dred-Scott ruling as are the specific laws it was founded on, and as are the conservatives who, in usual and long-standing twisted and racist fashion are attempting to use lies and trickery to subvert and dissolve the natural flow of the legal machinery of the democracy of the United States of America) is as follows: *In 2024, in light of the Dred-Scott ruling, which pertains to the following races only: Free Caucasion US Citizens (from the time of the inception of the US Constitution), male and female African-slaves, and Native Americans, regarding the bid of Vice President Kamala Harris for the office of President of the United States of America, does it matter whether or not her parents, Donald Jasper Harris (Jamaican) and to Shyamala Gopalan (East-Asian Indian), were full US citizens at the time of her birth in Oakland, California, on October 20, 1964?* The answer to this is "No," based on the 14th Amendment of the United States, and on various legal commentaries which are housed by Congress, regarding its interpretation, including: 1. "Constitution Annotated," which gives a summarized interpretation for general purpose use. 2. "The National Constitution Center" which states the following: "Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The citizenship provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment may be seen as a repudiation of one of the more politically divisive cases of the nineteenth century. Under common law, free persons born within a state or nation were citizens thereof. In the Dred Scott case,1 however, Chief Justice Roger Taney, writing for the Court, ruled that this rule did not apply to freed slaves. The Court held that United States citizenship was enjoyed by only two classes of people: (1) White persons born in the United States as descendants of "persons, who were at the time of the adoption of the Constitution recognised as citizens in the several States, [and who] became also citizens of this new political body," the United States of America, and (2) those who, having been "born outside the dominions of the United States," had migrated thereto and been naturalized therein.2 Freed slaves fell into neither of these categories. The Court further held that, although a state could confer state citizenship upon whomever it chose, it could not make the recipient of such status a citizen of the United States. Even a free man descended from a former slave residing as a free man in one of the states at the date of ratification of the Constitution was held ineligible for citizenship.3 Congress subsequently repudiated this concept of citizenship, first in section 14 of the Civil Rights Act of 18665 and then in Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment. *In doing so, Congress set aside the Dred Scott holding, and restored the traditional precepts of citizenship by birth.6"* 3. "Legal Information Institute," which gives an extensively long list of all the details that go into all the above information. Again, Dred-Scott doesn't even apply to the circumstances of Kamala Herris' birth at all, because her ancestry is not that of African-slaves nor of Caucasian US Citizens (at the time of the inception of the US Constitution) nor of Native Americans (inaccurately but often referred to as "Indians"; accurately referred to as indigenous nations). What does apply is the 14th Amendment, which was ratified on July 9, 1868, nearly 96 years prior to Vice President Kamala Harris' birth as a full citizen of the United States of America, in Oakland, CA, on October 20, 1964. The immigration status of her parents is wholly immaterial to the question of her citizenship and qualification for the Office of President of the United States of America. Let this be a lesson go all "birthers" (those who question the birth-situations of black people who run for POTUS) everywhere and for all time. Your concerns are wholly without merit, you are racist bigots, and this US Citizen of this Internet Court of Opinion rules in favor of Vice President Kamala Harris in the US Internet Opinion Case of Harris v. Birthers.

"every man is a TRAITOR to himself and his posterity, who shall ratify it (The US Constitution or any Law) with his signature (or vote), without first endeavouring to understand it." John DeWitt I by John DeWitt October 22, 1787

The letter is real short but has a lot of stuff in it.

Why the Democrats attack local police. The Feds can't enforce Federal laws consistently with in the States without a Federalizes Police Force.

August 18th, 2024

Thank you for your service to Posterity 📜

Sounds like madison

Anyone else get emotional listening to this one? Sounds like the narrator was choking back her patriotism too 🇺🇸😭

Too fast and difficult to understand

F the shindra

🫡

At 13:00 to 14:00 is all u need to know about these people and their thoughts...

Once more unto the breach!

I make it to real come see Adam

I'm here U no you know I'm ADAM

After viewing here, read and learn about Lincoln's views (excerpts from Lincoln's letter to Hoarace Greeeley): "I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union." Now read Microsoft Copilot's (AI) thoughts: "Abraham Lincoln’s letter to Hoarace Greeeley is a significant historical document. Written during the heart of the Civil War, it’s one of Lincoln’s most famous letters. Greeley, editor of the influential New York Tribune, had criticized Lincoln’s administration in an editorial called “The Prayer of Twenty Millions.” In response, Lincoln defended his constitutional duty and his goal of saving the Union. He stated that his paramount objective was to preserve the Union, regardless of whether it meant saving or abolishing slavery."

Why is Massachusetts called Massachusetts-bay?

So Thomas Jefferson is not the villain they’ve tried to make him out to be. Thank the BLM Marxists.

AMEN! AND THIS GOSPEL SHALL BE TOLD IN ALL YHE WORLD .THEN SHALL THE SON OF MAN REAPPEAR IN CLOUDS OF FURY!!!🇺🇸💯💀

Best audio content I’ve yet found on TH-cam. This narrator is excellent

So glad I found these recordings!

Best narrator I’ve heard yet, on any topic.

GREAT ADDRESSS BY PRESIDENT BUCHANAN! HE IS OFTEN MALIGNANED BY HISTORIANS ON HIS HANDLING OF THE SLAVERY ISSUE--BUT HE HAD TO FOLLOW THE LAW AS LAID DOWN BY THE CONSTITUTION! HE MADE EMOTIONAL & AND LEGAL APPEALS TO HIS COUNTRYMEN TO ABANDON THE IDEA OF SECCESSION & CIVIL WAR WHICH COULD ONLY DESTROY A NOBLE GOVERNMENT CREATED BY OUR FOREFATHERS AND PAID FOR BY THEIR SWEAT & BLOOD! HE BELIEVED SLAVERY WOULD EVENTUALLY RUN ITS COURSE AND THAT CONTINUOUS AGITATION ON BOTH SIDES COULD ONLY BRING CATASTROPHIC CONSEQUENCES! TO MAKE WAR ON A REBELIOUS STATE WAS REPUGNANT TO HIM--AS WAS THE NOTION THAT ANY STATE WITH GRIEVANCES AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COULD DECIDE TO BREAK AWAY WILLY NILLY! HE ALSO DEFENDED PRESIDENT-ELECT, ABRAHAM LINCOLN AND WARNED AGAINST EXAGGERATED PRECONCEPTIONS REGARDING HIM. BUCHANAN REMINDED THE COUNTRY THST LINCOLN, LIKE HIMSELF WOULD BE OBLIGED TO FOLLOW THE EXISTING LAWS REGARDING SLAVERY-OR UNTIL THOSE LAWS COULD BE AMENDED. THIS IS AN INTELLIGENT & EMOTIONAL APPEAL TO REASON BY PRESIDENT BUCHANAN TO FOR DEVOTION TO UNION AS ALL COST DESPITE DIFFERNCES BETWEEN NORTH & SOUTH. TO SEE THE GREAT & NOBLE GOVERNMENT IN THE USA FAIL WOULD SEND A MESSAGE TO THE WORLD THAT SELF GOVERNMENT CANNOT WORK!

4:15 Has not aged well

Good to know .thank you😊

Little known fact, this guy started recording this in 1787.

I'm actually just listening to this because I'm a nerd. I'm not even in school anymore.

He was 100% completely wrong. Just look at how well Africa, Haiti and the all Black inner cities of America are fairing. They're all pristine havens of peace and justice, no violence to speak of. True testaments to the falsity of his words.

He didn't speak for the whole South, just the slaveowners (who weren't even a majority).

Slavery should be colorblind. Stephens is an idiot.

55:35

28:31

Remove my shackles

Right now

Listen on 1.5x speed. You’re welcome

This amendment clearly violates the 5th the 10th the 13th and the 14th amendments of the US constitution.

The name: "Alexander" Means Defender(Protector) of Men. The Surname: Hamilton means, “From the Beautiful Mountain.” There is a town of Hamilton near Glasgow, which took its name from the family. The name: "Phillip" Means "Lover of Horses" The Surname: "Hsieh" Means "To Thank" Thank you for loving horses as the defender of mankind From the Beautiful Mountain. I, Phillip Hsieh, as a U.S. Citizen and an Apostolic-Teaching- Evangelist will serve to defend, protect, and help mankind in the court rooms of Law. There is no partiality or favoritism with Jesus. Jesus will equally give justice to all!

Required listening and reading

Listen and hear the lie that many believe starting at 18:27. Truly, the Gibeonites were not black people and black people descend from Cush not Canaan. The land of Cush is not the land of Canaan. Noah cursed Canaan, not Ham, Cush, Mizraim, nor Put, but many have chosen to believe a lie by the father of lies. Oy! Genesis 2:13 The name of the second river is Gihon; it is the one which goes around the whole land of Cush [Ethiopia]. Gen 10:6 The sons of Ham were Cush [Ethiopia], Mizraim [Egypt], Put [Libya], and Canaan [Palestine, Lebanon, western Jordan, southern and coastal Syria]. Genesis 9:24 So Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done to him. 25 Then he said: “Cursed be Canaan; A servant of servants He shall be to his brethren [Joshua 9].” 26 And he said: “Blessed be the LORD, The God of Shem, And may Canaan be his servant. 27 May God enlarge Japheth, And may he dwell in the tents of Shem; And may Canaan be his servant.” Exodus 6:4 “I have also established My covenant with them, to give them the land of Canaan, the land of their pilgrimage, in which they were strangers." Joshua 9:23 “Now therefore, you are cursed [Genesis 9:25-270, and you will never cease to be slaves, both gatherers of firewood and labor to draw water for the house of my God.” 24 So they answered Joshua and said, “Since your servants were fully informed that the Lord your God had commanded His servant Moses to give you all the land, and to destroy all the inhabitants of the land before you, we feared greatly for our lives because of you, and did this thing. 25 And now behold, we are in your hands; do to us as it seems good and right in your sight to do.” 26 This he did to them, and saved them from the hands of the sons of Israel, and they did not kill them. 27 But on that day Joshua made them gatherers of firewood and labor to draw water for the congregation and for the altar of the Lord, to this day, in the place which He would choose. The one who has ears, let him hear.

❤ @14:16 Is a great quote. It can be used for why we had to have voter right laws, affirmative action, and civil right. Amendment 14 should have suffice but one brand of citizens were discriminating on another so laws had to be implemented. I hope those laws are not taken away because equal practice is still not the norm.

We need a clear understanding of the wicked mind and strategies of the Confederate States that influences the small brains of today...

What is the date?

As there is a group trying to rewrite history, teaching our kids that slavery was NOT an issue of the civil war...rather, the "aggression of the north". Its always good to have a reference from the mouth of the south in that time shed light on how incorrect the history revisionist are in trying to change the narrative of the confederate intention.