วีดีโอ

Hey, good work on the artwork, not really attracting though. Hey I should mention this video is on a interesting subject but the only issue is that you show no emotion when your speaking. Try adding a bit of emotion to your voiceover, you sound like a robot.

Sooo... Buy Bitcoin? It is energy (work/labor)used to solve equations and puzzles to create a currency

I don't get the example. You can spend infinitely but not a big sum? Makes no sense. One could never afford a car or house OR maybe the first one would be free if it's within the value one provides. That wouldn't work because it's not a constant value and saving isn't possible. But let's say it works like that, then it just would be confusing as to how much money you actually have. Account says 50 but it can be 1 or 5000.

2:05 This isn't true. The value of the economy can rise when there's deflation.

Relativistic spending sounds stupid. As you describe it at 6:45, It's just money in a market in reverse. Money as we have it already motivates people to contribute to the best of their ability and it already pays according to time and quality of work. Basically the same as now with the remaining question how capital is paid.

I don't really see how authoritarian De-Leonism is authoritarian considering how those policies are necessary for that form of governance to survive long term (considering how all forms of non capitalist governments face international sabotage, E.G Chile). That aside the video is pretty good and unbiased, as a newcomer to this channel I was worried that authoritarian De-Leonism would be called authoritarian due to being anti electoral (which for anyone who needs to know means that they want to establish the ideology via revolution instead of bourgeoisie elections).

Great video man!

I would recommend you take a look at the What is Politics podcast, particularly episode 7 which talks about the material incentives for gender relations which could give another way to analyze the clan structures discussed at 8:20

Awesome slides! I would like to see more graphics like this. #loveyourvids

That's vary interesting! The thumbnail drew my attention!!! #loveyourvids.

✨ *Promosm*

Fantastic work on the slides! Do you make them they really help say your point in depth? 😄

Everyone knows the real classes of leftism 1. good (mine) 2. hitler (anyone that disagrees with me)

While it wouldn't be quite accurate to say that I disagree, I find your descriptions here to be a bit odd in their singularity. Would you be willing to present some of the references you used in creating this?

There is nary a hinge in sight throughout this entire series. I think some focusing with experimental and historical data, plus some practical application toward some current events could make this series or this type of analysis really pop. I recommend taking a little more care when citing sources so its more obvious where you're getting the things, and which things are original thoughts as well as giving a direction for further study

Social democrat here. Not bad for a 5 minute video 👍. You have my subscription

i could totally be wrong but if its from platonic philosophy, the bit about "spooks of the mind" ive vaguely heard phrases like that and i believe its "spokes" as in like the fixed axel of a chariot wheel

Finally somebody properly explains what's socialism

This is really interesting 🤔. You make your slides vary clear and readable.

Wow, I actually really liked this. Simple, informative, and honestly something I don't hear a lot of left leaning content creators talking about. Usually people just say phrases like "Liberal, Socialist and Tankie"

I like Socialism

That Mercator projection made me think Sweden is way larger than it is.

Very nice video my friend. Also, hello my fellow southern 👋 I am from Florida

Cool and informative, but I think that you need a script to avoid "uh"-s, this way you will sound way better

total BS as usual

This is a really good breakdown tbh, I’ve spent a lot of time engaging with the specific leftist philosophies but I’ve never thought about the broad classes they fall into within the left

Interesting, love the videos. It was informative. I have subscribed.

Very oversimplified, but awesome video

Out of curiosity, where on the political spectrum do you come from?

Hey man, thank you for the video. It’s so nice to hear someone with your accent describing these kinds of things. It gives me hope for my country

I was randomly suggested this video. Your content subject looks interesting, but this video (at least) presupposes some knowledge for a "basics" video. What is the goal of Card Communism? What is a Fredonian currency? Maybe 30 seconds or description that gets someone up to speed would help. This feels like two minutes of information in a 6 minute video. But the idea that you can even have daily or weekly performance measured in an intellectual job is hard to take seriously. (Heck, it's hard to take seriously in a physical labor! Who is measuring it? How do you account for retaliation? Is there some sort of bell curve? What if you have some sort of injury or impact to performance? What happens when someone burns themselves out? How do you account for vacation? How do you account for larger goods or services that require saving? You're saying this resets every day - how would a trip to London work, for example? How do vacations work?

I would really appreciate it if you added a transcript or captions :)

Thank you for these; really eloquent and lucid introductions!

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Good Job!

Yooooooo I really can't wait!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My thoughts on the Political Compass: (1) The question shouldn't be whether the political compass is valid, but whether it's a better or worse way to describe political beliefs than other models (for example, the traditional left-right spectrum). The key thing to keep in mind is that the "political compass" doesn't describe objective reality but is just sort of a shorthand way of describing political views within a certain social/political/cultural context. (2) The original "world's smallest political quiz" was absolutely created as libertarian political propaganda; the questions are pretty vague and are worded in a way that encourages agreement, and the effect is that it vastly overestimates the importance/popularity of libertarian ideas. I don't think that invalidates the idea of thinking of political beliefs as being on different axes though. (3) My experience -- both in analyzing quantitative data and in just talking to people -- is that the "social freedom" and "economic freedom" axes are not really orthogonal, and that a single axis (left-right) actually describes most political belief and behavior. With that said, two, or three, or four axes may be useful. I think beyond that though the marginal utility of adding additional axes approaches zero. There may or may not be infinite axes but only the first few of them are actually useful in terms of sorting people into groups large enough to wield power in a democracy. (4) My experience has been that second most important axis is not so much about social liberty but about social progress vs traditional authority. As noted the first axis (more or less economic equality vs liberty axis) is the strongest signal most of the time. Though the relative importance of each axis probably varies quite a bit. (5) Furthermore, most people have ambiguous political beliefs that are not really ideologically consistent. In many cases, people's beliefs can be contradictory (for example, wanting universal health care but not wanting to pay taxes necessary to fund it). Beliefs can vary based on mood, who they are around/listening to what is in the news, etc; for example my own views on gun control tend to shift around depending on how recent/shocking the last mass shooting has been. That does not mean that people with inconsistent beliefs are "in the middle", but that their ideological belief system cannot be boiled down to a single point on a cartesian plane. I think it is better to describe people more as occupying a region than a single x,y (or x,y,z) point. Some people (particularly well-educated, high-information voters) tend to occupy a small region. Others tend to have more esoteric/inconsistent views and would occupy a larger region.

Can't wait!!!!!😃😃😃

I don't like the political compass. An authoritarian left-wing and a libertarian right-wing don't make any sense to me. If you're right-wing you want wealth and power concentrated for one reason or another, if you're left-wing you want it decentralized.

I like the NAP it sounds like your saying nap😂 but everything else is interesting 🤔

Disco Elysium homework

I love your accent! :3

Question: we're do you get your information? 🤔🤔🤔# love your videos

I subscribed!

Cool

Lol 😆😹 love the thumbnail 👍

Now that's really good to know

We're do you get this content and information?🤔#love your vids

I like that this video isn’t just using “post-Marxism” as a boogieman, which is how it’s commonly used especially in right-wing circles. Interesting stuff, I’m gonna go look more into card communism now

Ive noticed that you guys really seem to like this video, what kind of content would you like to see going forward?