วีดีโอ

Ask yourself. You came here and left comment... :)

eats bananas!

wtf is your problem man? Do you happen to know the curb weight, transmission, critical rating, price of this car? 8.5 seconds for an SUV is a more than correct acceleration ... for example 150 hp X1 BMW AWD takes 9- 9.3 sec And what does 150 hp mean? diesel? gas ? transmission? maximum torque? wheels, weight, torque curves? mah ... you are a joke man...

@@matteomazzamuto4787 correct?🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂poor driver of sunday!

@@morisking555But you really have shown yourself to be the average driver ... Moreover with little knowledge in the automotive field ... So ... Have a nice day

@@matteomazzamuto4787 come back at drive truck and exit of the balls! goat

@@morisking555 if you say so... =)

As I wrote below I was really impressed by this car. Interior, grip, engine all was surprisingly good. The consumption was high >11L in city and >8L on highway, but I pushed pedal to the limit. One strange thing - I didn't felt electric motor at all because petrol engine is always on, electric is kind of support only. Anyway I rent this car for 2 days and made around 600km, but it left good memories. I tested 260HP 4x4 and it was much, much better.

@@joez-cz8483 That's good to hear. I saw you recommend the 180hp version at least. What do you think the consumption will be like there? 1-2 litres more than the 150hp version?

@@lukaposeidon8490 Well it all depends how you will drive. Remember that having more powerful engine you don’t need to push that much for the same performance what’s effect in consumption. If I will have to choose I would rather pick the 260hp 4x4. It is real REAL hybrid and you can run 100km/h only on electric motor. When I back home I took 260HP from dealer. We made 20-30 km city and highway and consumption was below 10L, so better performance, better grip, better fuel consumption ... only the price. But you can make the ROI calculation and then throw it away and decide by heart :)

@@joez-cz8483 1.) the 1.6l engine Its the same engine on all, only software is different 2.} electric + thermic hp don`t sum up 3.} the hybrid fuel consumption is estimated, not actual, which is quite lower than what your computer shows.

1st - If you don't know roads are not always flat. Uphill or downhill makes huge, huge difference. 2nd - Video contains 3 different recordings. Different day = different roads, weather, wind, temperature, etc. 3rd - Number of people or baggage weight. It all matters. That's why I made 2 attempts. Besides or rather first of all, why would I lie??? Yes camera is shaking, what is wrong with that?

No, it was 150PS

@@joez-cz8483 it is so fast, were you going downhill a little?

@@edmondbodnar3246 It was really flat. At least first two attempts. Last one (Top Speed) was rec on highway and there I had little uphill and downhill, but I don’t think it had any impact in measurement. Yes, car was pretty quick as for that power and had good grip too! Tucson surprised me on fast corners as much as well made interior. I had this car only for 3 days and then went straight to dealer for 260HP Plugin 4x4 test drive ;)

@@joez-cz8483 thank you for your answers. I have to choose between 150 ps 6mt, 2wd and 150ps or 180ps, 6imt, 2wd mild-hybrid. The only thing is that the mild-hybrid version cannot be equipped with a spare wheel. And do you think the extra money is worth it for the 180 ps version? What would you choose?

@@edmondbodnar3246 Lack of spare wheel doesn't convince me as much as 4x4, power and suspension. Don’t forget that this kind of vehicles with high centers of gravity roll over more easily than other cars. If I had to choose, I would choose 230hp or 260hp Plugin - why? Obviously more grip, more power and in case of Plugin the fuel consumption was very low - below 10L/100km. (short test drive - city & highway) I know it’s all about money, but at least I would suggest you to spend your savings on 180hp with 4x4.

How it is possible that 150HP have similar acceleration as 200HP, ha? It is slower around 2 sec to 100km/h. That Diesel performs almost like 1.4 TSI hybrid 218HP. But hybrid has no AWD and this is what I need.

@@joez-cz8483 maybe because stock 1.4 tsi on dyno usually have around 180hp? also total weight and used gearbox makes huge difference as well.... its just not hp...

@@lukask.3465 lol what. You have no clue what you are talking about...

I am buying this car in a week or so, what is highway mpg? ( or km/100l ) say you are sitting at 70mph 120kph?

@@Pinionaire depending on how you drive , fuel consumption is between 7.5 - 8.5L/100km - constantly 120km/h probably arounbd 6.5 - 7L/100km/h

@@sebastianm.8383 I've owned the 2018 GSI for about 3 months now and never get tired of it. It's a fantastic highway cruiser. I live in the mountains and it absolutely kicks ass on twisty roads, thanks to 4x4 torque vectoring and adaptive sport suspension.

i have an average of 8l/100km diesel consumption.....

​@@sebastianm.8383 Range is 8 - 10 L/100km. Depends on traffic and speed of course . I have made pretty accurate test in other video.

thx bro :)

Go back to school boy!

it's up to you to go back to school ! Diesel emissions are very harmful and dangerous for the environment and health Diesel lives its "last days" It will be banit of cities and finally highways and everywhere in Europe

@@alexfoli9906tobacco and alcohol kills much more people and its not banned yet! Diesel ban is another trick of the EU bandits to force us spending money for petrol or hybrid becouse people spend for diesel fuel like 30-40% less comparing the petrol!!! Why the governments invents new taxes for electric vehicles? All this "ecological care" exist only to shit our brains to we believe them! Those purpose is our money!!! Its all about money!Wars,drugs,oil...

Thank you for your reply You're right, tobacco and drugs and some drinks certainly kill more than the Diesel or gasoline! It's all about money! It puts us in mind that it is very bad diesel. To make us buy small cars at the prices of big sedans.(but ELECTRIC) P.S: audi produce diesel 5.0, 4.0 TDI and say which pollutes less that small cars ???

@@alexfoli9906 VAG is greedy cheaters-fact! But they are all the same saying-"Our engines spends only 3 litres per 100km" Consumption in real life is 2-3 litres bigger.So the pollution of coarse is bigger. Everyone see that but nothing changes.

Around 32 sec

@@joez-cz8483 my insignia sw 2011 194hp 0-200 33 sec

@@InsaneTopSpeed Well, it was measured only once by phone, not like previously counted from what was recorded and repeated few times. (maybe I will record that one day) Also watching speed, traffic and phone is quite complicated at the same time :o "A" model had different gearbox but was heavier. In new Insignia, Opel decide to use 8 gear AT - maybe it’s a reason. To be honest, I don’t really see big benefits of that decision. Fuel consumption is still high, of course acceleration is better compared to your model but still not as good as current competitors. Its funny. Take a look for SUV like Alfa Stelvio which accelerate to 100km/h is 1 sec faster with same 210hp power from turbo diesel engine … BUT torque is lower (470Nm), weight is higher and aerodynamic …? WTF? Gear box is an answer I think. I notice that B model has potential but maybe is still bit too heavy or that gear box … I don’t know. Max speed I achieved was over 240km/h which is not so bad from other side.

Why? There is no reason. Result will be the same. In summer consumption was basically the same. BTW my current average consumption is 10,1 L/100km :o

Yes, I am. I also know your dilemma. For me was little easier because I don’t like VW Group especially their interiors. But, I tried them too! As well as Giullia, A4 and Mondeo. In general I focused on 4x4 diesel cars over 200hp at reasonable price. List wasn’t long, I compared performance and basic price of: Insignia 4x4 210hp & Mondeo only FW 210hp both cost 38 500€, strong Passat 4x4 with 240hp cost 42 500€ and most beautiful Giullia 4x4 210hp in price 44 500€. A4 price was ridicules for only 190hp similar to BMW and Mercedes. (my friend has 2 years old C-Class and is not worth that price, is much louder and boring inside, I drove this car many times as passenger and driver ... no, thx) According to above preferences Opel and Alfa remained on battlefield. I was so keen to pick Alfa but it’s relatively small car vs Opel. Alfa is lighter and faster, but I’m not teenager anymore and strange, somehow I wasn't feel safe driving that car. My previous Insignia A offered more armoured and trustful feeling. From other hand at that time this model was not available for test (only 170hp) and there was completely no data about weight (very important after model A), acceleration, etc. And all the time my heart whispered that gorgeous Alfa has "Cuore Sportivo" … oh, oh, oh it was hard. And then came configurator - The common sense - in price of basic Alfa I configured my Opel with all cool gadgets like Navi, LED lights, OPC, BOSE, digital speedometer and so on...

Since you had own Insignia A, did you have any problems with the engine? Audi, Merc and BMW are quite expensive, especially if you want to have all the gadgets. The passat and superb are a little boring on the inside, but folk likes their engines and DSG. On most videos, Opels 8th speed AT is reviewed as slow, compared to DSG. My friends all buy used BMW or Audi, imported from Germany, but I don't like to buy used car with high mileage. what about interior materials, is there a lot of hard plastics?

I already describe that under (0-100km/h video) that only one issue I had with A came from bad service. Besides that, after 3 years nothing happens just brakes, oil, filters, wipers … routine stuff. B has one thing. Range of windscreen washer cover ONLY 1/4 of the window!!! Lack of touchpad and only one USB audio port is bit dissapointing, but from other hand navigation and FM Radio works much better than A model. Interior has WOW effect same as Giullia BTW :) Opel used good quality plastic parts. Because of OPC version black colour dominate, some parts look like made of piano black which is nice. Gearbox & engine are ok for me. But yu know always could be better … V10 BiTurbo owners dreams about W12 BiTurbo :)

I am now also in the dilemma. Currently driving a 240hp Passat 4x4 dsg and looking for one of the three cars. Really interested in a gsi Sports Tourer with your engine but the fuel consumption is about 1L above the Passat I am currently driving. Hmm... 30hp less and 1L more? what is your average after those 3 months?

Hi KG, After 7 months and over 45 000km the average consumption is 9,9L/100km at average speed is 70km/h. In 70% car is used on highways rather at the highest speed when it’s possible. Also few times I was trailering a boat … at a lower speed of course ;) In city consumption is higher, similar to this one from video. I just back from vacation now - 1800km, 4 persons, full trunk at mix of narrow mountain roads and highways … thanks to speed control (the Wife) average consumption was 8,3L/100km, there was a moment when we dropped to 7,8L/100km. As always it's depends on driver and his driving style. If you want to save fuel don’t put the pedal to the metal. The AdBlue is another story which I need to watch. Once on the highway the computer informed me that range is low, about 1000km. I refilled 3 litters at range 700km. Then I back home (900km), next day morning car displayed information that range is 1000km again!!!??? I have to admit I was speeding like hell but 3 litters it’s a lot… then I refilled 15 litters unfortunately I don’t remember the mileage but after 2-3 months the indicator turns on again when I start the engine. Its my first car with AdBlue and I have no experience, maybe someone else can say how it should work?

Sorry that I answer in English but I’m not fluent in German. Above tset was made in winter time when North experienced with extremely low temperatures this year what for sure effect in fuel consumption as well as low mileage of that particular car. Maybe I should consider to make a new test? Nevertheless, now with 5k more on the clock with outside temperature 10-15oC I can tell you that I drop to 8,4L/100km on the same road with the same”way” of driving … 😊 at Extra Urban drive which takes 9.0 L/100km in the winter with -6oC outside. BTW. Im really couries about fuel consumption of the petrol w. 260hp so if any one would like to share please do.

thats the plan for next week

Davor Vrki you are talking about a diesel :/

You're welcome ;)

Joe Z-cz Rolling is a beast ,,its my dream car Do you have any problem ?

The only problem is that I spending more time flying than driving now. I had issue with previous model, but it was due to bad service. They simply tried to save money (warranty) and fix broken part instead of replacing it. It ended twice on a trailer. After that absolutely nothing happen. Comparing to previous model 'B" is bigger especially on back seats and trunk. I think "B" has better suspension and AWD system. "A" was also louder. I left my old one and get to new 30 minutes later. I start to drive, try to set seat the way i like it and I felt like it's 50 km/h but it was over 70 so, you better watch for police at the beginning, especially in city :) For sure I hate radio display. Without joystick is just hard to drive and navigate at the same time. SUCKS !

Check my latest video might be interesting

hi, no it's "Elite Nav" with OPC pack. Biturbo Diesel 210 HP

wishcould this model come to Greece

NasosMazdaspeed6 it is though the same engine as a GSi diesel!