- 15
- 411 970
TheAvWriter
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 31 ต.ค. 2010
CHARLOTTE PERKINS GILMAN - AMERICAN AUTHOR & ACTIVIST
A brief video on the life, works, and ideas of Charlotte Perkins Gilman, American author and feminist
มุมมอง: 3 725
วีดีโอ
THE MANHATTAN PROJECT - AMERICA'S FIRST ATOMIC BOMB
มุมมอง 4093 ปีที่แล้ว
A brief history of The Manhattan Project, the United States program to develop and use an atomic bomb during World War 2. My first video created in Final Cut Pro, by a good friend named Eric.
AMERICAN PIE A MONTAGE PRESENTATION
มุมมอง 1.1K4 ปีที่แล้ว
A SLIGHT DEPARTURE FROM THE AVIATION VIDEOS: Nearly fifty (50) years ago, Don McLean came out with his rock song BYE, BYE, MISS AMERICAN PIE. At that time, I vowed to myself that I would make a video to accompany the music. Well, fifty years later, and I finally have finished the work. This is an updated version from yesterday, created with MS Photos, not AVS Video Editor. Hope you enjoy the up...
ANTOINE DE SAINT-EXUPERY - FRENCH AVIATOR & AUTHOR
มุมมอง 10K7 ปีที่แล้ว
A brief history of the life and times of Antoine de Saint-Exupery
THE STINSON FAMILY - AMERICAN HEROES
มุมมอง 7K10 ปีที่แล้ว
A brief biography of Katherine, Edward, and Marjorie Stinson, American aviation pioneers
AVIATION POSTERS - 1900s TO 1960s
มุมมอง 53911 ปีที่แล้ว
Series of aviation posters / illustrations from 1900s to 1960s
LOUIS BLERIOT - FRENCH AVIATION HERO
มุมมอง 24K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Short biography of Louis Bleriot, first person to fly the English Channel.
THE WRIGHT BROTHERS - AMERICAN HEROES
มุมมอง 65K12 ปีที่แล้ว
A brief history of aviation pioneers Wilbur and Orville Wright
ALBERTO SANTOS-DUMONT - BRAZIL'S FATHER OF FLIGHT
มุมมอง 52K12 ปีที่แล้ว
A short biography of Santos-Dumont, the great aviation pioneer of Brazil and France - corrected version
AMELIA EARHART - AN AMERICAN HERO
มุมมอง 19K12 ปีที่แล้ว
A brief biography of the famous American pilot Amelia Earhart
BESSIE COLEMAN - AN AMERICAN HERO
มุมมอง 195K12 ปีที่แล้ว
Brief biography of Bessie Coleman, first African-American to earn an international pilot's license.
EDDIE RICKENBACKER - AN AMERICAN HERO
มุมมอง 8K12 ปีที่แล้ว
Brief biography of American pilot Eddie Rickenbacker
GLENN CURTISS - AN AMERICAN HERO
มุมมอง 11K13 ปีที่แล้ว
A brief biography of American aviation pioneer Glenn Curtiss
HARRIET QUIMBY: AN AMERICAN HERO
มุมมอง 14K14 ปีที่แล้ว
A brief biography of America's first licensed woman pilot, Harriet Quimby CORRECTION: It was Matilda Moisant, not Quimby, who flew over the Castle of Chapultepec in Mexico City.
They actually only used a catipult on the eroupian flights
Thanks for the references. Here are a few more. A typical unsupported claim by SD van: | Santos Dumont was a great inventor and a genius. The Wrights were neither. Santos proved flight was possible, The Wrights proved nothing. SB: Please indicate the contributions that SD made with respects to rigid wing heavier than air flying machines. There were quite a few great inventors and possible geniuses among the 200 or so aviation pioneers who made significant contributions before 1910. My list of contributions made by the Wrights is 5 times as long as my list for Santos-Dumont. All of the more than 200 aviation pioneers thought that flight was possible. The Wrights proved nothing? They were not interested in proving anything to others. Their experiments were designed to prove to themselves that they were on the right track. If you wanted something proved, you would have to pay for it. The Wrights were not going to give away their secrets for free. What most people wanted was proof that controlled flight possible and how to build a practical flying machine. SB: Perhaps this will generate some comments. @Steve Bett Açúcar Chocolate wrote: The Wrights did not FLY because they had no engines to fly. In the wright period the engine block weighed a lot, consequently, the greater the power of the engine, the greater its weight. "The genius of Brazilian, ALBERTO SANTOS DUMONT, was so great that he could transform the 25 hp antoinette engine into a lighter and more powerful engine generating 50 hps (This is a historical fact)." SB: In the case of the bis-14, he unbolted the 25 hp engine that was not powerful enough for a long hop and installed an off the shelf 50hp Antoinette 8V. This certainly was a contribution to aviation since it was it was copied by at least 4 other aviation pioneers. When they installed the engine on their prototype they could duplicate the hop made by the 14-bis in 1906. To to say it was evidence of genius is counter-factual misinformation. There are better examples. @Açúcar Chocolate SB: Have you read Lins de Barros articles? The Brazilian physicist wrote a paper circa 2000 that made the case for Santos-Dumont without the use of misinformation and conspiracy theories. I will send you the link if you haven't. Just ask for it. @Açúcar Chocolate wrote "None of the claims of the Wrights are indisputable or beyond doubt. This is because they were not witnessed and certified by the FAI." SB: That was not even possible before 1905. SB: Some of the Wright Flyer II and III flights were witnessed by members of the American. Aero Club but that would not count. They were not French and they were not official witnesses. The second kind of doubt is with respect to flights that seem too incredible to be accurate. That applies only to the 873 ft. 4th and final flight of Wilbur Wright. I can't prove that it didn't happen but I don't think the Wrights proved that it did. AC: "the greater the power of the engine, the greater its weight" SB: Before you speculate on the weight of the 1906 Dayton engine, read up on it. The 1906 Vertical 4 was not any heavier than the 2 earlier engines the Wrights used from 1903 to 1905, but it produced almost double the horsepower. Google Wright vertical 4. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_Vertical_4 weight: 160-180 lbs. (70-80 kg) power: 28 hp. at 1325 rpm 42 hp at 1500 rpm *31 kw AC: Santos Dumont "...was so great that he could transform the 25 Hp antoinette engine into a lighter & more powerful engine generating 50 hps." SB: So Santos could do this but not the Wrights. Where is the evidence? I have no evidence that Santos Dumont had a role in the design and/or production of the Antoinette engines. He might have suggested that the Lavavasseur build a lightweight aero engine based on his popular speedboat engines. He might have told Leon that if he built a 200 lb. 50 hp engine he would buy it. Please find the evidence that he did something that requires genius . Something more than buying an off the shelf aero engine. He did switch from a 25 hp engine to a 50 hp Antoinette 8V (209 lb) engine when it became available in 1906. Wikipedia also has an article on the Antoinette engines that were designed and built by Leon Levavasseur. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoinette_8V SB: Santos-Dumont made a number of contributions to aviation. This is probably not one of them. There are better examples of his genius. What is the source of your "historical facts"? @stevebett4947 In Portuguese (the sources are also available in Portuguese) produção do Motores Antonieta. Ele mudou de um motor de 25 hp para um Motor Antoinette 8V de 50 hp (209 lb) quando ficou disponível em 1906. A Wikipedia também tem um artigo sobre os motores Antoinette. Eles foram projetados e construídos por Leon Levavasseur en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoinette_8V SD fez uma série de contribuições para a aviação. Este não é um deles. Há melhores exemplos de sua genialidade. Qual é a fonte de seus "fatos históricos"? --------- All are invited to discuss including .... @skrilllex @fabioramos2937 @slashpuppet1 @adityanair3673 @slashpuppet1
THE WORLD'S FATHER OF AVIATION!!!
"Father of aviation" is a subjective term, and there is much disagreement about it. Personally, I don't believe that aviation has any single parent. If it did, that parent would be its mother anyway.
@cardinalRG Real not subjective
@@PauloDLara --You missed the point, friend.
@cardinalRG Santos Dumont father of aviation , my point!
They replicated the brother's plane it could not fly!!
th-cam.com/video/povGggaIK2A/w-d-xo.html Santos Dumont wins
The Flyer never took off on its own merit because it did not have a powerful engine to get it off the ground. It was a very heavy machine with an extremely weak engine. The United States military did several tests and created a perfect replica and put it to flight. It did not fly; it crashed and broke. Santos Dumont's plane flew and stayed fully in the air, even with a very heavy engine, because its duck design helped with air resistance and it took off high because of the power of the engine used. So yes, Santos Dumont was the first to invent the airplane. The brothers only created the Flyer, which was a glider.
_”The Flyer never took off on its own merit because it did not have a powerful engine to get it off the ground.”_ That claim requires a calculation that assimilates factors such as horsepower, torque, gearing, propeller efficiency, coefficients of lift and drag, and others. If you haven’t performed this calculation, then you’re just guessing. _”It was a very heavy machine with an extremely weak engine.”_ Yes, and that’s helps explain why it was a marginal performer. But it does not prove that the engine was insufficient. _”The United States military did several tests and created a perfect replica and put it to flight. It did not fly; it crashed and broke.”_ There have been no attempts to fly a genuine Flyer I replica in equal physical conditions. There have been no 14-bis replicas at all, only what are known as “look-alikes”, aircraft which are largely like the originals, but which also have modifications and upgrades. In short, the performance of reproduction aircraft so far neither proves nor disproves the claims for the Wrights and Santos-Dumont. _”The brothers only created the Flyer, which was a glider.”_ The Wright Flyers were powered aircraft, not gliders.
❤ 🇨🇵 Great Life, Great American woman ! ❤ from France
Não há, absolutamente, nenhuma prova consistente do alegado voo de um avião dos empresários irmãos Wrights em 1903, ou mesmo em 1905. Na verdade, por volta de 1905, eles patentearam o projeto de um planador, tipo de aparelho existente já havia quase meio século. Antes do voo de Santos Dumont, os irmãos Wrights não apresentaram um avião em público ou em competições. Este fato deixa claro que eles não conseguiram construir um avião, neste período. Ao contrário, o 14 Bis de Santos Dumont, o inventor do avião, decolou, em 1906, com voo certificado pelo Aeroclube da França e presenciado pelo povo de Paris. Os irmãos Wrights apresentaram um avião, somente em 1908, dois anos após o voo de Santos Dumont, quando já existiam vários aviões voando pelo mundo. Entretanto, apesar das verdades históricas, o ufanismo dos americanos do pós Segunda Guerra Mundial elevou estes irmãos ao nível de inventores do avião, desconsiderando a expressiva inexistência de provas.
Ah, Silvio, how many times must you be corrected before you accept better information, or at least do some genuine research of your own? The Wrights' first patent was for a control system, not an entire type of aircraft. All of the Flyers were powered aircraft, not gliders. The Wrights flew in public before 1908. And as always, you're only revealing your own bias by framing this technical ,historical topic in nationalistic terms. The Brazil-versus-US squabbling is irrelevant and tiresome.
@@cardinalRG Todo tempo investido em direção da busca da verdade é louvável. Portanto, não se trata de nacionalismo. Aliás, não sei nem o motivo de ter nascido esta polêmica, uma vez que foi somente após a 2ª Guerra Mundial que foi criada a teoria impondo os empresários irmãos Wrights como os inventores do avião. A sua preocupação em relação ao objeto do projeto patenteado pelos irmãos Wrights é irrelevante, pois não esclarece o centro da polêmica em relação à ausência total de provas consistentes do voo de um avião dos irmãos, antes da decolagem do14 Bis de Santos Dumont.
@@silvioqueiroz4045 --The Wrights were world famous decades before World War II even started. It sounds like you've been listening to Palhares too much, because he promotes the same myth about the Wrights suddenly become a post-war contrivance to boost US stature.
Perfectly presented, 48 years in 15 minutes🫡🇺🇸
❤
He was a true early aviator but not the first to achieve controlled powered flight. His 1906 historic flight in Paris had only 2 axis control, not the 3 needed to actually control the plane. They were essentially powered hops. The Wrights for years already had 3 axis control and a year before had flown 39 km!!! Dumont's best flight that day was 220 m. It's not even close. It doesn't matter how the Wrights got in the air, they stayed in the air and controlled their machine for kms when everyone else were struggling for metres!
zero evidence of that, only "trust me bro"... A couple of years from now, north americans will claim they discovered america as well
Excellent video! Thanks!
By all rights, Katherine should've started the Stinson Aircraft company
I bought a hard cover American version at a booksale at my local library. It had an early '40's publishing date. In the late '90's I met a young couple getting married. They read something their minister suggested for the ceremony. It was a "modern" version of a soliliquy by the Little Prince. I went upstairs and found the book. I showed them the original. They thought their minister just came up with this brilliant sentiment. I gave them the book as a wedding present. This book is still important.
Show !!!! th-cam.com/video/NjJk-V-pkis/w-d-xo.html
😮just like lonnie johnson
So sad
Cry Wright Brothers th-cam.com/video/LFycVClpXq8/w-d-xo.html / th-cam.com/video/AyTi-tR0T4g/w-d-xo.html
The Wrights are deceased. Why would they cry about anything?
Santos Dumont would never give up his planes for the First and Second World Wars, and as he closed the factory because of the war, the French became resentful of Santos Dumont and simply ceased to recognize him as the father of aviation, the one who actually flew first, giving this place to the Wright Brothers to please the United States who were now mass-manufacturing planes for France. Nothing is as simple as it seems, there's geopolitics in between.
Actually, the truth is much simpler than this strange fiction you created. It was Dumont who destroyed the 14 Bis and all its design drawings shortly after its last flight because he knew it was a dead end. The next one the 15 Bis was even worse.
@@raymondjensen4603 he destroyed only a few recent inventions and at the end of his life, he did so after he saw planes, planes that he had created, bombing São Paulo, in the attempt of a coup d'état in 1930. but his relevant inventions such as the 14 Bis and the Demoiselle which you call the 15 Bis (NOTE: 15 bis never existed, he stopped at the 14 Bis, the Demoiselle being a new model of his experiments) were used in world aviation as models to be followed and were opened for the whole world to use and make their own planes. Santos Dumont donated his designs to the world airplane because he believed that something like this should not be patented. he destroyed his other projects because he was disgusted with life, because he felt guilty for having invented something so destructive because his models were used in World War I. No, it's not that simple. In addition, he was the first man to actually fly in an airplane, while the brothers had a glider that only took off with a catapult.
Who flew first in a legit plane? If in the rules an airplane is only a heavier-than-air vehicle that can fly, then this is an airplane, even using outside help like catapults, as the Wright Brothers did, then the Wright brothers made the airplane first, but if in the rules an airplane needs to be a lighter-than-air vehicle, that can fly, but being fully autonomous, without needing external help such as catapults, then Santos Dumont created the first airplane.
There are no rules, only the subjective definitions of various groups and individuals. This is why _official_ recognition of who flew first is meaningless. And you misunderstand the role of a catapult, because it only affects takeoff distance, and is unrelated to self-sustaining flight.
Adore her.
Thank you! ♥️ RIP Pancho RIP Thaddeus 🙏
Irmãos brothers de fato foram os primeiros a inventar o planador com motor sem força de decolagem
Criaram um planador, conquistaram um prêmio que não pertencia a eles e ainda por cima o """avião""" é brocha😂
Alberto Santos Dummont flew before the Wrights and there is no scientific evidence to prove this, in addition to half a dozen dubious photos, letters, telegrams and drawings that scientifically prove nothing. They appeared with their machine in France only in 1908 and before that they didn't prove anything. Santos Dumont already had the 14 Bis and the Demoisele already in 1907... Facts!
Most if not all the crash's in the woman's race that killed one of them was because of sabotage. Was a lot of men then that didn't want women getting any kind of flying respect.
There are several biographical telling videos there on TH-cam. Each are interesting but each stories slightly different details, slightly differently.
Hj todas as criaçoes semelhantes a dos wrightt nao se sustentam no ar ja as replicas do 14 bis voam sem serem catapultados.
You are mistaken. I encourage you to do some genuine research.
Antes de 1948 os wright nao eram conhecidos porque jamais participaram do clube dos inventores e nunca disputaeam nenhuma competiçao aberta .e nao ha registros do voo de 1903 somente em 1908 eles compraram um motor na europa e voaram mas ja era comum muitos voarem.
You are mistaken. I encourage you to do some genuine research.
Dumont's 14bis was a serious attempt to fly, based on European ideas that were flawed at the time. The Wrights were not going to demonstrate the performance of their flyer till their patent was approved in May 1906. The demonstrations in France in 1908 proved their concepts, and the patent laid out in detail what they were. With these concepts, and their own knowledge for building light engines and aircraft structures the Europeans were back in the game. Further, the demonstrations changed mainstream thought that flight was impossible to creating a demand that hadn't existed. Santos-Dumont demolished his 14bis and its design..., and in truth, it made no lasting contribution. But in this flourishing time, Santos-Dumont designed and built a delightful airplane called the Demoiselle. You can still get the plans for this airplane. It was small, simple, and light, his idea of an airplane for everyone, this had lasting value. So, he may not have been an Edison, he was kind of like a Henry Ford.
This video was really informative. I learned a lot!
Flight has many fathers ...
Well at least he didin't used a catapult to help on taking off.
The greatest myth regarding first flight was that the Wrights used a catapult..., they did not. The 1903 flyer took off on its own power. It was launched on a rail without assistance. A rail was used because the ground was sand. This is not my opinion, this is fact.
Eu não discuto mais esse assunto com os americanos. Visitei o museu da aviação em Dayton, Ohio (cidade dos irmãos arrombados), com uma camiseta que fiz dizendo em inglês: Santos Dumont, pai da aviação. Pensa nuns olhares… Fodam-se!
The fact that you frame this technical topic in nationalistic terms, only reflects your own bias.
This was terrific. Did they manage to find Saint Ex’s remains?
American heroes??!! Bullied the Smithsonian Museum into declaring themselves the "inventors of heavier than air flight when we all know that Gustav Whitehead beat them by 2 years in 1901
I encourage you to do some genuine research regarding the Smithsonian's relationship with the Wrights.
Do some research, Whitehead never flew anything!
American Hero's ( Doubters have never studied the actual facts.) The Wright Brothers invented controlled powered flight of gliders over a period of five years and were awarded patents for their efforts.
One of the greatest documentaries I've ever seen.
Sorry, but this video is fake: first public flight made by Wright Brothers was in 1908 and before that, just narratives th-cam.com/video/n3XvSCF-djw/w-d-xo.html
No, the first flight was five years earlier by the Wright brothers.
@@raymondjensen4603 Public flight my friend, it means the first time that they show a flight to the people was in 1908. Wright Brothers says they made a flight in 1903, but there are no proves about that, only their words...so I was in Venus planet last week but I can´t show to you, maybe 5 years in the future I will prove to the people but until there, my 3 friends know that.
@@oshesterwithworth3912 Just under two years before Dumont flew (and when I say flew, I mean hopped) in public, the Wright brothers were circling Hoffman Prairie and staying aloft until they ran out of fuel. There were lots of people that witnessed these flights but did not understand their significance. The wrights would fly for twenty minutes, but so what. The great Santos Dumont was in the air for hours at a time, in a BALLOON, they didn't understand the difference. The word got out to such an extent that Amos Root traveled 200 mile over rough dirt roads to see these experiments. If you want to read his firsthand accounts of these flights, just Google "Gleanings in Bee Keeping" and the wright brothers. If you hopped into a space craft right now and circled Venus10 times and came back, yes, I would believe you that it wasn't your first time, how could it be. This isn't about facts, it's about what you want to believe and nothing I write will change that. There is way more proof than what I've laid out, and if you wanted to know the truth it's everywhere. I write this for those who want the truth and don't have a narrative they need to protect.
You people are insane.
It was the Brazilian Santos Dumont who for the first time managed to lift and sustain a flight with his own means of his 14 Bis device.
Your chronology is mistaken. The Wrights first flew in 1903, and Santos-Dumont's 14-bis in 1906.
@@cardinalRG Manda a NASA construir uma réplica do Flyer de 1903, e uma réplica do 14 bis de 1906, e veja qual a réplica que consegue levantar voo e se sustentar no ar. Antes de 1906 Santos Dumont construiu 13 aviões, mas nenhum conseguiu levantar voo e se sustentar no ar. Foi somente o número 14 que conseguiu levantar voo e se sustentar no ar . Mesmo assim foi o 14 bis, que foi uma cópia do avião número 14. Depois Santos Dumont construiu o avião número 15, 16, 17, e o número 18. Em 1907, Santos Dumont desenvolveu o Demoisele. Os irmãos Wright compraram um motor do mesmo fabricante do avião de Santos Dumont, e aprenderam com Santos Dumont como que o avião decola com os meios próprios. Foi somente em 1908 que eles conseguiram decolar e se sustentar no ar . As cópias do Flyer que eu vejo voando, sāo cópias de aviões que foram desenvolvidas depois de 1908. Para tirar a dúvida é só fabricar a réplica do avião de 1903, fazer essa réplica voar, e colocar o vídeo na interneth pro mundo inteiro ver. E se você pesquisar na interneth as replicas do 14 bis de 1906 levantando voo, você vai encontrar bastante video. Mas se você pesquisar na Internet as replicas do Flyer de 1903 levantando voo, você não vai encontrar nenhum vídeo. E é isso aí Valeu.
@@rosebritoamorefinanceiro8704 --If you think that the comparative performance of replicas would be determinant, then it’s for you to enable that scenario, not me. At any rate. much of your comment is erroneous, and if you’d like me to give you corrections, then feel free to request that.
He could only hop,all planes copied the wright bros propeller designs in order to stay aloft-point off fact!
He hardly sustained his "hop"! It was uncontrolled. And was years late to even claim that!
Of course freedom of information
Santos Dumont foi pioneiro em máquinas voadora mais leve que o ar, e no mais pesado que o ar. O engraçado e os americanos falando que o 14 bis era uma máquina desajeitado sendo que o Flyers nunca vôo! Como o flyers vôo tendo mais peso e pouca potência?
Very nice video. Although, behind the scenes, Henry Kleckler, Curtiss’s best friend, shop Forman and senior design engineer, designed the OX-2 engine used to set the land speed record. Henry also was the engineer who put the curve in the wings, invented the aileron, designed the Junebug and designed the OX-5 engine, the first mass produced airplane engine.
NOT...NEVER.NOTHING. NO. NEGATIVITY
CHICAGO, IL industry Advancement 4 African-Americans and those affected by inadequate urban planning.
Shows you no man is an Island. His success rest on the shoulders of others,
The North Americans may have been the first to fly, but Santos Dummont invented the plane. The Flyer of 1903 was not a plane at all.
You have that backwards.
Watching her story sent chills up my spine as a African American woman I have accomplished many "first" in my community one being the first hired as a police officer in all white dept....when I think about women like Bessie who came before me I am so proud that she never allowed her circumstances or the segregated laws to deter her from greatness...what a heartbreaking end to her physical life here on earth....but her sprit and story live on...thank you Bessie....for your sacrifice and for paving the way....see u when I get there beautiful
“You know they got her 💔🤲🏾🙏🏿😣😪🤦🏾♀️
Proud of you Brazil 🇧🇷💐greetings from Brazil.
Wrong
This was excellent and spot-on!
richard pearse, a farmer inventer from new zealand successfully flew his plane in a controlled manned flight, 31st of march, 1903, 6 months before the wright brothers, a little fact most americans don't like or acknowledge, look it up folks,
It's an interesting claim, but the comparative evidence for Pearse's flights is paltry. Do you have some evidence to offer?
So no evidence. You should consider that if others don't believe your claim, it's not necessarily because they don't like it. Without evidence, you're basically expecting people to accept your claim just on your say-so.
Richard Pearce himself gave the Wright brothers credit for flying first!