วีดีโอ

I'm here because my partner I struggle to resolve conflict. Im playing tennis, and she's playing Monster Trucks 😂 It's very frustrating when you present ideas and they fall flat. Bad example of good reasoning: th-cam.com/video/UMKkX8qRHsw/w-d-xo.htmlsi=NUEDGzGNx0K3L_IZ Better example: th-cam.com/video/WjsSHd23e0Q/w-d-xo.htmlsi=zZ-5XwvVIB9hvfoD

Interesting lecture 👍

i think therefore i am AM!

Thank You Very much Sir, This is the only one that I'm searching it for hours ❤

The great lecture ever bruh keep it up

Great video, thanks for sharing it

I really struggle to understand things out of my interest. I barely understand a thing.

Great video 👌

Or... it's the other way around: morality is needed to build a religion, which can be taken as a primeval encoding of ethical concepts for a community to refer to as a guide. Human beings show the capacity to roughly distinguish good from evil from an early age, and mature a finer sense of it the further they experience the aftermath of their actions on the others. And then they decide if to apply what they know. What people may lack is a common opinion on specific issues, but the fear of God is gone as soon as you sin and nothing happens. The "inborn" ability to develop decent behavior may in fact be bypassed through religion! All kinds of carnages take place fully blessed by beliefs. Organizing on a vast scale inhuman acts of mass murder requires a strong ideology (political or religious) to support the conflict of conscience in a large number of mentally sane individuals. It is true that a single human cannot create a moral law, yet, as a whole, society has indeed the authority to do so. No God is necessary, the majority is. And it actually happens: the constitutions are based on the most shared ideas of a correct way of living among the others. They are periodically adapted to social changes (no dogmas) and differ depending on cultural contexts. This relegates Gods to the role of boogeymen, especially needed in times when there were no effective ways to keep antisocial activities under control. And its dictates were soon manipulated to serve as a tool for those who wanted to impose their authority on others. In such a scenario, the Euthyphro dilemma is pleonastic. The remaining difference between religion and legislation (not coincidentally non-existent in some countries) is that the first one goes deeper into the intimacy of a person, whilst the second keeps more distance from one's freedom of choice. The hideous aspect is that believers place themselves on the "right side" by default, within that safer area injustices are often permitted for "higher" purposes. Religion in this case is used to hack the consciences and alter your sensitivity to overcome the normal perception of right and wrong.

Thanks a lot for this ! Very clear and interesting!

Agree, excellent video, thank you!

He made some mistakes along the way. For example: “At last I have discovered it - thought! This is the one thing that can't be separated from me. I am, I exist - that is certain“. Alas it’s not certain. And thankfully we can separate ourselves from thought

You’re just reading it, we need explanation!!😊

You have hit the nail right on the head....great

Thank you, there's a lot to learn here for me. I'd have to watch the video a few more times I think. I'm still trying to place the puzzle pieces here... for some reason I feel that christian ethics doesn't fit any of these completely... it's a bit of each right? Is there a diagram of various ethics views and how they overlap with each other and with religious systems?

Good video. I might add Wim Vandekerckhove’s work on whistleblowing and rational loyalty to the list, though

As a doubter

So does this mean that my existence is 100% safe and untouchable?

I am therefore I think.

4 MINUTES FOR I AM

great video! only person who explained virtue ethics perfectly!!

Inspiring, on point on Love your Enemy, I want share a poem from Hafez For peace of this world and the next, understand what I advise Magnanimity the lot of friends, and with foes try to relate Try to relate to your enemy, strive for it with love ,

is it possiable you should provide us with presentation link and research report?

Both the thumbnail and the channel name, made me think this was about how "common" superpowers could be used to solve climate change Bit sad its not that XD

What about common goods in liberalism? I cannot take them from anyone but can influence others negatively by misusing them.

Is it a free individual choice if I am manipulated into buying something through advertisement?

This should be required in corporate contexts. If you have something becoming entrenched in management, it is vitally important for people to speak up. Especially if you don’t want a company to go under, like a hospital. Because they can face huge litigation that would literally bring it to its knees If you try as much as you can, you need to go to the press with evidence. Go to a reporter like ABC News or something like that

I don’t understand why all of the comments and all of the commentary are focused on the thinking and not on the being

This is more of an axiom. It may be true or it may not but this is somthing we must maintain.

Non temere credere, est nervus sapientae.

Wonderfully explained, thank you so much !!😊

It means the Foundation in possession of my physical form does not know I have connected a link to the internet using [REDACTED].

Pacifist are but cowards

Great explanation I totally understand

I would of asked Desartes ; Is there a thinker of thoughts ?Is there a feeler of feelings ?

Meanwhile, in a more PASSIVE sense: "i thinks, therefore i is." Doubt you can say this in either LATIN, or French. Anyone? thx

There is something obvious that is being overlooked. Bob knows that if he saves his car, society will condemn him. He also knows that if he doesn't give to a charity, no one will condemn him. Furthermore, it is correct for Bob to value his own life over that of this child on the tracks. If a lion was hungry, but could only eat one person, you don't need to offer yourself up as a potential meal to save someone else. Your obligations are first to yourself, your family, your friends, your community, etc. Therefore it is both right and morale for Bob to value his own life over that of both the child on the train tracks and the child in Africa. The morale condemnation of leaving the child to die on the tracks would negatively impact Bob and his family. The same is not true of the child in Africa.

hey nice video well explained

Discussion questions: What moral theory do you gravitate to? What do you think is the most important thing to consider when evaluating the morality of an action?

I think RSL's dependence upon the Euthyphro Dilemma is really shallow - he misses an obvious solution.

Antonio Bento: One sure fire way to test your assertion, would be to drop a 200 lb. rock on your foot and see if the rock actually exists and if the pain and damage to your foot is actually there or not. I believe you get the point without having to go through that test. God exists because the universe he DESIGNED, and created exists. Just examine closely one, single human cell and see the amazing organization that exists there. Organization in creation exists because the Grand Creator.

Great deed

I tried this argument before the judge at the IRS. He smiled, banged his gavel and said, "Pay up. Next case...."

This was really good. You got a subscriber.

I was here

I am therefore i think

This was the most "on the spot" lecture ever. You surely got a talent to present the theories with a comprehensive order and connection. Well done!

Amazing video. Have a nice weekend

bro is a default

I think I know, therefore i am at God's mercy.