วีดีโอ

앗 목소리가 달라요? 뭔가 너무 차분한가요? ㅋㅋㅋ 항상 응원해줘서 고마워요 ❤

@kimexplainskorean 네, 좀 달랐네요 ㅋㅋ!! 벌써 연말 ㅠㅠ 시간이 빠르네요!!

@ 그러게요! 연말 즐겁게 보내세요 🥰

천만에요 😉

⭕️왜 좋아하는지 잘 모르겠어요. 저도 사실 같은 생각이에요.

⭕️혼자 있을 때 편안함을 느껴요. / ⭕️ 혼자 있을 때 편안함이 느껴져요. 👍

@kimexplainskorean 아하!!! 알겠습니다!! 제 실수를 고쳐 주셔서 감사합니다

열심히 준비한 보람이 있네요. 고마워요 ❣️

따뜻한 댓글 너무 고마워요. 나중에 시간이 나면 한번 봐 보세요!

칭찬 감사합니다!

이런 말을 들을 줄 몰랐는데! 천상 한국어 선생님😍 앞으로도 많이 기대해 주세요 💕

완전 자세히 설명했죠? 💪

저도 고맙습니다 🙌🏼

와.. 꿀팁도 알고 👏 고마워요 🫶

I know that is so confusing! Sadly I don’t have much time to make it at the moment. But I will try to cover "Indirect quotation in Korean“ (oh.. it is gonna be a long one.) sometime soon. Quick tip: With -ㄷ irregular verbs, the key is to be aware of when the -ㄷ changes to -ㄹ (typically when followed by vowels) and when it remains unchanged (when followed by consonants). No matter if it is direct speech or reported speech.

@@kimexplainskorean well, I’ll be looking forward to it! Thanks for the tip!!

The difference between them is „Disconnect nuance!(I mentioned it around 02:00)“ 어렸을 때 자주 먹었던: It suggests that there was a specific time in the past when you used to eat something frequently, but you might not do so anymore. This form focuses on the completion of the action in the past. 어렸을 때 자주 먹던: It implies that eating the food was a regular activity when you were young, without stressing whether the habit has ended or not. This form focuses on the habitual nature of the action in the past. Based on this slight different nuance, you might hear more 먹었던 when people talking.

@@kimexplainskorean Thanks!

답이 늦어서 미안해요. 전체 문장을 봐야 설명드릴텐데, 우선은 둘 다 쓸 수 있어요. 제가 여기서 설명한 것처럼 (영상에서 1분 30초) 말하는 화자가 부모님이 돌아가시는 그 당시 상황을 회상하며 말하고 있어서 ‘돌아가시던’을 쓴것 같아요. 돌아가시고 난 다음 상황을 회상하며 말한다면 ’돌아가셨던‘을 썼을 거에요. 이해가 되었나요?

Excellent! That would be more appropriate to add 시 as you mentioned. Thanks for pointing it out! Please note that language etiquette is not clearly defined by the dictionary meaning of the language expression or the language norms, so you should consider the relationship between the speaker and the listener, language habits, etc.

Sorry to hear that. This is a definitely tough one to fully understand. Which one exactly is confusing🤔?

Thank you for the compliment. When it comes to 계절, they both are correct to use. (Theoretically 어느 should be used instead of 무슨 as you said) However 무슨 계절 is more commonly used.

@@kimexplainskorean Thank you so much for your response :) Finally I can put my mind to rest <3

Glad to hear that! Thank you for your comment ;-)

Good to hear! Thanks ☺️

kimexplainskorean@gmail.com

Hello 👋

@kimexplainskorean KIM, Thank you for Your Emergency Response 😀

@ Hey! I am sorry for that! It has been a year 😂 I just thought, you would write something later or more? 🤭

@@kimexplainskorean I don't know that what was that "Hey" for, Anyway thank you Kim... I'm gonna text you on your Gmail.

Thank you for the cheering comment 😍

I am glad that you found it helpful! And very good question! It means the same (where I got married.) but the nuance is a bit different. 결혼한 곳 :you are simply referring the action in the past. 결혼했던 곳: you are recalling the action /memories. It is hard to guess if this person is still married or not anymore by hearing 결혼한 곳, 결혼했던 곳. Ex) 그 남자는 제가 사랑한/사랑했던 사람이에요. The man is the one that i loved.( she is not in love with this man anymore.) The reason why it is confusing is because.. -ㄴ/은 can be used to for the completed action in the past which has relevance to the present situation. (Not all the time! Not all the action verbs! )It can be just simply used to refer to an action in the past. 이해가 되었나요? 😉 어렵죠?

@@kimexplainskorean Thank you for replying so quickly! I think I'm starting to understand the difference a little bit better. 사랑한 사람 - the person I loved 사랑했던 사람 - the person I used to love (I'm reminiscing about this) 사랑하던 사람 - the person I loved for some time in the past / the person I've been in love with for some time 결혼한 곳 - the place where I got married 결혼했던 곳 - the place where I remember getting married Does this look correct? :)

Almost! 사랑했던/사랑하던 사람: you are reminiscing about this. But 사랑하던 사람 : the memory is more lively than 사랑했던 사람. 결혼한 곳: fact, not reminiscing. 결혼했던 곳: fact + reminiscing! Is it now clear? 🙌🏼

@@kimexplainskorean All clear now! Thank you! ~~~

Thanks for the compliment.🙂 And yes, these is a subtle nuance difference between these 2 sentences. 1. 시험 보기 전에도 어려울 줄 알았어요. -도 means also/in addition to. 'I knew that it would be difficult (NOT ONLY)before the exam (BUT ALSO while studying/preparing or something like that.) 2. 시험 보기도 전에 어려울 줄 알았어요. -도 is used to exaggerate/stress! 'I knew that it would be difficult EVEN before the exam.‘ 이해했어요?

@@kimexplainskorean이해했어요. 도와주셔서 감사합니다!

안녕하세요! 좋은 질문이에요! As 살다 is one of the persistent action verbs(hard to be uncompleted), 살았던 집, 살던 집 they are interchangeable and mean the same. But as I mentioned in that video, 던 has a „lively“ nuance compared to 었던. So when you look back and you think it feels like not ages ago(as you said, in the near past/not very long ago), 살던 would be better to use. I hope it clarifies your question.🤓

I am so glad (also a bit surprised) that you found it relaxing! 고마워요 🤩

@@kimexplainskorean 🥰

감사합니다 :-)

아이고😂 맞아요! 지적해 줘서 고마워요 🙏🏼

I AM FLATTERED! Thanks for your detailed comment! I feel appreciated! And I hear you! This topic is not easy at all! But practice makes perfect ;-)

So glad to hear that. That is all I want to hear :-) I thank you for your comment!

well done you! To answer your question, most of fairy tales start with "Once upon a time there was a girl. She was ~(blah blah)." In Korean, "옛날에 한 소녀가(New Info) 살았어요. 그 소녀는 (Introducing/ providing info about the subject/old info)~~." 은/는 emphasizes what is followed after 은/는, which is normally a description or an action. Here 가 has focus on 한 소녀 and 은 has focus on blah blah part. Another example! When you introduce yourself, you say "저는 그라젤라(sorry if I am wrong pronouncing your name. I don't know how it should sound .^^;)예요. " Because what you want to say/emphasize is your name.. not "I", even if it is also new info. It depends on the context! I hope my answer clears it up.

@@kimexplainskorean I think I get it know thank you! Just to make sure, if the context were like we're talking about 음식 and then I change the topic to about 개. (and I'm also not comparing in this situation) Will it be I introduce first 음식 with 이/가 then continue with 은/는 because it already been mentioned then I want to talk about 개 so I use 이/가?

I am afraid, it doesn’t work like that all the time. It depends on what you want to say. For example, 내가 가장 좋아하는 한국음식은(providing info) 김치야. 김치는(providing info/old info) 발효음식이야. 내가 가장 좋아하는 한국 드라마는(providing info.. even though the topic has been changed.. 이/가 is not used.) 도깨비야. See my point?

It is actually not necessary to know that term. But I find it useful to know and it makes more sense if you know it 😉.

Very good question! To make a long story short, 있다 is tricky one, as it can be a verb or an adjective! In this case 시간(이) 있다 it is used as an adjective! (Try to think it like „be available „-state of a person!) But as it ends in/with 있다 , therefore 는! My tip: When adjectives modify nouns, noun modifier 는 is most of the time used. Noun modifier 을 can be attached to adjectives as well but it is very rare and it is hard to make one.

@@kimexplainskorean 알겠습니다. 감사합니다 :)

I came from reddit too!

So glad to hear 🤩

저도 감사합니다 ☺️

도움이 되었다니 너무 기쁘네요 :-) 안 그래도 vocab 관련 영상 시리즈도 생각 중이었는데 ! 꼭 기억해 두고 영상 만들어 보도록 할게요!!

Thanks a million 🙏 Your comment keeps me motived to make more videos. 🥰

You just made my day! 너무 고마워요!