วีดีโอ

The Chinese Army is also equipped with tactical ballistic missiles, not just the Rocket Force. In the phl191 MLRS, the tactical missile has a caliber of 750mm, similar to the PRSM. The Export Version name is Fire Dragon 480, with a range of 300KM. However, the self-use version is said to be able to reach more than480- 500KM. Similar to the US military's PRSM.

Yeah, good segment. Very relevant to our defence situation. Something to be considered is that the short-range stuff is easy to disperse and spread outside China. Say, for example, they secure one of the Phillipine Islands early in the conflict. Then, we can easily face a high threat from the cheaper, more numerous shorter range systems Further. they will have much shorter travel times and, thus, will be more difficult to defend against.

Chinas manufactors can produce 4000 cruise missiles or any other similar type per month. its not what they have, its about what they can produce.

The russians are upgrading Iskander up to 1300 km range with reduced payload of 250 kg.

The numbers of the missiles in services seems misleading .. either it has been made very less to make China isn’t not capable or to cover a something which will not raise some western eyebrows .. there’s no way a missile system with just 48,30,80,36 in numbers even when the missile has been in service since 1990 is a huge false information.

Could you do a video on Americas multi domain units.. Very vague topic sorry

2023 china build 30 million cars. df17 weight about 15 ton or 10 cars. so china production capacity is 3 million df17.

Another great analysis mate! Given recent reports of corruption in the rocket force, I wonder how many operational ones they really have?

Copy and paste. Talk alot. Know nothing. All of the information is outdated.

Grate video, as always, but I can’t help wondering how many missiles they have, this are the systems, but how many missiles are there to every system, is that something we can calculate or make an estimated guess? And it would be interesting to know maybe a little bit more about them, like the type of warhead, guidance, speed, penetration aids and estimated hit probability. Keep up the good work.

I don't think the number in service here are accurate. I think you may have used the number of "military units" rather than the inventory number. The missiles number would prob be 4-6x the number depending the type of missile. For the DF-10 or CJ-10 the missiles number will be way higher as it's also used by the PLAN and PLAAF, sub-sonic missile can be easily mass produced so the actual number may be comparable to the number of tomahawk the US have.

Using image of North Korean Hwasong-11C for 9K720 Iskander.

It's so annoying, I'm subscribed to this channel with full notifications turned on, yet I NEVER get a notification of a new video.

Do they have export versions? Might we see them in Lebanon, Syria,Iran,Yemen?

Junk

War with the PLA would be a headache... Its like going against the USA in ww2 with all its industrial might

way superior to the british navy in any way, except nuclear sub.

Taylor Angela Moore Daniel Young Betty

Thank you.

Super happy I found this channel. I don’t know why, but Australian Militarytube is way better than it should be

Davis Shirley Anderson Mary Lewis Larry

No need for an Army. NZ has zero enemies. There is a need for a fisheries enforcement air and sea force. A civil force to deal with natural disasters is needed. Supporting US Government Operations is an Evil Crime against Humanity. Take that from a 32yr US Army Military Intelligence Officer. Or spend the money Whiskey, Cocaine, Food and Music every weekend for the People of NZ so it won't be wasted being a lacky for the United States.

Rodriguez Laura Walker David Rodriguez Lisa

Johnson Mark Rodriguez Christopher Thompson Donald

Why would you sink your flagship? only ten years old idiot government move to these times we have two carriers with no aircraft only 3 destroyers 2 new supply vessels both out of action due to major repairs new patrol boats with no weapons.

Such a good channel.if you can one day upgrade your mic and add some more engaging visuals you can easily match Perun. Powerpoints something for you?

With modern fighting drone and modern portable anti tank system around, expensive higher tech IFV seems not so much useful than the much more simple IFV which cheaper and easier to be built

It seems that we are also getting some Toyota HiLux 6x6 MUV .

More waste of money !!!!

There are some information that are left out especially newer procurements for the TNI, as in the ones signed in IndoDefence 2022 the Trisual Air Defense Missles and the KHAN Ballistic Missile from Turkiye. And the procurements of UAV from Turkiye like the Anka drone and possibly the Akinci, TB2, or the Aksungar drones. Another future procurement that would have been nice to be shown are the 2 PPA Frigates/OPVS from Fincantieri Italy. As obviously this was uploaded on July I would like to add information that the TNI is possibly looking into more vessels procurement in the future like the frigates, destroyers, and LHD from a number of competing nations, like China, South Korea, Japan, France, Italy, Spain, Turkiye, and possibly Germany. Also regarding the submarine procurements the TNI AL would also like to acquire interim submarines as the Scorpene submarines would take up to 6 years to build as it will be build in Surabaya Pt.Pal under the TOT from Naval Group.

We need three such Brigades not one! One does not provide the necessary ability to relieve or support the Brigade should it face sustained attack. It does not allow redundancy or replacement of trained personnel due to attrition of manpower. This is nothing more than a token force easily brushed aside by a genuine national state.

The new 120mm x 8 wheel self-loading mortar😮

The Type 96 will be better in all aspects when compared with the US Ohio Class SSBN. The US currently has 14 operational Ohio Class submarines which are quite old and my guess is that China will has at least 36 Type 96 because they are much cheaper to build. Once it pass the sea trials , production will be very fast with at least 5 submarines a year or even more. US submarines pose a clear and present threat to China and it will do everything it can to counter the US threat. The US latest Columbia Class SSBN will be better than the Chinese Type 96 I think. Expected to be in service only in 2031 with repeated delay and cost over-runs, I see the Chinese over-taking the US in nuclear power submarine within the next 5 years. In terms of diesel electric conventional submarine, the Chinese already has one of the world best with their Type 39C.

I was expecting something like this coming from the former Soviet Union (remember those guys!), not from China!

Very informative presentation like normal.

It’s silly sharing his information on line to the world.

Let me kow when it actually happens

New Zealand does the dishes whilst the Allies do the heavy lifting

Hall Christopher Lewis Brian Clark John

Clark Margaret Lopez Sandra Perez Jose

Hello, I am very happy to see your video analysis. I have watched a lot of comparisons of fifth-generation aircraft on TH-cam, such as J20 F35 F22. Can you do a comparison of 4.5-generation fighters J-16 and F-15EX? Both aircraft are the latest multi-purpose fighters of China and the United States. But there is little analysis about them. Thank you

When they line up " quantity over quality " it will be as good as " quality over quantity ".....only strategy will separates the two sides

The Air Force must be the most efficient and cost effective method of defence/surveillance/attack?? Imagine if we spent $368 billion on new planes and drones instead of submarines

Lindsay Vista

Interesting idea. Mobility indeed, its sort of a cross between dragoons and light cavalry. They dont have any howitzers at all, or any direct fire guns. Its all mortars. They'll be at a range disadvantage against virtually any force. I can see the utility of it as a component of a larger force, as outriders. Theyre nimble enough to show up in irritating places quickly and presumably disengage just as fast. Putting entire squads in vehicles with paper thin (presumably) armour seems reckless, at least the Humvee only carried 4-5. I assume the armour is similar to a BTR's, ie less than a centimtre.

Young Barbara Perez John Davis Carol

Something about India building there own fighter jets would be interesting.

You should look at the Australian Slinger system. 160 units are going to Ukraine.

Australia needs 16 Brigades (6 Mechanized, 2 Armored, 2 Cavalry, 2 Light, 2 Air - Mobile and 2 Missile). The Armored Brigades (Will have 1 Armored Rgt, 3 Mechanized Bn, 1 Artillery Rgt, 1 Enginire Bn, 1 Logistics Bn, 1 Supply Bn, 1 Air Defence Bn and 1 Helicopter Rgt). With 75 000 Personal and 25 000 Reserves.

But what about the emus?