ArchaeologyX
ArchaeologyX
  • 9
  • 88 900
ArchaeologyX
Welcome to ArchaeololgyX.
มุมมอง: 610

วีดีโอ

West Pittston Dig
มุมมอง 1.4Kปีที่แล้ว
Seven deep test pits were excavated along the west bank of the Susquehanna in West Pittston, Pennsylvania.
Susquehanna River Dig
มุมมอง 9K2 ปีที่แล้ว
The PaleoDigger Machine was used to dig deep test pits along the Susquehanna and Juniata Rivers in Pennsylvania.
PaleoDigger Level Logger
มุมมอง 2832 ปีที่แล้ว
I designed and built a microprocessor system for the PaleoDigger machine. The Level Logger system measures the depth of the auger in the ground and automatically records the excavation level depths. I also talk about patenting your invention.
Building the PaleoDigger Machine
มุมมอง 7163 ปีที่แล้ว
A compilation of my PaleoDigger Machine videos was screened at the Arkhaios Film Festival in October 2020. This annual film festival features cultural heritage and archaeology films. The films shown in the official selection far exceed the production values of my videos. I feel fortune that my video was included in this year’s screening. Please visit the Arkhaios Film Festival web site for more...
Using a Hand Auger for Archaeology
มุมมอง 4.2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
A hand auger or bucket auger is a handy tool for archaeologists. This video shows how I use a hand operated bucket auger for archaeology.
The PaleoDigger Machine
มุมมอง 2.2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
In my first ArchaeologyX video I proposed building a machine to dig deep archaeological test pits in riverbank soils. This video highlights the work of building of the PaleoDigger machine. The machine was tested on the Slickerman Bottom Paleoindian Site (36SO304) located in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. This first test was successful. Upgrades and new additions to the machine are underway. Ten...
Hot Rock Boiling
มุมมอง 3.2K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Kinorea Two Feather Tigri teaches IUP grad student Kristina Gaugler how to boil water in a pot using the traditional hot rock method. Rocks used in the experiment will be compared to fire cracked rocks (FCR) found on archaeological sites in Pennsylvania.
Where are the Paleoindian Sites?
มุมมอง 67K5 ปีที่แล้ว
Where are the Paleoindian sites? Paleoindian sites that are buried in stratified deposits are difficult to find. The best sites are deeply buried. Deep archaeological excavations are labor intensive and expensive to conduct. Proposed is a mechanized method for deep archaeological testing. The PaleoDigger machine has the potential to significantly reduce the cost of deep testing and greatly incr...

ความคิดเห็น

  • @lesjones5684
    @lesjones5684 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It’s junk 😅😅

  • @lesjones5684
    @lesjones5684 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I can dig it 😂😂

  • @maximillianpatterson639
    @maximillianpatterson639 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great work and I hope that you are patenting your designs. I'm in western New York, not that far away, on the Susquehanna and Chenango rivers.All of this territory is rich in fresh water,woods,and animals.The Natives lived well.

  • @robbieevans6536
    @robbieevans6536 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think I will look on Amazon for a cheaper auger... And then I may keep some records while I'm augering.

    • @quemahoning
      @quemahoning หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are cheaper alternatives. If it is something you expect to do regularly as part of your work, then I recommend the AMS brand because you can add additional tools as needed.

    • @robbieevans6536
      @robbieevans6536 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@quemahoning I think for a hobby.

  • @Arthur-Silva
    @Arthur-Silva 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cheers from Brazil! thanks for sharing this video!

  • @AlbertPOost
    @AlbertPOost 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have 3 tips: 1) arrange for an automatic robo-GPR , which can be used to scan fields and terraces; 2) study gridging as developed in geology: it solves how many cores you must take given the object density. 3) for soft sediments a (vibrating) suction corer cores up to 5 meter in one swoop using a drainage pipe. Best

    • @quemahoning
      @quemahoning 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi Albert, GPR can provide information about the terrace structure, but it doesn't detect small artifacts. You have to dig to know what is there. Each state as established methods. In Pennsylvania, we dig a test pit every 15 meters (50 feet) on a grid. We will use 5 meter intervals when trying to define the boundary of a site. A vibra core machine is good for doing soil sampling and analysis, but the core diameter is much too small to collect and assess the artifacts. The volume of soil is what matters. You need a test pit diameter of 50 cm (20 in) or more. My machined digs a 52 cm diameter hole. Test pits 50 cm in diameter is probably the average size required in each state.

    • @AlbertPOost
      @AlbertPOost 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@quemahoning For that size of coring I agree. And perhaps vibs of 12 cm diameter would miss larger objects. At the same time: it would be interesting to have automtic robots with GPR and other tools simply going up and down fields for reconaissance.

    • @AlbertPOost
      @AlbertPOost 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@quemahoning Furthermore, I would like to congratulate you with the briljant presentation. It would be interesting to analyse the articles on European hunter gatherers. I get the impression that in Europe there is a little too much emphazis on trade networks, where your explanation -long distance herd following- is the more likely one for much of the observed variation.

  • @Ur2ez4me81
    @Ur2ez4me81 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Want to know a good place to find points? Just have to make sure you are allowed to do it but look in landscaping stone around businesses. They dredge from rivers & I literally found several arrow heads just sitting in the piles lol.

  • @Lugeix
    @Lugeix 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm just a common joe nobody. Doesn't the layer at which the artifact is found is needed for dating?

  • @pareidoliarocks
    @pareidoliarocks 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you! So this is how fire cracked rock happened? I find buckets of it in my East TN yard. But I thought it was just from surrounding the fire pits. I've heard others talk about finding "cooking stones", but I thought i didn't know how to recognize them! Silly boy...

  • @radronsradicalrides5511
    @radronsradicalrides5511 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What did she say was a natural salt?

    • @quemahoning
      @quemahoning 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wild ramps, a way to add flavor when salt is unavailable. They are common in western Pennsylvania.

  • @OhNoIts33
    @OhNoIts33 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please make more of these!!

  • @USINGISMILE
    @USINGISMILE 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is absolutely brilliant! Hope all is well, I sure would love to see more of these!

  • @georgecuyler7563
    @georgecuyler7563 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah go deep

  • @35ABSTRACT
    @35ABSTRACT 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you personally think a few sample holes is a legitimate effort to uncover archaeology before it’s lost forever or perhaps would checking every inch the future bridges will occupy is a better choice? Just curious because I hate leaving permissions until I’ve scoured every speck at least three times before moving on.

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These archaeology surveys are very expensive. Add up the wages for crew, travel, hotel rooms, per diem, and equipment and the numbers become shockingly large. There is an agreed-upon scope of work that is based on long-established guidelines for conducting archaeological excavations. If interested, the guidelines are freely available online. www.phmc.pa.gov/Preservation/Environmental-Review/Pages/Survey-Standards.aspx

  • @35ABSTRACT
    @35ABSTRACT 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You won’t find the first peoples of NA looking for Clovis artifacts but with your brilliant machine and more test holes than a piddling 3 in such a large area, you’ve already cemented your name in the annals of archaeology. Thanks for taking us along with you!

  • @christopherscallio2539
    @christopherscallio2539 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Brian; I'd love to see somebody, anybody explore the Archeology of Mecca. Nobody will do it. Will you? According to Koran Adam & Eve were evacuated from Paradise in the 7th Heaven to Mecca on Earth. There are supposedly a 1,000 Jewish Prophets buried there in Tombs. No tombs have been found to date. As the supposedly oldest continuously inhabited city on Earth there is absolutely No Archeology to be found until 200 years after Mohamed supposedly existed. No Ancient Maps refer to Mecca until 200 years after Mohamed.

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It would be really cool to do archaeology in Mecca. That is way out of my budget and expertise. It would be an awesome city to visit.

  • @Iz0pen
    @Iz0pen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are you ok? Is the project still going to be posted here?

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, I am ok. Just really busy with archaeology contract jobs. It is tough to earn a living and do videos simultaneously. Part of the problem has been a lack of professional video gear. A smartphone camera with a $20 tripod is a good way to start, but to do it right you need the gear. Good equipment is really expensive, but I'm in the process of solving this obstacle. I am working on several archaeology projects that include video production. One is being edited right now. Good stuff on Paleo and pre-Clovis is coming.

  • @fossil7009
    @fossil7009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Post more! Your project is awesome!

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just really busy with archaeology contract jobs. It is tough to earn a living and do videos simultaneously. I am working on several archaeology projects that include video production. One is being edited right now. Good stuff on Paleo and pre-Clovis is coming.

  • @millsdorn2613
    @millsdorn2613 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For everyone who disagrees. I worked with Brian and his machine on a project where there was no way to hand dig an STP to 3+ meters and we found artifacts. There was no damage to these artifacts, and I would argue that shovel testing would have caused damage or loss of artifacts. He knows what he is doing. This was a game changer in knowing where we needed to orient our blocks for a phase III.

  • @CliftonHicksbanjo
    @CliftonHicksbanjo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Holy shit, this is the future of Phase 1

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At least for the deep sites. Archaeologists are very conservative when it comes to field methods. It is taking time to get everyone on board with this new way of doing archaeology, but once they see it at work in the field, the machine sells itself. I have completed jobs in Pennsylvania and Virginia. Finding projects in Ohio, Maryland, and New York is my goal for this year. And Texas!

    • @CliftonHicksbanjo
      @CliftonHicksbanjo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@archaeologyx4988 Those of us carrying screens and shovels are watching...

  • @Angie2343
    @Angie2343 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @ArchaeologyX I can't subscribe to you. TH-cam won't let me.

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have no idea why it won't let you subscribe. I've never had that happen to me.

    • @Angie2343
      @Angie2343 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@archaeologyx4988 YouiTube's algorithm

  • @ghostwriterinme5050
    @ghostwriterinme5050 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We've waited a long time for this, thank you!

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is more to come. Video production takes a lot of time. It is tough to do while trying to earn a living.

  • @ghostwriterinme5050
    @ghostwriterinme5050 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome!

  • @ghostwriterinme5050
    @ghostwriterinme5050 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely Incredible, Thank You!

  • @Less1leg2
    @Less1leg2 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Paleoindians sites? Gone? When you have a continental wide Glacial Ice Sheet that tends to shed water. Anything in the path of the water release tends to get washed away with flood. I don't believe modern academia appreciate the magnitude of Glacial Ice Sheet water releases. They weren't drip by drip events of a small stream of ice water run-off. I think when many of the Researchers go into the fields and assess Paleoindian relics. I've noticed how messed up a site is. We have seen other dig sites of found Mastodons, Mammoths, Sloths, etc. Huge numbers of bones all piled up and mingled with mud stuff. Again, hard water run-off takes no prisoners. Herds of beasts were washed away like blades of grass in the wind. Even when a Water Release occurs, the vastness is so large we can't comprehend the magnitude of wash. Ground earth, washed away to bed rock because of the size of the release and the speed of the release. Of course paleoindian sites are few and far between. Our North American Story of early habituation was washed out, over and over again until the Great Ice Sheet was gone. But even still, modern academia won't accept questions by people like Graham Hancock, or Dennis Stanford, Randall Carlson. These fellas, see evidence that doesn't or may not follow perfectly the traditional academia's perspective on OUT OF SIBERIA human habitation of North America. Evidence is being found, and its not agreeable to OUT OF SIBERIA man comes stories. It seems to be, Man came, but didn't live well close to the vast Ice Sheet. In fact, living close to the Glacial Ice Mass meant being washed away more times than not.

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the eastern US, we don't have the massive flood scaring the Randall Carlson identifies out west. Yes, the river valleys, the Allegheny, Beaver, and Ohio in particular, received large volumes of glacial melt water. The outwash terraces are well mapped down these valleys. This melt water did not flood across the entire land mass, only the valley bottoms that extended south from the glacial front. Rivers like the Clarion, Kiskiminetas, and Monongahela in Pennsylvania never received glacial melt water. These rivers may have been undersized during the height of glacial due to a lack of effective precipitation. Remember though, the ices sheets had already retreated back into Canada when people of the Paleoindian period were living in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York.

  • @here_we_go_again2571
    @here_we_go_again2571 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was interesting. I was surprised that you didn't find anything with so many dep test pits. Thank you for sharing.

  • @here_we_go_again2571
    @here_we_go_again2571 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool! I have never seen one of these machines before. Dang! That's a lot of finely sifted topsoil (seems like a shame to throw it back in the hole)

  • @manvasser8320
    @manvasser8320 ปีที่แล้ว

    Всё по науке!

  • @mikebuckley2332
    @mikebuckley2332 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have found multiple full and broken points about 2000 yards north of where you were digging in the first clip of you digging!

  • @MsHeather383
    @MsHeather383 ปีที่แล้ว

    Central Idaho! I'am living in a mine field of artifacts in Idaho, found in Ohio!?

  • @v1ncepupp1o7
    @v1ncepupp1o7 ปีที่แล้ว

    SE PA here. You bet ill be out here searchin for that fluted point.

  • @ВладимирШпилевой-б6э
    @ВладимирШпилевой-б6э ปีที่แล้ว

    Нахуй тебе кружка?

  • @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve
    @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve ปีที่แล้ว

    That was an excellent presentation and an awesome invention! I think we need more people, educated, and involved in fieldwork and preservation/conservation.

  • @micwell2247
    @micwell2247 ปีที่แล้ว

    I knew they trapped Eels up the Juniata a lot..in fact not to far up you can still see remnants of the stone traps which settlers used also...

  • @dukedex5043
    @dukedex5043 ปีที่แล้ว

    $600 for a metal pole. Absolute scam.

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is what I thought. I built my first hand auger out of off-the-self steel. It didn't work. The cutting blades folded over and the arch twisted off. The AMS auger is made from hardened steel. It is not simply a metal pole. I tried some of the cheaper AMS copies and bent them as well. I would never buy anything other than an AMS hand auger, regardless of the price. I paid around $600 for my auger set in 2006. It was one of the best purchases I have ever made. This auger set has dug a lot of deep holes and has never failed me.

  • @petershaver5006
    @petershaver5006 ปีที่แล้ว

    I found an angostura at my moms house.

  • @jamebrooke894
    @jamebrooke894 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know three in Northern Indiana some 30 miles separates. You find mostly broken ones but I've found 2 whole ones. 1" to 1.5" in length.

  • @angelapeek4041
    @angelapeek4041 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you awesome

  • @porkyfedwell
    @porkyfedwell ปีที่แล้ว

    More frequent videos please!

  • @mkaberli
    @mkaberli ปีที่แล้ว

    At least one deeply buried Early Archaic site, dating to between 5,000 and 7, 000 years ago, was discovered in California's Central Valley It site (CA-Kerr_116) was discovered by two archaeologists (Fredrickson and Grossman) conducting a survey Buena Vista Lake. If early archaic sites are that deep, then one could assume the Paleoindian sites could be much deeper.

  • @Becca2334
    @Becca2334 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweet actoin❤🎉🌝

  • @iwalkincircles2960
    @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

    I said in an earlier that rivers move. You were obviously digging where the river used to be.

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 ปีที่แล้ว

      Every location on a flood plain is a location where the river used to be. The question is how long ago was the river in that location? There are portions of flood plains that have been stable since the end of the last ice age. It is those locations, down deep, where the potential for PaleoIndian sites exists. The Shawnee-Minisink site along the Delaware River is one example.

  • @iwalkincircles2960
    @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

    The first hole I saw you dig had a box in it.

  • @iwalkincircles2960
    @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would hope you found something. So far day 2 and nothing to show. 2 weeks and nothing. That sucks

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 ปีที่แล้ว

      The regulatory requirement is to prove that there is nothing there. You can't do that without digging holes. If you are the developer paying for the archaeology survey, you are hoping that nothing is found.

    • @iwalkincircles2960
      @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am sure they hope nothing is found. Just sucks all that work and nothing

  • @iwalkincircles2960
    @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

    You use meters when talking about digging but degrees when weather. How about feet? If you gonna use 1 form of measure, European, then stick with it. Don't mix them. Don't understandable why you use meters in America anyway

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree, it is down right un-American to use anything other than British units.

  • @iwalkincircles2960
    @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

    The pull cord broke so I bought a brand new chainsaw. 5 dollars vs at least 100. No Brainerd for me not for them. Just goes to show you how smart archeologists are.

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 ปีที่แล้ว

      It wasn't the pull chord. Part of the pull cord reel broke. Your accounting is way off. The new saw cost $158. That is peanuts compared to the hourly cost of seven paid crew, hotel rooms, per diem, skid loader rental, and the race against approaching bad weather in the first week of January. So you think I should kill an entire work day running around looking for parts that I would most likely have to order online and wait days for delivery? I would have spent $500 if needed to be back up and running in an hour.

    • @iwalkincircles2960
      @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

      You said pull cord so that where I got my info. Did hear the pull cord reel broke.

  • @iwalkincircles2960
    @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

    That looks like more work than a shovel

    • @archaeologyx4988
      @archaeologyx4988 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't dig a 20-inch in diameter hole to a depth of 13 feet (4 meters) with a spade shovel. Traditionally we dig a 1 by 1 meter square (3.2 x3.2 ft) pit to a depth of 5 feet (1.52 meters). At 5 feet, we are stopped by OSHA safety regulations. In order to dig the pit deeper, all the surrounding squares must be dug down to 5 feet to create a step-back to prevent the walls from collapsing in on the workers and burying them. River sediments are soft. I know two archaeologists who were buried in a wall collapse. Fortunately, they survived, but they will never again ignore the OSHA safety requirements. To do so is dangerous and life-threatening. After digging the step-back, the center pit can be dug down an additional 5 feet for a total depth of 10 feet. From there you could did a smaller hole in the floor of the pit down to the 13-foot target depth. Let's do the math. That is nine squares dug down to the first 5 feet, which equals 460.8 cubic feet of soil to remove. Add another 5 feet to dig the center pit down to 10 feet, and the smaller 20-inch round hole to 13 feet, which totals to 460.8 + 51.2 + 6.5 = 518.5 cubic feet of soil dug with a shovel. The PaleoDigger machine digs a 20-inch diameter hole to 13 feet deep without any workers entering a dangerous hole. This equals 28.4 cubic feet of soil removed. If you were paying the bill for this work, which would you prefer?--two weeks digging 518.5 cubic feet of soil with a shovel, or half a day digging 28.4 cubic feet of soils with the PaleoDigger machine. This is what I call a no brainer.

    • @iwalkincircles2960
      @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't really care for Osha wither way.

    • @iwalkincircles2960
      @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

      So I do see what your saying and I see your point. You do end up digging deeper than I thought

  • @iwalkincircles2960
    @iwalkincircles2960 ปีที่แล้ว

    Duh. They are defined deep. 1000s and 1000s and 1000s of years by a river would definitely be buried by flood water or washed away. Also the water tables were way lowers they were close to the water making them wash away or covered more easily. Also water ways moved or have been rerouted over 1000s of years. A River can change course in less than 100 yrs.

    • @Ur2ez4me81
      @Ur2ez4me81 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True but they can still be found. Chances are low but I can happen. I never found projectiles as old as Paleo but found some sitting in a pile of landscaping stone that are thousands of years old & still intact.

  • @regnichol462
    @regnichol462 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice technique, especially when you have several metres of potential occupation.

  • @ThomasSmith-os4zc
    @ThomasSmith-os4zc ปีที่แล้ว

    There is no such thing as Paleoindian only Abbotts Epoch. There is no continuity in the stratigraphy. Look at the stratigraphy of the Koster Site in Illinois or the stratigraphy of Joffre Lanning Coe's excavations of the Carolina Piedmont. The Archaeologist have absolutely no deductive or analytical ability.