วีดีโอ

Estaba mal dormido cuando hice está madre, pero no me arrepiento xd

basado viene de based en ingles No se refiere a la palabra en español basado de "basado en" Basado o based es alguien que dice o hace algo sin importarle si resulta polemico

Y bocchi realmente trata sobre cómo superar la ansiedad social xd, osea, cada capítulo se centra en el crecimiento personal de bocchi y como a cada rato ella sufre por su ansiedad social

Como bocchi Ay no, como vas a decir eso, Bocchi deGod es el mejor anime de comedia, wey, mira como cambia la animación ay ay ay ay no sabes nadaaaaaa

@@nuiyoshiart literal xd

@@wilsonchoqueroque5858 no se no lo vi.

@@nuiyoshiart ademas es entretenido

I assume its activated. Since its reaction effect, same like any exosisters monster if opponents moves card from their gy. If not there is no way darkfluid can chain that. But if its like valmonica link 1 monster who continuous (like bagooska thingy) effect protection, sure, it cannot be negated.

It depends on the translation, the first one I found mentions that both effects can be activated, meaning it depends on the owner whether to do it or not. In another description, which I think is more reliable, the first effect is a decision, but the second is treated as mandatory, in this case it can be fulfilled because Playmaker refuses to activate Darkfluid's effect of denying it because even if he denies it, according to the writing basis of Darkfluid and Perfectron itself, they can activate their effects until their counters run out (In what I read on the different pages both agree that there is no limit regarding how many times Perfectron can activate its effect, the same with Darkfluid, it does not say that once it is denied it cannot be activated again [As an appendix this was a small "bug" in DL, at least that's how I remember it because there was a monster that as such had no limit when activating its effect, that is to say that even if it was denied it could activate it again, then DarkFluid denied it and the only one who ended up losing was DarkFluid itself, which lost its counters]) Following this path, it was basically a loop, mentioned by Bohman himself and AI, "Playmaker, did you understand the power of DarkFluid instantly to master this combo?" - "You fell into a combo of destruction that you can't avoid." If Playmaker negated Perfectron's effect, it would activate again, but regardless of the translation, Perfectron's second destruction effect doesn't need any requirement beyond battling, so whether activated or not, Playmaker would have to spend 2 counters to negate those effects, although according to Darkfluid's effects, it would attack before Perfectron's second effect is activated. Buuuut, reviewing rules and such things, we would have 2 paths: 1.- Basically, like this duel, but summarized, that is, Darkfluid begins the attack, Perfectron spends 1 counter to avoid its destruction, Darkfluid spends 1 counter to negate that effect, and by its own effect it attacks again before Perfectron's second effect is activated, and so on until Perfectron runs out of counters and its ATK is 0, and DarkFluid crashes with 3000 ATK. 2.- The other way, I don't know how likely it is, because I don't know 100% of the rules of the counters in the game, that is: Darkfluid attacks, Perfectron spends 1 counter to avoid its destruction, Darkfluid denies that effect, and here comes the thing... If DarkFluid denies that effect, the counter is lost? If it is lost, then the same thing would happen as above, but if it doesn't lose, Perfectron has a way to avoid being destroyed indefinitely until DarkFluid loses the counters, that is, it also keeps its ATK and the power of the Judgment Arrows magic that doubles it, if Dark Fluid runs out of counters, then it would lose by ATK. So going back to the duel, either Playmaker knew about this, that is, if he didn't allow Perfectron to spend the counters, they wouldn't decrease, and therefore he would lose, or he wanted to force Bohman to be forced to spend Perfectron's counters so that his ATK reaches zero. Well if he didn't, Bohman lost. Now how can we know if Perfectron's second effect is mandatory or not? Well we can guide ourselves from what I said, if Perfectron's effect won't activate after the battle, Bohman wouldn't have any problem stopping there, buuuut since Perfectron's own effect to avoid being destroyed is optional, Darkfluid can negate it, basically Bohman was screwed in one way or another and he ended up losing. Because if we analyze the duel, DarkFluid attacks, Perfectron activates its effect, loses 1 counter, the battle continues, Bohman, in clear ignorance, because DarkFluid's card was created right there, activates Perfectron's effect to destroy Darkfluid, was it necessary? YES, because DarkFluid had its counters and Bohman didn't know what they were for beyond buffing DarkFluid's own attack, plus he would get rid of a strong monster, which as he himself comments, "The only link 5 monster is the one I created." So between ignorance and arrogance he chose to activate Perfectron's destruction effect, starting the loop, the option was that knowing that he can't assure anything regarding DarkFluid, he doesn't know what else he can do, if he leaves it alive another turn, it may have some effect that he doesn't know about, so the most "sensible" thing was to exhaust Darkfluid's counters

They will just add a new mechanic