วีดีโอ

👍👍👍👍👍

This is gold

Coxy, have you retired? Keep the vlogs up

You don’t describe Stirner very well You say nonsense about him He doesn’t say other people are your food And he is not about a fight against the state At least read his work before you write about it

Fusionism!

This is hugely helpful; really well explained. A must-watch for any A Level Politics teacher doing anarchism. Thank you so much.

Amazing. Thank you 🔥

thanks

Thank you SO SO SO SO MUCH

Yesss!!! Just what I need :D

thank you!!

Errors in putting Leninist ideas in Marx’s mouth. Marx wasn’t a statist, didn’t call for a socialist state. Nor did Marx really differentiate socialism and communism - those are largely Leninist ideas.

Social and mutualist anarchism would work in city environments with unions and stuff but individualist anarchism would work best in rural areas with less people and more self sufficiency.

The President of the United States is not directly elected. Each state allocates people called electors, of a number equal to that state's number of representatives and senators in Congress. The electors are /usually / selected by whichever party's presidential candidate won the popular vote in that state. For example, Wyoming gets 3 electors. The number of representatives in the lower chamber, the House of Representatives, is determined by population, as stated by the Census. Which is taken evry ten years. So the 2008 election was determined by electors enumerated by the 2000 census. Thus why, partly depending on population shifts, elections can swing opposite the popular vote.

For the differences in worldview based on differing views of human nature I'd highly recommend Thomas Sowell's book "The Conflict of Visions".

I can't understand why such good videos on this topic have such a low number of views.

Great video. Hard to find well-made and balanced videos on voting systems. I think this one did well to point out both sides of the argument here. Bookmarked.

This gentleman does not understand anarchy. Anarchy simply is achieved and exists there is no “once we get beyond it”. Once anyone or any group of people start to decide what anyone else should do via coercion it is no longer anarchy. This need to have subtypes of anarchism is just due to a lack of courage and fear of taking full responsibility for themselves. They need an authority in charge because they are deeply psychologically troubled from their own childhood.

this was so amazing! so helpful for me in my political science course in uni (first year), thank you!!

Mutual aid is an interesting book but suffers from the flawed science of its time. btw I say PRU-don not PROUD-on

What are some texts to check out by oakeshott?

anarcho individualism sounds great to me until it starts sounding like its cool with violating other ppl’s individualism. so, its a non-reciprocal ideology. its not a contract, its simply a doctrine. i mean, thats every dictator and politician out there.

In "For a New Liberty" Rothbard asks What would you do about crime with out a sate? Then he goes through all the common sense ideas that a family or group of people would try... working together with their neighbors, locks on the doors, maybe bars on the windows, maybe getting weapons, practicing security precautions. I listened to half this video, tired of the distortions.

Currency is emergent; read "Debt; the first 5000 years"

define "society?" Didn't Josiah Warren create a community and a "Time store?" how is that leaving society.... Thoreau has a chapter on society.

2:45 and already he is building a strawman by saying things that aren't necessarily so, like Individualist anarchists' are against "society" and "religion" some may be and some may not... There was a good book "Native American Anarchism" Paperback - January 1, 1983 by Eunice Minette Schuster (Author) who goes through the religious and pacifist roots of American Anarchism.

Rawls has nothing to do with Woke ideology. It is all based on the enabling the individual and not the group the individual belongs to. Once you move into Woke say positive discrimination based on race or gender you have left Rawls. The veil of ignorance is incompatible with these kind of preferences. In fact I would say that Rawls is one of the best arguments against DEI and Post modern Identitarianism.

So Brexit referendum didn't pass the 40% of the population saying yes test that the 70s devolution /Scottish referendum had to pass?

“Anarcho”-capitalism isn’t anarchism. Capitalism is inherently hierarchical.

I’m questioning if anarchism will work, since the human race isn’t a hive mind. Only when every human believes in anarchism wil anarchism work?

you are a true motivation, I love your classes, lots of love xx

amazing

2 weeks away from my politics A level mock and this really helped, thank you for posting this

_Many_ individualst anarchists are and were anti-capitalist, such as Benjamin Tucker, Voltaririne de Cleyre. "Anarcho-"Catpitalism is a bit of a 20th century distortion. Rothbard admits as such, thinking the old pro-labor, anti-capitalist, anti-state movement was effectively dead post-1940s and so he could appropriate the term "anarchist". Ofcourse, we've seen a rise of anarchist with the 60's New Left and anti-globalization protests since 90's.

This has got to be the greatest explanation on Marx & the basics of Socialism and Communism If I’d have had Coxy’s vlogs growing up I’d have done really well in school, instead of the big dry text books they used to make us read Excellent teacher 👍

Typical English teacher on TH-cam = clear and explained easy, straight to the point. If this was an American, it would be a 15 min introduction of waffle Thanks for the great content Coxy 👍

Coxy, can you continue with these lessons. They really help me understand. I see you haven’t posted any new ones, the way you teach is very good i.e simple and clear 👍

Great teacher 👍 Keep these coming

Please make sure you keep making these vlogs Coxy, you have really helped me understand a lot of things

Collectivism does not exist in reality, only in the mind. There is no forrest ; there are trees.

Excellent teacher! Cheers Coxy 👍

Murray Rothbard wasn't even a real anarchist as anarchism is stateless socialism not capitalism which is founded upon violence and Coercion.

Coxy is the man. The best teacher, explains it in a simple and easy way. Cheers for the vlogs 👍

This Coxy is a brilliant teacher. I wish he, and his style of explaining was at my old school growing up ! Keep up making these vlogs Coxy, because it saves me reading big dry books on these guys 👍👍👍

Keep these vlogs coming Coxy 😎👍

Thanks mate

Great video mate

All anarchist agree that so-called anarcho-capitalists are not anarchists

A lot of this is performative, and actually practical. In order to preserve the essential "order" and prevent a revolution, some concessions must be made. Being American (and a cynical one), we've seen this with FDR's New Deal, and LBJ's "Great Society's" social welfare programs. These changes occur during crisis, and huge technological advances. Monarchy is indeed, in large part, essential to British identity irrespective of class. State provided healthcare supports business. We're in late stage Capitalism here in the States, and neo- liberal politics are proving disastrous.

You are a brilliant teacher, I really enjoyed this. Thank you