วีดีโอ

Amazon link is in the description of the short (not sure if you can see it on mobile but on computer, in the description of the short, there is a link)

The size of this is pretty small. It can be programmed in python or scratch or some other programming language. If it’s the same path you can just record the motion and replay the arm

@@kylegwtoddfor night time low light I would say r6 or the new r6 mkii. Full frame. And larger pixels

@@ronjenkins4257 that’s true. I haven’t used it for a long time. But I do recall the previews don’t load as fast as Lightroom. Lightroom is really built for batch processing

@@cngpictures.videos It's even super slow converting Canon's RAW files to TIFFs, which I do to run them through Zerene focus stacking software.

Glad you found it helpful!

Glad you found it helpful!

Which one will be the best, but I also want to do graduation picture and other things?

@@stephaniealvarado8929 if you do indoor sports where light is more limited, I would go r6 or the newer r6 mkii. If you are doing a sport where you need more reach, the 90d might be a good choice but make sure there is enough light for higher speed shots.

@@stephaniealvarado8929 it also depends on your lenses and what lenses you plan to use with

Comes down to what your needs are and how much you’re willing to spend :)

Any ef lenses that have autofocus should work on the r6 assuming you have the ef to rf (an adapter that has contacts and support autofocus) the canon branded ones all support af

They have some stronger motor versions. But as the motor strength and arms payload increase, so does the cost usually. Thought this was a decent price to play around for some table top setup

@@cngpictures.videos totally agree, did you film with it? I don’t see any more videos about it on your page?

@@injectionAI made one short with the iPhone mini and haven’t had time to do more yet but I do have some ideas th-cam.com/users/shortsHg5XRZnhCb4?feature=share

Amazon link is in the description of the short (not sure if you can see it on mobile but on computer, in the description of the short, there is a link)

I added a link here bio.site/cngpictures.videos

There was some slight rotation but the bokeh and lights in the background gives you a solid reference as well

What was your finding? Did you have a 1 to 1? Glad you found this video useful!

@@cngpictures.videos Unfortunately not 1:1 haha, though it isn't a true macro just a telephoto with a macro function (Canon FD 80-200 F4 L), but it ended up being 1:2.9 (0.34x). The lens is from 1985 so it's hard to find correct info and I saw values from 0.22x (Canon's own website!) to 0.39x

Awesome! Canon fd lenses are fun! What are you using it for?

amzn.to/3Svgh0a it’s a kit with the lav mics

@@cngpictures.videos Thanks for replying, really appreciate it! One more question, I’ve got the Røde Wireless II PRO kit and it comes with one TRS (SC2) cable. Do I need to buy an extra one to be able to use all for mics with this kit?

Are you referring to the trs that connects to your camera or laptop? For rode wireless system the two transmitters have a 3.5mm port and the cables from that kit work with the system. I’m not familiar with the rode wireless go ii pro system though.

@@cngpictures.videos Perfect! Thanks mate, gonna purchase the kit now. 🙌🏾

Glad you found it helpful! Was good to visualize it myself!

so you would connect two rode receivers with four wireless rode transmitters to the sc6? That would work as well. this was just an easy way to use two rode wireless go ii and connect more lavs to it :)

@@cngpictures.videos i only used two sc7 cables to go from trs to trrs and then sc6 adapter double female trrs to one male trrs for phone. that is it. 4 mics on the phone video

​@@exercisepedia.eu1 2 sc7 would bring 2 lavs which you connect via one sc6 to phone. Where do the other two lavs go?

So I’m not super picky with the audio. I didn’t hear much difference. In theory a splitter or long cable degrade signal but it also depends on the quality of the cable and splitter. If you spend money on a good one, it should be fine. I think the usb cable with the rode works with connecting to the pc (never tried myself. I only used it to transfer files not using it as an audio interface) I think rode has a special cable to connect the receiver to the iPhone (again I haven’t tried that myself)

If you have one picking up rubbing with clothes, and you combine all of them, it'll corrupt the whole batch. You need to separate them if you absolutely need quality. Just buy sets of the rode mics. They come with two mics and a receiver, and then you combine it in post. Some models make backup recordings to help mitigate sounds like rubbing ECT.

Thanks! Hoping it was helpful to visualize the difference

Awesome! Just have to make sure the two mics on each transmitter have similar audio levels since they are merged into one channel (similar distance to mic and similar speaking volume)!

@@cngpictures.videos Thanks for your advice, I will try that tomorrow. Keep it up!👍

@@cngpictures.videosdoes the affect the audio quality? Thanks. You’re a genius and will save me money on buying another kit. Ty

@@Reyskee you might lose some because by signal and cables, any additional connector and cable can degrade signal so good cables and connectors are important. As mentioned in video, the bigger draw back is that the two mic signals are merged into one channel and can’t fine tune and adjust in post independently

It definitely isn’t the fastest but at least it is quiet?

Thanks. I was surprised too. Great lens for the price point!

I have not had a chance to try out a tamron lens. Tamron has made some great lenses but at the end of day, I think it comes down to the cost and value of the lens and the features you are looking for in the lens. Do you care about size of the lens? Is cost an issue? And do you care for the difference between f1.4 vs f1.8? Comes down to how you define what is superior.

Depends on what you are planning to shoot. 24-105 f4 is a good overall multipurpose lens. The 70-200 has more zoom and f2.8 is beautiful especially at 200mm. Depends if you need the extra reach and compression or care for the f2.8

@@cngpictures.videos Thank you for the response, its leaning towards getting the 70-200 and saving for a 16-35. but if a 24-105 f2.8 used comes along for a good price i might go for it

I don’t have a 256gb but I just tried a 128gb and it was working!

@@cngpictures.videos Thanks for checking.

As long as you shoot raw instead of jpeg files, it doesn’t affect image quality (unless you are trying to extremely recover shadows and highlight or purposely adding noise grain back into image)

Editing RAW files doesn't change the RAW file, ever. Changes you make are stored separately from the RAW file itself. The output can be worse if you don't do a good job editing, but just edit the RAW file again. This is unlike say editing a JPG, where changes are repeatedly applied and baked into the JPG file.

Glad you liked it! 😀

If the megapixels on the R5, you can get a nice additional crop if needed!

I only have the mk I and only shot In log not log 3. Is it noisy viewing on the camera or once you see it on the comp?

@@cngpictures.videos I'm unable to see it since I don't use a monitor but when I zoom it, I can clearly see them. I'm starting to wonder if the native iso 800 is the most ideal exposure to shoot.

Thanks for the opportunity to test out the plugin. I think I'm starting to get hooked with the film emulations!

I think so! It has lots of analog dials that lets you control the different aspect of the exposure triangle! It would be especially good if you’re a tactile learner. Makes it straight forward to change the apega tire around the lens and the top dial to change shutter speed!

Definitely a fun camera to use and can get some awesome images out of it!

What do you currently use to edit your raw photos?

I haven’t tested it side by side but it should be better because the pixels on the sensors is still the full frame size and density. Crop mode just uses smaller portion of the full sensor and doesn’t actually change the pixel size/density of the sensor itself

It is easy. I separated the audio file using DaVinci resolve. The adobe podcast enhance website, you just upload a file and it’s a one click situation.