วีดีโอ

Иисус любит тебя, обратись к нему, пока не стало слишком поздно❤

Some people should not be allowed to comment stupid things like this What you say does not make sense at al

Foi uma boa série, sem muitos desequilíbrios, mas ela teve alguns erros que fizeram com que alguns elementos não fossem contados, por isso teve uma nota um pouco baixa.

Which girl exactly did her routine in the 59s and 60s? And if her routine is so easy, why aren’t more gymnasts doing it to get themselves in the medals? Huh? Educate yourself instead of embarrassing yourself proving your stυρidity

CRY

She was also competing injured, which might have contributed to some of the issues.

IJBOL

Her 2016 was meant for her. It was rock solid performance! I tried doing a single turn on one tile on the floor only to find myself on a different tile.

Weavers win was a flub she'll never have that ever again

@@HonestCoach-us1edHow do you know that she just won Europeans.

@@yeewei-tn2wf if Simone is on her game there’s no way

@@HonestCoach-us1ed agreed, but don’t call Sanne a flub she’s the has the best dance elements on beam.

"close enough" isnt enough, unfortunately. Turns have to be 100% completed. Not 99%.

@@mattj5391 Did you just ignore the part where they were drawing comparisons to incomplete Mustafina turns being given full credit? The element evaluation should at least be consistent so that spectators and fans can both understand the judging easier or even take it seriously.

This is the Olympics not fantasy football

@@ansonpang Once again, that doesn't seem to apply to the many Mustafina turns still being credited despite not spinning three times around.

Check out her routine from Rio. Phenomenal!

Her father wasn’t aloud to be at the Olympics with her due to some controversy here in the Netherlands

@@lievekseen2320 Thanks 🙏

She was also injured, which hampered her.

No

No. And the other L turn was also not counted as a consequence. Thats why she didn’t qualify

@@Fvhlipe Oh darn her D score really took a tumble then

Had they credited the double l-turn, what would the D score be?

@@Fvhlipe That's incorrect. The Wevers was downgraded to L turn 1.5 and they did pay the L turn + turn + double + split + jump full; but yes, she would have qualified with a better Wevers turn.

Low difficulty. A 5.8 compared to the 6.6 at the Rio Olympics. Also there was tougher competition on the beam at this Olympics. Sanne was 3rd reserve

@@acrobaticspa yeah the Chinese gymnasts were unbeatable at the beam finals this year. When they hit, they're absolutely amazing amd they certainly did this year. I missed seeing sanne too and I was hoping she would have done her Rio routine

@@acrobaticspa the cop of the 2013-2016 is very different to teh cop 2017-2021,the past cop have big dowgrarded on the D.V difficulty value

@@acrobaticspa 5.8 is not that low, Tang Xiying have a 6.0 rutine, Urazova have 5.4 rutine and she mame the final, she can't make the final for her disconection at the beginning

@@gonzalezaramburu5741 urazova had a 5.9 in tokyo

¿En qué te basas para decir que es una rutina pobre? Seguro hacer series de piruetas es muy fácil para ti. Las acrobacias de las chinas son igual o menos difíciles que lo que ella hace, solo que hacen muchas conexiones para incrementar su dificultad . Simplemente tuvo errores de conexión que la dejaron fuera de la final está vez, eso no significa que su rutina sea "pobre" . Si no saben de gimnasia, no opinen.

@@gonzalezaramburu5741 Y tu si sabes? fue pobre así que SUPÉRALO!!

@@lucia60001 tuvo errores pero su rutina no es pobre, tiene buen nivel de dificultad, ademas esto son las clasificaciones, no las finales, solo que tu solo te fijas en los mortales o combinaciones de acrobacias, casi nadie hace los giros como Sanne, por algo el doble giro con pierna en 90 grados tiene su nombre. Sabias eso????

@@matyy1261 si lo sé y me encantó que ella ganara el oro en Río'16 porque se lo mereció y además por encima de las americanas, y porque fue ESPECTACULAR pero ésta rutina no se le parece ni de lejos, además se la ve muy nerviosa e insegura. En este caso le doy la razón a los jueces, ella no convenció.

As she should

She was not pissed. She looked like she was pumped that she hit a good routine

@@pedropelaez nope. She was pissed she made two mistakes at the very beginning. Watch it again.

maybe resting after the olympics?

Not sure why but this is the exact same routine she’s been doing for the last few years. Almost identical to the 2018 Euros th-cam.com/video/tlgtALTW2_o/w-d-xo.html

@@JasonQiuMusic yes but in the Dutch trials she was doing a Ariel loso and she was trying to get 21/2 turn into the code that she didn’t attempt

@@augustisthebest1606 She might have been wanting to do the 2.5 for the team finals but wanting to play it safe for qualifications. The LOSO seems to have been a one off - at the June 26 date she went back to doing the BHS.

She downgrades in quals. Always had.

Is the double L turn also credited?

There was much stronger competition

The judging was insane sadly she was only .1 off making the finals

Low D and Low E.

@@eimardgomes1128 her e was good only like 2 balance checks

@@augustisthebest1606 The judging was not insane for her. Guan Chenchen got 8.033 for a nearly perfect routine.