วีดีโอ

😂😂

Still doesn't represent him as a person just because he's offered roles like that. Man has to get paid.

He's from that generation when videogames were just gaining mass appeal. It's entirely likely he just missed that boat and doesn't get it. But from what I've read, his problem with Trevor isn't just that it's a videogame role, it's that the character became so popular that he felt typecast. More popular and well known than any of his live action roles for sure. People would call him Trevor at conventions, randoms on the street or out in public, and he's got this huge body of work which he believes shows a wide range, yet all people seem to want to remember him for is this misogynistic drug addict named Trevor. I can see where he's coming from. I've also seen actors embrace that scenario, and happily accept the name of their character as their own, and even fall into character or call back a catchphrase if applicable. If that's not in him, it's not his fault.

@menghao737 well that's the thing. I get when people want to show they can do anything. That's great, and I think he can do another trevor level role. The thing is, I think that if you're an actor and you do such a great job at a role that should speak to your level as an actor. I'm not saying typecast as Harry Potter and Daniel Radcliff, but he's done the walking dead and even has another movie coming out. He's not being forced to do trevor, but I say trevor is a part of his acting style. Every role he does has that trevor flavor to it, which is a call back to just how great and loved that role is and possibly got him work on other shows and movies due to that role and the popularity of that game. I have a boss who's not of the video game era. He only played RDR2 and GTA 5. He talks smack about games all the time when me and the boys are talking about games but if we start talking about those games he's a bigger need then us. To me that role for him was probably what set him apart from others that could try that typeset.

He really is, and such a wonderful actor to work with

Thank you! 🙏

Thank you so much! We’re so happy to hear that you enjoyed the film, we appreciate the support!

Thanks so much! We’re so happy you enjoyed our film

Thanks for coming back after a year! Happy to hear that we’ve stayed in your mind for that long. On your “advice” especially on the “portraits” line, I’m not sure if you’re aware of foreshadowing as the line was to reveal who Thomas is to Mark. With that being said, I in no way believe our film is perfect and we’ve grown quite a bit since this film was made, but I respectfully disagree with you and wish you the best of luck, especially if you ever tackle a project of your own!

@@lucapizzoleo super glad to hear your response. I’m curious what specific points you disagree on? I love discussing film ideas.

⁠@@conical3333 Hey there, happy to chat, as stated previously in regard to your criticism about dialogue. Dialogue can serve different purposes, including establishing character, tone, and context. The "what do you shoot?" exchange might seem simple, but it was included to set tensions, and set up thematic elements subtly. Sometimes, it’s about building atmosphere or showing character interactions naturally, and as I strived to make this feel like a natural conversation, just like in a real life, it often follows a question and answer format. Additionally, not every piece of dialogue needs to be cryptic or complex to be engaging. Lastly, in reference to the cinematography, it can come down to taste and preference. What you like may not be what I like and that’s the beauty of film and art.

@@lucapizzoleo You are right about a few things. But... dialogue (if you want it to be great) has to always be analytical. If it becomes complex or cryptic while also sounding realistic than you have amazing dialogue. Quentin Tarantino does an incredible job of this, so does Edward Yang. The "what do you shoot" scene could be considered realistic but the problem is that it comes off as redundant, overly practical and fake, it feels artificial because "what do you shoot" feels like it was written just to set up the next line, not written as a genuine question (though that might just be me), additionally. the conversation is just facts, facts, facts back and forth with slight hidden meaning behind one or two lines. If it had some analytical dialogue in it, it would be more interesting. Great dialogue always leans toward analytical and great dialogue works like a great conversation in real life----not a boring one with the same energy as "hows the weather?" "it says its gonna be sunny". Keep in mind I say all this with as much respect as possible, and this is to help you grow as a writer. watch this incredible video a few times on the way dialogue works and how it connects to real life: th-cam.com/video/y873yinIsUk/w-d-xo.html .

@@conical3333 I think we can agree to disagree on the quality of the portraits line, you might find it to be a disingenuous response or set up but plenty of people including myself who disagree with you. Also, I appreciate you wanting to share advice however your initial comment doesn’t strike me as just constructive criticism. The fact you came back to our short after a year to leave a comment calling almost every aspect of our film “sub-par” especially when you don’t have any films of your own comes across to me as malicious. But clearly you seem like such an expert with so much knowledge so I hope you put it to use and make a film of your own one day. And make sure if you get any comments from some random TH-cam account who posts gmod videos be sure to listen to their advice like gospel. Lastly, want to reiterate I don’t see my work as perfect, in fact I think it’s far from it. However, I’m a young filmmaker who puts my work out there and is growing every day. As a filmmaker that’s all you can do. Thanks again for watching our film we appreciate you coming back, wish you all the best and good luck!

Last summer whisper by anri