TroyMcClure
TroyMcClure
  • 3
  • 17 242
2005 6.0 F350 New Exhaust
2005 6.0 F350 New Exhaust
มุมมอง: 15

วีดีโอ

2005 Ford F350 6.0 Powerstroke
มุมมอง 632 ปีที่แล้ว
2005 F350
EL SV vs NL 10x42 Field Testing
มุมมอง 17K4 ปีที่แล้ว
This is my off the cuff comparison of a 2016 EL SV 10x42 vs the new 2020 NL Pure 10x42 during an archery elk hunt.

ความคิดเห็น

  • @oracleocp
    @oracleocp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks very much for the detailed review. Question, you mentioned you wear contacts - how is the usable eye relief with glasses? I wear glasses and generally need 18 mm of actual eye relief or more depending on the height of the eye cup when fully retracted. Looks like the eye cup is very mininal when retracted (which is good for glasses) but I'd love to hear your opinion.

  • @Latitude2010
    @Latitude2010 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shame, excellent binocular but I’m very sorry to say terrible review

  • @SteinerOtmar
    @SteinerOtmar ปีที่แล้ว

    Deutsche

  • @GM-bq6zo
    @GM-bq6zo ปีที่แล้ว

    Els look better imo, nl pure bit ugly shape.

  • @benoistclouet409
    @benoistclouet409 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this very informative test. I am a photographer and a polar guide and binoculars are my first tool for looking for bears on the ice... in particular. I have old 8x30 SLCs which still work great but want to invest in a newer 10x42 pair and the NL Pure look great! However, I have read on some foreign forums that these binoculars posed two major problems: 1/ condensation on the exit lenses (next to the eyes) especially in cold conditions (much much more than other top-of-the-range binoculars). This would be due to the abandonment of the treatment of glasses with SvaroClean which would contain PFCs harmful to the environment. 2/ Glare problems in bright light conditions (snow, water, reflections...) which would be due to the fact that the inside of the frame is not black over the entire body of the binoculars (unlike the Leica Noctivid ). Do you have an opinion on these two points which are essential for me given my use (use on the sea, in the Arctic > snow, ice, water, strong contrast with negative temperatures)

    • @nick4uuk
      @nick4uuk ปีที่แล้ว

      These have been tested down to -25c as part of their operating claim, haven't they?

  • @torreyintahoe
    @torreyintahoe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    To be able to have 12x with the same footprint as 10x EL with the same field of view and the ergonomics is huge.

  • @freeforester1717
    @freeforester1717 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The headrest is worth getting for these in x 10 or x 12, it does work very well to reduce tremor whilst viewing.

  • @toddstrader899
    @toddstrader899 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the tripod adapter and where do you get it?

    • @MrGeoflo
      @MrGeoflo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      outdoorsmans.com

  • @lukas7417
    @lukas7417 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For years I experienced the same diopter 'issue' with my Zeiss Conquest and Victory were i had to set it to -1 for a sharp view. Now with my NL Pure's it's at 0 dead on. (I have perfect eye sight) Goes to show how good the optics, build and QC are at Swarovski.

  • @armandomada633
    @armandomada633 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome glass took me 6 month to get it but it’s here now .Thank you for posting.

  • @stuartkerr2205
    @stuartkerr2205 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't hear your voice. Why bother doing the review when you have to whisper. Should have done the review somewhere you didn't need to whisper.

  • @charlesboelter5457
    @charlesboelter5457 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Extremely helpful, Definitely going to get the NL now.

  • @robgerety
    @robgerety 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about the 12x42 NL Pure?

  • @Howlin23
    @Howlin23 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the Leica HD-R’s and think about going to the NLs and a dedicated Leica rangefinder. What do I gain optically coming from a high end rangefinding bino compared to a non rangefinding pair

  • @MattH-wg7ou
    @MattH-wg7ou 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh to be rich!

  • @mrmashta1877
    @mrmashta1877 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video, well done. But OMG 5.41 mins - how dirty is that glass. !!!!!

    • @alex781021
      @alex781021 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I try to no clean it in the field until I absolutely have to. They took a dunk in the spring the next day to get the grime off. Absolutely nuts what 16 hours a day 10 straight days will do to ocular.

    • @mrmashta1877
      @mrmashta1877 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alex781021 No worries, i thought i was the only one that had glass like that. Once again - Great video.

  • @mauriciolacruz
    @mauriciolacruz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I almost can't hear your voice, sorry.

    • @alex781021
      @alex781021 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, that's what happens when you've got a herd of elk 300-400 yards you're hunting.

    • @mauriciolacruz
      @mauriciolacruz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alex781021 Hehee... I was guessing something like that. 😉👍🏻 Have you tried the Leica Noctivid?

    • @alex781021
      @alex781021 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mauriciolacruz Yes, superb optics. You can’t get much better. I personally preferred them over the Zeiss SF’s but it starts becoming subjective to the users eyes. If I was forced to use one big 3’s binoculars (EL, SF, or the Nocitivid) for my lifetime I would not be disappointed.

    • @mauriciolacruz
      @mauriciolacruz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alex781021 And which one do you prefer (and why) between the EL SV, the NL and the Noctivid?

  • @charlesrockwell3923
    @charlesrockwell3923 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great detailed explanation of the differences between NL and EL. Made me change my mind and I will get some NL's. Thanks!

  • @colinkey7094
    @colinkey7094 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This requires sub-titles; I cannot understand a word the Yank is saying.

  • @莫少爺
    @莫少爺 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the optical quality of SWAROVSKI NL Pure the best among all binocular brands? Is its clarity and true color reproduction the best in binoculars in the world?

    • @ARlELATOM
      @ARlELATOM 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes they are the best!

    • @tehrihumbert876
      @tehrihumbert876 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Using Swaros since more then 20 years, my answer is : YES !!!