วีดีโอ

Best illustration so far on this topic...God bless you sir

Hello. Let's measure the Universe with gravitational quanta (more precisely in digital format)?! With the help of the “HYBRID gyroscope” you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 250000 meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 88/88/88 cm, and the weight is 14 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

Why is the second half of this video just the void

Oh and the results do vary from horizontal vs perpendicular?

I seen a channel that was going to do the same experiment but with radiowaves and been waiting for it to come out... Maybe the speed of Radio waves is slower and thats why i haven't seen the outcome.... Because we all know that anyone that says its different will be outed as a crackpot... Im still waiting. Yes i "believe the speed of light varies" and i would love to be proven wrong (my beliefs) But would like proof not calculations or dogma rhetoric. Please dont belittle or be condescending just want proof from experiments not "accepted fact" from the science community or Einstein...

random but that's my exact textbook I'm using in hs phys in the intro!

I didn’t understand this fully in class, so thank you! Great video

Very helpful

Thank you.

Sir, you need more subscribers 😭😭😭😭 you explain so well!!!

Thank you!

This vid just saved me for my test Tysm!

This was very useful for my Physics Depth Study thank you!

This video was exactly what I was looking for. Thank you!

Gineos

He was the first American to get a novel prize.

The one way farfield speed of light has been measured and it is c. This was done by transmitting a radio wave from one dipole antenna to another dipole antenna, where both the transmitted signal and the received signal are measure by one oscilloscope (ie. one clock). The orientation of the 2 antennas were pointed in many directions and experiment was repeated many times over months. But the experiment showed something unexpected. It showed that speed of light is instantaneous in the nearfield and reduces to the speed of light about 1 wavelength from the source. Since Relativity assumes light only propagates at speed c, and this has been shown to not be true especially in the nearfield of the source, then Relativity needs to be reanalyzed. Derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light shows that Relativity reduces to Galilean Relativity, and only in the farfield does it reduce to the speed of light c. This is because as c=infinity, the Relativistic gamma function becomes equal to one, causing the Lorentz transforms to reduce to the Galilean transforms. But using farfield fields yields the Lorentz transforms. But since time and space are real and can not depend on whether nearfield or farfield fields are used (i.e what frequency of light is used), then the effects of Relativity on time and space must be an optical illusion. Time and space are absolute as indicated by Galilean Relativity. When moving objects are observed using farfield electromagnetic fields then time can appear to dilate and space can appear contract, but the effects are not real and can be verfied by using nearfield electromagenic fields which will show time and space have not changed. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then the effects of General Relativity on time and space must also be an optical illusion. So what is a better theory of gravity if General Relativity is wrong. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromaganetism for weak gravitational fields, which is all that we observe. Consequently Gravitoelectromagnetism predicts all known observed gravitational effects. But the difference is that Gravitoelectromagnetism is a field theory, whereas General Relativity is a geometric theory. Gravitoelectromagnetism assumes gravity is modeled by 4 equivalent Maxwell Equations as for Electromagnetism. The equations only differ in the constants used. Gravitoelectromagnetism is field theory of gravity and assumes there are both an Electric and Magnetic components of gravity. Just like for electromagnetic fields, changing magnetic fields create electric fields and visa versa. Gravitoelectromagnetism also assumes time and space are absolute and not flexible as General Relativity predicts. For more information see my short 15 min: TH-cam presentation and the paper below it is based on: TH-cam - New Interpretation of Relativity: th-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/w-d-xo.html Based on the following paper: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023 viXra.org/abs/2309.0145 Here are some other experiments where the one way speed of light was measured in ina a similar way in materials: In a wire: th-cam.com/video/xt3QzXa-kOQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ACv14veSz0LLcLku In a fiber optic cable: www.picotech.com/library/experiment/speed-of-light

This was so well explained thanks my man 😅

Damn to think it was back about 250 years Is crazy.

Your video is Exceedingly excellent

👍🏻

Thanks

Urgent Question Mr. Brad, how did u know the direction of the resultant ??

Physics of Front ferrying

This still forms a right angle. This is helpful for right triangles, but the name is misleading.

Anyone else impressed by how long that mineshaft is?

O are they acting like a quantum battery. No one answers these questions. Does it loose its electron votage when it reaches the other side?

thanks

Excellent video. This channel deserves to get big

This vid saved me for the exam 🙏🏽

Thanks! So helpful!

Amazing video as always sir

I think the experiment was in the open air. There was not a dead straight 35 km tunnel

I am also an adult learner who has to retake physics to enter college and this helped tremendously, thank you!

My questions i when do you use kinematics and when do you use conservation of energy

Remember me when you get your silver play button

Mr Langdale is hands down the best teacher I’ve ever had and if we’re being honest the best on this planet. Hope ur doing well.

Nice

Thanks interesting. Hello. The speed of light is constant - Within the framework of the prevailing gravitational field - This assumption can be experimentally confirmed by physical experience: On the surface of the earth along its gravitational field, we fix the speed of light in the fibers of the optical angular gyroscopes, gyroscopes located symmetrically on a special platform and moving along a circle without angular velocity. You need to look at the picture with three optical gyroscopes. Internet request PATENT KZ-33869

secondly, in this michelson experiment, what kind of a light did he use? was it a pulsating laser or something? cause if not, then a fast rotating mirror will simply create a circular reflection along the mineshaft and at all times light will be hitting the observer. am i right or am i wrong? i hope this is not met by silence. cause, that would only further tell me that finite speed of light is a lie. another reason to belive this is the case is because, there is no recorded experiment that shows this. and its difficult to do as is, and apprantly fizeau had a light in 1849 that could reach upto 8 kilometers away, and then bounce back to him, for him to record. how is that even possible? in 1849? what kind of a light did he have? how was he able to focus it like a laser in 1849? how did he have a mirror that could give him a sharp image from 16kms? and why dosent anyone perform this in 2022 with all the modern tech?

I want to replicate this on a smaller distance. i basically just want to testify to myself, that light has a finite speed, and is not instantaneous. do you think this can be done? do you know of any setup, or can you come up with a setup that prooves to me that light has a finite speed? thanks.

Michelson's determination of the speed of light was low by around 6 km/s relative to the accepted speed of light of 299,792,458 m/s. (Damn good!) But the "accepted" speed of light is for a vacuum; what is the accepted speed of light at atmospheric pressure? Does that factor make his measurement closer, or does it shift too far and make Michelson's measurement too high?

If the mirror did one full rotation or 1/4 or 1/2 you would still see light. How do they know it was hit after it rotated 1/8 around? Idk why this is so confusing to me.

the force of attraction between me and these concise explanations is strong!

Keep up the great work

Thank you sir

the beatles have been real quiet since this dropped

why 1/8?

On urdu

To keep the mirror from exploding, Michelson used a 16 sided mirror. The light traveled 8448 one way trips per second, or 4224 two way trips per second. The mirror rotates 1/16 of 1 revolution for each two way movement of light. The emitted light and the received light are on the same 90 degree axis to the two way path of light. This is important as it limits the errors.