วีดีโอ

the gt 710 is a menace to the GPU society. Except the 710 can be a emergency display adapter (the r7 240 too but better). 240 is available for only 12 to 13 dollars and the gt 710 is for around 25 (?) to 40 in my country...

I need Windows 10 Lowest Version for gaming for playing these new released but low demanding requirements games like Red dead redemption 1 & metal gear solid volume 1: Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7600 @ 3.06GHz 3.07 GHz R.A.M: 4.00 GB RAM GRAPHIC CARD: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

VMware has better performance than virtual box

At 06:13 I don't get why you concluded that, as all your tests showed the 1.8 Core 2 Duo being a bit better than the 3.4 Pentium D.

Frame times are better on the 710 because it has dedicated ram, compared to shared DDR4 ram from the CPU

Good video, straight to the point. Thanks.

Depending on the BIOS, you can overclock the iGPU as well 🤔 sometimes even with voltage adjustments Also interesting would be how the iGPU would perform on DDR3 vs DDR4, as the 6th generation supports both.

Thanks. The results were about what I expected. The HD 530 trading blows with the GT 710 GDDR5. I got a UHD 630 with my i5 8500T and its fine for me since I don't do much graphically intensive stuff and the hardware encode/decode with QuickSync is quite nice considering older Intel HD Graphics (like pre HD 530 ones) have QuickSync problems or flat out is not detected. Weirdly I've been on a search for kinda modern iGPU performance but on a dedicated PCIE GPU form so its power efficient compared to my RX 5600XT when I don't need the GPU horsepower. Only the RX 550 is a somewhat reasonable purchase price-wise since the GT 1030 is like 2~2.5x of a RX 550.

When I worked a repair shop, our top of the line was 700 or 900 series. They always had a GT 740 4G available and we used it occasionally. Seemed like a decent light gamer card, nowadays crippled by no Vulkan, but was a decent card in its own right. Could you find one of those and test it?

well you could find that temperature sensor from powersupply and extend it to the CPU heatsink to get that psu fan control

GDDR5 indeed helps GT 710 a lot, back then it's almost only half as fast as HD 530

In fact, 7850 is NOT actually athlon 64 cpu, it's something in middle between athlon 64 and athlon 2. Real athlon 64 it's like Athlon 64 x2 3800+, 4400+ and so on. 7850 even was named as Athlon X2 7850, without x64. It's with l3 cache, what was only in Phenoms before(and many time after).

What was used in virtualbox? Emulation or kvm?

I think some of it also came down to driver optimization. Like for instance, I saw the HD 530 perform better in DX11 but struggle in DX9 in comparison. Reminds me a lot of Arc gpus today and how weird their drivers were, especially with them having to emulate DX9 support

I would definitely use the HD 530 more, for one thing, I wouldn't need to occupy that GPU slot with as something as weak as GT 710, and for another - Codecs, I would rather to convert/render videos faster.

Amazing iGPU. GTA settings?

i noticed that some drivers migh limit fps to 30 for intel

I enjoyed the video, thanks.

Good video. Just for fun, I tried Batman Arkham Asylum on a gt 710 1gb ddr3 that has 8x's electrical (A tiny fanless card that is great for troubleshooting) and on the Intel 770 graphics (13700k cpu). I overclocked both, I got 2000mhz stable on the Intel graphics and didn't get far on the gt 710, +40 on the core and +110 on the memory. The Intel 770 graphics was a LOT faster, it held a locked 60fps with the highest settings at 1440p. The gt 710 was limited to 1080p with medium settings and averaged around 45fps if my memory serves me correctly. I was surprised at the Intel 770 graphics.

The thing is that while the GT710 is more or less useless nowadays, the HD530 still has 'certain' use cases, namely H.265 QuickSync encoding (QSV). While recording/streaming with OBS, you can just offload the encoding to the iGPU. Of course, modern GPUs have great encoders, and by "modern" I mean Pascal/Polaris or newer, so you're only going to notice a ~2-3% performance difference. But on older cards, it can be pretty significant.

Intel really improved a lot with 530, i remember original gt 710 ddr3 beating hd 4000 and ones that came before it easily. I put one in a cheap dell with 3470 and it worked like a charm, later down the road, I got a 1030 gddr5 and the i5 was bottlenecking it so I got a 3770.

woa these results were very interesting! i was expecting the 710 to lose in every game

Upgrading/ sidegrading to an iGPU of the same era is NOT something I ever thought was possible

Actually the HD 530 has 192 shaders, like the 710. 24 is the number of execution units, which have 8 shaders each, even on newer Intel graphics.

First!

Beide sind nichts 😂hatte beide raspbery pi4 4gb war absolute mist jede sd karte geht kaputt bei den images der atomic pi kann nix außer gutes hd bild eignet sich nur als mediacenter dafür war es zu teuer 😂

Most Q6600 can be overclocked to 3.6 but phenom does not🎉

You should of used a 3rd gen CPU with the HD 4000 graphics.

I noticed on few games had higher CPU use on NVidia's card, wonder what causes that? Technically drivers are to interact with DirectX API calls translating to the specific language of hardware or in case of OpenGL drivers are literally the OpenGL API written by NVidia for their hardware. Either way drivers could delegate some job to GPU could also "emulate" some on CPU, can schedule some task, rearrange etc. I suppose the only way to verify would be to use worse CPU and check whenever both cards are bottlenecked equally?

Isn’t 210 1gb?

let's try to overclock brisbane to 3 - 3.2 GHz

Then just overclock the i5 if you can overclock the FX too?

I have a quick question. Why is it that when my gpu is under load (specifically at 100% or 99%), my monitor's display would start to have waves of statics going down to up? When it's not under load, these don't show. What could be the possible problem here?

The purpose of Haswell was a new cache pipeline, coupled with support for AVX2, FMA3 and BMI. And in games and software that actually use those instructions properly, the gap is indeed noticeable. Even in basic AVX workloads, Haswell is still always faster. Some game releases over the last couple of years require those instructions sets, making Haswell an absolute bare minimum for gaming. Ivy is dead now, basically.

CPU-Z shows your i5-3570 running at 2.65V! I'm pretty sure that's a sensor glitch lol

watching this video on my i7 3770 with r5 200 series, i love my i7 3770 lol

Thank you

crazy how little clock speed matters here

This is a GREAT comparison video. Kudos.

Good stuff

Thank you for the video

I still have one of these. It barely runs windows XP. The GX150.

I also have all the 3 "original" low end geforce cards, 210, 710 (DDR3) and 1030 (GDDR5). I didn't know you also have all of them 4:29 haha. Unfortunately I killed my 710 after running +380/+320 on Core/Memory with 1.162v core voltage for 2 years. 210 is also dead after I flashed a wrong bios on it, but I have all the cards. Only 1030 is alive, I am still using it with a Ryzen 7600 because GPU prices are bad in area ;(

I remember it being a rebranded tesla card from 2007-8, it was supposed to go up against Intel's GMA (predecessor to HD graphics), but due to it being rebranded and launched later, when many people started to buy i3s and pentiums with hd graphics, they started to compare them and that's where the jokes started. Well, I've had this card with E5800 and it was way better then the GMA so I had fun with especially playing pre 2010 games.

Man, I remember back in 2015 "upgrading" my old Core 2 Duo with the original ddr3 version, it was a night and day difference. Nowadays I only find videos about how trash it is but I genuinely enjoyed my time with it.

VMware was so difficult to download.

Thanks! It worked. Also drilled ventilation holes in the empty casing. Also have small fans blowing on them during use.

I have issues with these virtual machines, even windows sandbox crashing after some time.

i honestly don't think so, benchmarks say the athlons are faster but i've used both and i would much rather use a Pentium D, the athlons just didn't have enough cache or transistors and feels incredibly sluggish compared to the D even if it technically performs better in CPU intensive tasks

Gt 730 DNA mod