วีดีโอ

Have you read the Gospel of Mary Magdalene? I highly recommend you do. Trust me, Jesus was married and had children. I'm not sure why it's so hard to believe he has descendants to this day.

Definition of hearsay: the report of another person’s words as a witness.

Wasnt it a young man like puberty age?

The Bible isn't "historical" evidence. It is not a historical text; it has no other volumes to compare itself to in order to form a historical consensus. It doesn't even include dates or a timeline in the text. For example, if 500 years from now we are trying to determine if World War 2 was a real historical event, we would have access to thousands upon thousands of competing volumes and documents from different authors and published at different dates, all claiming the same dates, scenarios and characters. this is strong historical evidence. With the Bible, we have all anonymous authors, with no dates, describing different variations of the same accounts in a compendium of short-stories that we know for fact was intentionally doctored by political motivated institutions multiple times throughout history. Obviously, we can draw from other forms of archaeological and non-Christian literature to determine historical legitimacy for many Christians figures and stories, but the Bible in and of itself is not historical. Even if you are Christian, belief in the Bible as factual (not historical) requires faith, not objective reality.

They were attempting to arrest him and he slipped out of his garment to avoid capture, just as Joseph had left his coat behind as he fled from Potipher’s wife. Even if you have to run naked don’t let yourself be captured by the authorities. Run.

Look for Morton Smith

The garment falling and exposing nudity is another hint to the Old Testament. Jesus was to die, he was in the Garden going through the turmoil. Adam and Eve, were in the garden when they sinned, and then realised they were naked and shame became them. Jesus being arrested, the symbol of the male figure running in a shroud of linen, aka the son of god, the linen falling and exposing nudity. Exposing the flesh of man. Linen in the ancient Mediterranean was a common dressing for the dead. Jesus would be wrapped in linen mere hours later after he was killed. And the nudity exposed without shame as the figure of the male ran from the garden represents the nudity of man as god created them before the fall of Adam... both of these things happened in a garden. Which was symbolic. The fall of man in a garden, the fall of Christ to his death in a garden. The linen shroud, representing the death of Christ, falls, and man is cleansed of his sin... nude without shame as the sin is cleansed. That's what the figure of the male running represents... there's a reason why the running figure is mysterious, and it's esoteric and spiritual...and if you read the New Testament, you will know Jesus spoke in parables and symbology. But I guess you guys prefer bumming instead. @dr.bitterbrains-xf9pr

Jesus was definitely crucified for caught being with a naked boy and not for anyone's sins

check out Dr Ammon Hillman at Lady Babylon for more depth on this.....

Can you count? I see 1 not 3

There are some who believe that the fall of Satan didn't occur before Adam and Eve but rather when Jesus was crucified. At that moment, all beings in the universe saw the true character of Satan and cast him out of heaven. He then came down to Earth for a short time. Keep in mind that God measures time differently, with one day for God being equivalent to 1,000 years. Therefore, if Satan fell on the fourth day, he would only have two days left until the Sabbath, which marks the seventh millennium. This could be considered a short time, representing the “last days”

You didnt understand anything! Watch lady babylon

Youre right, they 'win' a point. Problem is christianity is complete unprooveble nonsens.

I gotta tell ya kid, you do good work.

John 21:20-24 confirms the Gospel of Judas 🙏😮😮😮🤔🤔🤔🧐🧐🧐. This is Foster watching from Ghana .

Ammon!

Thanks brother.

So why is the book of John so different than the others? Why are they all different? Because they were told by different people in different times

Will there be speaking in the movie?

But it was a young boy, wrapped in medicinal linen and naked. That still doesn’t explain this scenario at all.

Check out Dr. Amon Hillman. He is a Classical philologist, who is the upmost expert in reading ancient Greek wait till you hear what he has to say

They looks like us 😮 i mean us as Arab

How does anyone claim to know what was in the “original manuscripts” if we have no “original manuscripts” ? Who were those “eyewitnesses” ?

Line upon line and precept upon precent there is often multiple meaning and at times deeper meanings. Such as when they speak of the king of Tyre but jumps to a strange place called the Garden of Gods I’m sorry sir you error. There are three heaven in the Bible the heaven above, then a 2nd heaven where Angels roam and a third heaven where Gods thrown. I’m sorry sir you error.

I was just telling my daughter last night how my favorite books are the Acts and Paul's letters that follow. The fact that the epistles lack the emotion of the Gospels makes them easier to really internalize and think critically about.

As for your upcoming topic, James is written to believers with the context of proving your faith interpersonally (practically), whereas Paul's teachings get limited to him discussing our position with God. God knows our heart. Clearly these aren't actually contradictory, and Paul's writings also deal with outwardly proving our faith too. I used to be a firm believer in the camp that "faith without works is dead" refers to a lack of good works being evidence of the proclaimer is in fact a nonbeliever. This still can be true, but I now believe it primarily is linked to Romans 1:17: "For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith." "Faith without works" is dead because it will not reproduce. You cannot lead others to Christ when your life is in conflict with Christ. Generations fall away because they see the works (or rather, lack of) in their elders.

I also believe Jude is written by Jesus' brother.

This is such a farrago of lies, distortion, cherry picking and bad history. Like some baby-faced TH-camr can "prove" things that better minds haven't been able to.

These were all found in a trash heap, right? Did anyone question why these were all trashed?

Jewish children become adults at 12 and 13 years old. Boys bar mitzvahs are at 13 years old.

I hope that these outstanding Papyri are, at the very least, digitally scanned and made public so that those with the desire can attempt to translate them. I suspect there is more coming that will be revealed from 1st Century scholars. And thank you for this, as I did not know there was the "potential" for a great deal more to be revealed. But I am not surprised.

Actually Yehovah has been used by rabbis, they kept the Holy name secret only speaking it to pass it on to younger rabbi scholars.

In my scripture studies it has become clear that the account in Genesis 1 is only an account of ***spirits*** being created IN HEAVEN. The waters, firmament, earth, plants, sun, moon, stars, animals and humans created are ALL spirits being prepared to be given a physical part. The "days" are days in Heaven because the spirit for our sun is not created until the fourth day. God rested for one of His days after Genesis 1, but not after Genesis 2 so we know the creation of Adam and Eve in Genesis 2 is NOT the same account as the creation of male and female spirits in Genesis 1:26-27. In Genesis 2:7 two things come together: the breath of life (the spirit created in Genesis 1) and dust of the earth. So we do not have yet an account of the creation of our physical earth and universe except for the few details in Genesis 2. Since God is eternal, the earth and universe can be old.

Scholars claim the Epistle of James was written by the half-brother of Jesus, but another option that is not discussed and it was more likely written by the Apostle James. Peter, James, and John retained their apostleship to the circumcision (Galatians 2:9). The epistle was addressed to the twelve tribes who will be scattered during the last days or Daniel's 70th week. Obviously it had to be written before James' martyrdom in Acts 12. The epistle does not record the conclusion of Acts 15:7-11 in the matter of salvation by grace through faith.

James? One of his cousins? Sure. Jesus didn’t have a biological brother or sister. If he did, He wouldn’t have said to Mary, standing/kneeling next to John by the cross “Behold your son.” And to John, “Behold your mother.” He placed John in charge of caring for Mary upon His passing, and in fact John stayed under John’s roof from that point on. This wouldn’t have been necessary had James or others were brothers of Jesus. James was likely Jesus’ cousin or other close relative of Jesus.

I don't care at all who wrote James. All that really matters is that it is extremely early. The argument that it is poorly attested in the earliest writers is no evidence at all. Those writers were from the Paulinist-gentile tradition and were not familiar with the writings of the Jewish-Christian church. I feel certain that the original Gospel of the Hebrews, James, Jude and the Didache are all First Century.

I mostly agree with your criticisms of Dibelius, but that does not make a positive case for the authenticity of James. We know that several early texts were falsely attributed to James, and the church tradition assigning James the just to this epistle comes rather late. Nothing in the epistle itself points to James' authorship anyway, except for the name, which as you discussed is quite common. And I don't buy your process-of-elimination guess. Although it is possible that James the Just wrote the epistle, the evidence just doesn't seem to back up that tradition.

I think you might find this youtube channel Very interesting , a video that will get you straight there is " Have You Not Read The 7777th verse via Truth is Christ ; enjoy

Thank You for showing me that there are a multiple in past and now of scholars that think their the "fixers" of ALMIGHTY INFALLIBLE AUTHORITY GOD JESUS CHRIST "WORD" (KJVB Isaiah 52: 14 Revelation 19: 13 John 1: 1 -17,17:17:14:6) ; Ecclesiastes 12: 12-14 . Congratulations on your Marriage

KJV James !!!!!!!

I’d say we’re somewhat more educated about science, life and religion than those 2000+ years ago.

INTERESTING--

That is untrue, there is a case before the Supreme Court right now upholding Jewish women's rights to their religion, which allows abortion.

Yea your leveling all the other parts that contradict it. Bibles and holy scriptures are just men writingbshit down to justify what they believe

They were clearly okay with circumstantial abortions at the very least. Arguing anything else is anti-biblical. There's literally an abortion ritual for cheating wives in Numbers. "‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord. Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. After the priest has had the woman stand before the Lord, he shall loosen her hair and place in her hands the reminder-offering, the grain offering for jealousy, while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse. Then the priest shall put the woman under oath and say to her, “If no other man has had sexual relations with you and you have not gone astray and become impure while married to your husband, may this bitter water that brings a curse not harm you. But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”- here the priest is to put the woman under this curse-“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[a] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.” Numbers 5:18-22 That's not even getting into all the child-sacrifice we're finding the Israelites did with the Molak sacrifices, which have been glossed over by centuries because we couldn't interpret the Hebrew word "Molag" and assumed it was another deity. Turns out it was a burnt offering of a child to get favor from YHWH. Now we know that the at least some Israelites practiced child sacrifice again, it's right there in the Exodus. “You shall not put off the skimming of the first yield of your vats. You shall give Me the firstborn among your sons. You shall do the same with your cattle and your flocks: seven days it shall remain with its mother; on the eighth day you shall give it to Me." Exodus 22:28-29 I swear, Christians will read anything but the Bible.

Exposure still exists in many poorer cultures.

To be fair, these people also banned wearing cotton and wool at the same time, the eating of bat eggs, and their holy book includes a talking magical donkey. Hard to pick and choose the parts one should take seriously. As it turns out, historically, it's only taken seriously if it agrees with your own political and social views. Otherwise we would be bashing infants against rocks all the time (Psalm 137:9) and feeding children to bears if they make a joke about baldies (Kings 2:23-25) So, if we pick and choose the bits that are sacred at any given time, are they actually sacred? To be fair though, I don't think I've ever seen a jew eat a bat egg.

Considering they were called racial slurs i think you should add some black people, I'm just saying.

There was 1 man named Adam, the first man. God didn't make like 12 of them to gang bang Eve.

In PALESTINE 🇵🇸 also Jesus’s dad was Joseph. You’ve been gaslit for 2,000 years