- 57
- 31 913
Sumit Verma
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2020
Radio control Model Aircraft, helis, drone enthusiast. Love the hobby.
3d printed @planeprint Seafury
What an awesome looking plane and design . Took almost a month from start to maiden. BUT not for beginners. It requires some flight experience
This plane by design has some traits which are not beginner friendly
- too much banking angle and it starts to nose dive
- I assumed that it will glide well but I was wrong, always need some speed
- it was tail heavy even with correct cg (3300 6s)
- require some mucking around to put the servos
5 to 6 mins of flight time
5050 580kv propdrive v2 motor with 13x6 prop
Auw: approx 3350 grams
This plane by design has some traits which are not beginner friendly
- too much banking angle and it starts to nose dive
- I assumed that it will glide well but I was wrong, always need some speed
- it was tail heavy even with correct cg (3300 6s)
- require some mucking around to put the servos
5 to 6 mins of flight time
5050 580kv propdrive v2 motor with 13x6 prop
Auw: approx 3350 grams
มุมมอง: 387
วีดีโอ
3d printed 70mm Cougar
มุมมอง 187หลายเดือนก่อน
Design by Altsi on Cults. It flew great once it was in the air. I installed Fms 70mm 4s edf, which I felt was underpowered for this plane. 6s would be perfect. Crash landed on the second flight, but will print again with 6s setup. 4s 3000 battery - couple mins of flight time with 57% left. CG as per the marks. I wish it had retractable landing gears. 😇
Fms Futura V3 80mm
มุมมอง 2202 หลายเดือนก่อน
This plane needs no introduction. Loved flying it. Not short of any power. Powerful 80mm EDF System: Delivers high-speed performance and thrilling flight experiences. Durable Landing Gear: Strong and reliable for smoother take-offs and landings, even on rougher surfaces. Stable and maneuverable, making it suitable for intermediate to experienced pilots. Not Beginner-Friendly: While manageable f...
Planeprint Crop Duster 3d printed
มุมมอง 2304 หลายเดือนก่อน
Quick flight of this fun little cute flier. By @planeprint . Flies great just like Planeprint’s other designs. No bad tendencies. Very easy to fly. Printed in approx 2 days with 2 printers running parallel. All up weight is 460gms 2305 brushless motor 3s 850mah battery. 5mins of flight with less than half throttle
3d printed Planeprint’s Super Tucano
มุมมอง 2284 หลายเดือนก่อน
3D printed @planeprint super Tucano. Such a great design, as usual. it flies like a puppy. love it.  Printed with overture air pla (not regular pla). Landing was not great as I printed the wheels with PLA and it was very bouncy. Will replace them will regular wheels. 2200mah 4s 4mins of flight time.
Seagull P-47 Snafu
มุมมอง 2787 หลายเดือนก่อน
What an amazing warbird, looks sooo pretty, flies on rail once trimmed out. Easy to fly but still not for beginners. It is for experienced pilots. Cruises at half throttle. 6s 5000 7 mins of flight time with mixed throttle.
@planeprint L39 Albatros - 3d printed jet
มุมมอง 2.4K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
As usual the design is great. Flew really well except it was little touchy (fixed using expo and dual rates) and slightly tail heavy (fixed by moving battery slightly further towards the nose). Took around 5 days with 2 printers to print. Used Elegoo neptune 3 pro. - 70mm Fms Edf - 6s battery
Freewing T45 v2 90mm edf Jet
มุมมอง 1.6K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
A negligence turned out to be great fun :). I have a habbit of checking the battery with a battery checker before putting in the plane but guess what, this time I didn't do it and put an undercharged 6s battery into my Freewing T45 90mm Jet. Gave full throttle and felt that it is doesn't have power that it should have. I should have aborted the take off than but probably was not in my right min...
FMS Futura 64mm
มุมมอง 57210 หลายเดือนก่อน
What a great flier it is. Easy to handle. Flies locked in. Battery: 2600mah 4s 55% left after 3 mins of flight time with mixed throttle. Tried 2200mah 4s with 35% left after 3 mins of flight time with mixed throttle Rx: Radiomaster ER6 Tx: Radiomaster TX16s MKII
Flightline B-25 Mitchell 1600 bomber
มุมมอง 39811 หลายเดือนก่อน
What an amazing looking and flying machine.  Must have in a collection. Battery:5000mah 6s Flight time: after 3 minutes approx still 85% left Very solid landing gears.
3dLabprint p51d Mustang - 3d printed
มุมมอง 1Kปีที่แล้ว
Flies amazing. AuW - 1530gms 3648 700kv motor 10x6 4 blade prop 4s 2200mah battery 2mins of flight time with 70% left
Eclipson p51d 3d printed
มุมมอง 285ปีที่แล้ว
This is my 3rd attempt to this plane. 1st one was printed using pla and I didn't like the way it flew, it felt heavy in the air. 2nd was with lw pla, it flew great but very very flimsy and fragile. Finally printed with overture air and I love the way it flies. It is a 3s battery setup with the recommended motor.
Prime rc Turbo Bushmaster
มุมมอง 621ปีที่แล้ว
An amazing flier. It can go from being gentle to wild (3d) covering wide range of pilots. 3300 6s battery. 4 mins of flight time. Will try 4500mah next time.
3d printed @eclipsonairplanes Cobra
มุมมอง 2.1Kปีที่แล้ว
Take 2. First one hit a rabbit hole and shattered while landing. This flies soo good. Printed using Overture air with supplied Pla gcodes. It is 20 to 25% ligter than pla version and around 10% heavier than lw pla. I will always recommend this material instead of lwpla for Eclipson planes as they come flimsy and fragile in lwpla. This material is super sturdy, strong and not brittle and heavy l...
3d printed Savage bobber by #planeprint
มุมมอง 1052 ปีที่แล้ว
3d printed Savage bobber by #planeprint
Flitetest Bushwacker scratch build depron
มุมมอง 432 ปีที่แล้ว
Flitetest Bushwacker scratch build depron
You are lucky man to save this plane :) nice work!
@@jozsefkern thanks. There was lot going on on the sticks 🙂
You did the phenomenal job buddy!
@@BMSRC-im6qe ❤️
Good save...but if it is tail heavy then definitionally the CG is off. Whether it is the user who improperly balanced it or the designer who put the CG markings in the wrong location. Either way the CG is incorrect.
PlanePrint has never marked a CG wrong.
@@rcdavidk I didn't say they did. I'm just saying there is only 2 reasons for the CG to be off. Never said which it was in this case.
@@InspGadgt You want to be pedantic... ok then... I never said you said they did. I simply stated that PlanePrint has never marked a CG wrong. Jeez, what the hell is wrong with people these days. You offered 2 explanations and I dispelled one of them. Given that the CG is right and that the elevator trim, after landing, is level with the HS and the pilot put in full down trim then let's guess where the elevator started. Further... that didn't really look like a tail heavy landing. All in all, good save in the air and a good landing. And the landing gear look really solid. Nicely done to the pilot.
good save.
With the CG described in the manual, the Fury is NOT tail heavy! However, you have to make sure that the CG is correct when balancing, which is sometimes tricky with a low-wing glider. The Fury in the official video has exactly the specified CG and flies very comfortably.
Does the PW Pla actually age better than the Elapor from the foam waffles or do you have to reprint the plane after two years and a few hours of sun if you want it to look good? I'm thinking about getting the Model S on Black Friday, so I have a few questions: The carbon rods seem to me to be used somewhat inefficiently, why isn't a continuous rod used on the wing, and the wall thickness of 1mm is also relatively thick, wouldn't 0.5mm wall thickness be enough to save 10-20g in weight or do you think that the surfaces would fold together when looping and the fuselage would then not have the necessary strength? What options do you have in the large fuselage with the positioning? For example, would I install a much larger motor (I still have one that weighs around 150g with a 60A controller...) Or can I get large servos (Hs81) right at the front? Of course I don't see the point in going to the trouble of using LW PLA and then putting 40-120g of lead in it... Spinners and blade holders are supposed to be printed, are there more than just aesthetic reasons for you to use ready-made aluminum? It should be printed to be stable, at least with the weak drive. Greetings
It does not look like you used flaps on your take off or landing. Have you tried to use the flaps?
@@victormadison8662 yes you are right, I didn’t. Yes I have used flaps. They work fine, need a little bit of speed though while landing.
@@loveforrcplanes Sounds like this model needs to keep up the speed to prevent tip stalling. Right?
@ yes.
Hello my friend ,i really need your help ,so im having a hard time on what should i do from now on ,i dont have printer but i wana know what is better 3d printed planes or pnp form fms eflite etc ,since you had the chance to fly both sides ,thanks
@@florinapetresimeon.suceava Hi, they both are very good and capable but if you are starting your rc plane journey, I would say start with foam planes. 3d printed planes are like lego blocks. print each part, put it together as a plane and put the electronics. It is a journey from print to sky. There is a learning curve to it (not difficult though) but it is fun.
@@loveforrcplanes thanks
Motor spec ?
@@DilFav190900 PROPDRIVE v2 5050 580KV Brushless
What prop size did you use and Lipo (5S/6S)?
@@victormadison8662 14x7 6s
How many LiPo Cells do you use and what is the weight? Best regards
6s 5000, but for weight I would suggest 6500. It was around 5.3kg
@@loveforrcplanes Thank You
What is the total weight without battery?
around 1.9kg
It's very good. It floats well and seems like an easy plane to fly. It's great that you can fly with just this many batteries.
@@rinku1n1n It is very easy to fly and the best part is I can print more 😇😁.
Did you use active foaning PLA or pre-foamed? Thanks!
Active. Esun Lw pla
Is that actually a 3DLabs P51D.?
It is Eclipson’s
this is 100% the Eclipson p-51. Ive built both a few times
@@jasonstewart5249 thanks. I’ve just printed the 3DLabs version. It’s massive. Biggest print I’ve ever done. Eclipson do make some nice designs.
@@jasonstewart5249 yes you are right. I had the Video title as the same as well 😛
so wish you guys that print these planes would sell them ago some of us don't have or not interested
Intellectual property is planeprint’s else no issues.
❣️ 'promosm'
What expo and rates do you use? I tried flying mine and i have 2 crashes already 😢
I have 60, 80 and 100 with 40% expo for all.
Nice! How's the durability? I've tried a few printed planes but they all seem very fragile. Or it's just my bad landings 😂
Thanks. They are like balsa Planes, If you crash them they will break. This plane can take some heavy landing. Planeprint designs with lwpla are good that ways. I have many 3d printed planes from different design companies in my collection. Some of them are almost an year old. For sure landing is an important part to save the plane 😂😂
Loks great! Please, what capacity 6S battery did you use?
Thanks. 3300mah 6s.
cool
Oh no! I remember it flew so well when I was last there at gmac.. also you are a crazy dude launching a 90mm warbird LOL
haha..it was worth it :)
Thanks Joe. This is a must have in the collection 😇
Nice looking jet.
That is a nice looking jet.
Keep up the videos bro!! Russ from "Action RC"
Thank you Russ :)
Sehr gut geflogen, die Dateien habe ich mir gerade gekauft. Viele Grüße aus Deutschland.
Thank you
Sehr schön geflogen!
3d birds are not that easy but look great and you did a great job like the video bud!!
Thanks 🙏
hello sumit Im Joe and its a great plane and I just bought one and great flight bud. Gave you a big like👍👍👍👍👍 and sub to your channel and Nice flight!!! sub and like!!
hi, can you indicate which lipo you used (3s or 4s), what type of ESC and motor? Thank you
Hi, 3648 700kv motor 10x6 4 blade prop 4s 2200mah battery 50a Esc
Awesome work Sumit!!
Nice work!!!
Good looking and good flying plane! Thanks for sharing!
Was this a 4s battery?
Yes 1800mah 4s
Flying great! Love your video! come on! Hope to see more good videos from you
Thanks for the video and info.
Were you able to print it with single walls? I tried printing single wall with Overture Air and it was just too flimsy. Had to do 2 walls. Haven't assembled it yet.
Yes single wall. Mine is not flimsy and very sturdy. Hope you are printing with pla not lw pla gcodes.
Oh I gotcha. I missed the part about supplied gcodes. Duh. I've been trying to manually figure out settings based upon their LW-PLA settings. I may have to try it again your way using the PLA settings. I'm new to the LW-PLA stuff and printing airplanes, and the Overture Air really threw me off because I didn't realize that foaming and pre-foamed LW-PLA were a thing. Definitely a learning curve! Appreciate your response and posting a video showing this plane flies well in Overture Air! @@loveforrcplanes
Nice flying!!
That was so good!!!
Hope mine flies that well , without falling apart. 1:55 1:55 😂
😀. Good luck for your maiden flight. It is a good model.
Stl?
Planeprint.com
Awesome build. Wow efficient speed. Please can you teach me how to build it.
Didn’t build myself. Bought it off someone 😇
What did you use for the decals? Haven’t been able to find what people use yet
Waterslide decal paper
@@loveforrcplanes cool thanks
how about some LW-pla then very light fiberglassing over the top? maybe wing chord would need to made longer
That flew amazingly! I hope I get to see it in person!
Why ? Can you explain what happened. Too much throttle or not enough ?
Didn’t give enough throttle. 😞
Please can you share stl files with me? I really need them. Thanks a lot.
did you find it need it to please
You want the files you go and buy them from the designer. Don't try to pirate files.
Awesome job I hope to maiden mine this week.
Thanks 🙏🏽