- 67
- 374 533
Chicago Crossing Model Railroad
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2011
A 3' x 7' N-scale model railroad representing industrial Chicago during the mid-1990s.
Micro Trains 60' TBOX Boxcar | CCMR Railcar Reviews
Here, we take a look at Micro Trains' extra-detailed 60' boxcar. Is its enhanced detail and features worth the $50+ MSRP? Plus, enjoy a running session with all of CCMR's industries and buildings mixed into new locations as work on the layout moves forward.
มุมมอง: 847
วีดีโอ
Aurora Greenbrier 60' Boxcar | CCMR Railcar Reviews
มุมมอง 91314 วันที่ผ่านมา
A review of Aurora Miniatures' N scale 60' boxcar model. This review covers quality, detailing, comparative value with other models, and features a running session with the model on Chicago Crossing. Running session begins at 16:43.
Tangent Covered Hopper | CCMR Railcar Reviews
มุมมอง 1K14 วันที่ผ่านมา
A review of Tangent's 4750 cu ft. covered hopper in N scale. This review covers quality, details, comparative value with other models, and features a running session with the model on Chicago Crossing. Running session with hopper car begins at 15:32
LED Exterior Lighting | Cassidy Tires Rebuild 6 | CCMR At The Bench #21
มุมมอง 98321 วันที่ผ่านมา
Chapters: 00:31 - Intro and summary 10:53 - Penthouse lighting 13:26 - Security light fixtures 16:16 - Scratchbuilding sign lighting 22:29 - Wiring
Bachmann N scale 55' Coil Car | CCMR Railcar Reviews
มุมมอง 953หลายเดือนก่อน
Is this Bachmann Silver Series N scale model worth the hefty $40 price tag?
The Permanent Beginner | CCMR Train Talk #7
มุมมอง 1.8K2 หลายเดือนก่อน
When every day at the layout is a new experience full of experimentation and occasional failure, it can feel like always being a beginner. We talk about why this is a good thing.
What's Next on CCMR | Layout Update #13
มุมมอง 1.8K2 หลายเดือนก่อน
We'll talk about upcoming projects and programming on this edition of CCMR Layout Update.
The Water Tank | Cassidy Tires Rebuild 5 | CCMR At The Bench #20
มุมมอง 1.2K2 หลายเดือนก่อน
Here we take a look at revamping the rooftop water tank that came with this Walthers building.
Pico LEDs | Illuminating N Scale Buildings | CCMR At The Bench #19
มุมมอง 1.6K2 หลายเดือนก่อน
Using pico LEDs to light individual components of N scale buildings. Plus, approaches for window blanking and partial interior lighting of a small factory building.
Modeling Industrial Rooftops in N Scale | Cassidy Tires Rebuild 4 | CCMR At The Bench #18
มุมมอง 2.3K2 หลายเดือนก่อน
Here we take a look at using crepe paper to simulate roofing material on the Cassidy Tires warehouse, and add back revised HVAC units and rooftop conduits.
Modeling Bricked-In Windows | Cassidy Tires Rebuild 3 | CCMR At The Bench #17
มุมมอง 1.4K2 หลายเดือนก่อน
This edition of At The Bench covers my approaches to adding brick and cinderblock into windows.
Modeling Industrial Window Patches | Cassidy Tires Rebuild 2 | CCMR At The Bench #16
มุมมอง 1.4K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
My approach to patching old-style factory windows using strip polystyrene.
Modeling Windows for Visual Storytelling | Train Talk #6
มุมมอง 2.7K3 หลายเดือนก่อน
We see them everywhere but may not pay attention to their value as storytelling elements in models and dioramas. In this video, we examine how modeling windows in buildings can offer important visual clues that enrich a scene. This video focuses primarily on industrial urban scenes. However, many of the principles can also be used when considering residential structures and other models.
Painting and Detailing Bricks and Mortar | The Cassidy Tires Rebuild 1 | CCMR At The Bench #15
มุมมอง 2.9K4 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this series, we take a nondescript warehouse and build in story and character. Here, we'll get it up to standard by aging the brick and concrete.
CCMR Layout Update #12 | Get in Touch and Upcoming Projects
มุมมอง 3.8K4 หลายเดือนก่อน
CCMR Layout Update #12 | Get in Touch and Upcoming Projects
The $50(ish) Weathering Kit | Tools for Building Fundamental Skills | CCMR At The Bench #14
มุมมอง 1.5K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
The $50(ish) Weathering Kit | Tools for Building Fundamental Skills | CCMR At The Bench #14
The Weathering Journey | Train Talk #5
มุมมอง 1.4K6 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Weathering Journey | Train Talk #5
CCMR Weathering Series | The Grey Boxcar
มุมมอง 1.4K6 หลายเดือนก่อน
CCMR Weathering Series | The Grey Boxcar
CCMR Weathering Series | The Bulkhead Flat
มุมมอง 1.1K6 หลายเดือนก่อน
CCMR Weathering Series | The Bulkhead Flat
Jackson Terminal 60' TTX Flatcar | CCMR Railcar Reviews
มุมมอง 9807 หลายเดือนก่อน
Jackson Terminal 60' TTX Flatcar | CCMR Railcar Reviews
On The Art of Railcar Weathering | CCMR At The Bench #13
มุมมอง 2.9K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
On The Art of Railcar Weathering | CCMR At The Bench #13
The Rainy-Day Checklist | Finding Joy In Model Railroading
มุมมอง 4K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Rainy-Day Checklist | Finding Joy In Model Railroading
When Is A Layout Really Finished? | CCMR Train Talk
มุมมอง 4.3K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
When Is A Layout Really Finished? | CCMR Train Talk
The Fine-Scale Modeler's Dilemma | Realism vs. Resolution
มุมมอง 21K9 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Fine-Scale Modeler's Dilemma | Realism vs. Resolution
N Scale Cardboard Boxes | New Adventures in Finescale Modeling
มุมมอง 2.3K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
N Scale Cardboard Boxes | New Adventures in Finescale Modeling
The Truck Parking Spot | Evolution of a Diorama | CCMR At The Bench #11
มุมมอง 4.2K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Truck Parking Spot | Evolution of a Diorama | CCMR At The Bench #11
N Scale Jersey Barriers | Art in Precast Concrete | CCMR At The Bench #10
มุมมอง 1.7K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
N Scale Jersey Barriers | Art in Precast Concrete | CCMR At The Bench #10
CCMR Layout Update #11: Signs of the Times
มุมมอง 2.3K11 หลายเดือนก่อน
CCMR Layout Update #11: Signs of the Times
SD40-2 N-Scale Locomotive by ScaleTrains | Unboxing and Review | CCMR Railcar Reviews
มุมมอง 7K11 หลายเดือนก่อน
SD40-2 N-Scale Locomotive by ScaleTrains | Unboxing and Review | CCMR Railcar Reviews
Really beautiful layout,hard to believe it's that small,love your weathering
This is a gorgeous layout. Makes me want to visit my neighbors to the south again soon and get some amazing Chicago style deep dish!!
The overpass and grade separated berm should look really cool!
I know this is 9 months old now, but I thought a couple of points might be worth bringing up:- Firstly I believe it's good to aim for a consistency of 'level of detail' for a model, which applies to any scale. Your older and lower detail models will look much worse if they are alongside highly detailed models, if you aim for a consistent level of detail then nothing should jar, even if they are not the most highly detailed models. Secondly, and particularly with reference to the larger scales, for models of older prototypes a lot of information has been lost to time. No photograph is going to show every nut and rivet, so is it valid to 'invent' detail which can't be found from reference materials to make a model look highly detailed?
Nice review of a staple of Chicago railroading near the mills and factories that are left.
Thanks Mark - and true, still some yards full of these cars!
Would love to know what the overall dimensions for this are? This is beautiful
7x3
@@ChicagoCrossingRR Wow! That's impressive.
@@adventureseeker9800 thanks! It is a small space to be sure!
Great video!
Thanks!
I'm not usually into "unboxing" or "review" style videos since, for me at least, I'm going to break every single one of those little details off at some point lol. As long as the car looks like how it should it's good enough for me. Brake piping and the like will 100% get broken by my clumsy fingers. That said, I have really been enjoying these review videos and have been finding them helpful as far as technical information goes, like weight and coupler info. Would be interested if you reviewed some open load cars like gondolas, flats or bulkheads. Stock that has a different weight loaded vs. unloaded. Also just want to mention your scenery work in the end cinematics is so damn good. That cracked, overgrown parking lot is so well done.
Thanks! Likewise I try to be a bit detailed and add comparisons with other models to provide a bit more context than the usual 'oh look a new train car/loco' video. Appreciate the suggestions - when I was back in Chicago not long ago I was looking for one of the bulkhead flats from ScaleTrains to review, will keep an eye out if there are any detailed gon models, etc. I'd previously reviewed a few of the different coil car models - some of those were seriously underweight without a load in them, others had a detachable weight. My fave flatcars have been the intermountain 60' flats, I've had a lot of fun adding real wooden decking, etc. BTW the parking lot where all of those large factories are is also kids' play foam, scored, painted and scenic'd to look like concrete while providing a nice base for the buildings :)
Nice job on the review. I love detail, my problem is I find some of it on the floor after a while. I have a large rolling stock fleet. I have a $10.00 rule. I try not to spend more than $10.00 per unit. I buy used and project cars on eBay. At $50.00+ per car, a 20 car train is 1k. Add in a loco and your at 1.25k. 😊😊😊
It's an apt observation Paul. I have to handle my Scaletrains coil cars with kid gloves for that reason. I'm really not in love with the price point of this model, and your math shows why (it also makes me shudder to think of how much money is sitting inside the rightmost cabinet under my layout). I'm not particularly tuned into the overall trajectory of the hobby, but if folks are starting to gravitate toward smaller switching-style layouts maybe having a smaller fleet of a few really good cars starts to make sense. I have hundreds, but for someone even like Boomer, I've really only seen a couple dozen ever show up on his layout. I've likewise started to consider selling off some of my older models just to clear out some room.
That night shot with Metra passing through is phenomenal! The lighting really adds just the right amount of ambiance to Chicago at night. You absolutely nailed this build.
Thank you!
Good review. One subject I'm missing from your reviews and comparisons though is ride height. When comparing this boxcar to the older MT box during the test run the different is quite big as cars with truck mounted couplers tend to ride high.
It's not something I normally consider if couplers are at right height. In this case, the old and new MT had couplers at precisely the same height. The FVM transfer caboose was actually high.
@@ChicagoCrossingRR Different perspectives. :-) To me the ride height is far more important than the small details. The ride height you can see far away - the small details not. :-)
@@cslundsten it take all kinds in this hobby - thanks for sharing 😀
Looks like MicroTrains is trying to step up to the more 'luxury' models of ScaleTrains and Atlas Master Line. Good move since that seems to be what the hobby is asking for - and those separately applied air hoses and cut levers are a nice added detail - even if you're the one adding them. The price point is a little rough though - $50 for a boxcar seems high and i'm saying that because i just picked up a ScaleTrains hopper for $37 (i know they're different cars BUT other than door details we're not talking much variance). And why, on NONE of those examples in the video do the doors open?! I actually look for that in boxcars because i'm picky enough to want to open them and plan to detail the interiors with loads and junk debris someday. i think if those doors opened, they'd get $50 from me... probably a few times over.
Does the vertical lift bridge function? Or is that just for looks?
Just for looks!
Very nice boxcar. I usually don’t mind the accessory packs, so that wasn’t an issue for me. The paint detail is superb. I don’t own any rolling stock from Aurora, but I would be annoyed by the proprietary couplers. I have an inventory of microtrains couplers and trucks just for that reason. Kato is the same way, and I shy away from them unless the consist will be permanently assigned, such as passenger coaches. Thanks for the in depth review. ☺️
Those couplers on the Aurora will probably be a pain. Once they're connected the car performs just fine, but it is somewhat inconvenient to uncouple this car from others. I would love some standardization - other viewers chimed in about the same thing. I have been seeing MT couplers on more cars from other manufacturers, which is good. If only ScaleTrains would ditch the bulky brown things on their cars I'd be happy - and I'd love to see others follow suit.
Nice review of always improving details in N scale. We´re really far from the 70´ and 80´ when choices were really more limited. Not to mention details. I suppose that both cars can be opened for adding or removing (?) weight. Air hoses pro and con. It´s really modeler choice. When the car is uncoupled, they look awesome. But ridicously hanging while train is in motion. The Kadee style look not fantastic when uncoupled, right under coupler. For those not using magnetic uncoupling, it can be cut shorter and more bent to create sort of illusion of being coupled to an other car or locomotive. Some cut them completely. No easy perfect solution. Same with locomotives MU hoses. Illusion and pretending that... On our layouts we all do so much "pretending" , that one more or less is really modeler choice. Thanks Éric and enjoy all.😊
I've had to cut or reposition a lot of my Atlas 'air hoses' because they are often situated too low and will jam into the frog of a switch. They can be a pain. There really is no obvious solution, and another frustration is the bounciness of the MT style couplers, others call it the 'slinky' effect but it makes slow speed switching look a bit jarring in N scale.
@@ChicagoCrossingRR Thanks to mention that it´s not your loco, or track electrical contact, but those couplers. When your train passed at slow speed to show the car, that back and forth ghost movment is creepy😊😊
@ another issue due to a lighter weight car!
Have to compare the ride height of the older MT car they sit very high
Hi Dave, good observation and I think that's generally true of all cars with truck-mounted couplers -probably doesn't come as a surprise that these cars might run at a bit more prototypical 'lower' height.
Another great review, thanks.
Thanks!
Both beautiful cars,underbody detail on Aurora miniatures is better than Micro trains car,cut levers and airhoses,not hard to figure out to install
Thanks Dave, I'm not sure whether the differences in underbody detail represent differences in the prototype or just a gloss on an area few pay attention to on the MT model - thankfully I've never found myself underneath a boxcar :)
Looking forward to the new year.
Thanks Tim!
This is a super smart layout! There's so much potential on these N scale layouts when you add structures and small curves to keep things interesting. Amazing attention to detail 👍 🚂
Thank you!
Keep the reviews coming. Glad to see they went with micro trains couplers.
The fewer 'proprietary' coupler types out there I think the better.
Nice looking car, but the proprietary couplers aren't always great. It's not always easy to convert to Micro Trains couplers either. I had an Arnold SW1 and it wouldn't couple to some of my rolling stock at all, even with a shove. I wish there was more standardization in this aspect of n scale.
The good on this model is the scale size of the coupler, but as you saw it frankly didn't play well with the micro-trains type. There is kind of a rogue's gallery of couplers out there now, would be better if fewer.
Overpasses will look great! and it's a great new project.
Thanks! Will be getting started soon!
Returning home from the trip... With blue ribbon coaster, snitched from the bar. This talking head format seems really organic. Cheers for the New Year!
Thanks Pavel - glad you had a good trip and got some treasure out of it as well. Yeah, I used to do a cable access talk show long ago, but feels sort of funny editing footage of me. I'll probably talk to the camera a bit more frequently going forward.
The multi-stage light-up sign in the background is a huge win! It adds a little dynamic element that draws your eye and breaks up your view making the layout seem much bigger. Excellent!
Thanks! Absolutely, part of the magic of miniatures is including bits of animation to make the scene come alive.
Hi again. Happy new year and happy model railroading in 2025. I will probably have more questions about N scale LED lightning. I will watch your video again and make sure I won't ask stupid questions before doing so. You're a king modeler.
Hi Luc, happy new year to you as well! I'm still a bit of a novice with lighting myself but always happy to try and answer questions!
@ChicagoCrossingRR Hi. Thanks for answering. It will ONLY be about Atlas lights. And some very basic questions simply to make sure I'm buying the right stuff. Regards.
This is a very helpful video! I was frustrated with most planning videos because i couldn't see how the plan related to the finished product, and I wasn't sure which features were useful and which ones were not. I kept making the typical error of trying to do too much with too little. Your plan ideas were great! Thanks for sharing them! I have now subscribed to your channel!
Thanks Gordon and welcome to the channel! Hope you find what's here to be just as helpful as this video!
Have just started my first N gauge layout and like the idea of the 'scenic focus'. Even though mine is a tiny loop with one siding for shunting lots of ideas to take on board. Thanks for sharing your design. New year, new ideas!
I'd recommend trying to hide as much of the rear loop as you can, it will help your layout seem bigger. Good luck and have fun!
makes me feel like I’m in Chicago
Glad you found a bit of Chicago in there!
Hi Eric, I follow a bunch of layouts around the world and tareouts and rebuilds happen for many reasons. What I'm doing this time is making a 1 to 1 footprint plan of the layout on 30 inch wide rolls of paper. I will be able to see how it all fits together. I'm doing freelance, so it's all my own creation. I'm look forward to your journey.😊😊😊
Thank you Paul! I've likewise noticed a lot of folks doing renovations, and excited to see how your layout starts coming together. The life-size print is really interesting. I've seen everything from building small maquette models to the 1:1 approach, I think they're all good answers to the question of how to get the plans right. Happy new year!
Sounds exciting. Looking forward to watching your progress
Thank you!
While the tunnel won't be saved, the change to an above-grade vinette simulating some Chicago trackage (maybe a viaduct involved as well?) will fit in well with the overall "flatland" of Chicago. See also the above-grade trackage of the South Shore and Norfolk Southern near the Ford plant at 130th and Torrence Ave.
Thanks Mark - it's actually impressive how much grade-separated track there is in the Chicago area. I'm keeping an eye out for as much prototype track-over-track as I can since this helps me assess the scale, height and build of the prototype!
@@ChicagoCrossingRR If I remember correctly, there's also some grade-separated track on the Metra Electric/CN line running from University Park to downtown. The Metra crosses over the IHB in Riverdale/Dolton. I believe that's where an old wooden trestle burned several years ago, requiring an emergency reconstruction.
@@markh.6687 I'd occasionally take the Metra Electric down to Hyde Park - it was above grade there as I recall, further south it moves down to at-grade with road underpasses. It's a sweet line.
@@ChicagoCrossingRR "55th, 56th, 57th streets. Watch the doors." Yes the 5's are all above grade. So are Riverdale, Ivanhoe, Harvey, Hazelcrest,Homewood, Flossmoor stops are all above grade with road viaducts. In Harvey Metra crosses over CN and CSX so you have a 'rail viaduct" at Park Avenue & about 153rd St. Somebody just got killed at that crossing; the CN frieghts can move pretty fast, tracks are diagonal to the grade crossing, and viaduct can obstruct driver's view. The University Park end of the line is at grade alongside the CN/IC. I forget where it goes to grade, believe it's outbound west of Richton Park. Been awhile since I've been over that way.
@@markh.6687 it's been 20+ years for me :) Glad to get the details here, it helps to identify where best to look on Google maps, etc.
eric, btw, before retirement i had a 1 week assignment at zion nuke plant for the DOE and took the metra north out of chicago to get there ( i saw your map on the wall and it got me thinkin' about your neck of the woods !!) were you in the air force ???
Hi Dennis, I was in the Air Force’s auxiliary (Civil Air Patrol) as a cadet. I had strongly considered a career in the Air Force until my vision required correction. I mounted my uniform elements as a memory of that period.
@@ChicagoCrossingRR EXCELLENT, ERIC !!
Beautiful video !!! Like 244
Thanks!
Now that the buildings are removed, I see the military medals and a US Army red rope?
The shoulder cord represents service in the cadet advisory council for the Illinois Civil Air Patrol wing. I was a cadet in CAP for a number of years.
Eric. Your logic on the changes to be made is fundamentally sound, as always. Your creativity in making the changes will make each new episode magical, as always. Looking forward very much to Chicago Crossing being part of my 2025. It must please you greatly to have a firm following here of support, and encouragement. Many thanks for your efforts.
Absolutely, it's great to have a helpful community out there!
Everything sounds good that your getting into. I am N scale also and just a bit behind you in my layout. There is no rush in our hobby as things take money and time as the real world happens. Keep up the good video's.
Thanks Adrien - 'no rush' has been my philosophy for nearly a decade with this layout, I think it's paid dividends so far :)
You put a lot of good thoughts and ideas together.
Thanks Ron, as long as they pan out!
When did the F5 hit Chicago Crossing?! If you are going to this extreme, have you thought of a complete redesign of the layout? Maybe move to a linear, around the walls? Don't know what your space will allow, but wow! Good luck with your plans.
I don't have much appetite for tearing the entire layout up for a redesign. This is a work of art. I have been planning a second shelf-style layout but it'll be its own thing rather than an extension of this one.
Sounds like a plan! I appreciate your desire to improve the realistic feel of the layout. Really interested in the automated lights with the arduino too. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks! The goal will be to have some momentary switches that can trigger the specific effects. It'll be interesting to learn how to program everything!
You are kicking it up a notch! Fascinating to see the layout without the structures. You do so much in a small space. Excited to see what you come up with.
Thanks Alan!
Good stuff! Looking forward to following your progress. I'm curious how you attach you buildings to the layout so they're still removable but stay in position day-to-day? As I begin work on the buildings on my new layout I'm trying to keep everything removable to save me some trouble when I move in the nearish future (and to also allow me to add lighting, etc in the future).
Basically gravity ;). All of the buildings rest on 'concrete' foundations made from kids' play foam and then painted to resemble concrete. What I like about that material is that it provides a nice and stable foundation that has sufficient friction to keep the buildings reasonably well in place. Because it's a softer material, the buildings also sit flush.
@@ChicagoCrossingRR Ah awesome! I figured about as much but wanted to make sure I wasn't missing some trick you had up your sleeve lol. I saw boomer uses stakes along his building foundations that fit into holes on the layout but I for the life of me I can't get mine to align properly. Probably a step best done during construction instead of after the fact I'm guessing.