- 7
- 89 252
Dinosu
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 17 ม.ค. 2022
Here I'll share some fun things I make through computer programming.
Proving E = mc² the WRONG WAY [long Short]
Of course, this isn't a valid proof. But it shows that you CAN prove a formula using only well-known formulas and substituting letters!
Also, your right headphone isn't broken, don't worry lol
Also, your right headphone isn't broken, don't worry lol
มุมมอง: 26 808
วีดีโอ
How I played RUSH E in Shared Piano (Chrome Music Lab)
มุมมอง 22K4 หลายเดือนก่อน
Here I explain my process of saving any MIDI file to a Chrome Music Lab Shared Piano room, as a follow-up to my video of Rush E played in Shared Piano. Finished source code: github.com/DinosuGithub/Shared-Piano-MIDI-Saver Rush E in Chrome Music Lab Shared Piano video: th-cam.com/video/cBmqqECVnsA/w-d-xo.html 🔗 Other links - Mido Python module: github.com/mido/mido - Auld Lang Syne MIDI file: bi...
Rush E in Chrome Music Lab Shared Piano
มุมมอง 36K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
Rush E in Chrome Music Lab Shared Piano (g.co/sharedpiano) Explanation of how I made it: th-cam.com/video/J2zTMEurSO4/w-d-xo.html 🔗 Links - Original Rush E by Sheet Music Boss: th-cam.com/video/Qskm9MTz2V4/w-d-xo.html - Midi file source: musical-artifacts.com/artifacts/2960 - Rush E in Shared Piano (shown in video): musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/Shared-Piano/saved/#egcvJUmtbyGQVzZRkFZW
How I coded this scene (Perlin Noise tutorial)
มุมมอง 6482 ปีที่แล้ว
Link to the Scratch project: scratch.mit.edu/projects/751168742 In this tutorial, I go over the Perlin noise algorithm behind my project "Autumn in Acadia," so that you can generate your own realistic, inspiring terrain. All photos in the video were taken by my family.
CloudHead 24/7 Monitoring for Python and More
มุมมอง 1.7K2 ปีที่แล้ว
CloudHead is a handy tool to keep your servers alive 24/7, with extremely low monitoring intervals (15x faster than UptimeRobot's free plan!) ▸ Link to the keep_alive.py code mentioned in the video: replit.com/@PyGrammer5/SOM/#keep_alive.py ▸ Link to the CloudHead Scratch project: scratch.mit.edu/projects/718934835/ ▸ Link to the CloudHead Cloud Server: replit.com/@PyGrammer5/CloudHead-Cloud-Se...
The Algorithm Behind Sudoku Solver
มุมมอง 3902 ปีที่แล้ว
The goal of sudoku is to arrange numbers in a grid so that each row, column, and diagonal has all the numbers from 1 to 9. This tutorial covers a computer algorithm for solving these puzzles. The Sudoku Solver project can be found here: scratch.mit.edu/projects/638703167/
The Math Behind Drawing Morpher
มุมมอง 1.4K2 ปีที่แล้ว
On Scratch, my Drawing Morpher project was recently featured. You can find it at scratch.mit.edu/projects/604365857/. In this video, I explain the concept of linear interpolation and how it is used in this Scratch project.
My left ear is fucking dying
I cannot imagine the units for this abomination
My headphones broke and I can only hear on the right side
When you throw all the non-related stuff together but it still returns something normal…
i like how when you reach the part where something is equal to 0, the equation is basically just 0 = 0
Would be better without vertical video, also only audio in left ear. But I thought it was funny how you used unrelated formulas that used variables they named the same letter to "prove " something that is already known to be true through a completely nonsense method.
utter abuse of capitalisation
Long short So medium?
When mathematicians are really drunk
when exporting, make the audio mono, not stereo please. It is unbareable to listen on headphones. Thank you kind sir.
Sorry! I realized my mistake after it was too late, but now I know for the future
That trick at 1:20 is absolutely filthy but I love it 😂😂
I need printouts of this proof to stick around school bruh
my right ear is sad
First, I kept my right one from my TWS and checking the website did I mute the tab or in YT. Edit: This is a direct attack on physics, mathematics, economics and all sciences.
You could do this if you introduce fractions that make units of unity (scalars) and then rework it mathematically correct. You could have used some integration trick when the outer product from the Lorentz Force arose. You did things in letter sense right all the time except for then f = q[E+(v x B)) and v x B means det[r v B] and r = [i, i, k], v = [v_x, v_y, v_z] and B = [B_x, B_y, B_z]. So yeah you shouldve worked out those first and then did some clever manipulation. For the rest its super funny to watch how our beloved math gets butchered only to arrive at E = mc^2 You did forget the E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2 part though
didn't realize there IS audio until reading the comments LMAO(i usually only wear headphones one sided-usually on my right ear)
Damn he’s good
the best mathematics memes i see in a while
Peak mathematical comedy, 10/10
bro has everything but capitalizing the e
Its concerning that ive seen of made such formulas somehow or somewhere answering mock questions of competitive examinations
bro I recognized your username from scratch
:D
Unirpnically. E=mc^2 is a special case of E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2
Note that the einstein equation only holds when quantity demanded is always negative, and a b c forms a right triangle
Nobody wants a boring old right triangle anyway.
Out of context this is an amazing comment lmao
Also note that b^2=0, so c^2 must also be 0, meaning e=mc^2=0. lol
Velocity too must not be 0 as we are then dividing 0 by 0.
You proved e=mc^2 not E=mc^2
He proved that mc²≈2.718
But how much is hammer compared to c?
the english alphabet needs a dlc lmao
You just need to go on beyond zebra
Omg 🤣. I have enough knowledge to know all of the formulas used. This video is quite funny.
lmao
My left ear really enjoyed this proof
my left ear hates it
my left ear is enlightened
According to desmos graphing calculator, variables are case sensitive, therefore e is not necessarily the same as E unless proven otherwise.
Proven otherwise
So you think Einstein is incorrect?
Huh
bro started from economy going to physic 😭😭
E = mc² where E is the area of a circle, m is 🥧(pi) and c the radius, fixed at 299 792 458 meters. Sinple unproff. Btw I hate that all your reasoning is so logical, I am going to learn this proof just to annoy my physic teacher, he is too much in imaginary. I guess I could put his theta to 0 so he returns to the real plane, but..
This unironically looks like a proof one could get from ChatGPT.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Audio is panned unbearably to the left.
This is comedy gold
Einstein got a grammy in physics for this??
you dont think this proof dserves an oscar??
I'm still mad that noone calls long shorts "pants"
pants
pants
pants
pants
pants
Average scientific humor:
Now I understand how bad Einstein actually was in maths =P
BRO STARTS WITH ECON IM DEAD
Yeah stay in the grave buddy
Great video, i especially love the Pythagorean theorem to finish it off 🤣 Also how did you figure this out? Did you just try a random equation and substitute other equations until you got to e = mc²? How long did it take you?
I worked backward from E = mc². Surprisingly, it worked out pretty quickly: I only had to backtrack once! It might have taken an hour total to figure it out, but I think taking a break in the middle really helped. I was honestly pretty surprised when it came together.
Excellent proof! Just be careful when dividing by m and by v, because they may be equal to 0. Additionally, I don't think you can just divide by v in the formula for Lorentz force because v is a vector, but it should not matter because the numerator is 0 anyways.
can you prove it to my right ear next time
this comment made me laugh out loud
me too lmao @@irispetal
Einstein wants to know your location
then he'll lose his momentum
then how will he know his velocity?
@@Ruffrolf get another man , calculate his velocity and the make him collide with einstein. Then calculate the velocity of the other man after the collision and then use it to calculate the velocity of einstein.
why is the audio only in my left ear 😭
Oops!! I'd better check next time lol
This proof comes from the left field
What I hate the most is that every step of this is 100% correct.
I disagree. Just having the same symbol doesn't make random substitutions correct. In abstract math, most variables in formulas are dimensionless. In physics, most variables have dimensions. So for example the last step equates an "a" having dimensions m/s^2 with a dimensionless "a", which is not correct. But even if dimensions were preserved, some formulas have necessary context that must hold, such as a, b and c being sidelengths of a right triangle for pythagoras. An acceleration and a magnetic field do not form a valid right triangle, at least not one with the speed of light as the sidelength of the hypotenuse.
@@terra_creeperhe meant the algebra and not the sub
@@LukieReal But substitution is part of algebra.
Also, the lorentz force law involves a cross product so dividing by v doesn't work
@@BraedenHill536 Dividing by v also does not work because v is a vector.