วีดีโอ

24:30 I don't get it, should people who want to destroy your country be allowed to freely do so?

Really insightful

In Solidarity with the international proletariat. Revolutionary greetings comrades

I read somewhere that fascism originated in France way prior to Mussolini. I want that Gabriel examines this and fix the narrative in some later on discussions on the network. I'm from Europe and for me, antisemitism with rg to ,,J'ai accuse,, of Emile Zola's response to the Dreyfus affair in time when the fundamental framework of fascism took its shape.

Flagged for promoting terrorism.

So who's the moron who entirely sabotaged this cause with brain dead call for 'death to America', and 'death to Canada'? Are you certain this person doesn't have ties to the Mossad? Bc they're certainly helping Israel's cause by deflecting attention from the IDFs war crimes to themselves. Or are they connected to the govt and helping them push through their censorship policies, etc?

So how does it feel being declared a terrorist organization in Canada and the USA?

Wicked serpents. The Lord Rebukes you Jezabel.

I'm now reading Western Marxism by Domenico Losurdo edited by Gabriel Rockhill an outstanding work!

Terrorist apologists

Dr. John Henrick Clarke used to speak HIGHLY of C.L.R James and I really didn’t know who he was was. This video is very helpful and I’m so excited!

I’m really loving learning about socialism and its principles! If these principles were implemented in our political system it would cure all the ills that plague our society and especially in AFRIKA!💯👍🏿💪🏿

I’m so glad that I found this outlet, I’m new to this political sphere and I’m very eager to learn more about the struggles of those people who oppose capitalism!!💯💪🏿

I’m new to this political ideology but it’s clear to me that socialism is fair and that it’s what AFRIKA needs to liberate themselves from capitalism and all its evils!

Can yall do some responses to Paul Cockshot’s criticism of U equal exchange.

Nasser is rarely mentioned in western media. A pivotal figure. No fascist chieftain but sometimes he acted like one. Failures: union with Syria, war in Yemen, mischief in Lebanon, the deluge of 1967, domestic repression, and a taste for assassinations. To say his legacy is complex is an understatement. He will always be remembered for 1952 and 1956 but his legacy is one that is a mix of the sweet and the bitter.

Informative story shared from one true young Libyan from his perspective on what they all had gone thru during the time of war and then. Respect!! May Allah bless all Libyans with peace & unity like before. Insha Allah...

I don't know if I will get a response, but I hope I do. I will soon buy Unequal Exchange and Profit and Crises. However, I want to know just how the notion of "finance capital" is dealt within the UE literature. The term still seems vague to me. Does "finance" actually hold any real value in terms of M -> M? Does it allow for the expansion of productive forces considering it just seems to be parasitic rentierism? Or is there a way to formulate it in a way that removes the parasitic aspect within it?

Taliban is Pashtum supremacy over non-Pashtuns.

Afghanistan is starving due to Durand Line.

Soviets did not invade Afghanistan, it was invited by Democratic Afghan government to root out CIA created Mujahileen.

Very interesting conversation and comments too may l all so suggest works by basil Davison too

Basil Davison wrote a few books about him and his ideas

If treating separately "the person" and "their work" is idealist and bourgeois, then we have to take seriously the anticommunist pseudocritiques that Marx himself shouldn't be taken seriously because he was 'financed by bourgeois money' provided by Engels (or that Engels himself was a hypocrite as he himself was a son of a capitalist), that he was antisemitic, sexist and whatnot else provide conservatives and liberals in their saga do 'discredit marxism once and for all'. This view is too superficial and problematic imo.

ESTE GOBIERNO VA A CAEEEERRR 🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪🇻🇪

😂😂 Nicolás está solicitado junto con unos personajes del gobierno

Eso es pura mentira acabaron con las universidades ella es fruto de la revolución buscar a un culpable, y defender el gobierno para que le den una dulce vita, mientras el pueblo que se joda que resuelva como pueda.

Eso es una narrativa que ya no se la come el pueblo destrozaron la economía, y se robaron todo y el principal de está desgracia fue el difunto presidente Hugo Chávez. Maduro es un hombre muy astuto pero para atornillarse al poder. Tienen 25 años mandando se robaron todo entre ellos, convirtieron a Venezuela en un país de mafiosos, esa es la realidad pero según ellos la culpa es de los gringos.

Thanks so much for including the English subtitles comrades

Good video!

We in the west are not able to change. Unless the rest of the world start alternative to everything . Like the BRICS but even the UN. and leave the current UN. So the west is forced to attend eye to eye. Or isolate it self. And get forced to leave the rest of the world alone.

> "On the basis of the fundamental postulate of historical materialism set out in the introduction and according to which it is not the degree of exploitation that renders a situation revolutionary, but the objective incapacity of the system to develop the productive forces, and bearing in mind the scope of present development in relation to the general level of mankind’s technical knowledge today" So exploitation is a secondary factor for revolution in the global South? And does this mean that the primary reason labor aristocrats in rich countries aren't interested in communism is because the productive forces are still developing for them? And not because they're not exploited workers? Deindustrialization partly contradicts this, but it can also be negated because they can still get the products from industrial production via outsourcing from poor countries. So the primary reason they're still interested in capitalism is because it offers them the latest technology? And not being exploited workers is a secondary reason? This also could be part of the reason communism fell in Europe and China. The industrial productive forces were built, but the technology productive forces were maybe still lagging the imperialist countries and the people wanted access to newer technology and they didn't trust communism to be able to do it. Being cut off from the world might be enough to convince most people to give up communism. Edit - The below is not quite accurate. Emmanuel criticizes Lenin, but not everyone is right about everything all the time. This includes Emmnauel. Lenin's work is still valuable so it shouldn't be dismissed as unscientific like Emmanuel did. Emmanuel also described Lenin's imperialism book as "marginal work" in this article "White-Settler Colonialism and the Myth of Investment Imperialism," free download on www.annas-archive.org,: "Unfortunately a certain piety towards Lenin's writings still prevents Marxists from disengaging themselves intellectually from the influence of a marginal work which never had any scientific pretensions, and which was written rapidly, in the difficult conditions of exile, with no other documentation to hand but the Bern library. The author himself described it as a simple 'attempt at popularization'; and far from being a general theory of imperialism, it was only an empirical analysis conditioned by a particular historical situation." I think communist party central committee members need to be actual economists. If we had this requirement we wouldn't have parties failing to develop the productive forces or denying the labor aristocracy exists. And it would weed out and prevent career politicians and intellectuals from coming into positions of power and pumping more bad theory. Economic reality is not up for debate. Capitalist university education doesn't teach unequal exchange so it must be self-taught, meaning there's no excuse for communists not to learn it. Those who refuse to be economists won't take it seriously and will end up ignoring their economic advisors and continue to run communism into the ground.

Very interesting conversation. Thank you.

Harf of the members was PET (DK FBI) fore spliting the left. Idiotik loser taktik to akt so ekstreme.

A criticism for this book that nobody talks about is that Cope is inconsistent on the mass immigration issue. In the long term he's anti-mass immigration because it's obviously caused by imperialism. When imperialism ends, mass immigration will also end. But in the short term he's pro-mass immigration because it helps lower the labor aristocracy's wages. However, and I don't have any economic data to back this up, I don't think immigration alone can end the labor aristocracy cause the borders will never truly open up completely. All it'll probably do is turn the immigrants into labor aristocrats themselves. Even Immanuel Ness admitted that immigrants stop sending remittance money back home eventually. Whatever the case, Cope follows Lenin's example on the issue and takes a strictly materialist position on it despite the fact that it can be considered non-class oppression on the host nation, because they're taking in immigrants who can't readily assimilate. Which is inconsistent because Cope is against non-class oppression. He's stated he's against requiring women and non-white people taking a materialist/pure class struggle position since they're subject to non-class oppression. National demographic decline/replacement is a real phenomenon that should be opposed though, it's non-class oppression. The Native Americans were largely replaced in the name of materialism to build capitalism in North America at the expense of the natives. Now replacement is happening to the white European nations in the name of materialism to essentially build communism at the expense of the Europeans. You could argue they have it coming since it's their own doing through their imperialist actions. But we shouldn't let entire nations be replaced for the sake of materialism. Communists need to be speak out about this issue before it's too late. It's mass non-violent settler-immigration. And people who deny that white people are a nation should also remember that Lenin said black people in the U.S. were a nation. Cope said the same thing. If they're a nation then so are white people. And nations don't change based on oppression status. Communists also need to promote single nation countries and be against multi nation countries and/or unions. Nations need to govern themselves. It's the most logical position. Lenin and Stalin were both concerned about Russian chauvinism in the USSR. And it could've easily been solved by requiring single nation countries. A nation being current historical constitution resemblance and language. Or current race and language. But this is a great book that every communist should read. Even after Cope's defection to capitalism.

Good work boss

I'm reading Gabriel Rockhill's essay on CIA and the Frankfurt. What level of influence did the Frankfurt School have with the OSS, specifically the denazification of Germany post WW2?

I just wanna let you guys know that this work is appreciated even if it’s nowhere near as popular as it deserves to be

Excellent presentation! Is the document available ?

playback goes crazy at 10:00 idk if known issue

I would love videos explaining his books in detail, it's not easy to get into

R.I.P. Njabulo Dlamini

The March on Rome was a coup

Only 4.5k listeners. No wonder the world is in the messed up state that it's in. So many choose to live in darkness with so much light available.

Rockhill ignores the proliferation of Chinese Special Economic Zones, a hyper-fascist creation which benefits the corporate class, privatizes public territory, abuses labor, avoids national regulations and tariffs, and is a threat to sovereignty.

Does Rockhill provide any critique of the rapidly growing billionaire class and overall class divide fully underway in China? Strangely this is never dealt with head on by the western online left.

Bourgeois is not a good term, does it mean the middle class, or the 1%, this is not the same.

Dr. Tamanisha did her thing on this podcast! Loved her analysis. Salute

Liberation is usually described in terms of gender or race, probably becausr socialism has been diminshed since Reagan. But, liberals want universal healthcare and a smaller military. Our friends are in democracies, not in Middle East, China, Russia or most of Africa.

They last words I can hear are « it’s a central, central part of the class struggle […] » at which point the sound cuts off inexplicably.