วีดีโอ

Doing it in godot made it easier to test the level and edit it. Just use it to design the level. Then import it into blender to use as a base for creating its visual.

I use a custom sphere that I made from blender to get rid of that hole.

@@_PiCode Aahhhhh... I will try that!

And you're obviously far too smart to post the four simple lines of code here.

@@CrispyGFX Multiply Normal's with light direction you want void vertex(){ vec3 LightCalc = NORMAL * LightDirection; LightInfo = LightCalc.x + LightCalc.y + LightCalc.z; } if you want to normals react your object rotation Add render_mode world_vertex_coords Also if you want to chose Shadow and Light Color void fragment(){ vec3 AlbedoColor = mix(ShadowColor.rgb,LightColor.rgb,LightInfo); } by the way since you are making lighting your self right now add unshaded as render mode and remember this lighting example have infinite distance so it acts like sun light if you want to make lighting like in this video you also need to add position data to calculation

Probably just 3D

I record the jolt physics and play the clip as a background of the godot physics.

first ,start from basic.

I'm sure they were all valuable contributors and not just dummy accounts created to troll after they got their snowflake fee-fees hurt over on Twitter.

@@MoogieSRO Also, it was 5 accounts doing the trolling. 5 bans is not "mass bans".

yeah isn't that the old school way of doing light? like when they also did vertex colors

@@PASTRAMIKick Yep. Gouraud (pronounced "go-ro") shading calculates lighting per-vertex and then interpolates the colors across each face. Phong shading calculates *normals* per vertex, interpolates those, and then calculates lighting per-fragment. It generally looks much, much better, but also requires more computational overhead, and a programmable shader pipeline (I believe Gouraud shading was the standard on fixed-function hardware.)

Idk, I didn't test. But in the article it said "to optimize performance on older and lower-end devices", sounds like there is a big difference.

there is a huge difference, pixel lighting calculates light on every fragment, compare that to low poly models which have at best 1000~ vertices, yeah it makes a difference. you just need to know when to use it

Better Performance, maybe just use it on things that you will not see often, like background objects. Or, making PS1 style games.

Perfect for retro style games like PS1, N64, you don't need to fake it and runs better, especially on old hardware.

per vertex lighting could be very useful to create some low level effects to use in other things

Yea, but sometimes you really need to squeeze out every drop of performance for lower end devices, especially mobiles.

What you'd be doing is just for aesthetic, this is actually performance related.

​@GoblinArmyInYourWalls I doubt seeing any performance impact on actual hardware, waiting for a benchmark to measure the real impact

​@@Shenron666My laptop is straight ass and outdated, vertex lighting does make a difference in this case. You are not gonna be making these kinds of optimizations for the latest hardware anyways.

Because of... What?

compared to unreal yeah

because of godot foundation? use a fork then, because of your thinking? no. just ignore godot foundation and their mess.

@@killuad0 I hear what you are saying, and I would agree for projects being developed under non professional circumstances. But the foundation has seen it fit to ruthlessly ban anyone who has committed or is associated with the "wrong think" from accessing the projects GitHub page. This situation is a nightmare for any organization, company, or multi-developer project using the Godot Engine. I really want to see Godot succeed because of my passion for LibreWare, but the foundations temper tantrum has made using their engine professionally an uneasy choice for many. It really is an inferior engine for a lot of people because of this, and that disappoints me greatly.

It's good for ordinary games. It also comes with a decent save system and okay graphics and is open source. But I need to make mine…

Nah, It's just a snapshot.

@@_PiCode bruh

Are you using godot 4 instead of 3? This tutorial only worked on godot 3, because Generic6DOFjoints springs doesn't work in godot 4. To fixed it, you have to either use jolt physics or use this updated system that worked in godot 4: th-cam.com/video/VRXHzTUe1-Y/w-d-xo.htmlsi=SrBr8yiJ9g7skEOe

@@_PiCode yeah, that’s the problem! Thank you very much!!:)

@@_PiCode by the way did it work for you in jolt physics in godot 4.3? because I was using that, and the springs themselves work, but the problem remained that I cannot rotate the arms with the controls. The only difference is that I use node3D instead of Spacial that you used in godot 3, can that be the problem?

@@bordacsbalazs6014 That's probably not the problem. But idk why its not working.

@@_PiCode okay, thank you!:)